This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”), and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, notice hereby is given that on May 24, 2001, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Incorporated (“CHX” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons and to grant accelerated approval of the proposed rule change.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the CHX rules relating to: (a) The Exchange's SuperMAX 2000 price improvement algorithm, to permit price improvement of partial orders; and (b) automatic execution sequences and algorithms relating to the trading of Dual Trading System issues on the Exchange, to permit automatic execution of partial orders at the order sending firm's election. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend portions of Article XX, Rule 37(a) and (b) and to add an Interpretation and Policy relating to Article XX, Rule 37(h). The text of the proposed rule change is available from the Office of the Secretary of the CHX or the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received regarding the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item III below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the CHX rule provisions relating to: (a) The Exchange's SuperMAX 2000 price improvement algorithm, to permit price improvement of partial orders; and (b) automatic execution sequences and algorithms relating to the trading of Dual Trading System issues on the Exchange, to permit automatic execution of partial orders at the order sending firm's election. Both changes are intended to make the Exchange and its specialists better able to accommodate the rapidly changing demands of the marketplace relating to price improvement and automatic execution of orders.
a. Price Improvement of Partial Orders. The proposed change to Article XX, Rule 37(h), which governs the Exchange's SuperMAX 2000 price improvement algorithm, would permit a specialist who enables SuperMAX 2000 for an issue to price improve an entire order, or to provide differing levels of price improvement for different portions of the order. For example, in the case of a 1500 share order for issue XYZ, the proposed change to the price improvement algorithm would enable the specialist to provide price improvement of $.02 per share for the first 500 shares, $.01 per share for the next 500 shares, and no price improvement (i.e., execution at the BBO) for the last 500 shares. The differing levels of price improvement would be designated by the specialist and would be effected by a systems change, which the Exchange expects to implement October 1, 2001.
The purpose of the proposed rule change relating to the Exchange's SuperMAX 2000 price improvement algorithm is to increase the number of opportunities for customers to receive price improvement by permitting specialists to participate in SuperMAX 2000 without requiring them to price improve an entire order. Currently, the Exchange believes that there are specialists who might not desire to offer price improvement to large orders but may be willing to offer price improvement to portions of such orders; the amended rule would allow the specialist to provide the opportunity for more orders to receive price improvement (although in some cases to less than the entire order), while providing customers with more certainty that orders would receive price improvement up to the designated level(s).
b. Automatic Execution of Partial Orders for Dual Trading System Issues. The other proposed changes to Article XX, Rule 37 are designed to achieve consistency between Dual Trading System issues and Nasdaq/NM securities with respect to the automatic execution of orders. The Exchange anticipates that these changes will provide customers with greater certainty and speed of execution, and will eliminate any current confusion caused by differing automatic execution parameters.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend Article XX, Rule 37(b)(6), which governs the automatic execution rules relating to Dual Trading System issues. Under the current rule, if an order's size exceeds the automatic execution threshold, the entire order is placed in the specialist's book for manual execution. However, under the proposed amendment, customers could elect automatic execution of partial orders in instances where the size of the order is greater than the automatic execution threshold designated by the specialist. If the customer elects partial automatic execution, the order would be automatically executed up to the size of the automatic execution threshold, with the balance of the order placed in the specialist's book for manual execution. Start Printed Page 48075This feature has been available for Nasdaq/NM securities for several months and has been utilized by a number of customers; those customers who do not view partial executions as an advantage remain free to proceed under the current framework.
The Exchange also proposes to amend Article XX, Rule 37(a) and (b)(1) to make the automatic execution and auto acceptance thresholds designated by specialists for both Dual Trading System issues and Nasdaq/NM securities the same. Under the amended rule, the minimum automatic execution threshold for listed securities would be decreased to the current Nasdaq/NM level of 300 shares. Orders at or below the automatic execution threshold would be automatically executed regardless of the NBBO size. Specialists may also choose to automatically execute orders of a size greater than their automatic execution thresholds if the order size is less than or equal to the NBBO size. The automatic acceptance threshold for Nasdaq/NM securities would be increased to the current listed level of 5099 shares.
2. Statutory Basis
The CHX believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with section 6(b)  of the Act in general and in particular with section 6(b)(5)  in that it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any inappropriate burden on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments Regarding the Proposed Rule Change Received from Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington DC 20549-0609. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying at the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-CHX-2001-11 and should be submitted by October 9, 2001.
IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change
The Commission has reviewed carefully the Exchange's proposed rule change and believes for the reasons set forth below, that the proposal is consistent with the requirements of section 6(b) of the Act, and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange. Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with section 6(b)(5) of the Act  in that it will facilitate transactions in securities, promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market. The Commission believes that the proposed rule change will enable specialists to provide price improvement to customer orders using the CHX's automated system.
Further, the Commission notes that it approved a proposed rule change on October 13, 2000 implementing the same changes with respect to trading in Nasdaq/NM securities. That proposed rule change was published for comment, and the Commission received no comments. Therefore, the Commission finds good cause to approve the proposed rule change before the thirtieth day after the date of publication of notice of the filing as it will enable customers to receive price improvement sooner, and because the substance of the proposed rule change, as it applies to Nasdaq/NM securities, has already been subject to public comment.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the proposed rule change is hereby approved on an accelerated basis.Start Signature
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
3. On October 13, 2000, the Commission approved the Exchange's proposed rule change relating to automatic execution of orders for Nasdaq/NM securities. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 43443 (October 13, 2000), 65 FR 63660 (October 24, 2000). The approved rule change included provisions relating to automatic execution of partial orders for Nasdaq/NM securities and the automatic execution threshold established by the CHX specialist.Back to Citation
8. See note 3, supra.Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 01-23155 Filed 9-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M