On September 2, 1999, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD” or “Association”), through its wholly owned subsidiary, NASD Regulation, Inc. (“NASD Regulation”), submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”)  and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, a proposed rule change relating to performance fee arrangements.
The Federal Register published the proposed rule change for comment on July 21, 2000. The Commission received no comments on the proposed rule change. On January 31, 2001, the Association submitted an amendment to the proposed rule change. This order approves the proposed rule change and grants accelerated approval to Amendment No. 1. The Commission is also soliciting comment on Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
NASD Rule 2330(f) prohibits members and persons associated with members from sharing in customer account profits and gains except under certain conditions. Subparagraph (f)(1)(A) permits sharing in customer account profits and gains where the firm has authorized it and the sharing is proportionate to the member's or associated person's contributions to the account. Subparagraph (f)(2) permits, under certain conditions, members or registered representatives to charge a performance fee (an advisory fee based on a percentage of the capital gains or capital appreciation of an account). Currently, NASD Rule 2330(f)(2) permits the receipts of a performance fee only if: (i) The member or associated person reasonably believes that the customer account meets certain minimum net worth ($1,000,000) or amount invested ($500,000) requirements; (ii) the member or associated person obtains the prior written authorization of the arrangement from the member carrying the account; (iii) the member or associated person reasonably believes that the customer is able to understand the compensation arrangement and its risks; (iv) the compensation agreement is in writing; (v) the member or associated person reasonably believes that the agreement is an arm's length agreement; (vi) the compensation formula takes into account realized and accrued gains and losses over a period of at least one year; and (vii) the member discloses all material information relating to the agreement, including method of compensation and potential conflicts of interest.
According to NASD Regulation, the requirements of NASD Rule 2330(f)(2) have always closely tracked the requirements of Rule 205-3 under the Advisers Act. However, effective August 20, 1998, the Commission amended Rule 205-3 to provide greater flexibility in structuring performance fee arrangements with clients who are financially sophisticated or have the resources to obtain sophisticated financial advice regarding these arrangements. Because the NASD had incorporated the requirements of Rule 205-3 into NASD Rule 2330(f)(2), when the Commission amended Rule 205-3, NASD Rule 2330(f)(2) was no longer consistent with Rule 205-3.
In order to restore consistency, the proposed rule change would permit members and their associated persons Start Printed Page 11624that act as investment advisers to share in customer account profits and gains subject to the provisions of Rule 205-3 under the Advisers Act. The NASD amended Rule 2330(f)(2), to eliminate the conditions set forth in the rule and to incorporate the terms of Rule 205-3, as may be amended from time to time. The NASD stated that this approach represents a decision by the Board to incorporate whatever performance-based standard the Commission may adopt from time to time. Thus, in the future, the proposed rule will conform to any subsequent amendments by the Commission to Rule 205-3. NASD Regulation will notify its members of any subsequent amendments to Rule 205-3 in a Notice to Members within 90 days of the amendment.
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities association, and, in particular, the requirements of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act. The Commission believes that proposed rule change should continue to ensure that NASD members enter into performance fee arrangements only with clients who are financially sophisticated or have the resources to obtain sophisticated financial advice regarding performance fee arrangements. The Commission also believes that cross-referencing Advisers Act Rule 205-3, rather than duplicating the specific provisions of Rule 205-3 in NASD Rule 2330(f)(2), will ensure that NASD Rule 2330(f)(2) remains consistent with Advisers Act Rule 205-3. The Commission notes that otherwise, NASD members acting as investment advisers might be subject to conflicting rules on the same subject. Finally, the Commission believes that NASD Regulation's commitment to issue a Notice to Members within 90 days of any amendments to Advisers Act Rule 205-3 should ensure that members remain aware of the requirements for performance fee arrangements.
The Commission finds good cause for approving Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after publication in the Federal Register. The Commission notes that Amendment No. 1 clarifies that the proposal applies to members acting as investment advisers and cross-references Advisers Act Rule 205-3. The Commission believes that Amendment No. 1 will make the requirements of NASD Rule 2330(f)(2) more clear and, therefore, should help to ensure that members comply with the rule. Accordingly, the Commission finds good cause to accelerate approval of Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change, consistent with Sections 15A(b)(6)  and 19(b)  of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether Amendment No. 1 is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the NASD. All submissions should refer to the File No. SR-NASD-99-42 and should be submitted by March 19, 2001.
For the foregoing reasons, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the amended proposed rule change (SR-NASD-99-42) is approved.Start Signature
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
4. Letter from Alden S. Adkins, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, NASD Regulation, to Katherine A. England, Assistant Director, Division of Market Regulation, Commission, dated January 30, 2001 (“Amendment No. 1”). Amendment No. 1 amends NASD Rule 2330(f)(2) to clarify that the rule applies to members or persons associated with members that act as investment advisers, whether or not registered as such, and to add a cross-reference to Rule 205-3 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”). Amendment No. 1 also states that NASD Regulation will notify its members of amendments to Rule 205-3 within 90 days through a Notice to Members.Back to Citation
5. See Investment Advisers Act Release No. 1731 (July 15, 1998), 63 FR 39022 (July 21, 1998).Back to Citation
6. Telephone conversation between Alden S. Adkins, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, NASD Regulation, and Katherine A. England, Assistant Director, Commission (October 27, 2000).Back to Citation
7. See Amendment No. 1, supra note 4.Back to Citation
8. In approving the proposal, the Commission has considered its impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 01-4594 Filed 2-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M