Pilot Program for Parallel Review of Medical Products
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) (the Agencies) are soliciting nominations from sponsors of innovative device technologies to participate in a pilot program for concurrent review of certain FDA premarket review submissions and CMS national coverage determinations. The Agencies announced the intention to initiate a pilot program in the Federal Register of September 17, 2010. The Agencies are now providing notice of the procedures for voluntary participation in the pilot program, as well as the guiding principles the Agencies intend to follow.
Table of Contents Back to Top
- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
- SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
- I. Background
- A. Parallel Review Proposal
- B. Expected Benefits of Parallel Review
- II. Parallel Review Pilot Program for Medical Devices
- A. Guiding Principles
- B. Appropriate Candidates
- C. Procedures
- D. Roles and Responsibilities
- E. Duration of the Pilot
- F. Evaluation
DATES: Back to Top
Effective Date: November 10, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Back to Top
For device sponsors interested in requesting voluntary parallel review:
Markham C. Luke, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 301-796-5550, e-mail: email@example.com.
For General questions about parallel review:
Peter Beckerman, Office of Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 301-796-4830, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org or
Tamara Syrek Jensen, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 410-786-3529, e-mail: Tamara.Syrekjensen@cms.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Back to Top
I. Background Back to Top
A. Parallel Review Proposal
As discussed in the September 17, 2010, Federal Register notice (75 FR 57045), parallel review is intended to reduce the time between FDA marketing approval and CMS national coverage determinations, thereby improving the quality of patient health care by facilitating earlier access to innovative medical products for Medicare beneficiaries. In the notice of September 17, 2010, we solicited comments on parallel review of submissions to FDA and CMS for regulated medical products. We also stated our intention to initiate a pilot program for parallel review of devices. The Agencies received 36 comments before the comment period closed on December 16, 2010. The public comments can be found at: http://www.regulations.gov, identified by docket number FDA-2010-N-0308. Major themes of the comments included, among others: Parallel review should be sponsor/requester initiated, voluntary, and include an option to opt out of a national coverage determination (NCD); agencies should clarify the confidentiality standards for data sharing between the Agencies; and agencies should establish clear and concise guidelines on the procedures and a timeline for parallel review. These comments have informed the parallel review pilot program for medical devices we are announcing in this notice. We also intend to seek input and feedback from candidate sponsor/requesters who participate in the pilot. Current information describing the FDA-CMS Parallel Review Pilot Program for Medical Devices can be found at the following Web site: http://www.parallel-review.fda.gov.
B. Expected Benefits of Parallel Review
The expected benefits of an FDA-CMS parallel review program were discussed in the September 17, 2010, notice. The anticipated benefits include facilitating development of innovative new products and increased efficiency in the Agencies' review processes.
It has come to our attention that innovators have generally focused solely on obtaining FDA approval, only to later realize that Medicare payment may not automatically be forthcoming.
As stated in the notice of September 17, 2010, parallel review will serve the public interest by providing the possibility of reducing the time between FDA marketing approval or clearance decisions and Medicare NCDs. The efficiencies gained by parallel review are expected to benefit all interested parties. Patients are expected to gain quicker access to innovative medical technologies if they are covered. The sponsor/requester gains timely insight to the information needs of CMS with respect to pursuing a positive NCD as well as a potentially shortened time to payment due to a streamlined multi-review process. The Agencies gain enhanced channels of communication. Specifically with regard to CMS, its early involvement will streamline the decision making process. It will also focus attention on health outcomes of importance to Medicare, and provide early awareness of any remaining evidence gaps. If there are evidence gaps, CMS may address them by implementing coverage with evidence development (CED) or other policy vehicles. For example, if FDA approval or clearance is conditioned on a post-approval study, CMS could decide to cover the device within the parameters of the post-approval study under CED.
II. Parallel Review Pilot Program for Medical Devices Back to Top
The Agencies have developed a pilot program that reflects our review of the comments received on the September 17, 2010, notice and our interest in creating a streamlined process with minimal additional burden to interested sponsor/requesters. This document outlines the: (1) Guiding principles underlying the pilot program; (2) appropriate candidates for the pilot program; (3) procedures FDA and CMS intend to follow in conducting parallel product reviews; and (4) general roles and responsibilities of the sponsor/requester, FDA, and CMS.
A. Guiding Principles
In response to comments received, the Agencies have identified basic principles underlying the parallel review pilot program described in this document. The following principles are intended to create a common understanding among the sponsor/requester, FDA, and CMS about the goals and parameters of the parallel review pilot program:
1. Participation in parallel review will not affect the review standard for device approval by FDA or for a coverage determination by CMS.
2. The Agencies will adhere to all statutory and regulatory requirements as stipulated in the memorandum of understanding between FDA and CMS, available at http://www.fda.gov/aboutfda/partnershipscollaborations/memorandaofunderstandingmous/domesticmous/ucm217585.htm.
3. A sponsor/requester may withdraw from, and FDA and CMS may terminate, parallel review up until the time of CMS's public posting of an NCD tracking sheet.
4. The Agencies will not publicly disclose participation of a sponsor/requester in parallel review prior to CMS's posting of an NCD tracking sheet, unless the sponsor/requester consents or has already made this information public or disclosure is required by law. If a sponsor/requester does not wish the information that would be revealed by the posting of the NCD tracking sheet to become public, it must withdraw from parallel review prior to this point.
5. Due to Agency resource issues the pilot program expects to accept no more than three to five candidates per year.
B. Appropriate Candidates
During its pilot phase, the Agencies believe parallel review should focus on truly innovative technologies that are most likely to benefit from the efficiencies of parallel review. Accordingly, appropriate candidates for the parallel review pilot are medical devices which each use the following:
1. New technologies for which the sponsor/requester has had sufficient pre-investigational device exemption (IDE) interaction with FDA or approved IDE application.
2. New technologies for which an original or supplemental application for premarket approval (PMA) or petition for de novo review would be required.
3. New technologies that fall within the scope of a Part A or Part B Medicare benefit category and are not subject to an NCD.
The agencies encourage any interested sponsors who believe their devices are appropriate candidates and would like to explore the use of the pilot program to contact FDA by e-mail at: email@example.com, before initiating the procedures referenced under section II.C of this document entitled “C. Procedures.”
For sponsor/requesters of devices that have already had contact with FDA through the pre-IDE or IDE process, much of the information necessary to assess the suitability of a candidate technology should already be in FDA's possession. The Agencies have developed the following procedures to ensure adequate information to assess a candidate's suitability for parallel review without creating a burdensome new application process:
1. Nomination. The sponsor/requester of an innovative therapeutic or diagnostic device may nominate its device for participation in parallel review by following the instructions posted on the http://www.parallel-review.fda.gov web page. FDA intends to acknowledge receipt of nominations by e-mail. The following information will assist FDA in processing and responding to nominations:
- Name of the sponsor/requester and relevant contact information;
- Pre-IDE/IDE/PMA/De Novo reference number;
- Name of the product;
- Succinct description of the technology and disease or condition the device is intended to diagnose or treat;
- Stage of development of the technology (that is, in preclinical testing, in clinical trials, currently undergoing premarket review by FDA);
- Brief statement explaining why the device is an appropriate candidate for the pilot program as described under the section II.B of this document entitled: “B. Appropriate Candidates.”
2. FDA/CMS Consideration. The Agencies intend to meet to consider a nomination within 30 days of receiving a complete nomination containing the information described previously. The Agencies may contact the sponsor/requester to request supplemental information.
3. Sponsor/requester Notification. Upon completion of the consideration meeting, the Agencies will notify the sponsor/requester whether the product is an appropriate candidate for the parallel review pilot program.
4. Acceptance Meeting. If deemed an appropriate candidate, the Agencies will meet with the product sponsor/requester, either in person or by phone.
5. FDA Review. Parallel review candidates will be reviewed according the normal FDA review process. Participation in parallel review will not affect user fees, review timeframes or procedures, or the FDA standard of approval, which is reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness.
6. CMS NCD Review and Timing. CMS will begin its informal review process sometime after submission of the PMA or de novo petition. For PMAs, this will typically begin after the PMA-specific Panel meeting of the FDA Medical Devices Advisory Committee.
D. Roles and Responsibilities
The Agencies have outlined the general roles and responsibilities of each participant in the parallel review process to ensure clarity and shared understandings. These roles and responsibilities are as follows:
1. Sponsor/requester. The sponsor/requester initiates consideration for parallel review by submitting a complete nomination as outlined previously under “1. Nomination,” of section II.C of this document entitled “Procedures.”. Once a nomination has been submitted, the sponsor/requester should comply with all requirements necessary for FDA review of a PMA or de novo petition and CMS issuance of an NCD including the submission of a formal request for an NCD. The Agencies request that a sponsor/requester who wishes to withdraw from the parallel review process notify the FDA and CMS in writing before CMS' formal opening of an NCD by the posting of the NCD tracking sheet.
2. The FDA. FDA will provide a secure and confidential nomination and review process as outlined previously in section II.C of this document. FDA will initiate review of nominations for parallel review by retrieving applications from the secure mailbox, and coordinating with CMS, on the planning and implementation of the parallel review process. FDA will review PMAs and de novo petitions for products that have been selected by the Agencies for parallel review according to the usual timeframes, procedures, and review standards for PMA approval and de novo classification.
3. The CMS. In addition to the coverage review, CMS's parallel review roles include participating in the nomination process as well as coordinating with FDA regarding the planning and implementation of the parallel review process. During the parallel review, CMS is responsible for maintaining open communication channels with FDA and the sponsor/requester and for fulfilling its statutory obligations concerning the NCD process.
E. Duration of the Pilot
The Agencies intend to accept requests for participation in the pilot program for parallel review for 2 years. The Agencies may terminate the pilot program before the close of the 2-year period, or may extend the pilot program beyond 2 years. The decisions will be announced in the Federal Register.
The Agencies intend to use their experience with the pilot program to develop a parallel review program not only for devices but also for drugs and biological products. The Agencies anticipate their experience with the parallel review program for devices and feedback from participants in the program will inform guidance for a broader program applicable to all medical products. The Agencies may also determine that they should extend or modify the parallel review pilot program to continue their evaluation.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance Program) (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, Medicare—Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)
Dated: September 21, 2011.
Donald M. Berwick,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Dated: September 21, 2011.
Margaret A. Hamburg,
Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
[FR Doc. 2011-25907 Filed 10-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P