This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Rule
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
34
as of
09/09/2026 at 6:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
This final rule amends the NASA FAR Supplement (NFS) to revise numbering and ombudsman information as a result of FAC 97-17; revises regulations to indicate that award fee determinations are no longer exempt from the Disputes clause as a result of FAC 97-15; revises regulations to indicate that precontract costs are applicable to awards resulting from broad agency announcements; and makes an editorial correction to other regulations.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
June 22, 2000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Celeste Dalton, NASA Headquarters Office of Procurement, Contract Management Division (Code HK), Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-1645, e-mail:
celeste.dalton@hq.nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
FAC 97-17, dated April 25, 2000, revised FAR 16.504 and 16.505, including the requirement to identify the facsimile and e-mail address of agency task and delivery ombudsman.
( printed page 38777)
This final rule revises numbering within NFS 1815, 1816, 1819, and 1852 to reflect the FAC 97-17 changes and update the agency ombudsman information. This final rule also revises sections 1852.216-76 and 1852.216-77 to indicate that award fee determinations are no longer exempt from the Disputes clause as a result of FAC 97-15. Changes unrelated to FAC 97-15 and 97-17 are made to allow precontract costs for awards resulting from broad agency announcements (BAA). The use of precontract costs is currently allowed for sole source contracts, except those resulting in firm fixed-price or fixed-price contracts. Contracts awarded under BAAs are considered competitive based on FAR 6.102(d). However, the award process for BAAs is similar to that for sole source awards since negotiations with the contractor occurs after source selection, rather than prior to selection in the normal competitive contract award process. Because of the selection process under BAAs, it is reasonable to allow the approval of precontract costs. Additionally, an editorial change is made to correct the title of paragraph (i)(3) to section 1815.370.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
NASA certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small business entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601et seq.) because it does not impose any new requirements.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to the NFS do not impose any recordkeeping or information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501,
et seq.
The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as the one at 1852.215-84, Ombudsman, in all solicitations (including draft solicitations) and contracts. Use the clause with its Alternate I when a task or delivery order contract is contemplated.
PART 1816—TYPES OF CONTRACTS
4. Amend section 1816.504 by adding paragraph (a)(4)(v) to read as follows:
5. Amend section 1816.505 by redesignating paragraph (b)(6) as (b)(5).
PART 1819—SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS
6. Amend paragraph (f)(1) in section 1819.201 by removing the words “Deputy Associate Administrator for Procurement (Code H)” and inserting the words “Director of the Contract Management Division (Code HK)” in its place.
PART 1831—CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES
7. In section 1831.205-32, revise paragraph (1) to read as follows:
(a) An ombudsman has been appointed to hear and facilitate the resolution of concerns from offerors, potential offerors, and contractors during the preaward and postaward phases of this acquisition. When requested, the ombudsman will maintain strict confidentiality as to the source of the concern. The existence of the ombudsman is not to diminish the authority of the contracting officer, the Source Evaluation Board, or the selection official. Further, the ombudsman does not participate in the evaluation of proposals, the source selection process, or the adjudication of formal contract disputes. Therefore, before consulting with an ombudsman, interested parties must first address their concerns, issues, disagreements, and/or recommendations to the contracting officer for resolution.
(b) If resolution cannot be made by the contracting officer, interested parties may contact the installation ombudsman, ______ [Insert name, address, telephone number, facsimile number, and e-mail address]. Concerns, issues, disagreements, and recommendations which cannot be resolved at the installation may be referred to the NASA ombudsman, the Director of the Contract Management Division, at 202-358-0422, facsimile 202-358-3083, e-mail sthomps1@hq.nasa.gov. Please do not contact the ombudsman to request copies of the solicitation, verify offer due date, or clarify technical requirements. Such inquiries shall be directed to the Contracting Officer or as specified elsewhere in this document.
(End of clause)
Alternate I
June 2000
As prescribed in 1815.7003, insert the following paragraph (c):
(c) If this is a task or delivery order contract, the ombudsman shall review complaints from contractors and ensure they are afforded a fair opportunity to be considered, consistent with the procedures of the contract.
9. In section 1852.216-76, revise the date of the clause; remove the last sentence of paragraph (f)(3); and revise paragraph (g) to read as follows: