This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice is hereby given that, on May 25, 2000, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (“the Act”), Mobile Wireless Internet Forum has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are 3Com, Mount Prospect, IL; Alcatel, Antwerp, Belgium; Bell Atlantic, Bedminister, NJ; Celletra, Yoqne'am, Israel; Cisco Systems, San Jose, CA; Compaq Computer Corporation, Omaha, NE; Comverse Network Systems, Plano, TX; DDI, Tokyo, Japan; Ericsson, San Diego, CA; Fujitsu, Kawasaki, Japan; Hewlett Packard, Grenoble Cedex 9, France; Hyundai Electronics, Ichon, Kyounki-do, Republic of Korea; IBM Corporation, Somers, Republic of Korea; IP Mobile, Richardson, TX; LG Information & Communications, San Diego, CA; Lucent Technologies, Naperville, IL; Malibu Networks, El Dorado Hills, CA; Marconi Communications, Coventry, New Century Park, United Kingdom; Microsoft Communications, Redmond, WA; Mobile.com, Bellevue, WA; Motorola, Arlington Heights, IL; NARUS, Inc., Palo Alto, CA; NEC, Tokyo, Japan; Nokia Telecommunications, Irving, TX; Orange Pcs, Bradley Stoke, Bristol, United Kingdom; Portal Software, Cupertino, CA; Qualcomm, San Diego, CA; Samsung, Sungnam-Shi, Kyunggi-Do, Republic of Korea; Sharp Electronics Corporation, Nara, Japan; Siemens, Munich, Germany; SK TELECOM, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Solect, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sony SSA, San Diego, CA; Sprint, Overland Park, KS; Sun Microsystems, Palo Alto, CA; Synacom Technology, San Jose, CA; Tekelec, Morrisville, NC; Telefonica Moviles, Madrid, Spain; Telstra, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia; TIW, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Toshiba Corporation, Convent Station, NJ; Vodafone AirTouch, Walnut Creek, CA; VoiceStream Wireless, Carlsbad, CA; Wind, Rome, Italy; Hitachi, Yokohama, Japan; Nortel Networks, Richardson, TX; and Telcordia Technologies, Morriston, NJ. The nature and objectives of the venture are to advance the adoption of a single open mobile wireless internet architecture that enables seamless integration of mobile wireless telephony and internet based services (voice, data, video, web, etc.), meeting the needs of network operators and Internet service providers, and is independent of the wireless access technology.Start Signature
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-20307 Filed 8-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M