{"description":"Documents matching 'compliance access easy auditing reporting requirements'","count":5142,"total_pages":50,"next_page_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/documents?conditions%5Bterm%5D=compliance+access+easy+auditing+reporting+requirements&format=json&page=2","results":[{"title":"Concept Release on Consolidated Audit Trail and Other Audit Trails and Data Sources","type":"Proposed Rule","abstract":"The Securities and Exchange Commission (the \"Commission\") is publishing this concept release to solicit comments in support of a comprehensive review of the Consolidated Audit Trail and other audit trails and related data sources currently used in the regulation of U.S. securities markets, including comments regarding the funding mechanisms for these audit trails and/or related data sources. There have been several developments since the Commission last evaluated the scope and sufficiency of these audit trails and related data sources. These developments have prompted the Commission to consider whether changes should be made to the rules and regulations governing existing audit trails and related data sources to better respond to and reflect current market conditions; demonstrated regulatory needs; civil liberty, privacy, and confidentiality concerns; cost-efficient technology solutions; and cybersecurity considerations.","document_number":"2026-07651","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/20/2026-07651/concept-release-on-consolidated-audit-trail-and-other-audit-trails-and-data-sources","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-04-20/pdf/2026-07651.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-07651.pdf?1776429917","publication_date":"2026-04-20","agencies":[{"raw_name":"SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION","name":"Securities and Exchange Commission","id":466,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/securities-and-exchange-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/466","parent_id":null,"slug":"securities-and-exchange-commission"}],"excerpts":"should maintain two-sided reporting requirements, whether the application of two-sided reporting requirements should depend on the underlying product and/or asset class, and from which parties the CAT should require reporting if two-sided reporting is eliminated.\n 128 \n \n What are the costs and benefits associated with one-sided reporting versus two-sided reporting? Is there a material difference in accuracy between one-sided reporting and two-sided reporting? Are there regulatory use cases enabled by two-sided reporting that would not be possible"},{"title":"Form PF; Reporting Requirements for All Filers","type":"Proposed Rule","abstract":"The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the \"CFTC\") and the Securities and Exchange Commission (the \"SEC\") (collectively, \"we\" or the \"Commissions\") are proposing to amend Form PF, the confidential reporting form for certain SEC-registered investment advisers to private funds, including those that also are registered with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator (a \"CPO\") or a commodity trading advisor (a \"CTA\"). The proposed amendments would eliminate certain filing and reporting obligations, streamline certain requirements, and make corrections and other revisions. The proposed amendments are designed to eliminate certain burdens, among other things.","document_number":"2026-07993","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/24/2026-07993/form-pf-reporting-requirements-for-all-filers","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-04-24/pdf/2026-07993.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-07993.pdf?1776948313","publication_date":"2026-04-24","agencies":[{"raw_name":"COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION","name":"Commodity Futures Trading Commission","id":77,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/commodity-futures-trading-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/77","parent_id":null,"slug":"commodity-futures-trading-commission"},{"raw_name":"SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION","name":"Securities and Exchange Commission","id":466,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/securities-and-exchange-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/466","parent_id":null,"slug":"securities-and-exchange-commission"}],"excerpts":"Form PF Adopting Release; Form PF; Reporting Requirements for All Filers and Large Hedge Fund Advisers; Further Extension of Compliance Date, Release No. IA-6919 (Sept. 17, 2025), [90 FR 45131 (Sept. 19, 2025)]; \n see also, \n \n \n Form PF; Reporting Requirements for All Filers and Large Hedge Fund Advisers; Further Extension of Compliance Date, Release No. IA-6883 (June 11, 2025), [90 FR 25140 (June 16, 2025)]; Form PF; Reporting Requirements for All Filers and Large Hedge Fund Advisers; Extension of Compliance Date, Release No. IA-6838 (Jan. 29"},{"title":"Health and Human Services Adoption of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards","type":"Rule","abstract":"The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) adopts with this rule OMB's Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, to include 12 existing HHS- specific modifications. This rule also repeals HHS' existing regulations governing the administration of HHS financial assistance awards. The existing HHS-specific modifications are described in the rule's preamble. Additionally, the rule will correct citations throughout all relevant HHS regulations.","document_number":"2024-21984","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/10/02/2024-21984/health-and-human-services-adoption-of-the-uniform-administrative-requirements-cost-principles-and","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-10-02/pdf/2024-21984.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2024-21984.pdf?1727381768","publication_date":"2024-10-02","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES","name":"Health and Human Services Department","id":221,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/health-and-human-services-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/221","parent_id":null,"slug":"health-and-human-services-department"}],"excerpts":"support, Grant programs—social programs, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. \n \n Child support, Grant programs—social programs, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. \n \n Child support, Grant programs—social programs, Indians—tribal government, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. \n \n Employment, Grant programs—social programs, Health care, Public assistance programs, Refugees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. \n \n Grant programs—social programs, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. \n \n Administrative practice and procedure"},{"title":"Semiannual Reporting","type":"Proposed Rule","abstract":"The Securities and Exchange Commission (\"Commission\") is proposing amendments to allow companies to file semiannual reports on new Form 10-S in lieu of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q to meet their interim reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (\"Exchange Act\"). The Commission is also proposing changes to the financial statement requirements of Regulation S-X to facilitate semiannual reporting and to simplify rules regarding the age of financial statements.","document_number":"2026-09095","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/05/07/2026-09095/semiannual-reporting","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-05-07/pdf/2026-09095.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-09095.pdf?1778071532","publication_date":"2026-05-07","agencies":[{"raw_name":"SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION","name":"Securities and Exchange Commission","id":466,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/securities-and-exchange-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/466","parent_id":null,"slug":"securities-and-exchange-commission"}],"excerpts":"“uniform standards” for all Exchange Act reporting companies.\n 16 \n \n The Commission's move towards a quarterly reporting requirement was also consistent with the recommendation of the 1969 Wheat Report, which \n \n concluded “that a regular, quarterly report would be more useful than the present, irregular 8-K report.” \n 17 \n \n Although the Commission has amended Form 10-Q and requirements in connection with quarterly reporting over time,\n 18 \n \n the Commission has not changed this cadence of quarterly interim reporting since it was adopted in 1970.\n \n "},{"title":"Enhancement of Emerging Growth Company Accommodations and Simplification of Filer Status for Reporting Companies","type":"Proposed Rule","abstract":"The Securities and Exchange Commission (\"Commission\") proposes amendments to streamline filer statuses for Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (\"Exchange Act\") reporting companies into two primary categories: large accelerated filers and non-accelerated filers. The Commission further proposes to raise the threshold and seasoning requirements for large accelerated filer status and extend certain existing accommodations and scaled disclosures, including those for smaller reporting companies and emerging growth companies, to all non-accelerated filers, while continuing to require compliance with non-scaled disclosure from large accelerated filers. The Commission also proposes to extend the deadlines to file periodic reports for the smallest non-accelerated filers, as measured by total assets. Finally, the Commission also proposes to update the rules that define which issuers are considered small entities for purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (\"RFA\").","document_number":"2026-10222","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/05/21/2026-10222/enhancement-of-emerging-growth-company-accommodations-and-simplification-of-filer-status-for","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-05-21/pdf/2026-10222.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-10222.pdf?1779281120","publication_date":"2026-05-21","agencies":[{"raw_name":"SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION","name":"Securities and Exchange Commission","id":466,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/securities-and-exchange-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/466","parent_id":null,"slug":"securities-and-exchange-commission"}],"excerpts":"non-accelerated filers. \n See, e.g., Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports, \n Release No. 33- 8392 (Feb. 24, 2004) [69 FR 9722 (Mar. 1, 2004)] (extending compliance dates for accelerated and non-accelerated filers); \n Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports of Non-Accelerated Filers and Foreign Private Issuers; Extension of Compliance Dates, \n Release No. 33-8545 (Mar. 2, 2005)"},{"title":"Combatting Illegal Robocalls Through FCC Numbering Policies; Implementation of TRACED Act-Knowledge of Customers by Entities With Access to Numbering Resources","type":"Proposed Rule","abstract":"In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) seeks comment on whether to adopt changes to its numbering policies with respect to how assigned numbering resources are utilized, reported, and resold by service providers as part of its continuing effort to combat illegal robocalls. The Commission explores and proposes a broad array of solutions to strengthen the Commission's numbering requirements and policies, particularly as they relate to resellers that use numbering resources to engage in some of the most extensive illegal robocalling schemes.","document_number":"2026-09134","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/05/08/2026-09134/combatting-illegal-robocalls-through-fcc-numbering-policies-implementation-of-traced-act-knowledge","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-05-08/pdf/2026-09134.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-09134.pdf?1778157911","publication_date":"2026-05-08","agencies":[{"raw_name":"FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION","name":"Federal Communications Commission","id":161,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/federal-communications-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/161","parent_id":null,"slug":"federal-communications-commission"}],"excerpts":"Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance Requirements for Small Entities \n 72. The RFA directs agencies to describe the economic impact of proposed rules on small entities, as well as projected reporting, recordkeeping and other compliance requirements, including an estimate of the classes of small entities which will be subject to the requirements and the type of professional skills necessary for preparation of the report or record. \n \n 73. In the \n NPRM, \n we propose to further extend the robocall certification requirements applicable"},{"title":"Medicare Program; Alternative Payment Model Updates and the Increasing Organ Transplant Access (IOTA) Model","type":"Rule","abstract":"This final rule describes a new mandatory alternative payment model, the Increasing Organ Transplant Access Model (IOTA Model), that will test whether performance-based upside risk payments or downside risk payments paid to or owed by participating kidney transplant hospitals increase access to kidney transplants for patients with end- stage renal disease (ESRD) while preserving or enhancing the quality of care and reducing Medicare expenditures. This final rule also adopts standard provisions that will apply to the Radiation Oncology Model, the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Choices Model, and mandatory Innovation Center models, including the IOTA Model, whose first performance period begins on or after January 1, 2025. The finalized standard provisions relate to beneficiary protections; cooperation in model evaluation and monitoring; audits and records retention; rights in data and intellectual property; monitoring and compliance; remedial action; model termination by CMS; limitations on review; miscellaneous provisions on bankruptcy and other notifications; and the reconsideration review process.","document_number":"2024-27841","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/12/04/2024-27841/medicare-program-alternative-payment-model-updates-and-the-increasing-organ-transplant-access-iota","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-12-04/pdf/2024-27841.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2024-27841.pdf?1732655723","publication_date":"2024-12-04","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES","name":"Health and Human Services Department","id":221,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/health-and-human-services-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/221","parent_id":null,"slug":"health-and-human-services-department"},{"raw_name":"Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services","name":"Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services","id":45,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/centers-for-medicare-medicaid-services","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/45","parent_id":221,"slug":"centers-for-medicare-medicaid-services"}],"excerpts":"law and CMS policies. We will also share certain aggregate, de-identified data with IOTA participants. \n f. Other Requirements \n There are several other model requirements for selected transplant hospitals, including transparency requirements and public reporting requirements. IOTA participants may also submit a voluntary health equity plan during the model, as described in section III.C.8. of this rule. \n (1) Transparency Requirements \n Patients are often unsure whether they qualify for a kidney transplant at a given kidney transplant hospital. IOTA"},{"title":"Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Interoperability Standards and Prior Authorization for Drugs for Medicare Advantage Organizations, Medicaid Managed Care Plans, State Medicaid Agencies, Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Agencies and CHIP Managed Care Entities, and Issuers of Qualified Health Plans on the Federally-Facilitated Exchanges","type":"Proposed Rule","abstract":"These proposals are intended to improve the electronic exchange of health care data and streamline processes related to prior authorization by increasing the interoperability of systems used across the health care industry. We are proposing new requirements for Medicare Advantage (MA) organizations, state Medicaid fee-for-service (FFS) programs, state Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) FFS programs, Medicaid managed care plans, CHIP managed care entities, and Qualified Health Plan (QHP) issuers on the Federally-facilitated Exchanges (FFEs), including issuers that offer small group market QHPs on the Federally-facilitated Small Business Health Options Program (FF- SHOP) Exchanges (hereinafter referred to as \"small group market QHP issuers on the FF-SHOPs\") (collectively \"impacted payers\"), to make available electronic prior authorization for drugs. We are also proposing to extend many existing interoperability requirements for the prior authorization of non-drug items and services to include prior authorizations for drugs to further reduce patient and provider burden. We are also proposing to require impacted payers to report their application programming interfaces (API) endpoints and related information for the Patient Access, Provider Directory, Provider Access, Payer-to-Payer, and Prior Authorization APIs to CMS. To help assess the impact of our policies, we are proposing to collect API usage metrics. In addition, we are proposing to apply the existing interoperability requirements to small group market QHP issuers on the FF-SHOPs as impacted payers. To improve impacted payers' ability to exchange health information while continuing CMS's drive toward interoperability, we are proposing to require certain Health Level Seven (HL7[supreg]) Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR[supreg]) implementation guides (IGs) that are currently recommended. In addition, HHS is proposing to adopt the HL7 FHIR base standard and certain associated specifications and IGs as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (hereinafter referred to as \"HIPAA\") (Pub. L. 104-191, enacted Aug. 21, 1996) standards for dental, professional, and institutional \"referral certification and authorization\" transactions and \"eligibility for a health plan\" transactions associated with prior authorization. We are proposing to add a definition for \"failure to report,\" which would allow CMS to impose a civil monetary penalty (CMP) on applicable manufacturers or applicable group purchasing organizations (GPOs) if those entities fail to grant CMS timely access to documents for the purposes of an audit. Finally, ONC is using this rulemaking to propose to adopt updated versions of certain health information technology (health IT) standards and specifications for HHS use, such as CMS's interoperability requirements, to support a more robust health IT infrastructure.","document_number":"2026-07205","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/14/2026-07205/medicare-and-medicaid-programs-patient-protection-and-affordable-care-act-interoperability-standards","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-04-14/pdf/2026-07205.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-07205.pdf?1775852111","publication_date":"2026-04-14","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES","name":"Health and Human Services Department","id":221,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/health-and-human-services-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/221","parent_id":null,"slug":"health-and-human-services-department"},{"raw_name":"Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services","name":"Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services","id":45,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/centers-for-medicare-medicaid-services","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/45","parent_id":221,"slug":"centers-for-medicare-medicaid-services"},{"raw_name":"Office of the Secretary"}],"excerpts":"required to report this information no later than 60 days before they begin covering patients under the applicable CMS program. \n To ensure that patients, providers, and other payers can have complete and appropriate access to information about prior authorizations, we are proposing to require impacted payers to make information about prior authorization requests and decisions for all drugs available to patients via the Patient Access, Provider Access, and Payer-to-Payer APIs (collectively “Access APIs”). For the Patient Access and Provider Access APIs"},{"title":"Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection; Modernizing the FCC Form 477 Data Program; Delete, Delete, Delete","type":"Proposed Rule","abstract":"In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) adopted a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM) that seeks comment on eliminating outdated requirements and ways to enhance the efficiency of the Broadband Data Collection (BDC) while ensuring that the Commission continues to receive accurate, granular data. Building off the infrastructure data-based coverage restoration process established by the Commission in 2024, the FNPRM seeks comment on several approaches suggested by commenters to simplify, streamline, or otherwise reduce burdens on this coverage restoration process. The FNPRM seeks comment on several ways to simplify the collection of fixed and fixed wireless biannual submissions, specifically on: (1) either allowing providers to indicate certain fixed broadband availability data have been \"grandfathered\" or else simply eliminating the collection of these data; (2) eliminating the requirement that a provider report fixed broadband availability data at speeds below 25/3 Mbps as part of its biannual submission; (3) revising the Commission's rules to eliminate the requirement for providers to use and disclose maximum buffer size data in their BDC biannual submissions; and (4) revising the Commission's rules to relax the 7 meter antenna height requirement that fixed wireless providers must use when modeling their coverage. In addition, the FNPRM seeks comment on ending legacy data collections for mobile service, specifically the collection of 3G mobile broadband availability data and mobile voice data as part of a provider's biannual submission, including potential impacts on reporting for Alaska and on relevant USF programs, respectively. Furthermore, the FNPRM seeks comment on current data retention practices to develop a set of best practices instead of adopting any substantive rule. The FNPRM seeks comment on several potential challenge process improvements, specifically on: (1) allowing service providers to presumptively rebut certain types of fixed challenges with infrastructure data and on requiring infrastructure data in response to certain types of fixed challenges; (2) various options for simplifying and reducing the provider response periods for the fixed challenge process; (3) streamlining the mobile challenge process by automatically removing from the National Broadband Map (NBM) all challenged areas that are conceded or upheld; and (4) relaxing or removing some current mobile crowdsourced data requirements to encourage the submission of additional data. The FNPRM seeks comment on mobile verification and audit process improvements. The FNPRM also seeks comment on improvements to the collection of mobile crowdsourced data and the use of drone data. Lastly, the FNPRM seeks comment on revising the Commission's rules to expressly provide that subscription data, the geographic coordinates of mobile or fixed wireless base stations, mobile or fixed wireless link budget parameter rationales, and any infrastructure data submitted in response to a verification request or audit will be always treated as confidential.","document_number":"2026-12767","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/06/24/2026-12767/establishing-the-digital-opportunity-data-collection-modernizing-the-fcc-form-477-data-program","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-06-24/pdf/2026-12767.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-12767.pdf?1782218725","publication_date":"2026-06-24","agencies":[{"raw_name":"FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION","name":"Federal Communications Commission","id":161,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/federal-communications-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/161","parent_id":null,"slug":"federal-communications-commission"}],"excerpts":"on small entities, as well as projected reporting, recordkeeping and other compliance requirements, including an estimate of the classes of small entities which will be subject to the requirements and the type of professional skills necessary for preparation of the report or record. \n \n Many of the proposals discussed in the \n FNPRM \n should reduce or eliminate reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements for small and other service providers. As such, we do not anticipate additional compliance costs for small providers and we do not"},{"title":"Registering Emergency Medical Services Agencies Under the Protecting Patient Access to Emergency Medications Act of 2017","type":"Rule","abstract":"The \"Protecting Patient Access to Emergency Medications Act of 2017,\" (the Act) which became law on November 17, 2017, amended the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) to allow for a new registration category for emergency medical services agencies that handle controlled substances. It also established standards for registering emergency medical services agencies, and set forth new requirements for delivery, storage, and recordkeeping related to their handling of controlled substances. In addition, the Act allows emergency medical services professionals to administer controlled substances outside the physical presence of a medical director or authorizing medical professional pursuant to a valid standing or verbal order. The Drug Enforcement Administration is publishing this final rule to conform its regulations to the statutory amendments of the CSA and to otherwise implement its requirements. This final rule adopts, with minor modifications, the notice of proposed rulemaking published on October 5, 2020.","document_number":"2026-02288","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/05/2026-02288/registering-emergency-medical-services-agencies-under-the-protecting-patient-access-to-emergency","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-02-05/pdf/2026-02288.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-02288.pdf?1770153307","publication_date":"2026-02-05","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE","name":"Justice Department","id":268,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/justice-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/268","parent_id":null,"slug":"justice-department"},{"raw_name":"Drug Enforcement Administration","name":"Drug Enforcement Administration","id":116,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/drug-enforcement-administration","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/116","parent_id":268,"slug":"drug-enforcement-administration"}],"excerpts":"the control substances consistent with the requirements established by regulations of the Attorney General.”). DEA expects most currently unregistered EMS agencies to be operating in a similar manner as registered EMS agencies, and such EMS agencies are already in compliance with the minimum physical security requirements. Therefore, DEA expects the physical security requirements of this rule, on balance, to be a codification of existing practice that will impose minimal costs.\n \n Recordkeeping Requirements \n \n Issue: \n Roughly thirty commenters, most"},{"title":"Medicare Program; Alternative Payment Model Updates and the Increasing Organ Transplant Access (IOTA) Model","type":"Rule","abstract":"This final rule will update and revise the Increasing Organ Transplant Access (IOTA) Model for Performance Year (PY) 2. This final rule also includes a technical correction to the regulatory text.","document_number":"2026-10890","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/06/01/2026-10890/medicare-program-alternative-payment-model-updates-and-the-increasing-organ-transplant-access-iota","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-06-01/pdf/2026-10890.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-10890.pdf?1779999311","publication_date":"2026-06-01","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES","name":"Health and Human Services Department","id":221,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/health-and-human-services-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/221","parent_id":null,"slug":"health-and-human-services-department"},{"raw_name":"Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services","name":"Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services","id":45,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/centers-for-medicare-medicaid-services","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/45","parent_id":221,"slug":"centers-for-medicare-medicaid-services"}],"excerpts":"proposals to extend payment and reporting flexibilities to IOTA participants impacted by EUC and to adjust the upside risk payment or downside risk payment amount for the IOTA participant if the IOTA participant is participating in the IOTA Model when such an emergency period has been declared.\n \n d. Other Requirements \n In the 2024 Final Rule, CMS finalized several other model requirements for IOTA participants, including transparency requirements, public reporting requirements, and a health equity plan requirement which is optional for the IOTA"},{"title":"Medicaid Program; Community Engagement Requirement for Certain Individuals","type":"Rule","abstract":"This interim final rule with comment period (IFC) interprets and implements the community engagement requirement in Medicaid under section 1902(xx) of the Social Security Act. States are required to implement the new requirement no later than January 1, 2027. This IFC specifies the requirements and expectations for States, including the Medicaid applicants and beneficiaries who must demonstrate community engagement as a condition of their eligibility, the types of qualifying activities that satisfy the community engagement requirement, the criteria to meet an exception from the requirement (that is, be deemed compliant), and the criteria to meet a specified exclusion from the requirement. It also specifies requirements for verification of qualifying activities, outreach to affected populations, steps States must take if they determine individuals are noncompliant, and additional operational considerations for States. Finally, this IFC specifies implementation timing and establishes new State reporting requirements.","document_number":"2026-11094","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/06/03/2026-11094/medicaid-program-community-engagement-requirement-for-certain-individuals","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-06-03/pdf/2026-11094.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-11094.pdf?1780346707","publication_date":"2026-06-03","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES","name":"Health and Human Services Department","id":221,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/health-and-human-services-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/221","parent_id":null,"slug":"health-and-human-services-department"},{"raw_name":"Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services","name":"Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services","id":45,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/centers-for-medicare-medicaid-services","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/45","parent_id":221,"slug":"centers-for-medicare-medicaid-services"}],"excerpts":"Assessing Compliance With the Community Engagement Requirement \n I. Verification of Compliance With and Exceptions and Exclusions From the Community Engagement Requirement \n J. Noncompliance Procedures \n K. Implementation Timing \n L. Outreach \n M. Managed Care Implications \n N. Additional Considerations \n O. Monitoring \n III. Good Cause for Proceeding With an Interim Final Rule With Comment Period \n IV. Collection of Information Requirements \n A. Wage Estimates \n B. Adjustment to State Cost Estimates \n C. Information Collection Requirements (ICRs)"},{"title":"Labor Organization Annual Financial Reports","type":"Rule","abstract":"The Department of Labor (Department) publishes this combined final rule to its regulations to improve its LM Labor Organization Annual Financial Reports by establishing a longer LM form for the largest labor organizations (Form LM-2 Long Form), revising a slightly shorter form for most labor organizations at and above the $350,000 threshold (Form LM-2), making a parallel revision to Form LM-3, and updating reporting thresholds for Forms LM-3 and LM-4 to promote financial integrity and transparency. The final rule applies prospectively under section 208 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (LMRDA).","document_number":"2026-10849","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/06/01/2026-10849/labor-organization-annual-financial-reports","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-06-01/pdf/2026-10849.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-10849.pdf?1780058719","publication_date":"2026-06-01","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF LABOR","name":"Labor Department","id":271,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/labor-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/271","parent_id":null,"slug":"labor-department"},{"raw_name":"Office of Labor-Management Standards","name":"Labor-Management Standards Office","id":274,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/labor-management-standards-office","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/274","parent_id":271,"slug":"labor-management-standards-office"}],"excerpts":"C. 411-415; financial reporting and disclosure requirements for labor organizations, their officers and employees, employers, labor relations consultants, and surety companies, \n see \n 29 U.S.C. 431-436, 441; detailed procedural, substantive, and reporting requirements relating to labor organization trusteeships, \n see \n 29 U.S.C. 461-466; detailed procedural requirements for the conduct of elections of labor organization officers, \n see \n 29 U.S.C. 481-483; safeguards for labor organizations, including bonding requirements, the establishment of"},{"title":"Revising Central Nonprofit Agencies' Requirements To Charge Fees and Clarifying the Permissibility of Subcontracting Within the AbilityOne Program","type":"Proposed Rule","abstract":"This notice proposes to amend the Committee regulation at 41 CFR 51-3.5 to formally codify the congressionally mandated requirements set forth in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2016, Public Law 114-113, Division H, Title IV, 129 Stat. 2639, December 18, 2015, which requires the central nonprofit agencies to enter into a written agreement with the Committee before charging fees to nonprofit agencies. This notice also proposes to amend the Committee's regulation at 41 CFR 51-4.4 to clarify the definition of subcontracting within the AbilityOne Program, amend and reduce regulatory requirements to subcontract, streamline the approval process for use of subcontracting, and lessen the administrative burdens for selecting subcontractors.","document_number":"2026-08392","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/30/2026-08392/revising-central-nonprofit-agencies-requirements-to-charge-fees-and-clarifying-the-permissibility-of","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-04-30/pdf/2026-08392.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-08392.pdf?1777466712","publication_date":"2026-04-30","agencies":[{"raw_name":"COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED","name":"Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled","id":74,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/committee-for-purchase-from-people-who-are-blind-or-severely-disabled","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/74","parent_id":null,"slug":"committee-for-purchase-from-people-who-are-blind-or-severely-disabled"}],"excerpts":"or stimulation authorized by a law of the United States.” \n 19 \n \n \n \n \n 17 \n \n See generally \n 2 CFR 200 and 200.100(a). CFR 1.200. 2 CFR 200 describes requirements from pre- through post-award, including property standards; procurement standards; performance and financial monitoring and reporting; subrecipient monitoring and management; record retention and access; remedies for non-compliance with an award or subaward; and award closeout and post-closeout responsibilities. It also sets forth cost principles, including specific guidance on selected"},{"title":"Access to Video Conferencing","type":"Rule","abstract":"In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) takes steps to ensure the accessibility of interoperable video conferencing services (IVCS). The Commission provides additional clarity on how the Commission's accessibility performance objectives apply to interoperable video conferencing services (IVCS), modifies those performance objectives to ensure access to IVCS, and addresses how the Interstate telecommunications relay services (TRS) Fund will support the provision of Video Relay Service (VRS) and other forms of TRS in video conferences.","document_number":"2024-27479","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/12/13/2024-27479/access-to-video-conferencing","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-12-13/pdf/2024-27479.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2024-27479.pdf?1734011114","publication_date":"2024-12-13","agencies":[{"raw_name":"FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION","name":"Federal Communications Commission","id":161,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/federal-communications-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/161","parent_id":null,"slug":"federal-communications-commission"}],"excerpts":"Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance Requirements. \n The amendments to the Commission's rules adopted in document FCC 24-95 may modify certain reporting, recordkeeping or other compliance obligations of certain small entities that provide IVCS or TRS. Compliance with these amended rules will be required January 12, 2027. The performance objectives adopted clarifying existing obligations, and are subject to existing achievability criterion. As a result, small entities should not find compliance with these rules overly"},{"title":"Food Distribution Programs: Improving Access and Parity","type":"Rule","abstract":"This final rule considers public comments submitted in response to the proposed rule revising the Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSFP), the Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations (FDPIR), The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), and USDA Foods disaster response regulations. This final rule makes access and parity improvements in USDA's food distribution programs to support access for eligible populations and streamline requirements for program operators.","document_number":"2024-24966","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/10/31/2024-24966/food-distribution-programs-improving-access-and-parity","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-10-31/pdf/2024-24966.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2024-24966.pdf?1730292329","publication_date":"2024-10-31","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE","name":"Agriculture Department","id":12,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/agriculture-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/12","parent_id":null,"slug":"agriculture-department"},{"raw_name":"Food and Nutrition Service","name":"Food and Nutrition Service","id":200,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/food-and-nutrition-service","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/200","parent_id":12,"slug":"food-and-nutrition-service"}],"excerpts":"children, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Surplus agricultural commodities. \n \n Food assistance programs, Grant programs—social programs, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Surplus agricultural commodities. \n \n Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Food assistance programs, Grant programs—social programs, Indians, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Surplus agricultural commodities. \n \n Food assistance programs, Grant programs—social programs, Indians, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Surplus"},{"title":"Premerger Notification; Reporting and Waiting Period Requirements","type":"Rule","abstract":"The Federal Trade Commission (\"FTC\" or \"Commission\"), with the concurrence of the Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, Department of Justice (\"Assistant Attorney General\" or \"Antitrust Division\") (together the \"Agencies\"), is issuing this final rule and Statement of Basis and Purpose (\"SBP\") to amend the Premerger Notification Rules (the \"Rules\") that implement the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act (\"the HSR Act\" or \"HSR\"), including the Premerger Notification and Report Form for Certain Mergers and Acquisitions (\"Form\") and Instructions to the Notification and Report Form for Certain Mergers and Acquisitions (\"Instructions\"). The final rule requires parties to transactions that are reportable under the HSR Act to provide documentary material and information that are necessary and appropriate for the Agencies to efficiently and effectively conduct an initial assessment to determine whether the transaction may violate the antitrust laws and whether to issue a Request for Additional Information (\"Second Request\") as provided by the HSR Act. In addition, the final rule implements certain requirements of the Merger Filing Fee Modernization Act of 2022 (\"Merger Modernization Act\") and ministerial changes to the Rules as well as the necessary amendments to the Instructions to effect the final changes.","document_number":"2024-25024","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/11/12/2024-25024/premerger-notification-reporting-and-waiting-period-requirements","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-11-12/pdf/2024-25024.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2024-25024.pdf?1731073564","publication_date":"2024-11-12","agencies":[{"raw_name":"FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION","name":"Federal Trade Commission","id":192,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/federal-trade-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/192","parent_id":null,"slug":"federal-trade-commission"}],"excerpts":"Hart-Scott-Rodino Annual Report, Fiscal Year 2010 appendix A (FY 2010) (reporting Adjusted Transactions in which a Second Request could have been issued from years 2001-2010); Fed. Trade Comm'n & U.S. Dep't of Justice, Hart-Scott-Rodino Annual Report, Fiscal Year 2013 appendix A (FY 2013) (reporting Adjusted Transactions in which a Second Request could have been issued from years 2004-2013); Fed. Trade Comm'n & U.S. Dep't of Justice, Hart-Scott-Rodino Annual Report, Fiscal Year 2022 appendix A (FY 2022) (reporting Adjusted Transactions in"},{"title":"GENIUS Act Requirements and Standards for FDIC-Supervised Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuers and Insured Depository Institutions","type":"Proposed Rule","abstract":"The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is soliciting comment on a proposal that would implement certain requirements pursuant to the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act) applicable to FDIC-supervised permitted payment stablecoin issuers and insured depository institutions, clarify deposit insurance coverage for deposits held as reserve assets for payment stablecoins, and clarify the treatment of tokenized deposits.","document_number":"2026-06974","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/10/2026-06974/genius-act-requirements-and-standards-for-fdic-supervised-permitted-payment-stablecoin-issuers-and","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-04-10/pdf/2026-06974.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-06974.pdf?1775738716","publication_date":"2026-04-10","agencies":[{"raw_name":"FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION","name":"Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation","id":164,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/federal-deposit-insurance-corporation","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/164","parent_id":null,"slug":"federal-deposit-insurance-corporation"}],"excerpts":"to the reserve asset composition report?\n \n \n Question 62: \n With respect to a PPSI that issues multiple brands of payment stablecoins, such as in white label arrangements, what modifications to the reporting requirements, including the reserve asset composition report, would be appropriate? Are there any additional disclosures that the PPSI should provide so the report is not misleading?\n \n \n Question 63: \n Should the composition report be required to list and name any IDIs holding reserve assets? Should the report be required to list and name other"},{"title":"Clarifying Exceptions to the Brady Act Background Check Requirement","type":"Proposed Rule","abstract":"The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (\"ATF\") proposes amending Department of Justice (\"Department\") regulations to clarify when a state's firearms-related permit meets the requirements under the Gun Control Act of 1968, as amended, as an alternative to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System check and includes minor changes to ensure that the regulatory language adheres closely to the language used in the statute.","document_number":"2026-08918","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/05/06/2026-08918/clarifying-exceptions-to-the-brady-act-background-check-requirement","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-05-06/pdf/2026-08918.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-08918.pdf?1777985128","publication_date":"2026-05-06","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE","name":"Justice Department","id":268,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/justice-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/268","parent_id":null,"slug":"justice-department"},{"raw_name":"Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives","name":"Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Bureau","id":19,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/alcohol-tobacco-firearms-and-explosives-bureau","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/19","parent_id":268,"slug":"alcohol-tobacco-firearms-and-explosives-bureau"}],"excerpts":"NICS alternate permits through a state criminal justice agency (“CJA”). However, if a state issues permits through a non-CJA, there may be difficulty directly accessing NICS because of FBI regulations, which limit NICS access to “criminal justice agencies in connection with the issuance of a firearm-related . . . permit or license.” 28 CFR 25.6(j)(1). Nevertheless, a non-CJA may still access relevant criminal history information to conduct a qualifying background check equivalent to a NICS check before issuing any such permits. For instance, Florida's"},{"title":"Surface Transportation Project Delivery Program; Utah Department of Transportation Audit Report","type":"Notice","abstract":"The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) established the Surface Transportation Project Delivery Program that allows a State to assume FHWA's responsibilities for environmental review, consultation, and compliance under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for Federal highway projects. When a State assumes these Federal responsibilities, the State becomes solely responsible and liable for carrying out the responsibilities it has assumed in lieu of FHWA. The program mandates annual audits during each of the first 4 years of State participation to ensure compliance with program requirements. This notice finalizes the findings of the fourth and final audit report for the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT).","document_number":"2023-19705","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/09/13/2023-19705/surface-transportation-project-delivery-program-utah-department-of-transportation-audit-report","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-09-13/pdf/2023-19705.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2023-19705.pdf?1694522727","publication_date":"2023-09-13","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION","name":"Transportation Department","id":492,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/transportation-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/492","parent_id":null,"slug":"transportation-department"},{"raw_name":"Federal Highway Administration","name":"Federal Highway Administration","id":170,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/federal-highway-administration","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/170","parent_id":492,"slug":"federal-highway-administration"}],"excerpts":"implement corrective actions to address all non-compliance observations. The Audit Team did not identify any non-compliance observations during this audit. \n Follow-up on the Prior Non-Compliance Observations From Audit #3 \n \n The FHWA had reported a noncompliance observation relating to UDOT not complying with the State's environmental review procedures as a part of Audit #3. \n 2019 Audit #3—Issuing a Document Without Final Legal Sufficiency Finding \n As noted earlier, in response to the 2019 audit finding that legal sufficiency review documentation"}]}