This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
Notice of amendment to final results of countervailing duty administrative review.
On January 18, 1991, the Department of Commerce (“the Department”) published in the Federal Register its final results of administrative review of the countervailing duty order on certain iron-metal castings from India for the period 1986 (56 FR 1976). Pursuant to a settlement agreement, the Department has recalculated the countervailing duty rates. The final countervailing duty rates for this review period are listed below in the Final Results of Review section of this notice.
February 4, 2000.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Copyak, Office 6, Group II, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2786.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
On January 18, 1991, the Department published the final results of its administrative review of the countervailing duty order on certain iron-metal castings from India for the period January 1, 1986 through December 31, 1986. See Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Certain Iron-Metal Castings from India, 56 FR 1976. Subsequently, respondents challenged the final results before the Court of International Trade (CIT). The primary issue involved the calculation of the program rates for the subsidies provided under India's International Price Reimbursement Scheme (IPRS). The IPRS is a program through which the Government of India (GOI) provided rebates to castings exporters that purchased domestically-produced pig iron at prices set by the GOI. According to the GOI, these rebates were calculated to equal the differences between the higher domestic prices actually paid and the lower alternative prices available from sources outside of India.
As the IPRS was also the subject of litigation for the review period 1985 in Creswell v. United States, Consolidated Court No. 91-01-00012 (Creswell), litigation for the review period 1986 was stayed pending finalization of Creswell. After the CIT affirmed the Department's remand determination for the 1985 administrative review (see Creswell, slip op. 98-139 (CIT Sept. 29, 1998)), the Department published a notice of amended final results in accordance with that opinion. See Certain Iron-metal Castings from India: Amended Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review In Accordance With Decision Upon Remand, 63 FR 67858 (December 9, 1998). In lieu of pursuing further litigation with respect to the administrative review of the review period 1986, the parties have entered into a settlement agreement. The parties agreed to countervailing duty rates that were calculated based on the methodology approved by the CIT in Creswell. On December 10, 1999, the CIT approved the settlement agreement and dismissed the lawsuit. See Southern Star, Inc., v. United States, Slip Op. 99-130, Consol. Ct. No. 91-01-00060 (CIT December 10, 1999).
Final Results of Review
Pursuant to the settlement agreement, we recalculated the company-specific and all-other subsidy rates for the period January 1, 1986, through December 31, 1986. The amended final countervailing duty rates are:
|Manufacturer/exporter||Revised rates (percent)|
|Crescent Foundry Co. Pvt. Ltd.||9.07|
|Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works||23.75|
|Uma Iron & Steel Co./Commex Corp.||30.24|
The Department will instruct the U.S. Customs Service (Customs) to assess countervailing duties on all appropriate entries. The Department will issue liquidation instructions directly to Customs. The above rates will not affect the cash deposit requirements currently in effect.
This amendment to the final results of countervailing duty administrative review notice is in accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)), 19 CFR 351.213, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).Start Signature
Dated: January 24, 2000.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-2578 Filed 2-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P