SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Executive Order 12866

This final rule has been determined to be non-significant under Executive Order 12866.

Executive Order 12372

The Food Stamp Program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance under No. 10.551. For the reasons set forth in the final rule and related notice(s) to 7 CFR Part 3015, Subpart V (48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983), this program is excluded from the scope of Executive Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local officials.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

This rule has been reviewed with regard to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601-602). Samuel Chambers, Jr. the Administrator of the FNS, has certified that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The rule would have almost no impact on the majority of applicant firms, since most applicants are legitimate food stores.

Paperwork Reduction Act

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the preamble of the proposed rule published on November 3, 1999 at 64 FR 59665 included a notice that announced our intent to submit revisions to the Office of Management and Budget relative to the information collection and associated burden hours imposed on retailers applying for participation in the FSP.

There are currently 3 forms approved under Office of Management and Budget No. 0584-0008. Each of these forms are used by retailers, wholesalers and meal services, including certain group living arrangements, shelters for battered women and treatment and rehabilitation programs for drug addicts and alcoholics, to apply to the FNS for authorization to accept and redeem food stamp benefits. Form FNS-252; Food Stamp Application for Stores, Form 252-2; Application to Participate in the FSP for Communal Dining Facility/Others; and Form FNS-252R; Food Stamp Application for Stores-Reauthorization. Section 9(c) of the Food Stamp Act of 1977, as amended, (7 U.S.C. 2018 (c)) provides the necessary authorization(s) to collect the information contained in these forms.

Comments were solicited for 60 days on the proposed increase in burden hours. No comments were received on the information collection proposal. The burden estimates as currently approved under OMB No. 0584-0008 through October 31, 2003 are shown on the following chart:

Executive Order 12988

This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule is intended to have a preemptive effect with respect to any State or local laws, regulations or policies which conflict with its provisions or which would otherwise impede its full implementation. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect unless so specified in the “Effective Date” paragraph of this preamble. Prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule or the application of its provisions, all applicable administrative procedures must be exhausted. These provisions are as follows: (1) For Program benefit recipients-State administrative procedures issued pursuant to 7 U.S.C. 2020(e)(10) and 7 CFR 273.15; (2) for State Agencies—administrative procedures issued pursuant to 7 U.S.C. 2023 set out as 7 CFR 276.7 (for rules related to non-quality control liabilities) or part 284 (for rules related to quality control liabilities: (3) for Program retailers and wholesalers—administrative procedures issued pursuant to 7 U.S.C. 2023 set out at 7 CFR 278.8.

Unfunded Mandate Analysis

Title II of the Unfunded Mandated Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) Pub. L. 104-04, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and the private sector. Under Section 202 of the UMRA, the Department generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with “Federal mandates that may result in expenditures to State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year. When such a statement is needed for a rule, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires the Department to identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt the least costly, more cost effective or least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule.

This final rule contains no Federal mandates under the regulatory provision of Title II of the UMRA for state, local and tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year. Thus, this rule is not subject to the requirements of Sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.

Executive Order 13132

FNS has analyzed this final in accordance with the principles set forth in Executive Order 13132.

As such, FNS has determined that the rule does not contain policies that have federalism implications as defined in the order and, consequently, a federalism impact statement is not required.

Background

On November 3, 1999, the FNS published a proposed rule (64 FR 59665) to improve the processing of applications from firms desiring to become authorized to accept and redeem food stamp benefits. The proposed rule sets forth four changes, two discretionary and two reflecting additional authorities provided under the Act, PRWORA Pub. L. 104-193. The ( printed page 52644) discretionary changes increase the timeframe within which FNS must approve or reject a firm's application from 30 days to 45 days and specify the types of documents firms might be asked to provide. Such documentation may include, but is not limited to, State and local business licenses, photographic identification cards, bills of sale, deeds, leases, sales contracts, State certificates of incorporation and invoice records. Section 833 of PRWORA authorized the Department to require that applicant firms sign a release form allowing FNS to verify the accuracy of information submitted by firms. This section also provided that FNS may request the submission of tax records. These changes to existing food stamp law were intended to prevent the authorization of firms which do not qualify for participation in the FSP. Additionally, as provided for in another final rule published on April 30, 1999 at 64 FR 23165, FNS has the authority to require that a retail food store or wholesale food concern be visited to confirm eligibility prior to authorization or reauthorization of such firm. The Department wishes to emphasize that applicant firms or firms applying for reauthorization must cooperate with the store visit requirements.

The public was provided a 60-day period to submit comments on the proposed provisions. One commentor, a major nonprofit retail trade association, submitted comments. The major concerns raised by the commentor are discussed below.

Application Processing Timeframes

The two major comments provided by the commentor relate to the subject of application processing. The first comment suggested that, when on-site visits are not required, the application process should be continued and completed within 30 days instead of the extended period of 45 days. Although this rule provides FNS with the authority to use the full 45-day time period when it is needed, authorizations of qualified firms are completed more quickly whenever possible to avoid or minimize delay. Therefore, determinations on stores not requiring an on-site visit will likely be completed in less than 45 days.

The second comment suggested that no on-site visits should be necessary for reputable retailers. The commentor defines “reputable” retailers as those that are well-known and familiar to the Agency. Further, the commentor states that authorization of well-known, reputable retailers within 30 days will ensure the broadest selection of retailers as quickly as possible. The Department expects that most applicant retailers are honest, reputable business persons or entities. Applications from such individuals (or business entities) applicants will continue to be processed in a timely fashion. Visits to stores will be made as circumstances require in the best interests of the FSP.

Accordingly, 7 CFR Part 278 is amended as follows:

1. The authority citation for Part 278 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2011-2036.

2. In § 278.1:

a. Paragraph (a) is amended by removing the last sentence and adding three new sentences in its place; and

b. The introductory text of paragraph (b) is revised.

The revisions read as follows:

3. In § 278.9, a new paragraph (m) is added to read as follows: