{"description":"Documents matching 'require transmission providers perform sufficiently'","count":5683,"total_pages":50,"next_page_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/documents?conditions%5Bterm%5D=require+transmission+providers+perform+sufficiently&format=json&page=2","results":[{"title":"Building for the Future Through Electric Regional Transmission Planning and Cost Allocation","type":"Rule","abstract":"In this order, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission addresses arguments raised on rehearing, grants clarification, in part, and denies clarification, in part, of Order No. 1920-A, which addressed arguments raised on rehearing of, set aside, in part, and clarified Order No. 1920. Order No. 1920 required transmission providers, inter alia, to conduct Long-Term Regional Transmission Planning to ensure the identification, evaluation, and selection, as well as the allocation of the costs, of more efficient or cost-effective regional transmission solutions to address Long-Term Transmission Needs.","document_number":"2025-06941","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/04/28/2025-06941/building-for-the-future-through-electric-regional-transmission-planning-and-cost-allocation","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-04-28/pdf/2025-06941.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-06941.pdf?1745585108","publication_date":"2025-04-28","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY","name":"Energy Department","id":136,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/energy-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/136","parent_id":null,"slug":"energy-department"},{"raw_name":"Federal Energy Regulatory Commission","name":"Federal Energy Regulatory Commission","id":167,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/federal-energy-regulatory-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/167","parent_id":136,"slug":"federal-energy-regulatory-commission"}],"excerpts":"Commission <span class=\"match\">required</span> <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> <span class=\"match\">providers</span> in each <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> planning region to participate in a regional <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> planning process that includes Long-Term Regional <span class=\"match\">Transmission</span> Planning, meaning regional <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> planning on a <span class=\"match\">sufficiently</span> long-term, forward-looking, and comprehensive basis to identify Long-Term <span class=\"match\">Transmission</span> Needs, identify <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> facilities that meet such needs, measure the benefits of those <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> facilities, and evaluate those <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> facilities for potential selection in the regional <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> plan"},{"title":"Enhancing Know-Your-Upstream-Provider Requirements and Strengthening STIR/SHAKEN (Call Authentication Trust Anchor; Advanced Methods To Target and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls)","type":"Proposed Rule","abstract":"In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) proposes steps to strengthen its robocall mitigation framework by enhancing Know-Your-Upstream-Provider (KYUP) requirements, improving oversight of voice service providers by the STIR/SHAKEN Governance Authority, raising caller ID attestation standards, and closing implementation gaps in STIR/SHAKEN implementation. Specifically, the Commission proposes establishing baseline KYUP information-collection, compliance review, verification, monitoring, and responsive-action requirements to ensure providers can identify and cut off bad-actor upstream providers. The Commission also proposes measures to expand the Governance Authority's vetting, enforcement, and reporting responsibilities to prevent misuse of STIR/SHAKEN certificates and to remove noncompliant providers from the authentication ecosystem. The Commission further proposes clarifying and strengthening STIR/SHAKEN attestation rules, including codifying attestation levels, defining improper attestations, and specifying permissible mechanisms for verifying number-to-customer associations. Additionally, the Commission proposes and seeks comment on additional steps to close caller ID authentication gaps, such as refining provider definitions, reconsidering exemptions, requiring providers serving end users to assign STIR/SHAKEN attestations, and ensuring calls maintain authentication information. The Commission also seeks comment on special circumstances, including addressing issues with foreign- originated calls.","document_number":"2026-13874","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/09/2026-13874/enhancing-know-your-upstream-provider-requirements-and-strengthening-stirshaken-call-authentication","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-07-09/pdf/2026-13874.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-13874.pdf?1783514714","publication_date":"2026-07-09","agencies":[{"raw_name":"FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION","name":"Federal Communications Commission","id":161,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/federal-communications-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/161","parent_id":null,"slug":"federal-communications-commission"}],"excerpts":"another voice service <span class=\"match\">provider</span> has refused or discontinued service to the upstream <span class=\"match\">provider</span>. \n We believe that this is the basic amount of information necessary for a <span class=\"match\">provider</span> to be able to know their upstream <span class=\"match\">providers</span>. We also believe this information will help <span class=\"match\">providers</span> determine if an upstream <span class=\"match\">provider</span> is a foreign entity. Are these views correct? Is there additional information we should <span class=\"match\">require</span> <span class=\"match\">providers</span> to obtain? For instance, should we <span class=\"match\">require</span> that <span class=\"match\">providers</span> obtain photos of certain individuals the upstream <span class=\"match\">provider</span> identifies with their"},{"title":"Building for the Future Through Electric Regional Transmission Planning and Cost Allocation","type":"Rule","abstract":"In this order, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission addresses arguments raised on rehearing, sets aside, in part, and clarifies Order No. 1920, which required transmission providers to conduct Long-Term Regional Transmission Planning to ensure the identification, evaluation, and selection, as well as the allocation of the costs, of more efficient or cost-effective regional transmission solutions to address Long-Term Transmission Needs. Order No. 1920 also directed other reforms to improve coordination of regional transmission planning and generator interconnection processes, require consideration of certain alternative transmission technologies in regional transmission planning processes, and improve transparency of local transmission planning processes and coordination between regional and local transmission planning processes.","document_number":"2024-27982","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/12/06/2024-27982/building-for-the-future-through-electric-regional-transmission-planning-and-cost-allocation","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-12-06/pdf/2024-27982.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2024-27982.pdf?1733406318","publication_date":"2024-12-06","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY","name":"Energy Department","id":136,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/energy-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/136","parent_id":null,"slug":"energy-department"},{"raw_name":"Federal Energy Regulatory Commission","name":"Federal Energy Regulatory Commission","id":167,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/federal-energy-regulatory-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/167","parent_id":136,"slug":"federal-energy-regulatory-commission"}],"excerpts":"now <span class=\"match\">require</span> that <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> <span class=\"match\">providers</span> develop a reasonable number of additional scenarios at Relevant State Entities' request. The aim of Order No. 1920 is to ensure that <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> <span class=\"match\">providers</span> engage in the <span class=\"match\">sufficiently</span> long-term, forward-looking, and comprehensive <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> planning that is essential to have the information necessary to determine which investments are worth making. As long as <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> <span class=\"match\">providers</span> engage in that robust planning process and achieve the transparency <span class=\"match\">required</span> through that process, <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> <span class=\"match\">providers</span> can"},{"title":"Enhanced Air Cargo Advance Screening (ACAS)","type":"Rule","abstract":"To address ongoing aviation security threats, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is amending its regulations pertaining to the Air Cargo Advance Screening (ACAS) program to require the transmission of additional data elements. The ACAS program enhances the security of flights carrying cargo into the United States by requiring the transmission of certain air cargo data and performing targeted risk assessments based on the transmitted data prior to an aircraft's departure for the United States. These risk assessments identify and prevent high-risk air cargo from being loaded onto an aircraft that could pose a risk to an aircraft during flight.","document_number":"2025-20606","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/11/21/2025-20606/enhanced-air-cargo-advance-screening-acas","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-11-21/pdf/2025-20606.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-20606.pdf?1763646322","publication_date":"2025-11-21","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY","name":"Homeland Security Department","id":227,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/homeland-security-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/227","parent_id":null,"slug":"homeland-security-department"},{"raw_name":"U.S. Customs and Border Protection","name":"U.S. Customs and Border Protection","id":501,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/u-s-customs-and-border-protection","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/501","parent_id":227,"slug":"u-s-customs-and-border-protection"}],"excerpts":"Air waybill number. \n The 2018 IFR also <span class=\"match\">required</span> the <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> of one conditional ACAS data element, the master air waybill (MAWB) number. Conditional data elements are only <span class=\"match\">required</span> under certain circumstances. If a conditional data element is not <span class=\"match\">required</span>, <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> of the data element is optional, but encouraged. The conditional MAWB number data element provides the location of the high-risk cargo and allows CBP to associate the cargo with an ACAS <span class=\"match\">transmission</span>. The MAWB number data element is <span class=\"match\">required</span> (1) when the ACAS filer is a different"},{"title":"Call Authentication Trust Anchor","type":"Rule","abstract":"In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) adopts rules that strengthen the Commission's caller ID authentication requirements by establishing clear practices for providers that rely on third parties to fulfill their STIR/SHAKEN implementation obligations. The rules authorize providers with a STIR/ SHAKEN implementation obligation to engage third parties to perform the technological act of digitally \"signing\" calls consistent with the requirements of the STIR/SHAKEN technical standards so long as: the provider with the implementation obligation makes the \"attestation- level\" decisions for authenticating caller ID information; and all calls are signed using the certificate of the provider with the implementation obligation--not the certificate of a third party. The rules also explicitly require all providers with a STIR/SHAKEN implementation obligation to obtain a Service Provider Code (SPC) token from the STIR/SHAKEN Policy Administrator and present that token to a STIR/SHAKEN Certificate Authority to obtain a digital certificate. Additionally, the rules include recordkeeping requirements for third- party authentication arrangements to enable the Commission to monitor compliance with and enforce Commission rules.","document_number":"2025-15809","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/19/2025-15809/call-authentication-trust-anchor","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-08-19/pdf/2025-15809.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-15809.pdf?1755521150","publication_date":"2025-08-19","agencies":[{"raw_name":"FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION","name":"Federal Communications Commission","id":161,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/federal-communications-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/161","parent_id":null,"slug":"federal-communications-commission"}],"excerpts":"standards will be traced back to that <span class=\"match\">provider</span>, not a third-party entity that technologically signs the call. Further, we agree with INCOMPAS that <span class=\"match\">requiring</span> <span class=\"match\">providers</span> to identify the specific third-party solutions that they may employ to <span class=\"match\">perform</span> the technological act of signing calls could <span class=\"match\">require</span> <span class=\"match\">providers</span> to update their Robocall Mitigation Database submissions more frequently if such solutions change, thereby increasing administrative burdens for <span class=\"match\">providers</span> with minimal benefit. Lastly, <span class=\"match\">providers</span> are already <span class=\"match\">required</span> to describe in their robocall mitigation"},{"title":"Pipeline Safety: Repair Criteria for Hazardous Liquid and Gas Transmission Pipelines","type":"Proposed Rule","abstract":"PHMSA proposes to modernize and to clarify the anomaly response criteria in the Federal pipeline safety regulations for gas transmission and hazardous liquid pipelines. Driven by twenty years of technological development, modern engineering concepts allow operators to identify, schedule, and remediate pipeline anomalies more effectively and in a less costly manner. PHMSA proposes incorporating these improved safety practices into its regulations by finalizing certain safety improvements advanced in recent rulemakings for gas transmission pipelines and extending those changes to hazardous liquid pipelines. In addition, PHMSA proposes certain non-substantive revisions to its gas and hazardous liquid repair regulations to improve compliance.","document_number":"2026-13805","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/08/2026-13805/pipeline-safety-repair-criteria-for-hazardous-liquid-and-gas-transmission-pipelines","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-07-08/pdf/2026-13805.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-13805.pdf?1783428318","publication_date":"2026-07-08","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION","name":"Transportation Department","id":492,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/transportation-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/492","parent_id":null,"slug":"transportation-department"},{"raw_name":"Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration","name":"Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration","id":408,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/pipeline-and-hazardous-materials-safety-administration","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/408","parent_id":492,"slug":"pipeline-and-hazardous-materials-safety-administration"}],"excerpts":"five years in hazardous liquid HCAs, seven years in gas <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> HCAs, and 10 years on other gas <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> pipelines <span class=\"match\">requiring</span> assessment.\n \n \n Immediate response criteria are generally set at a 1.1 FPR. At this point, the anomaly's burst pressure is within 10 percent of the maximum operating pressure, <span class=\"match\">requiring</span> immediate attention. Near-term response criteria are generally derived from the design factors in §§ 192.611 and 195.406, which results in a 1.39 FPR for Class 1 gas <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> pipelines and most hazardous liquid pipelines. To show"},{"title":"Building for the Future Through Electric Regional Transmission Planning and Cost Allocation","type":"Rule","abstract":"The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) revises the pro forma Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT) to remedy deficiencies in the Commission's existing regional and local transmission planning and cost allocation requirements. In this final order, the Commission requires transmission providers to conduct Long- Term Regional Transmission Planning that will ensure the identification, evaluation, and selection, as well as the allocation of the costs, of more efficient or cost-effective regional transmission solutions to address Long-Term Transmission Needs. The Commission also directs other reforms to improve coordination of regional transmission planning and generator interconnection processes, require consideration of certain alternative transmission technologies in regional transmission planning processes, and improve transparency of local transmission planning processes and coordination between regional and local transmission planning processes. These reforms are intended to ensure that existing regional and local transmission planning and cost allocation requirements are just, reasonable, and not unduly discriminatory or preferential.","document_number":"2024-10872","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/06/11/2024-10872/building-for-the-future-through-electric-regional-transmission-planning-and-cost-allocation","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-06-11/pdf/2024-10872.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2024-10872.pdf?1718023516","publication_date":"2024-06-11","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY","name":"Energy Department","id":136,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/energy-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/136","parent_id":null,"slug":"energy-department"},{"raw_name":"Federal Energy Regulatory Commission","name":"Federal Energy Regulatory Commission","id":167,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/federal-energy-regulatory-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/167","parent_id":136,"slug":"federal-energy-regulatory-commission"}],"excerpts":"proposal to <span class=\"match\">require</span> <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> <span class=\"match\">providers</span> to adopt enhanced transparency requirements for local <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> planning processes and improve coordination between regional and local <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> planning with the aim of identifying potential opportunities to “right-size” replacement <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> facilities. \n 11. This final order <span class=\"match\">requires</span> <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> <span class=\"match\">providers</span> to revise their interregional <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> coordination processes to reflect the Long-Term Regional <span class=\"match\">Transmission</span> Planning reforms adopted in this final order. This final order also <span class=\"match\">requires</span> that"},{"title":"Advanced Methods To Target and Eliminate Robocalls","type":"Proposed Rule","abstract":"In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) proposes steps to improve the availability and accuracy of caller identification information transmitted to consumers to enable them to better understand who is calling and decide whether to answer calls. Specifically, the Commission proposes to enhance the effectiveness of STIR/SHAKEN by requiring terminating providers to transmit verified caller name or other caller identity information for presentation on a consumer's handset whenever they transmit an indication that a call has received an A-level attestation. It also seeks comment on requiring providers to use Rich Call Data (RCD) to transmit verified caller name on IP networks, whether to permit or require use of other solutions, and an alternative option to require that providers implement RCD in their IP networks for all calls. The Commission further proposes to require voice service providers to implement measures to ensure that consumers know which calls originate from outside of the United States and to prohibit spoofing of United States telephone numbers for calls that originate from outside of the United States. Finally, the Commission seeks comment on whether some of its calling-related rules can be simplified, streamlined, or eliminated, perhaps because they are outdated or have not been enforced for a substantial amount of time.","document_number":"2025-22063","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/12/05/2025-22063/advanced-methods-to-target-and-eliminate-robocalls","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-12-05/pdf/2025-22063.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-22063.pdf?1764855925","publication_date":"2025-12-05","agencies":[{"raw_name":"FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION","name":"Federal Communications Commission","id":161,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/federal-communications-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/161","parent_id":null,"slug":"federal-communications-commission"}],"excerpts":"adopt to determine whether a <span class=\"match\">provider</span> has implemented RCD? Would any potential measure be different for resellers, originating facilities-based <span class=\"match\">providers</span>, intermediate <span class=\"match\">providers</span>, or terminating <span class=\"match\">providers</span>? If so, why? For example, would an intermediate <span class=\"match\">provider</span> properly be considered to have implemented RCD if it transmits to subsequent <span class=\"match\">providers</span> in the call path the RCD information it receives from the <span class=\"match\">provider</span> immediately before it in the call path? \n 41. If we do adopt an implementation mandate, how quickly can <span class=\"match\">providers</span> implement RCD throughout their"},{"title":"Required Rulemaking on Personal Financial Data Rights","type":"Rule","abstract":"The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is issuing a final rule to carry out the personal financial data rights established by the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (CFPA). The final rule requires banks, credit unions, and other financial service providers to make consumers' data available upon request to consumers and authorized third parties in a secure and reliable manner; defines obligations for third parties accessing consumers' data, including important privacy protections; and promotes fair, open, and inclusive industry standards.","document_number":"2024-25079","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/11/18/2024-25079/required-rulemaking-on-personal-financial-data-rights","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-11-18/pdf/2024-25079.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2024-25079.pdf?1731678320","publication_date":"2024-11-18","agencies":[{"raw_name":"Consumer Financial Protection Bureau","name":"Consumer Financial Protection Bureau","id":573,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/consumer-financial-protection-bureau","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/573","parent_id":null,"slug":"consumer-financial-protection-bureau"}],"excerpts":"presents opportunities for small data <span class=\"match\">providers</span> to better compete by offering products and services to a wider range of consumers. One commenter expressed concern that excluding smaller data <span class=\"match\">providers</span> would disadvantage small data <span class=\"match\">providers</span> relative to large data <span class=\"match\">providers</span> that continued to have the obligation, but for which they would not offer developer interfaces. The CFPB disagrees with this premise and notes that many large data <span class=\"match\">providers</span> are already offering developer interfaces and that small data <span class=\"match\">providers</span> can participate in open banking voluntarily"},{"title":"Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection; Modernizing the FCC Form 477 Data Program; Delete, Delete, Delete","type":"Rule","abstract":"In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) adopted an Order that takes steps to streamline the processes associated with the Broadband Data Collection (BDC) and the National Broadband Map and alleviates unnecessary regulatory burdens on service providers and challenge process participants. The Order aligns reporting requirements for broadband availability and subscription data, expressly declines to adopt a proposal to require satellite providers to submit additional certifications and supporting data, streamlines the Fabric challenge process, adopts a maximally- streamlined process by which the BDC system automatically removes areas or locations that fail a verification or audit without requiring the provider to update its availability data after receiving notice of the failed verification or audit, and makes certain ministerial changes.","document_number":"2026-12766","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/06/24/2026-12766/establishing-the-digital-opportunity-data-collection-modernizing-the-fcc-form-477-data-program","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-06-24/pdf/2026-12766.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-12766.pdf?1782218725","publication_date":"2026-06-24","agencies":[{"raw_name":"FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION","name":"Federal Communications Commission","id":161,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/federal-communications-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/161","parent_id":null,"slug":"federal-communications-commission"}],"excerpts":"requirements and reduces confusion among small and other <span class=\"match\">providers</span> without materially affecting the Form 477 data collection or the BDC. Additionally, the \n Order \n declined to adopt a proposal to <span class=\"match\">require</span> <span class=\"match\">providers</span> to report the availability of fixed voice services, which would impose new burdens on certain fixed voice service <span class=\"match\">providers</span> without <span class=\"match\">sufficient</span> justification for this additional reporting. The \n Order \n also declined to <span class=\"match\">require</span> additional certifications and supporting data from satellite <span class=\"match\">providers</span>.\n \n \n The \n Order \n also adopts changes to § 1.7009(d)"},{"title":"Completed Inspection Report Disposition","type":"Rule","abstract":"FMCSA amends the regulations to revise the requirement that motor carriers and intermodal equipment providers sign and return a completed roadside inspection form to the issuing State agency. FMCSA is aware that not all issuing State agencies require the return of these reports, and that requiring motor carriers and intermodal equipment providers to submit these reports to a State that does not require, or even request, the return of the form creates an unnecessary burden. Through this change, completed forms will only be returned to those States that request them. This action is in response to a petition for rulemaking from the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance (CVSA).","document_number":"2026-12450","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/06/22/2026-12450/completed-inspection-report-disposition","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-06-22/pdf/2026-12450.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-12450.pdf?1781786721","publication_date":"2026-06-22","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION","name":"Transportation Department","id":492,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/transportation-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/492","parent_id":null,"slug":"transportation-department"},{"raw_name":"Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration","name":"Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration","id":181,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/federal-motor-carrier-safety-administration","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/181","parent_id":492,"slug":"federal-motor-carrier-safety-administration"}],"excerpts":"rule. \n \n \n SUMMARY: \n FMCSA amends the regulations to revise the requirement that motor carriers and intermodal equipment <span class=\"match\">providers</span> sign and return a completed roadside inspection form to the issuing State agency. FMCSA is aware that not all issuing State agencies <span class=\"match\">require</span> the return of these reports, and that <span class=\"match\">requiring</span> motor carriers and intermodal equipment <span class=\"match\">providers</span> to submit these reports to a State that does not <span class=\"match\">require</span>, or even request, the return of the form creates an unnecessary burden. Through this change, completed forms will only be returned"},{"title":"Improving Transparency Into Pharmacy Benefit Manager Fee Disclosure","type":"Proposed Rule","abstract":"The Department is proposing a regulation that would require providers of pharmacy benefit management services and affiliated providers of brokerage and consulting services to disclose information about their compensation to fiduciaries of self-insured group health plans subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). These disclosures are needed so that fiduciaries can assess the reasonableness of the contracts or arrangements with these service providers, including the reasonableness of the service providers' compensation. These disclosure requirements would apply for purposes of ERISA's statutory prohibited transaction exemption for services arrangements. This proposal implements section 12 of President Trump's Executive Order 14273, Lowering Drug Prices by Once Again Putting Americans First, which instructs the Department to propose regulations to improve employer health plan transparency into the direct and indirect compensation received by pharmacy benefit managers. If finalized, this regulation would affect sponsors and other fiduciaries of self-insured group health plans and certain service providers to such plans.","document_number":"2026-01907","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/01/30/2026-01907/improving-transparency-into-pharmacy-benefit-manager-fee-disclosure","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-01-30/pdf/2026-01907.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-01907.pdf?1769721310","publication_date":"2026-01-30","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF LABOR","name":"Labor Department","id":271,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/labor-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/271","parent_id":null,"slug":"labor-department"},{"raw_name":"Employee Benefits Security Administration","name":"Employee Benefits Security Administration","id":131,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/employee-benefits-security-administration","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/131","parent_id":271,"slug":"employee-benefits-security-administration"}],"excerpts":"Covered Service <span class=\"match\">Providers</span>—Proposed Paragraph (c) \n \n Paragraph (c) of the proposed regulation defines the entities that would be covered service <span class=\"match\">providers</span> under the regulation and therefore would have disclosure and related audit obligations. The proposal identifies two types of covered service <span class=\"match\">providers</span>: (i) <span class=\"match\">providers</span> of pharmacy benefit management services (as defined in paragraph (d) of the proposal) and (ii) <span class=\"match\">providers</span> of advice, recommendations, or referrals regarding pharmacy benefit management services who are themselves <span class=\"match\">providers</span> of pharmacy"},{"title":"Compensation for Reactive Power Within the Standard Power Factor Range","type":"Rule","abstract":"In this final determination, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) finds that allowing transmission providers to charge transmission customers for a generating facility's provision of reactive power within the standard power factor range is unjust and unreasonable. The Commission, therefore, is revising Schedule 2 of its pro forma open-access transmission tariff (OATT), section 9.6.3 of its pro forma large generator interconnection agreement (LGIA), and section 1.8.2 of its pro forma small generator interconnection agreement (SGIA) to prohibit the inclusion in transmission rates of any charges related to the provision of reactive power within the standard power factor range by generating facilities.","document_number":"2024-24528","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/11/26/2024-24528/compensation-for-reactive-power-within-the-standard-power-factor-range","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-11-26/pdf/2024-24528.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2024-24528.pdf?1732542322","publication_date":"2024-11-26","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY","name":"Energy Department","id":136,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/energy-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/136","parent_id":null,"slug":"energy-department"},{"raw_name":"Federal Energy Regulatory Commission","name":"Federal Energy Regulatory Commission","id":167,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/federal-energy-regulatory-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/167","parent_id":136,"slug":"federal-energy-regulatory-commission"}],"excerpts":"that a <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> <span class=\"match\">provider</span> pay an interconnection customer for reactive power within the standard power factor range if the <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> <span class=\"match\">provider</span> pays its own or affiliated generating facilities for the same service, and the final determination <span class=\"match\">requires</span> <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> <span class=\"match\">providers</span> to make compliance filings to update their \n pro forma \n interconnection agreements accordingly. As a result of this final determination, <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> <span class=\"match\">providers</span> will be <span class=\"match\">required</span> to pay an interconnection customer for reactive power only when the <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> <span class=\"match\">provider</span> requests"},{"title":"Authority To Require Supervision and Regulation of Certain Nonbank Financial Companies","type":"Proposed Rule","abstract":"This proposed interpretive guidance, which would replace the Financial Stability Oversight Council's existing interpretive guidance on nonbank financial company determinations and its analytic framework for financial stability risks, describes the approach the Council intends to take in prioritizing its work to identify and address potential risks to U.S. financial stability using an activities-based approach, and enhancing the Council's analytical rigor and transparency.","document_number":"2026-06114","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/30/2026-06114/authority-to-require-supervision-and-regulation-of-certain-nonbank-financial-companies","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-03-30/pdf/2026-06114.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-06114.pdf?1774615520","publication_date":"2026-03-30","agencies":[{"raw_name":"FINANCIAL STABILITY OVERSIGHT COUNCIL","name":"Financial Stability Oversight Council","id":565,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/financial-stability-oversight-council","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/565","parent_id":null,"slug":"financial-stability-oversight-council"}],"excerpts":"transmitted to financial markets or market participants and what impact the potential risk could have on the financial system. Such a <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> of risk can occur through various mechanisms, or “channels.” The Council has identified four <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> channels that could facilitate the <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> of the negative effects of a risk to U.S. financial stability. These <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> channels are: \n \n • \n Exposure <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> channel. \n Direct and indirect exposures of creditors, counterparties, investors, and other market participants can result in losses"},{"title":"Central Valley Project/Power, Transmission, and Ancillary Services and California-Oregon Transmission Project Transmission Service-Rate Order No. WAPA-207","type":"Notice","abstract":"The formula rates for the Sierra Nevada Region (SN) Central Valley Project (CVP) power, transmission, and ancillary services and California-Oregon Transmission Project (COTP) transmission service have been confirmed, approved, and placed into effect on an interim basis. These new formula rates replace the existing formula rates which expire on September 30, 2024, and December 31, 2024. There are no changes to the existing formula rates for these services and there are no material changes aside from updating the effective dates.","document_number":"2024-16029","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/07/22/2024-16029/central-valley-projectpower-transmission-and-ancillary-services-and-california-oregon-transmission","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-07-22/pdf/2024-16029.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2024-16029.pdf?1721393121","publication_date":"2024-07-22","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY","name":"Energy Department","id":136,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/energy-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/136","parent_id":null,"slug":"energy-department"},{"raw_name":"Western Area Power Administration","name":"Western Area Power Administration","id":525,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/western-area-power-administration","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/525","parent_id":136,"slug":"western-area-power-administration"}],"excerpts":"such schedule. This term is synonymous to “Base Schedule.”\n \n \n <span class=\"match\">Transmission</span> <span class=\"match\">Provider</span>: \n As defined in WAPA's OATT, is the regional office within WAPA-SN that owns, controls, or operates the facilities used for the <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> of electric energy in interstate commerce and provides <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> service under the Tariff.\n \n \n <span class=\"match\">Transmission</span> System: \n As defined in WAPA's OATT, is the facilities owned, controlled, or operated by the <span class=\"match\">Transmission</span> <span class=\"match\">Provider</span> that are used to provide <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> service under Part II and Part III of the Tariff.\n \n \n UIE: "},{"title":"Implementation of the National Suicide Hotline Act of 2018","type":"Rule","abstract":"In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) adopts rules requiring covered text providers, including wireless providers, to develop the capability to transmit georouting data in a format that is compatible with the Lifeline's platform to allow the routing of covered 988 text messages by the Lifeline Administrator to the appropriate crisis center based on the texter's general location, rather than area code; and to provide such georouting data for covered 988 text messages, when available, to the Lifeline Administrator. To protect the privacy of 988 texters, this document defines \"georouting data\" as location data generated from a cell- based location technology that is aggregated to a level that will not identify the precise location of the handset, but only the general area from which the text originated, thereby making local resources available while protecting texters' identities.","document_number":"2025-17895","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/09/16/2025-17895/implementation-of-the-national-suicide-hotline-act-of-2018","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-09-16/pdf/2025-17895.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-17895.pdf?1757940319","publication_date":"2025-09-16","agencies":[{"raw_name":"FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION","name":"Federal Communications Commission","id":161,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/federal-communications-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/161","parent_id":null,"slug":"federal-communications-commission"}],"excerpts":"wireless <span class=\"match\">providers</span>. AT&amp;T adds that the Lifeline Administrator prefers solutions that provide georouting data only with a user's initial text message in a single conversation series, and that such solutions will likely <span class=\"match\">require</span> the Lifeline to query <span class=\"match\">providers</span> for georouting data. We also note that there is support in the record for including georouting data with the text user's initial message to protect privacy by avoiding the <span class=\"match\">transmission</span> of precise location information to downstream parties. Moreover, we <span class=\"match\">require</span> covered text <span class=\"match\">providers</span> to aggregate"},{"title":"Promoting Technological Solutions To Combat Contraband Wireless Device Use in Correctional Facilities","type":"Proposed Rule","abstract":"In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) seeks comment on proposals that would enhance public safety by removing regulatory barriers to the deployment and viability of existing and developing technologies that combat contraband wireless device use in correctional facilities. This document seeks comment on a proposed framework to authorize, for the first time, non-federal operation of radio frequency (RF) jamming solutions in correctional facilities. The Commission seeks to foster a collaborative environment among key stakeholders, including departments of correction, solutions providers, wireless providers, public safety and 911 entities, to explore an expanded range of solutions to a shared problem.","document_number":"2025-21325","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/11/26/2025-21325/promoting-technological-solutions-to-combat-contraband-wireless-device-use-in-correctional","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-11-26/pdf/2025-21325.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-21325.pdf?1764078345","publication_date":"2025-11-26","agencies":[{"raw_name":"FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION","name":"Federal Communications Commission","id":161,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/federal-communications-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/161","parent_id":null,"slug":"federal-communications-commission"}],"excerpts":"agreements between wireless <span class=\"match\">providers</span> and solutions <span class=\"match\">providers</span>? Are specific measures needed to prevent harmful interference to a wireless <span class=\"match\">provider's</span> base stations in a TDD context, for example taking into consideration the desired v. undesired signal levels in a TDD pattern? Should we <span class=\"match\">require</span>, in a TDD context, synchronization between a solutions <span class=\"match\">provider</span> deploying a jamming solution and the wireless <span class=\"match\">provider</span> offering service to an area that includes a correctional facility to avoid unwanted <span class=\"match\">transmissions</span> during the wireless <span class=\"match\">provider's</span> base station transmit"},{"title":"Advanced Methods To Target and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls","type":"Rule","abstract":"In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) modifies its existing call blocking rules. Specifically, the Commission requires all domestic voice service providers to block based on a reasonable do-not-originate (DNO) list. Second, it requires voice service providers to return Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) code 603+ when calls are blocked based on reasonable analytics.","document_number":"2025-04811","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/03/24/2025-04811/advanced-methods-to-target-and-eliminate-unlawful-robocalls","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-03-24/pdf/2025-04811.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-04811.pdf?1742561117","publication_date":"2025-03-24","agencies":[{"raw_name":"FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION","name":"Federal Communications Commission","id":161,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/federal-communications-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/161","parent_id":null,"slug":"federal-communications-commission"}],"excerpts":"this requirement only applies when <span class=\"match\">providers</span> block calls based on analytics; the Commission does not <span class=\"match\">require</span> <span class=\"match\">providers</span> to provide immediate notification when blocking based on a DNO list, pursuant to Commission notification if not based on analytics, or at the request of a customer without the use of analytics. As <span class=\"match\">required</span> by the Commission's rules, the Commission directs all <span class=\"match\">providers</span> to <span class=\"match\">perform</span> necessary software upgrades to ensure the codes it <span class=\"match\">requires</span> for such notification are appropriately mapped. <span class=\"match\">Providers</span> must ensure that calls that transit"},{"title":"Call Authentication Trust Anchor","type":"Proposed Rule","abstract":"In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) proposes to require that providers that continue to rely on non-IP networks implement non-IP caller ID authentication frameworks, including proposing to develop criteria for evaluating whether non-IP caller ID authentication frameworks are developed and reasonably available, as required by the TRACED Act, and proposing to conclude that certain existing frameworks satisfy those requirements.","document_number":"2025-10998","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/06/16/2025-10998/call-authentication-trust-anchor","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-06-16/pdf/2025-10998.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-10998.pdf?1749818725","publication_date":"2025-06-16","agencies":[{"raw_name":"FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION","name":"Federal Communications Commission","id":161,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/federal-communications-commission","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/161","parent_id":null,"slug":"federal-communications-commission"}],"excerpts":"service <span class=\"match\">providers</span>, 13 months for gateway <span class=\"match\">providers</span>, and 10 months for certain non-gateway intermediate <span class=\"match\">providers</span> to implement STIR/SHAKEN in their IP networks, and <span class=\"match\">providers</span> were generally able to meet those deadlines. Our rules adopted pursuant to the TRACED Act granted certain <span class=\"match\">providers</span> extensions from this deadline and permitted <span class=\"match\">providers</span> to request exemptions. Given those compliance timelines, would the significantly longer two-year compliance timeline we propose here be necessary to reasonably account for any additional burdens <span class=\"match\">providers</span> may face"},{"title":"Calendar Year 2027 Home Health Prospective Payment System (HH PPS) Rate Update; Requirements for the HH Quality Reporting Program and the Expanded HH Value-Based Purchasing Model; Medicare Provider Enrollment, Durable Medical Equipment (DME), and DME, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (DMEPOS) Policies","type":"Proposed Rule","abstract":"This proposed rule would set forth routine updates to the Medicare home health payment rates in accordance with existing statutory and regulatory requirements. In addition, this proposed rule discusses the behavior adjustment and proposes a temporary behavior adjustment and proposes to recalibrate the case-mix weights and update the functional impairment levels; comorbidity subgroups; and low- utilization payment adjustment (LUPA) thresholds for CY 2027. Additionally, this proposed rule discusses the provision of home health palliative care services and includes a request for information (RFI) on a home health specific wage index. This rule would also propose changes to the Home Health Quality Reporting Program (HH QRP) and summarizes potential initiatives to improve alignment between the HH QRP and expanded Home Health Value Based Purchasing (HHVBP) Model. Lastly, the rule would--clarify the application of the DMEPOS face-to- face encounter requirements for the replacement of DMEPOS items; make changes to the provider and supplier enrollment requirements; make changes regarding DME benefit expansion for infusion pumps and drugs; and discuss collection of information requirement changes regarding the DMEPOS Competitive Bidding Program (CBP) country of origin.","document_number":"2026-13602","html_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/06/2026-13602/calendar-year-2027-home-health-prospective-payment-system-hh-pps-rate-update-requirements-for-the-hh","pdf_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-07-06/pdf/2026-13602.pdf","public_inspection_pdf_url":"https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-13602.pdf?1782936912","publication_date":"2026-07-06","agencies":[{"raw_name":"DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES","name":"Health and Human Services Department","id":221,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/health-and-human-services-department","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/221","parent_id":null,"slug":"health-and-human-services-department"},{"raw_name":"Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services","name":"Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services","id":45,"url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/centers-for-medicare-medicaid-services","json_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/agencies/45","parent_id":221,"slug":"centers-for-medicare-medicaid-services"}],"excerpts":"Act also <span class=\"match\">requires</span> the Secretary to provide confidential feedback reports to PAC <span class=\"match\">providers</span> on the performance of such PAC <span class=\"match\">providers</span> for quality, resource use, and other measures <span class=\"match\">required</span> under sections 1899B(c)(1) and (d)(1) of the Act beginning 1 year after the applicable specified application date. Further, section 1899B(g) of the Act <span class=\"match\">requires</span> the Secretary to establish procedures for making available to the public information regarding the performance of individual PAC <span class=\"match\">providers</span> for quality, resource use, and other measures <span class=\"match\">required</span> under sections"}]}