This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
U.S. International Trade Commission.
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge's (“ALJ's”) initial determination (“ID”) granting complainants' motion for summary determination that they satisfy the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement of 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(3).Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Timothy P. Monaghan, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3152. Start Printed Page 18507End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
The Commission instituted this patent-based section 337 investigation on August 17, 2000, based on a complaint filed by Intel Corp. (“Intel”) and Level One Communications, Inc. (“Level One”). The respondent named in the investigation is Altima Communications, Inc. (“Altima”).
On March 16, 2001, complainants Intel and Level One moved pursuant to Commission rule 210.18 for summary determination that they satisfy the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement of section 337 for U.S. Letters Patent Nos. 5,608,341 and 5,742,603. The Commission investigative attorney supported the motion. Altima opposed the motion.
On March 16, 2001, the ALJ granted the motion for summary determination. No petitions for review were filed.
This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and Commission rule 210.42, 19 C.F.R. 210.42. Copies of the public version of the ALJ's ID and all other nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov)._ The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS-ON-LINE) at http://dockets.usitc.gov/eol/public.Start Signature
Issued: April 2, 2001.
By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
[FR Doc. 01-8584 Filed 4-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P