The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is considering the issuance of an order under 10 CFR 50.80 approving the indirect transfer of Facility Operating Licenses Nos. NPF-41, NPF-51, and NPF-74 for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (Palo Verde), Units 1, 2, and 3, respectively, to the extent held by El Paso Electric Company (EPE), one of seven joint owners or lessees of Palo Verde. The indirect transfers would occur in connection with a proposed corporate restructuring of EPE. The Commission is also considering approving conforming license amendments to reflect the proposed renaming of EPE, which is part of the restructuring plan for EPE. The facility is located in Maricopa County, Arizona.
According to a July 6, 2000, application filed by EPE, which was supplemented by a letter dated July 7, 2000, submitted by counsel for EPE, and a conforming amendment application dated October 3, 2000, submitted by Arizona Public Service Company, the licensed operator of Palo Verde, the proposed indirect transfers of the Palo Verde licenses as held by EPE would be to a newly created holding company, El Paso Electric Incorporated. El Paso Electric Incorporated will be created to implement the public utility restructuring requirements of the New Mexico Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999, SB 428, NMSA 1978, §§ 62-3A-1 through 23 (1999) (the “Restructuring Act”). The proposed restructuring encompasses the formation of El Paso Electric Incorporated, EPE becoming a direct subsidiary of El Paso Electric Incorporated, and a change in EPE's name to MiraSol Generating Company. Also, EPE will transfer its transmission and distribution assets to a new transmission and distribution company.
Arizona Public Service Company would remain as the managing agent for the joint owners or lessees of the facility and would continue to have exclusive responsibility for the management, operation, and maintenance of Palo Start Printed Page 65886Verde. The application does not propose a change in the rights, obligations, or interests of the other licensees of Palo Verde. In addition, no physical changes to Palo Verde or operational changes are being proposed.
By letter dated October 3, 2000, Arizona Public Service Company submitted the associated conforming amendments request. The proposed amendments would reflect the change in the name of El Paso Electric Company to MiraSol Generating Company in the licenses.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80, no license, or any right thereunder, shall be transferred, directly or indirectly, through transfer of control of the license, unless the Commission shall give its consent in writing. The Commission will approve an application for the indirect transfer of a license if the Commission determines that the underlying transaction that will effectuate the indirect transfer will not affect the qualifications of the holder of the license, and that the transfer is otherwise consistent with applicable provisions of law, regulations, and orders issued by the Commission pursuant thereto.
Before issuance of the proposed conforming license amendments, the Commission will have made findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's regulations.
As provided in 10 CFR 2.1315, unless otherwise determined by the Commission with regard to a specific application, the Commission has determined that any amendment to the license of a utilization facility which does no more than conform the license to reflect the transfer action involves no significant hazards consideration. No contrary determination has been made with respect to this specific license amendment application. In light of the generic determination reflected in 10 CFR 2.1315, no public comments with respect to significant hazards considerations are being solicited, notwithstanding the general comment procedures contained in 10 CFR 50.91.
The filing of requests for hearing and petitions for leave to intervene, and written comments with regard to the license transfer application, are discussed below.
By November 22, 2000, any person whose interest may be affected by the Commission's action on the application may request a hearing, and, if not the applicants, may petition for leave to intervene in a hearing proceeding on the Commission's action. Requests for a hearing and petitions for leave to intervene should be filed in accordance with the Commission's rules of practice set forth in Subpart M, “Public Notification, Availability of Documents and Records, Hearing Requests and Procedures for Hearings on License Transfer Applications,” of 10 CFR Part 2. In particular, such requests and petitions must comply with the requirements set forth in 10 CFR 2.1306, and should address the considerations contained in 10 CFR 2.1308(a). Untimely requests and petitions may be denied, as provided in 10 CFR 2.1308(b), unless good cause for failure to file on time is established. In addition, an untimely request or petition should address the factors that the Commission will also consider, in reviewing untimely requests or petitions, set forth in 10 CFR 2.1308(b)(1)-(2).
Requests for a hearing and petitions for leave to intervene should be served upon counsel for EPE, David B. Raskin, Esq., Steptoe & Johnson LLP, 1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036; the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555 (e-mail address for filings regarding license transfer cases only: OGCLT@NRC.gov); and the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff, in accordance with 10 CFR 2.1313.
The Commission will issue a notice or order granting or denying a hearing request or intervention petition, designating the issues for any hearing that will be held and designating the Presiding Officer. A notice granting a hearing will be published in the Federal Register and served on the parties to the hearing.
As an alternative to requests for hearing and petitions to intervene, by December 1, 2000, persons may submit written comments regarding the license transfer application, as provided for in 10 CFR 2.1305. The Commission will consider and, if appropriate, respond to these comments, but such comments will not otherwise constitute part of the decisional record. Comments should be submitted to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff, and should cite the publication date and page number of this Federal Register notice.
For further details with respect to this action, see the license transfer application filed by EPE dated July 6, 2000, the supplemental letter dated July 7, 2000, from counsel for EPE, and the application for the proposed license amendments filed by the Arizona Public Service Company dated October 3, 2000, which are available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland, and accessible electronically through the ADAMS Public Electronic Reading Room link at the NRC Web site http://www.nrc.gov.Start Signature
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day of October 2000.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Girija S. Shukla,
Project Manager, Section 2, Project Directorate IV & Decommissioning Division of Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 00-28125 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P