On October 15, 2001, the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”), and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, a proposed rule change establishing the fees for its NYSE OpenBook service. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on October 29, 2001. The Commission received one comment letter on the proposed rule change. This order approves the proposed rule change.
I. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
A. Proposed Fees for NYSE OpenBook Service
The Exchange proposes to establish certain fees for its NYSE OpenBook service. NYSE OpenBook is a compilation of limit order data that the Exchange will provide to market data vendors, broker-dealers, private network providers, and other entities through a data feed. According to the Exchange, for every limit price, NYSE OpenBook will include the aggregate order volume. The Exchange will make the NYSE OpenBook data feed available through the Exchange's Common Access Point (“CAP”) network. Initially, the Exchange will update NYSE OpenBook every ten seconds.
The Exchange has proposed two fees. First, the Exchange proposes to collect a fee equal to $5,000 per month from each entity that elects to receive the NYSE OpenBook data feed. Second, the Exchange proposes to collect an end-user fee of $50.00  per month for each terminal through which the end user is able to display the NYSE OpenBook.
B. NYSE OpenBook Service Agreements
The Exchange will require each NYSE OpenBook data feed recipient to enter into the existing form of “vendor” agreement. That agreement will authorize the data feed recipient to provide NYSE OpenBook display services to its customers or to distribute the data internally. In addition, the Exchange represents that it will require each end-user that receives NYSE OpenBook displays from a vendor or broker-dealer to execute the existing “subscriber” agreement.
The Exchange intends to supplement the vendor agreements with additional terms that are unique to NYSE OpenBook. First, the vendor agreements prohibit a data feed recipient that redisseminates the NYSE OpenBook outside of its organization from enhancing, integrating, or consolidating the redisseminated NYSE OpenBook data with limit order data of other markets or trading systems (i.e., the data feed recipient may only redisseminate the display of the NYSE's OpenBook in a separate “window”  marked “NYSE OpenBookTM”). A vendor, however, may place other markets' limit order displays on the same page as the NYSE OpenBook window. This restriction only applies to vendors that redisseminate the NYSE OpenBook outside of their organization. It does not apply to those entities that receive the data feed for their own internal use. In other words, data feed recipients will be permitted to enhance, integrate, or consolidate the NYSE OpenBook data with other markets' or trading systems' limit order data for their own internal use.
Second, the vendor agreement precludes a data feed recipient from retransmitting the NYSE OpenBook data feed. Thus, any entity that wishes to receive the data feed so that it may enhance, integrate, or consolidate the data with other markets' data for its own internal use must obtain the data feed from the NYSE. The Exchange, however, Start Printed Page 64896has represented that once it and the marketplace gains experience with the product, the Exchange will permit retransmission of the NYSE OpenBook data feed by vendors.
II. Summary of Comments
The Commission received one comment letter on the proposal. Generally, the commenter supports the Exchange's efforts in making its depth-of-book information available to investors as soon as possible. However, the commenter believes that the fee structure and the restrictions on how the NYSE OpenBook data can be used are unreasonable and unfairly discriminate against individual retail investors.
The commenter believes that the proposed fee structure deprives retail investors of equal and fair access to the same type of information as institutions and professionals because the proposed end-user fee is prohibitively expensive. Therefore, the commenter believes that retail firms, and in particular, firms with a large online retail client base, are placed at an unfair competitive disadvantage to firms that cater to institutional investors or serve their clients solely through telephone and in-person service. The commenter also states that the NYSE did not justify or attempt to explain the reasonableness of the $50 per device or end-user fee. Therefore, without a cost-effective alternative for retail investors, the commenter believes that the proposal does not meet investor protection standards.
In addition, the commenter states that the proposal unduly restricts the availability of critically important market data on a fair and equal basis. The commenter believes that the restrictions on the form and content of OpenBook would result in retail investors getting an inferior information product than would be available to institutions and professionals because retail investors would only receive a one-size-fits-all information product (i.e., the NYSE OpenBook display), as opposed to enhanced or consolidated market information.
In response to the commenter, the Exchange stated that the commenter's concerns generally focused on the absence of a retail online fee. The Exchange argued that as a product innovator, it was simply exercising its perogative to roll out NYSE OpenBook in phases, as dictated by demand.
After careful review, the Commission finds that the Exchange's proposed rule change to establish fees for NYSE OpenBook service is consistent with the requirements of the Act, and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange. In particular, the Commission finds that the fee proposal is consistent with section 6(b)(4) of the Act, which requires that exchange rules provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members, issuers, and other persons using its facilities.
Specifically, the Commission believes that the Exchange's proposed charges of $5,000 per month for receipt of the NYSE OpenBook data feed, and $50 per month for the end-user fee per terminal are reasonable when compared to similar types of service provided by other markets.
The Commission considered the commenter's concern that the Exchange's proposed fees unfairly discriminate against retail investors. The Exchange, however, has represented that as it gains experience with NYSE OpenBook, it may design a data product that is more suitable for use by registered representatives, and should ademand develop, it would consider designing a limit order data product for the retail, nonprofessional customer.
The Commission notes that this order only approves the filing submitted by the NYSE, for the fees for the NYSE OpenBook service. Therefore, the Commission is not approving or disapproving the terms of the NYSE's vendor or subscriber agreements. The NYSE's proposed restrictions on vendor redissemination of OpenBook data, including the prohibition on providing the full data feed and providing enhanced, integrated, or consolidated data found in these agreements are on their face discriminatory, and may raise fair access under the Act. 
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act,  that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2001-42) be, and it hereby is, approved.Start Signature
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to the delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
4. See Letter from W. Hardy Callcott, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Commission, dated November 20, 2001 (“Schwab Letter”).Back to Citation
5. The Exchange noted that although no other exchange currently offers a limit order data compilation, a few markets offer services that provide a point of reference. According to the Exchange, the Nasdaq Stock Market charges $50 per terminal for its Nasdaq Level II service for professional interrogation devices, which provides the best bid and offer from all market makers and ECNs (although it does not otherwise provide depth-of-book or depth-of-market information). The Exchange also believes that the London Stock Exchange charges $144-$219 per terminal for the price and size of limit orders in stocks that are included in the FTSE 250 index. Further, the Exchange believes that the Toronto Stock Exchange charges $30 per terminal for its order books.Back to Citation
6. The “window” requirement does not literally require a separate window, only separate displays. In other words, a vendor could format multiple displays in a single window.Back to Citation
7. See Schwab Letter, note 4, supra.Back to Citation
8. The commenter questioned whether the restriction on redissemination applied only to the redissemination of the data feed itself for whether it was a complete ban on external redistribution of the OpenBook display. The NYSE clarified that the restriction on redissemination applied only to the redissemination of the data feed.Back to Citation
9. In approving this rule, the Commission has considered its impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).Back to Citation
11. See note 5, supra.Back to Citation
12. For a complete discussion of the relevant provisions of the Act, see Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44962 (October 19, 2001), 66 FR 54562 (October 29, 2001).Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 01-30879 Filed 12-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M