Skip to Content
Proposed Rule

Processed Fruits and Vegetables

Action

Proposed Rule.

Summary

This proposed rule would revise the regulations governing inspection and certification for processed fruits, vegetables, and processed products. A projected fee increase ranging from 8 to 11 percent is proposed. These revisions are necessary in order to recover, as nearly as practicable, the costs of performing inspection services under the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 and to ensure the program's financial stability. Also affected are the fees charged to persons required to have inspections on imported commodities in accordance with the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1937.

 

Table of Contents Back to Top

DATES: Back to Top

Comments must be postmarked, courier dated, or sent via the Internet on or before September 5, 2003.

ADDRESSES: Back to Top

Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the internet or written comments concerning this proposal. Comments must be sent in duplicate to the Office of the Branch Chief, Processed Products Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, STOP 0247, Washington, DC 20250-0247, telephone (202) 720-4693, or e-mail Terry.Bane@usda.gov. Comments should make reference to the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be made available for public inspection in the above office during regular business hours and on the Internet at http://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/ppbdocklist.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Back to Top

Mr. Terry B. Bane at the above address, call (202) 720-4693, or e-mail Terry.Bane@usda.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Back to Top

Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act Back to Top

This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. Also, pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.

AMS regularly reviews its user fee financed programs to determine if the fees are adequate. The Agency has and will continue to seek out cost savings opportunities and implement appropriate changes to reduce its costs. Such actions can provide alternatives to fee increases. The fee schedule was last revised on November 19, 2000 (63 FR 66485). However, even with cost control efforts, the existing fee schedule will not generate sufficient revenues to cover the lot, year round, and less than year round processed fruit and vegetable inspection program costs and sustain an adequate reserve balance (4 months of costs) as called for by Agency policy (AMS Directive 408.1).

AMS projects that program costs will increase to approximately $14.4 million in FY 2004 and $14.9 million in FY 2005, primarily from increases in employee salaries and benefits. An estimated 3.4 percent pay increase for employees effective January 2004 and January 2005 will increase program costs approximately $375,000 in FY 2004 and approximately $390,000 in FY 2005. Without a fee increase, the FY 2004 and FY 2005 end-of-year reserve balances will decline from $4.3 million to $3.6 million (3.0 months reserve), and $2.4 million (1.9 months reserve), respectively. The required 4 month level would be approximately $5.0 million. The proposed fee increase ranging from 8 to 11 percent will increase revenue by $1.3 million per year and will enable AMS to replenish program reserves to a 4 month level, approximately $5.0 million, for both FYs 2004 and 2005.

The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. This action would increase user fee revenue generated under the lot inspection program and the year round and less than year round inspection programs by approximately $1.3 million annually. This action is authorized under the AMA of 1946 [see 7 U.S.C. 1622(h)] which provides that the Secretary of Agriculture assess and collect “such fees as will be reasonable and as nearly as may be to cover the costs of services rendered * * *”.

There are more than 1,250 users of PPB's lot, year round, and less than year round inspection services (including applicants who must meet import requirements [1] , inspections which amount to under 2 percent of all lot inspections performed). A small portion of these users are small entities under the criteria established by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201). There will be no additional reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements imposed upon small entities as a result of this rule. AMS has not identified any other federal rules which may duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule.

The impact on all businesses, including small entities, is very similar. Further, even though fees will be increased, the amount of the increase is small (ranging from 8 to 11 percent), and should not significantly affect these entities. Finally, except for those applicants who are required to obtain inspections in connection with certain imports these businesses are under no obligation to use these inspection services.

The rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have a retroactive effect and will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or policies unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule. There are no administrative procedures which must be exhausted prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule.

Proposed Action Back to Top

The AMA authorizes official inspection, grading, and certification for processed fruits, vegetables, and processed products made from them. The AMA provides that the Secretary collect reasonable fees from the users of the services to cover, as nearly as practicable, the costs of the services rendered. This rule would amend the schedule for fees for inspection services rendered to the processed fruit and vegetable industry to reflect the costs necessary to operate the program.

AMS regularly reviews its user fee programs to determine if the fees are adequate. While AMS continues to pursue opportunities to reduce its costs, the existing fee schedule will not generate sufficient revenues to cover lot, year round, and less than year round inspection program costs while maintaining an adequate reserve balance.

Based on the Agency's analysis of increasing program costs, AMS is proposing to increase the fees relating to lot, year round, and less than year round inspection services.

AMS projects that program costs will increase to approximately $14.4 million in FY 2004 and $14.9 million in FY 2005, primarily from increases in employee salaries and benefits. An estimated 3.4 percent pay increase for employees effective January 2004 and January 2005 will increase program costs approximately $375,000 in FY 2004 and approximately $390,000 in FY 2005. Without a fee increase, the FY 2004 and FY 2005 end-of-year reserve balances will decline from $4.3 million to $3.6 million (3.0 months reserve), and $2.4 million (1.9 months reserve), respectively. The required 4 month level would be approximately $5.0 million. The proposed fee increase ranging from 8 to 11 percent will increase revenue by $1.3 million per year and will enable AMS to replenish program reserves to a 4 month level, approximately $5.0 million, for both FYs 2004 and 2005.

For inspection services charged under § 52.42, overtime and holiday work would continue to be charged as provided in that section.

For inspection services charged on a contract basis under § 52.51 overtime work would also continue to be charged as provided in that section. The following fee schedule compares current fees and charges with proposed fees and charges for processed fruit and vegetable inspection as found in 7 CFR §§ 52.42-52.51. Unless otherwise provided for by regulation or written agreement between the applicant and the Administrator, the charges in the schedule of fees as found in § 52.42 are:

Current: $47.00/hr.

Proposed: $52.00/hr.

Charges for travel and other expenses as found in § 52.50 are:

Current: $47.00/hr.

Proposed: $52.00/hr.

Charges for year-round in-plant inspection services on a contract basis as found in § 52.51 (c) are:

(1) For inspector assigned on a year-round basis:

Current: $36.00/hr.

Proposed: $39.00/hr.

(2) For inspector assigned on less than a year-round basis:Each inspector:

Current: $48.00/hr.

Proposed: $52.00/hr.

Charges for less than year-round in-plant inspection services (four or more consecutive 40 hour weeks) on a contract basis as found in § 52.51 (d) are:

(1) Each inspector:

Current: $48.00/hr.

Proposed: $52.00/hr.

A thirty day comment period is provided for interested persons to comment on this proposed action. Thirty days is deemed appropriate because it's preferable to have any fee increase, if adopted, to be in place as close as possible to the beginning of the fiscal year, October 1, 2003.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 52 Back to Top

For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 52 is proposed to be amended as follows:

begin regulatory text

PART 52—[AMENDED] Back to Top

1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority:

7 U.S.C. 1621-1627.

§ 52.42 [Amended]

2. In § 52.42, the figure “$47.00” is revised to read “$52.00”.

§ 52.50 [Amended]

3. In § 52.50, the figure “$47.00” is revised to read “$52.00”.

§ 52.51 [Amended]

4. In § 52.51, paragraph (c) (1), the figure “$36.00” is revised to read “$39.00”, in paragraph (c) (2), the figure “$48.00” is revised to read “$52.00”, and in paragraph (d) (1), the figure “$48.00” is revised to read “$52.00”.

Dated: July 31, 2003.

A.J. Yates,

Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.

end regulatory text

[FR Doc. 03-20008 Filed 8-5-03; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-02-P

Footnotes Back to Top

1. Section 8e of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-604), requires that whenever the Secretary of Agriculture issues grade, size, quality or maturity regulations under domestic marketing orders for certain commodities, the same or comparable regulations on imports of those commodities must be issued. Import regulations apply only during those periods when domestic marketing order regulations are in effect.

Currently, there are 4 processed commodities subject to 8e import regulations: canned ripe olives, dates, prunes, and processed raisins. A current listing of the regulated commodities can be found under 7 CFR Parts 944 and 999.

Back to Context
Site Feedback