United States International Trade Commission.
Notice of Commission determination to conduct a full five-year review concerning the antidumping duty order on professional electric cutting tools from Japan.
The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with a full review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on professional electric cutting tools from Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1675(c)(5)(B); a schedule for the review will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
February 3, 2000.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Carpenter (202-205-3172), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (http://www.usitc.gov).End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
On February 3, 2000, the Commission determined that it should proceed to a full review in the subject five-year review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The Commission found that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (64 FR 59206, November 2, 1999) was adequate but that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission also found that other circumstances warranted conducting a full review.
A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission's web site.Start Signature
Issued: February 9, 2000.
By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
1. Commissioner Askey did not make a determination as to whether the respondent interested party group response was adequate in this review.Back to Citation
2. Chairman Bragg and Commissioner Koplan dissenting.Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 00-3707 Filed 2-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P