This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
Notice of enforcement policy.
This notice of enforcement policy announces to the public the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA's) intent to rigorously enforce its existing regulations governing flight crewmember rest requirements that are presently codified at 14 CFR 121.471. These regulations have been in existence since 1985, and it is the FAA's intention to ensure that the current rules, as interpreted, are followed by those whose conduct they govern. Accordingly, this notice publishes the FAA's long-standing construction of 14 CFR 121.471 and affords notice to affected certificate holders and flight crewmembers of the FAA's intent to enforce its rules in accordance with these interpretations. This policy statement is being given so those affected will have an opportunity to review their practices and, if necessary, come into full regulatory compliance.
This notice of enforcement policy is effective on May 17, 2001.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alberta Brown, Air Transportation Division, AFS-200, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-8166.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
The Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938 (52 Stat. 1007; as amended by 62 Stat. 1216, 49 U.S.C. 551) and subsequently the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (now codified at 49 U.S.C. 40101 et seq.) addressed the issue of regulating flight crewmember hours of service. The FAA's governing statute empowers and directs the Secretary of Transportation to establish “regulations in the interest of safety for the maximum hours or periods of service of airmen and other employees of air carriers.” 49 U.S.C. 44701(a)(4). The statue further provides the FAA with the authority to prescribe “regulations and minimum standards for other practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce and national security.” 49 U.S.C. 44701(a)(5).
The FAA's rules at 14 CFR 121.471(b) and (c) set forth flight time limitations and rest requirements for domestic operations. These provisions state:
Section 121.471—Flight time limitations and rest requirements: All flight crewmembers
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no certificate holder conducting domestic operations may schedule a flight crewmember and no flight crewmember may accept an assignment for flight time during the 24 consecutive hours preceding the scheduled completion of any flight segment without a scheduled rest period during that 24 hours of at least the following:
(1) 9 consecutive hours of rest for less than 8 hours of scheduled flight time.
(2) 10 consecutive hours of rest for 8 or more but less than 9 hours of scheduled flight time.
(3) 11 consecutive hours of rest for 9 or more hours of scheduled flight time.
(c) A certificate holder may schedule a flight crewmember for less than the rest required in paragraph (b) of this section or may reduce a scheduled rest under the following conditions:
(1) A rest required under paragraph (b)(1) of this section may be scheduled for or reduced to a minimum of 8 hours if the flight crewmember is given a rest period of at least 10 hours that must begin no later than 24 hours after the commencement of the reduced rest period.
(2) A rest required under paragraph (b)(2) of this section may be scheduled for or reduced to a minimum of 8 hours if the flight crewmember is given a rest period of at least 11 hours that must begin no later than 24 hours after the commencement of the reduced rest period.
(3) A rest required under paragraph (b)(3) of this section may be scheduled for or reduced to a minimum of 9 hours if the flight crewmember is given a rest period of at least 12 hours that must begin no later than 24 hours after the commencement of the reduced rest period.
(4) No air carrier may assign, nor may any flight crewmember perform any flight time with the air carrier unless the flight crewmember has had at least the minimum rest required under this paragraph.
In June 1999, FAA issued a notice of enforcement policy related to this rule. In that notice, the FAA clarified that the rules were applicable to all pilots operating in domestic scheduled operations. In December, 1999, FAA conducted a comprehensive review of air carrier scheduling practices and found that with one exception all operators were in compliance with the rule.
Interpretations of Rest Requirements
In part in response to the FAA's earlier focus on air carrier compliance with the flight and rest rules, the chairman of a national pilots union sent the FAA a letter posing a set of circumstances and inquiring about the applicability of 14 CFR 121.471 (b) and (c) to various scenarios. The FAA issued a response that reflects the agency's long-standing construction of these regulatory provisions. That response is attached to this notice. In substance, the FAA reiterated that each flight crewmember must have had a minimum of 8 hours of rest in any 24 hour period that includes flight time. In addition, the interpretation reiterated that if a pilot's actual rest was less than 9 hours in the 24 hour period that included flight time, the next rest period must be lengthened to provide for the appropriate compensatory rest. The substance of the FAA response is contained in the Appendix.
After the interpretation was issued, many operators questioned whether this was consistent with earlier FAA interpretations. FAA met with representatives of the airlines as well as with organizations that represent them. At the meeting, the representatives stated that their approved scheduling systems had not been tracking the actual rest that a pilot had received in a 24-hour period that included flight time. The operators expressed concern that applying the rule as interpreted could reduce safety. They suggested that a pilot should not be diverted from important preflight and taxi-out duties by the need to constantly monitor whether he or she has had sufficient rest to finish the flight. They were particularly concerned about what might happen when there has been a lengthy ground delay and the flightcrew or the aircraft dispatcher determines that the flight cannot be completed within the rest requirements.
FAA met with representatives of the pilots unions. The pilots stated that in the vast majority of cases pilots are receiving the amount of rest required by the rule. However, they suggested that in a small number of operations it was possible that when a pilot completed his or her assigned flight schedule, he or she may have had less than 8 hours of rest in the preceding 24-hour period.
To ensure that the application of the rule would have no consequences that would reduce safety, the FAA considered all these concerns and all the information provided by the operators and the pilot unions. Although there may be some impacts to schedules and some delayed operations, FAA believes that safe operations require that a flight crewmember has a minimum of 8 hours rest in a 24 hour period that includes flight time. In addition, that flight crewmember must receive additional rest in the next rest period to compensate for any potential fatigue.Start Printed Page 27549
Compliance and Enforcement Plan
The FAA intends to rigorously enforce these regulations governing flight time restrictions and rest requirements. Accordingly, any noncompliance with the regulation should be corrected without delay.
For any air carriers that are not currently in compliance with these regulations, the FAA intends to take into consideration the certificate holder's good faith efforts to come into compliance in determining what, if any, enforcement action is appropriate if noncompliance is discovered. With regard to violations by individual flight crewmembers, the FAA will consider the circumstances of each case, including such factors as the employing certificate holder's effort to come into compliance and the culpability of the individual.
While the FAA reserves the right to take appropriate action to address regulatory noncompliance, particularly in egregious circumstances, the FAA does not intend to target its inspection resources on this compliance issue at this time. However, this notice serves to advise air carriers, flight crewmembers, and the public that on [insert date (6 months from publication date)] the FAA intends to begin a comprehensive review of certificate holders' flight scheduling practices and expects to deal stringently with any violations discovered.Start Signature
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 14, 2001.
Acting Associate Administrator for Regulation and Enforcement.
Facts: A crew is assigned reserve standby duty commencing at 0600. They are then called at 0900 to check in for a flight assignment at 1100.
|End of rest||Report at||Release at||Sched. rest||Look-back rest|
|Day 1 0600||1100||2100||10:00||9:00|
|Day 2 0700||0700||1700||12:00||10:00|
In the above example, assume that the crew was assigned to three segments with a total of less than 8 hours of flying in each duty period and that the scheduled block-in of the last flight of each day is 15 minutes prior to release. This original schedule does not require compensatory rest. I note, preliminarily, that your letter states that I should assume that the flight crew “was assigned to three segments with a total of less than 8 hours of flying in each duty period.” I assume that by that statement you mean “less than a total of 8 hours of scheduled flight time for the three flight segments, on both Day 1 and Day 2.” Based on that assumption, the regulations that I will apply are those that require a minimum of 9 consecutive hours of scheduled rest (section 121.471(b)(1)) that may be reduced to a minimum of 8 hours with a minimum of 10 hours compensatory rest that must begin no later than 24 hours after the commencement of the reduced rest (section 121.471(c)(1) (the “reduced/compensatory rest” exception)). I have also made other assumptions or clarifications that are described in my responses below.
Situation 1: On Day 1, all goes according to plan on the first two segments. However, after leaving the gate on the third segment, the crew encounters an unanticipated ground delay that results in only an 8 hour, 45 minutes look-back rest period upon termination at destination.
1. Is compensatory rest now required upon landing?
Response: You do not provide specific details on what is the termination time of the last flight segment. (I assume that by “termination at destination” you mean the “termination of the last flight segment.”) However, you state, above, that the flight crew would only receive an 8 hours and 45 minutes look-back rest period. I therefore assume that the termination of that last flight segment, based on the other factual details you provide above, was at 2115. Looking back 24 hours from 2115 on Day 1 to 2115 on the day prior to Day 1, one finds only 8 and three quarters consecutive hours of rest in the period 2115 (of the day prior to Day 1) to 0600 hours (on Day 1).
The only situation in which a certificate holder may reduce the minimum 9 hour required rest period is to utilize the “reduced/compensatory rest” exception that allows certificate holders the flexibility to adjust scheduled rests in the event of late arrivals. Thus, a certificate holder may reduce the required scheduled rest so that one finds a minimum look-back rest of 8 consecutive hours on termination of the last flight segment, as well as provide the required compensatory rest. In your scenario, the certificate holder could reduce the required minimum 9 consecutive hours of scheduled rest to 8 and three-quarters hours. However, the certificate holder must also provide the flight crewmember with a compensatory rest period of at least 10 hours that must begin no later than 24 hours after commencement of the reduced rest period. In your scenario, that compensatory rest must begin at 2115 on Day 1, since the reduced rest begins at 2115 on the day before Day 1.
2. In the case of a ground delay prior to take-off, would the crew and certificate holder be correct in using planned flight time and taxi-in time in determining the scheduled arrival time?
Response: The FAA requires the crew and the certificate holder to use the actual expected flight time and taxi-in time, based on the specific conditions that exist on the day, to determine the scheduled arrival time for purposes of determining whether a flight should be commenced. For example, if an airline has published a flight time of three hours, but knows that the actual time the flight will take is four hours because of weather, ground delays, etc., then the FAA requires the carrier to use four hours for purposes of calculating the arrival time. On the other hand, if the air carrier has scheduled a flight for three hours, but on the day in question, it is reasonable to conclude that flight time would only be two and a half hours, the carrier may use two and a half hours to calculate the arrival time.
3. If the ground delay continues to the point that the look-back rest is reduced below 8 hours, can the crew continue? If so, what are the rest requirements upon arrival?
Response: The flight may not take off if the look-back rest period is reduced to less than 8 hours. There must be at least an eight-hour look-back rest period. The eight-hour minimum reduced rest may not be further reduced under any circumstance.
4. If a ground delay, that would result in a late arrival that would not provide at least 8 hours of look-back rest is known by the certificate holder and/or crew prior to gate departure, can the crew depart legally based upon the published scheduled flight time?
Response: No. As stated above, the FAA requires the crew and the certificate holder to use the actual expected flight time and taxi-in time, based on the specific conditions that exist on the day, to determine the scheduled arrival time for purposes of determining whether a flight should be commenced. If the actual expected flight time is longer than the carrier originally calculated in determining the scheduled arrival time, then the actual expected flight time must be used in determining the look-back rest period.
Situation 2. On Day 1, the crew is late inbound on the second segment which results in not being able to leave the gate on the third and last segment on time. As a result, the look-back would now provide 8 hours and 45 minutes rest in the previous 24, based on the scheduled duration of the final segment.
1. Is compensatory rest now required upon arrival?
Response: Yes. Compensatory rest would be required upon arrival at the third destination. See the discussion in my response to question 1 of Situation 1 above.
2. If the crew were further delayed so that they could not depart to provide at least 8 hours of look-back rest upon arrival, could they depart legally?Start Printed Page 27550
Response: No. If, when using the actual expected flight time, the carrier cannot find at least 8 hours of look-back rest upon arrival, then the flight may not depart, under the FAA regulations. See my response to question 3 of Situation 1 above.
3. If there is a known ground stop for the destination of the final segment, which would result in look-back rest of only 7 hours and 45 minutes, can the crew legally leave the gate? If they are off the gate when the ground stop occurs, can they continue?
Response: If it is known, or reasonably should be known, that the flight time will be extended because of ground stops at the destination airport, then this information must be included in determining the actual expected flight time. If, when this information is factored in, it is known or should be known that arrival based upon the actual expected flight time will not result in at least 8 hours of look-back rest, then the flight may not leave the gate. If the flight is away from the gate, but is not yet in the air, then the flight may not take off. If the ground stops at the destination airport do not become known until after the flight is in the air, the FAA will not, as a matter of enforcement policy, take enforcement action against the flight crewmember or the certificate holder for a violation of the regulations, provided the ground stops at the destination airport are an unforeseen delay beyond the control of the certificate holder and the full, required minimum reduced rest and the compensatory rest are given at the completion of the flight segment.
4. Should the scheduled arrival time in 3 above be based upon published scheduled flight time or flight planned duration (flight time plus taxi time)?
Response: Arrival time in 3 above should be based on flight planned duration, i.e., the actual expected flight time based on the conditions existing on the day in question. Also, I am not sure what you mean by “published scheduled flight time.” If you mean scheduled flight time as published in the Official Airline Guide (OAG), such flight time may be unrealistically high. Sometimes a certificate holder might overestimate the duration of a flight in order to have some cushion in the schedule and be able to report an on-time arrival. The actual realistic flight time (block to block time) may be less than such “published scheduled flight time” in the OAG.
5. Would the reason for the crew being late on the second flight (beyond the control of the air carrier or not) have any bearing on the rest requirement?
Response: I assume that your question is whether section 121.471(g) (the “circumstances beyond the control of the certificate holder” exception) excuses a rest violation. No. That exception applies only to the scheduling of flight time. It is inapplicable to, and does not excuse, a violation of a rest requirement. Also see my response to question 1 of Situation 1 in which I discuss the use of the “reduced/compensatory rest” exception, its purpose, and compliance with its terms.
Situation 3: On Day 1, one of the carrier's hubs is impacted by a weather system in the morning. As a result, the carrier decides to delay all remaining departure times that day out of the hub.
1. If a departure so delayed would result in a crew having look-back rest of less than 9 hours, would compensatory rest be required?
Response: Yes. (I assume that the look-back rest, which is less than 9 hours, would still be at least 8 hours.)
2. If the delay resulted in a crew having look-back rest of less than 8 hours, could a crew legally depart?
Response: No. The FAA would consider this flight to be in violation of the regulations.
Situation 4. The crew and air carrier know, prior to departure, that forecast winds or enroute weather are resulting in a flight plan for that segment that exceeds the normal duration published in the carrier's schedules.
1. Can the crew legally depart if the scheduled arrival time based on the flight plan would encroach upon or delay the required start of a compensatory rest period?
Response: I assume that the questions for Situation 4 relate to Day 1 and to the last flight segment. I am not sure what you mean by “published in the carrier's schedules.” See my response to question 4 in Situation 3 above. If you mean that the crew and certificate holder know, prior to take-off, that en route weather conditions will result in the flight taking longer than expected, then my answer is as follows. Even if the expected termination of the last flight segment would allow a minimum 8 consecutive hours look-back rest period, if the crew and certificate holder expect, prior to take-off, that the flight will infringe on the required start of the compensator rest period, the crew may not legally depart. Thus, although the actual flight time might exceed flight time limits and although exceeding flight time limits in these circumstances would be allowed under the “circumstances beyond the control of the certificate holder” exception, that exception does not permit an encroachment on reduced rest or compensatory rest below the minimums specified in the regulations.
2. If the original crewmember's schedule did not require compensatory rest, would compensatory rest be required if the scheduled arrival based upon the flight plan information resulted in the crewmember having less than 9 hours of look-back rest upon arrival?
Response: If, upon termination of the last segment, the look-back rest was actually less than 9 hours, then compensatory rest is required regardless of the scheduled arrival.
3. If the original crewmember's schedule did not require compensatory rest, would the crewmember be legal to depart if the scheduled arrival based upon the flight plan information resulted in the crewmember having less than 8 hours of look-back rest upon arrival?
Response: No. If, at the time of departure, it is calculated that a pilot will have less than 8 hours of look-back rest upon termination of the last flight segment, then the flight may not take off. The intention to give compensatory rest may not be used to permit a pilot to take a flight when it is known at the beginning of the flight that the pilot will have less than 8 hours of look-back rest upon termination of the last flight segment.End Supplemental Information
1. I note that the certificate holder could reduce the scheduled rest to a minimum of 8 hours.Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 01-12419 Filed 5-14-01; 2:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M