Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Section 11A(a)(3)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”)  the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) orders the American Stock Exchange LLC (“AMEX”), the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc. (“BSE”), the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. (“CBOE”), the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (“CHX”), the Cincinnati Stock Exchange, Inc. (“CSE”), the International Securities Exchange, LLC (“ISE”), the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”), the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE”), the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (“PCX”) and the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (“PHLX”) (collectively the “Participants” and individually a “Participant”) to act jointly in planning, discussing, developing, and submitting to the Commission a plan that will begin phasing in the implementation of decimal pricing in equity securities and options on or before September 5, 2000. The Participants should discuss the development and implementation of the phase-in plan with interested market participants, including, but not limited to, the Securities Industry Association (“SIA”) and its members, the National Securities Clearing Corporation, the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (“DTCC”), the Options Clearing Corporation (“OCC”), the Securities Industry Automation Corporation, the Intermarket Trading System Operating Committee, the Options Price Reporting Authority, the Consolidated Tape Association, and the Consolidated Quote Operating Committee (collectively the “Interested Parties”). The Commission further directs the Participants to submit the phase-in plan to the Commission no later than 45 days after the issuance of this Order. Finally, the Commission directs each Participant to submit the rule changes necessary to implement the phase-in plan no later than 60 days after the issuance of this Order.
On January 28, 2000, the Commission issued an Order  requiring the Participants to facilitate an orderly transition to decimal pricing in the United States securities markets. The Order prescribed a timetable for the Participants to begin trading some equity securities, and options on those equity securities, in decimals by July 3, 2000, and all equities and options by January 3, 2001.
On March 6, 2000, the NASD announced that the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (“Nasdaq”) would not have sufficient capacity to meet the target dates for implementation. The NASD also expressed concern regarding overall industry readiness and requested that the Commission work with the industry and the markets to determine an appropriate time frame that would not impose unnecessary risks on investors.Start Printed Page 38011
Subsequently, on April 13, 2000, the Commission issued an Order staying the original deadlines for decimalization. In the April 13 Order, the Commission also requested comment on two alternatives for implementing decimal pricing in exchange-listed equity securities this year. The first alternative would begin decimal pricing in all exchange-listed securities on or before September 4, 2000 (“Dual Pricing”). Congressman Thomas Bliley, Michael Oxley, and Edward Markey had strongly urged the implementation of decimal pricing on or before September 4, 2000 because of the benefits to investors. The second alternative envisioned a temporary or “pilot” program to begin decimal pricing in certain exchange-listed securities and options on or before September 4, 2000 (“Decimals Pilot”). Under both alternatives, all stocks would be traded in decimals by March 31, 2001.
II. Summary of Comments
The Commission received 36 comment letters on the decimal implementation alternatives presented in the April 13 Order. Nine individuals urged the Commission to support full decimalization for both exchanged-listed and Nasdaq securities either immediately or no later than the July 3, 2000 start-up date proposed in the Commission's original Order. Two vendors favored the Dual Pricing alternative proposed in the April 13 Order, in which all exchange-listed stocks would be priced in decimals on or before September 4, 2000. Nine commenters, consisting of broker-dealers, exchanges, and service bureaus, however, argued in favor of postponing any decimalization until a date closer to when Nasdaq is prepared to price its securities in decimals on March 31, 2001. The remaining 16 commenters, consisting of broker-dealers, exchanges, clearing organizations, the NASD, and the SIA, supported some form of phased-in dual pricing on or before September 4, 2000.
A. Immediate Decimalization
Nine individual investors argued in favor of the Commission mandating all markets to begin decimal pricing in all securities either immediately or at least by the original July 3, 2000 start-up date. These commenters did not address how the markets and the securities industry could accomplish the conversion to decimalization in an orderly manner.
B. Full Dual Pricing Starting On or Before September 4, 2000
Two vendors stated that they would be ready for the Dual Pricing alterntaive proposed by the April 13 Order. One of the commenters stated that, from a market data vendor's point of view, it would strongly prefer trading to Start Printed Page 38012commence in all exchange-listed securities in decimals on or before September 4, 2000 (compared to the Decimals Pilot).
C. Postponement Until Dates Closer to March 31, 2001
Nine commenters, including broker-dealers, exchanges, and service bureaus, argued that the Commission should implement a relatively brief phase-in period for both exchange-listed and Nasdaq securities—but that the beginning date for this process should be postponed until a date closer to when Nasdaq is prepared to begin pricing its securities in decimals on March 31, 200. These commenters were concerned about the potential systems difficulties and investor confusion that could arise from an extended period in which exchange-listed securities were priced in decimals while Nasdaq securities were still priced in fractions. The commenters stressed the benefits of postponing decimalization until the conversion could begin in both exchange-listed and Nasdaq securities at the same time. Nevertheless, while these commenters believed that a later start-up date would be advisable or preferable, most recognized that a phase-in schedule starting on or before September 4, 2000 would be technically feasible.
D. Phase-In Starting On or Before September 4, 2000
As discussed above, the remaining commenters agreed that some form of phase-in for decimal pricing for exchange-listed securities could begin on or before September 4, 2000. Some of these commenters preferred an extended pilot of only a small number of securities (along the lines of the Decimals Pilot alternative proposed for comment in the April 13 Order). For example, the SIA believed that a pilot was more feasible than Dual Pricing because a pilot would, among other things, minimize the difficulties faced by the securities industry to create and maintain separate processes, systems, programs, and procedures for both decimals and fractions and would simplify the educational effort directed at the investing public to assist them in understanding how specific securities would be priced. Other commenters, however, supported a more aggressive phase-in of decimal pricing in all exchange-listed securities. The NYSE, for example, favored commencing decimal pricing in a limited number of NYSE-listed securities, advancing to a full pilot of perhaps 50 NYSE-listed securities during an initial phase-in period of one month or less. The NYSE indicated that an expansion to all of its listed securities could prudently occur after approximately 60 days of trading in all pilot stocks. All of these commenters stressed the need for careful planning and systems testing to avoid potential market disruptions and to minimize investor confusion.
E. Minimum Price Increments
The majority of commenters who favored a phase-in process for exchange-listed stocks also believed that at least some exchange-listed securities should be quoted in minimum price increments of a penny. For example, the NYSE favored pricing in pennies in at least some stocks from the beginning of any pilot.
F. Options Pricing
Several of the commenters who favored beginning the decimalization phase-in of exchanged-listed securities on or before September 4, 2000, nevertheless recognized that this could present significant problems for the options markets. For example, the three options exchanges that supported some form of phase-in starting on or before September 4, 2000 cited that potential strains on options price reporting systems that could result from widespread decimal pricing in both exchange-listed securities and their related options. These concerns were also reflected in the comment letters from the SIA and the OCC. These commenters indicated that plans for the decimalization phase-in should take these concerns into account when setting minimum price increments for both stocks and options, and that it could be necessary to a least temporarily permit some options to trade at wide price increments than those permitted in the related stocks. For example, the SIA and the OCC recommended that options price increments be maintained in a similar manner to what is in existence today, i.e., options with premiums quoted under $3 per contract would be quoted in nickle increments and options with higher priced premiums would be quoted in dime increments.
Section 11A(a)(2) of the Exchange Act  directs the Commission, having due regard for the public interest, the protection of investors, and the maintenance of fair and orderly markets, to use its authority under the Exchange Act to facilitate the establishment of a national market system for securities. Section 11A(a)(3)(B) of the Exchange Act gives the Commission the ability to authorize or require by order the self-regulatory organizations “to act jointly * * * in planning. developing, operating, or regulating a national market system.”  This authority enables the Commission to require joint activity that otherwise might be asserted to have an impact on competition, where the activity serves the public interest and the interests of investors.
After careful consideration of the comments received in response to the April 13 Order and further analysis, the Commission believes that decimal pricing in exchange-listed securities and options should be phased in beginning or before September 5, 2000. Because the NASD has indicated that it would be possible to initiate a controlled decimalization phase-in of a limited number of Nasdaq securities on March 12, 2001, the Commission believes that the NASD should implement a phase-in plan on that date and extend decimalization to all Nasdaq securities no later than April 9, 2001. Accordingly, the Commission intends that full implementation of decimal pricing in all exchange-traded and Nasdaq equity securities and options (“Full Implementation”) should be completed no later than April 9, 2001. In view of the variety of concerns over immediate, full-scale decimalization in exchange-Start Printed Page 38013listed securities raised by commenters such as the SIA, the Commission believes that careful phasing in of decimal pricing is necessary to ensure the continued orderly operation of the markets and clearing organizations.
The Commission recognizes the concerns expressed by members of Congress and several small investors that decimal pricing in equity securities should be implemented as expeditiously as possible. We continue to believe that the conversion to decimal pricing will benefit investors by enhancing investor comprehension, facilitating globalization of our markets, and potentially reducing transaction costs. Nevertheless, the Commission must ensure that the conversion to decimal pricing is accomplished in an orderly and safe manners. In view of the concerns raised by commenters such as the SIA, the Commission believes that an immediate full-scale introduction of decimalization, without adequate planning and systems testing, has the potential to create widespread operational problems in the markets and the securities industry, which in turn could adversely affect investors.
The Commission is aware of the views of some commenters that the optimal conversion process for decimal pricing would involve simultaneous implementation plans for both exchange-listed and Nasdaq securities. Unfortunately, Nasdaq's inability to begin decimalization until March 31, 2001 renders this approach problematic. Moreover, many of the commenters that strongly preferred postponing decimal pricing until Nasdaq securities could be included recognized that at least some decimal pricing in exchange-listed securities would be feasible starting on or before September 4, 2000.
The remainder of the commenters believed that, with proper planning and testing, some phase-in of decimal pricing in exchange-listed securities and options should begin on or before September 4, 2000. The Commission is therefore directing the Participants to develop a phase-in plan to begin decimal pricing exchange-listed securities and options on or before September 5, 2000. The Participants should submit this plan to the Commission no later than 45 days after the issuance of this Order, and each Participant should submit the rule changes necessary to implement the phase-in plan pursuant to Section 19(b) of the Exchange Act no later than 60 days after the issuance of this Order. To facilitate a safe and coordinated conversion to decimal pricing, the phase-in plan should include a formal schedule of testing and readiness reporting to ensure that all Participants are ready to implement decimal pricing within the timeframes specified in the plan. Further, the phase-in plan should provide for decimal pricing of at least some options on exchange-listed securities that are participating in the phase-in. The plan should provide for the phasing in of decimal pricing for at least some Nasdaq securities starting no later than March 12, 2001, with decimalization extended to all Nasdaq securities no later than April 9, 2001. Finally, the phase-in plan should provide for Full Implementation by April 9, 2001. During this period, the Participants and the Commission will carefully monitor the effects of decimal pricing on systems capacity, liquidity, and trading behavior.
There was little agreement among the commenters regarding a minimum quoting increment during the phase-in periods; suggestions ranged from a dime  to a penny. As a result, the phase-in plan may fix the minimum quoting increment during the phase-in periods, provided that the minimum increment is no greater than five cents  and no less than one cent for any equity security, and that at least some equity securities are quoted in one cent minimum increments.
After the securities industry has gained some experience with the implementation of decimal pricing, the Commission believes that the Participants should study the impact of the use of a minimum pricing variation of one penny on trading patterns, liquidity, and capacity (“Study”). For example, the inter-market communications systems are likely to experience increased quote traffic resulting from the conversion to decimal pricing and other market changes. Therefore, two months after Full Implementation, the Participants must submit (individually or jointly) a study to the Commission regarding the impact of decimal pricing on systems capacity, liquidity, and trading behavior, including an analysis of whether there should be a uniform minimum increment for a security. If a Participant wishes to move to quoting in an increment of less than one cent, the Participant should include a full analysis of the potential impact of such trading on the Participant's market and the markets as a whole.
Within thirty days after submitting the Study, and absent Commission action, the Participants individually must submit for notice, comment, and Commission consideration, proposed rule changes under Section 19)b) of the Exchange Act to establish their individual choice of minimum increments by which equities or options are quoted on their respective markets.
It Is Hereby Ordered, pursuant to Section 11A(a)(3)(B) of the Exchange Act, that the Participants act jointly in planning, discussing, developing, and submitting to the Commission a phase-in plan, as described above. The Participants are ordered to submit to the Commission a phase-in plan, as described above. The Participants are ordered to submit to the Commission a phase-in plan for the equity and options markets no later than July 24, 2000. In addition, each Participant is ordered to submit the rule changes necessary to implement the phase-in plan no later than August 7, 2000. This Order will be effective until the Commission has acted on the proposed rule changes filed Start Printed Page 38014by the individual Participants pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act establishing the minimum increments by which equities or options are quoted on the respective markets or until otherwise ordered by the Commission.Start Signature
By the Commission.
By: Margaret H. McFarland,
1. Section 11A(a)(3)(B) authorizes the Commission, in furtherance of its statutory directive to facilitate the establishment of a national market system, by rule or order, “to authorize or require self-regulatory organizations to act jointly with respect to matters as to which they share authority under [the Act] in planning, developing, operating, or regulating a national market system (or a subsystem thereof) or one or more facilities thereof.” 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(3)(B).Back to Citation
2. The Commission selected September 5, 2000 as the latest start-up date for the phase-in period because it is the first trade date following the September 4, 2000 Labor Day holiday.Back to Citation
3. Additional requirements are discussed in the text accompanying infra notes 28 through 41.Back to Citation
4. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 42360 (Jan. 28, 2000), 65 FR 5004 (Feb. 2, 2000).Back to Citation
5. See Letters from Frank G. Zarb, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, NASD, to Arthur Levitt, Chairman, Commission, dated March 6, 2000 and March 21, 2000.Back to Citation
6. Nasdaq has committed to intensify its efforts (including, at the Commission's request, hiring an independent consultant to advise on capacity issues) to help ensure that it manages its growth responsibly. The NASD has assured the Commission that Nasdaq will dedicate all required resources and the attention of senior management to the conversion to decimal pricing. The Commission is monitoring Nasdaq's efforts closely.Back to Citation
7. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 42685 (April 13, 2000), 65 FR 21046 (April 19, 2000) (“April 13 Order”); see also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 42516 (March 10, 2000), 65 FR 14637 (March 17, 2000).Back to Citation
8. See Letter from Chairman Thomas Bliley, Committee on Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives; Chairman Michael G. Oxley, Subcommittee on finance and Hazardous Materials, U.S. House of Representatives; and Congressman Edward J. Markey Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Trade, and Consumer Protection, U.S. House of Representatives to Arthur Levitt, Chairman, Commission, dated April 4, 2000 (“Commerce Committee Letter”).Back to Citation
9. Nasdaq has assured the Commission that it will be able to support decimal trading of exchange-listed securities by Labor Day of this year (i.e., for the third market), and of Nasdaq stocks by March 31, 2001. See Letter from Richard G. Ketchum, President, NASD, to Annette Nazareth, Director, Division of Market Regulation (“Division”) and Robert L. D. Colby, Deputy Director, Division, dated April 12, 2000.Back to Citation
10. Copies of the comment letters are available in the Public Reference Room in file No. 4-430.Back to Citation
11. See e-mail from Nathaniel J. Olsson, dated April 23, 2000; e-mail from Don Welsh, dated April 23, 2000; e-mail from Michael Esch, dated April 22, 2000; e-mail from H. Rogers, dated April 23, 2000; e-mail from D. Zilant, dated April 23, 2000; e-mail from Steve Sutherland, dated May 3, 2000; e-mail from Patrick Murray, dated May 4, 2000; e-mail from Douglas Hawkins, dated May 23, 2000; and e-mail from Peter Pfieffer, dated May 12, 2000 (who identifies himself as a programmer analyst and sees no technical bars to implementing decimal pricing by July 3, 2000).Back to Citation
12. See letter from Don Finucane, Vice President, Marketing and Product Development, Standard & Poor's Comstock, dated May 10, 2000 (“S&P Comstock Letter”); and e-mail from ILX Systems, dated May 3, 2000 (“ILX E-Mail”).Back to Citation
13. Several commenters argued that decimalization should wait until all major securities markets, including Nasdaq, are ready to begin simultaneous. See letter from Fred Reif, Senior Vice President, A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., dated May 9, 2000 (“A.G. Edwards Letter”); letter from Paul B. O'Kelly, Executive Vice President, Market Regulation and Legal, CHX, dated May 9, 2000 (“CHX Letter”); letter from Bob Munro, Senior Director, ADP/SIS, dated May 15, 2000 (“ADP/SIS Letter”); letter from Norman Eaker, Principal, Edward Jones, dated May 9, 2000 (“Edward Jones Letter”); e-mail from Robert B. Sloan, Partner, Director of Information Services, J.C. Bradford, dated April 13, 2000 (“Bradford E-Mail”); letter from W. Leo McBlain, Chairman, and Thomas J. Jordan, Executive Director, Financial Information Forum, dated May 15, 2000 (“FIF Letter”); letter from Michael J. Ryan, Jr., Chief of Staff, AMEX, dated May 25, 2000 (“AMEX Letter”); and e-mail from Jeffrey C. Wells, Senior Vice President, Bridge Information Systems, dated May 10, 2000 (“Bridge E-Mail”). One commenter indicated that, in view of the complexities involved and the need for adequate planning and testing, the beginning of any decimalization should be delayed until mid to late October, 2000. See e-mail from Joyce L. Ulrich, First Vice President, Brokerage Applications, Legg Mason, dated May 9, 2000 (“Legg Mason E-Mail”). One commenter suggested that the date for full decimalization implementation be moved from March 31, 2001 to April 30, 2001. See letter from Tracey E. Curvey, Executive Vice President, Online Brokerage Group, Fidelity Investments, dated May 25, 2000 (“Fidelity Letter”). In addition, one commenter suggested that decimalization in exchange-listed securities should be initiated no sooner than early January 2001 in order to shorten the period of dual pricing until decimal pricing in Nasdaq securities can begin on March 31, 2001. See letter from Michael J. Simon, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, ISE, dated May 10, 2000 (“ISE Letter”).Back to Citation
14. Several commenters favored the Decimals Pilot starting on or before September 4, 2000. See letter from Charles J. Henry, President and Chief Operating Officer, CBOE, dated May 2, 2000 (“CBOE Letter”); letter from Scott G. Abbey, Chief Information Officer and Executive Vice President, Paine Webber, Inc., dated May 8, 2000 (“BSE Letter”); letter from Marc E. Lackritz, President, SIA, dated May 10, 2000 (“SIA Letter”); letter from Robert C. King, Chairman, and Lee Korins, President and Chief Executive Officer, Securities Traders Association, dated May 12, 2000 (“STA Letter”); letter from Wayne P. Luthringshausen, Chairman, OCC, dated may 17, 2000 (“OCC Letter”); and letter from Philip D. DeFeo, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, PCX, dated May 17, 2000 (“PCX Letter”). DTCC indicated that it would be ready for the Decimals Pilot on or before September 4, 2000, but indicated that it may be prudent to wait until September 25, 2000, after the options expiration cycle has concluded. See letter from Dennis J. Dirks, Chief Operating Officer, DTCC, dated May 12, 2000 (“DTCC Letter”). The PHLX indicated that the Decimals Pilot starting on or before September 4, 2000 was feasible and clearly preferable to the Dual Pricing alternative, but acknowledged that decimal trading ideally should begin at the end of February 2001. See letter from Meyer S. Frucher, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, PHLX, dated May 10, 2000 (“PHLX Letter”). The NYSE preferred a modified phase-in schedule that would rapidly expand the number of exchange-listed securities subject to decimal pricing (this proposal is described fully below). See letter from James E. Buck, Senior Vice President and Secretary, NYSE, dated May 16, 2000 (“NYSE Letter”). A major clearing firm also favored a flexible Decimals Pilot that would allow for the addition of more securities if conditions permit. See letter from C. Michael Viviano, Chairman, BNY Clearing Services, LLC, dated April 27, 2000 (“BNY Letter”). The NASD indicated that it could be ready for either Dual Pricing or the Decimals Pilot starting on or before September 4, 2000. See letter from Joan C. Conley, Senior Vice President and Corporate Secretary, NASD, dated May 10, 2000 (“NASD Letter”). One commenter indicated that, while Dual Pricing on or before September 4, 2000 was feasible, minimum pricing increments of a nickel (presumably for at least a phase-in period) would be best in order to permit the industry to experience potential volume increases at a slower pace. Moreover, this commenter acknowledged that dual pricing could result in confusion for its “traders, clearing clients, and prime brokers.” See e-mail from George Tumas, Managing Director, Banc of America Securities, dated May 10, 2000 (“Banc of America E-Mail”). Similarly, another commenter indicated that, while it would be ready for Dual Pricing on or before September 4, it would recommend that decimal pricing begin with a large number of exchange-listed securities in nickel minimum pricing increments. After a thorough evaluation of its impact on system and line capacity, decimal pricing in penny increments could begin at a later stage. See e-mail from Sara Banerjee, Vice President, Data Operations and Procurement, and Doug O'Hearen, Vice President, Development, Telekurs Financial, dated May 10, 2000 (“Telekurs E-Mail”).Back to Citation
15. See S&P Comstock Letter and ILX E-Mail supra note 12.Back to Citation
16. See S&P Comstock Letter supra note 12.Back to Citation
17. See supra note 13.Back to Citation
18. See supra note 14.Back to Citation
19. See SIA Letter supra note 14.Back to Citation
20. See NYSE Letter supra note 14.Back to Citation
21. See id.Back to Citation
22. The CBOE and PCX favored a phase-in in the form of an extended pilot of decimal pricing in a small number of stocks. See CBOE Letter and PCX Letter supra note 14. While the PHLX also supported a pilot, it indicated that widespread decimal pricing in listed stocks would be feasible “with a controlled, phase-in initial period.” See PHLX Letter supra note 14.Back to Citation
23. See SIA Letter and OCC Letter supra note 14.Back to Citation
24. See SIA Letter and OCC Letter supra note 14.Back to Citation
27. See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 41843 (Sept. 7, 1999), 64 FR 50126 (Sept. 15, 1999); and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 42849 (May 26, 2000), 65 FR 36180 (June 7, 2000) (directing options exchanges to develop strategies to mitigate quote message traffic). The Participants previously requested that, to address concerns about antitrust liability, the Commission order them to work together to coordinate decimal planning.Back to Citation
28. The Commission selected April 9, 2001 as the deadline of Full Implementation to avoid disruptions of securities pricing systems at broker-dealers, mutual funds, and other market participants during the critical period immediately following the quarter-end on March 31, 20001. These pricing systems are essential for accurate quarter-end pricing for millions of mutual fund investors, as well as for large numbers of institutional investors and other market participants who use over-the-counter equity derivatives that employ quarter-end expiration cycles.Back to Citation
29. See SIA Letter supra note 14.Back to Citation
30. The SIA's concerns over full-scale dual pricing are discussed in the text accompanying supra note 19.Back to Citation
31. Moreover, the Commission notes that the securities industry almost universally expressed the view that trading the same securities in both decimals and fractions would be confusing to investors and would disrupt the markets.Back to Citation
32. The Commission notes that, while the first industry test was held on April 8, 2000, industry testing is still ongoing and will continue throughout the summer.Back to Citation
33. The Commission believes that the Participants should continue to canvass their members' readiness for decimalization to establish a feasible phase-in schedule with a view towards. Full Implementation by April 9, 2001.Back to Citation
34. The Commission expects that the phase-in plan would also include a description of the securities industry's educational efforts directed at the investing public to assist them in understanding how specific securities would be priced.Back to Citation
35. The Commission notes that, while it is mandating a phase-in of decimal pricing, the Participants may set a more aggressive implementation schedule if they determine that decimal pricing can be safely implemented before the April 9, 2001 deadline.Back to Citation
36. See Edward Jones Letter supra note 13.Back to Citation
37. See Letter supra note 14.Back to Citation
38. Reasonable exceptions may be made for high priced securities.Back to Citation
39. The plan should provide that the minimum increments are no less than one cent for any option on equity securities.Back to Citation
40. The Commission assumes that exchange-listed stocks will be quoted on exchanges and the third market in the same increments. Participants should consider whether options should trade in the same format as the underlying security.Back to Citation
41. See SIAC/SRI Consulting, Mitigating Options Message Traffic Final Report (Dec. 14, 1999).Back to Citation
43. Although Commission staff may be consulted in discussing the proposed phase-in plan, staff presence at joint discussions is not required by this Order. In issuing this Order, the Commission does not address: (a) any joint or other conduct that occurred prior to the issuance of this Order or prior Orders, and (b) any joint or other conduct occurring after the date of this Order that is not ordered or requested by this Order.Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 00-15361 Filed 6-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M