Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), Labor.
Final rule; stay of effectiveness.
The Mine Safety and Health Administration is staying the effectiveness of certain provisions of the final rule addressing “Diesel Particulate Matter Exposure of Underground Metal and Nonmetal Miners,” published in the Federal Register on January 19, 2001 (66 FR 5706) and amended on February 27, 2002 (67 FR 9180). Start Printed Page 47297
This document stays the effectiveness of 30 CFR 57.5060(d), 57.5060(e), 57.5060(f), and 57.5062. Section 57.5060(d) permits miners to work in areas where diesel particulate matter exceeds the applicable concentration limit with advance approval from the Secretary; § 57.5060(e) prohibits the use of personal protective equipment to comply with the concentration limits; and § 57.5060(f) prohibits the use of administrative controls to comply with the concentration limits. Section 57.5062 addresses the diesel particulate matter control plan.
Effective July 20, 2002, MSHA is staying § 57.5060(d), § 57.5060(e), § 57.5060(f), and § 57.5062 until completion of further rulemaking to address these provisions.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marvin W. Nichols, Director; Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances; MSHA, 1100 Wilson Boulevard, Room 2313, Arlington, Virginia 22209-2296. Mr. Nichols can be reached at nichols-marvin@MSHA.gov (e-mail), 202-693-9442 (Voice), or 202-693-9441 (fax).End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
On January 19, 2001, MSHA published a final rule addressing diesel particulate matter (DPM) exposure of underground metal and nonmetal miners (66 FR 5706). The final rule establishes new health standards for underground metal and nonmetal mines that use equipment powered by diesel engines and, among other things, requires operators of underground mines to train miners about the hazards of being exposed to DPM. The effective date of the rule was listed as March 20, 2001 (66 FR 5706). Section 57.5060 of the rule establishes an interim concentration limit of 400 micrograms of total carbon per cubic meter of air to become applicable after July 19, 2002, and a final concentration limit of 160 micrograms to become applicable after January 19, 2006 (66 FR 5706, 5708, 5907).
On January 29, 2001, Anglogold (Jerritt Canyon) Corp. and Kennecott Greens Creek Mining Company filed a petition for review of the rule in the District of Columbia Circuit. On February 7, 2001, the Georgia Mining Association, the National Mining Association, the Salt Institute, and MARG Diesel Coalition filed a similar petition in the Eleventh Circuit. On March 14, 2001, Getchell Gold Corporation petitioned for review of the rule in the District of Columbia Circuit. The three petitions have been consolidated and are pending in the District of Columbia Circuit. The United Steelworkers of America (USWA) has intervened in the Anglogold case.
While these challenges were pending, the Anglogold petitioners filed with MSHA an application for reconsideration and amendment of the final rule and to postpone the effective date of the final rule pending judicial review. The Georgia Mining petitioners similarly filed with MSHA a request for an administrative stay or postponement of the effective date of the rule.
On March 15, 2001 MSHA delayed the effective date of the rule until May 21, 2001, in accordance with a January 20, 2001 memorandum from the President's Chief of Staff (66 FR 15032). The delay was necessary to give Department officials the opportunity for further review and consideration of new regulations. Ibid. On May 21, 2001 (66 FR 27863), MSHA published a notice in the Federal Register delaying the effective date of the final rule until July 5, 2001. The purpose of this delay was to allow the Department the opportunity to engage in further negotiations to settle the legal challenges to this rule.
II. Outcome of First Partial Settlement
As a result of a partial settlement agreement, MSHA published two documents in the Federal Register on July 5, 2001, addressing the January 19, 2001 DPM final rule. One document (66 FR 35518) delayed the effective date of § 57.5066(b) regarding the evidence and the tagging provisions of the Maintenance standard; clarified the effective dates of certain provisions of the final rule; and gave correction amendments.
The second document (67 FR 9180) addressed a proposed rule to clarify § 57.5066(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the maintenance standards and to add a new paragraph (b)(3) to § 57.5067 regarding the transfer of existing equipment from one underground mine to another underground mine. MSHA finalized these changes to the January 19, 2001 rule and published them in the Federal Register on February 27, 2002 (67 FR 9180). The final rule was effective on March 29, 2002.
Also, MSHA agreed to conduct joint sampling with industry and labor at 31 underground mines to determine existing concentration levels of DPM; assess the performance of the SKC sampler and the NIOSH Analytical Method 5040; assess the feasibility of achieving compliance with the standard's concentration limits at the 31 mines; and, to assess the impact of interferences on the sample in the metal and nonmetal underground mining environment before the limits established in the final rule become effective. Sampling and data analyses are completed, and MSHA is in the process of developing the final report.
III. Outcome of Second Partial Settlement
Settlement negotiations continued on the remaining unresolved issues in the litigation. On July 15, 2002, the parties signed an agreement that is the basis for this Federal Register document delaying certain effective dates.
As of July 20, 2002, MSHA will enforce the following provisions of the final rule as published on January 19, 2001 (66 FR 5706): § 57.5060(a), addressing the interim concentration limit of 400 micrograms of total carbon per cubic meter of air; § 57.5061, addressing compliance determinations; and § 57.5071, addressing environmental monitoring. MSHA will continue to enforce § 57.5065, Fueling practices; § 57.5066, Maintenance standards; § 57.5067, Engines; § 57.5070, Miner training; and § 57.5075, Diesel particulate records, as they relate to the requirements of the rule that are in effect on July 20, 2002.
The settlement agreement provides as follows:
To settle the DPM litigation now pending in the D.C. Circuit, the parties agree as follows:
The industry parties contend that the interim standard of 400 micrograms per cubic meter is not justified or feasible to achieve at the majority of mines with engineering controls alone, and will pose significant compliance problems and necessitate the availability of agency-approved time extensions, based on individual mine conditions. They further contend that the final standard of 160 micrograms per cubic meter of air must be revoked because it is not feasible under any foreseeable circumstances, even taking into consideration its delayed implementation. The United Steelworkers of America (“the union”) contend that the interim standard is feasible and that it should remain in effect. They also contend that achievement of the 160 micrograms per cubic meter of air standard is feasible. In light of these divergent positions, and in consideration of practical compliance questions raised during the joint industry/labor/government study, the parties will take the steps set forth below.
I. MSHA Actions With Respect to the DPM Standard for Underground Metal and Nonmetal Mines
§ 57.5060 Limit on Concentration of Diesel Particulate Matter
a. The interim concentration limit restricting total carbon to 400 micrograms per cubic meter of air becomes effective on July 20, 2002. Start Printed Page 47298
b. As discussed below, MSHA will issue citations for violations of the interim concentration limit only after MSHA and NIOSH are satisfied with the performance characteristics of the SKC sampler and the availability of practical mine worthy filter technology and MSHA has had the opportunity to train inspectors, conduct baseline sampling and provide compliance assistance at underground metal and nonmetal mines using diesel-powered equipment. MSHA will consult with NIOSH, industry and labor representatives on the performance of the SKC sampler and the availability of practical mine worthy filter technology. The following timetable is MSHA's current projection for its efforts to implement the interim concentration limit:
- July 20, 2002-July 19, 2003—MSHA MNM compliance specialists will provide compliance assistance to underground MNM operators covered by the standard. Compliance assistance will be in the form of DPM baseline sampling (compliance assistance only; results not citable) and information on feasible DPM controls, including practical mine worthy filters. During this period operators shall develop and implement a suitable written compliance strategy for their mines. MSHA will retain the discretion to take appropriate enforcement actions against operators who refuse either to cooperate in good faith with MSHA's compliance assistance, or to take good faith steps to develop and implement a written compliance strategy for their mines. MSHA will provide guidance on steps an operator may take—such as sampling to determine DPM levels, developing a plan to control emissions, and ordering engineering controls—to demonstrate good faith and thereby avoid citations.
- After July 19, 2003—MSHA MNM compliance specialists will issue citations for failure to comply with the 400 micrograms per cubic meter of air interim limit.
c. Throughout this implementation schedule, MSHA will continue to work with NIOSH to make sure the performance characteristics of the SKC sampler are satisfactory and with equipment manufacturers, mine operators, and representatives of miners to improve practical mine worthy filter technology, including the availability of after-treatment control technology for diesel powered engines, particularly for engines of less than 50 hp and 250 hp or greater.
d. After appropriate consultations and clearances, MSHA will publish a notice of proposed and expedited rulemaking to change the surrogate to elemental carbon for both the interim standard and the final standard which takes effect after January 19, 2006. Among the factors to be considered, MSHA will consider technological and economic feasibility in determining an appropriate final standard including the data from the Joint MSHA/Industry Study: Determination of DPM Levels in Underground Metal and Nonmetal Mines (Joint Study).
e. Section 57.5060(c) allows mine operators to apply for additional time to come into compliance with the final concentration limit due to technological constraints. MSHA will publish a notice of proposed and expedited rulemaking, proposing to adapt this provision to the interim concentration limit as well, include consideration of economic feasibility, and to allow for annual renewals of such special extensions, upon application to and approval by the Secretary. It is anticipated that this rulemaking will be concluded before July 20, 2003.
f. Section 57.5060(d) permits miners engaged in specific activities such as inspection, maintenance, or repair activities, with the advance approval of the Secretary, to work in concentrations of DPM that exceed the interim and final limits. Section 57.5060(e) limits the circumstances under which personal protective equipment may be used to comply with the DPM concentration limits and § 57.5060(f) prohibits the use of administrative controls. In conjunction with the rulemaking for changing the surrogate, MSHA will publish a notice of proposed rulemaking to amend these three provisions, as follows: MSHA will continue to require mine operators to establish, use and maintain all feasible engineering control methods. Consistent with MSHA's longstanding enforcement policy for its existing exposure-based standards applicable to metal and nonmetal mines, MSHA will require mine operators to supplement feasible engineering and administrative control methods with personal protective equipment, in the event that controls do not reduce the concentration level to the required limit or are not feasible or do not produce significant reductions in DPM exposures. As a part of this rulemaking, MSHA will consider the advisability of requiring periodic application to the Secretary, before respirators are used. Rotation of employees will not be allowed as an administrative control for compliance with this standard.
Section 57.5061 Compliance Determinations
a. To implement § 57.5061(a) MSHA will consider a single personal sample an adequate basis for a compliance determination. It is MSHA's intent to provide maximum assistance to operators to help them achieve compliance with both the interim and final limits of the DPM standard. When MSHA begins to fully enforce the DPM standard, it will issue a citation as it does for all other contaminant sampling under the M/NM standards. MSHA expects the mine operator to begin the abatement process by first looking at routine steps to improve DPM exposure levels. MSHA will resample at the request of an operator who has taken such abatement steps to see what progress has been made to lower compliance levels. If an operator has taken additional samples which indicate possible compliance, MSHA will resample with an additional single sample and if that sample is in compliance MSHA will accept that the violation has been abated. If routine and usually effective steps such as improved maintenance, administrative controls or the implementation of a standard filter program do not achieve abatement, MSHA, at the operator's request, will assign the mine for a technical compliance evaluation. That evaluation will include a mine visit, observation of mining equipment including installed controls and multiple samples to determine what additional feasible steps will achieve compliance or achieve substantial reductions toward compliance. However, if Technical Support has previously evaluated the same piece of equipment in substantially similar circumstances, it will make an abbreviated evaluation of the steps needed to reasonably assure compliance.
b. MSHA will employ an enforcement policy for the interim concentration limit that will use elemental carbon (EC) as an analyte to ensure that a citation based on the 400 micrograms per cubic meter of air limit of TC is valid and not the result of interferences. Under this policy, MSHA would first develop an appropriate error factor to account for variability in sampling and analysis from such things as pump flow rate, filters, and the NIOSH 5040 method. If the TC measurement is below 400 micrograms per cubic meter of air plus the error factor (for example, 440 if the error factor is determined to be 10%), MSHA's policy would be not to issue a citation. MSHA will consult with industry and labor representatives before establishing an appropriate error factor.
c. If the TC measurement is above the error factor level, however, MSHA would look at the EC measurement from the sample, obtained through the NIOSH 5040 method, and multiply EC by a factor of 1.3 to produce a statistical estimate of what TC should be without interferences. If the TC measurement is above this estimate, as a matter of enforcement discretion, MSHA would not issue a citation when the EC measurement times the multiplier is below the error factor level. (For example, 440 if the error factor is determined to be 10%.)
The 1.3 multiplier that MSHA will use to estimate TC (i.e., EC × 1.3 = estimated TC) is derived from NIOSH's determination that TC is 60-80% EC.
MSHA will announce its enforcement policy in a program policy letter.
d. To implement § 57.5061(c), MSHA will conduct personal sampling for purposes of making compliance determinations for the interim and final concentration limits.
Section 57.5062 Diesel Particulate Matter Control Plan
Together with the proposed rulemaking for changing the surrogate, MSHA will publish a notice of proposed rulemaking to revise § 57.5062.
Other Provisions of the DPM Standard
While taking the steps discussed above, MSHA will continue to enforce provisions of the final rule currently in effect, which address fueling practices, maintenance of diesel-powered equipment, engine requirements, miner training, and recordkeeping. See 67 FR 9180 (Feb. 27, 2002); 66 FR 35518 (July 5, 2001).
II. Parties' Actions in Litigation
The parties note that provisions of the DPM standard will not be deleted until they are modified or superseded by new rulemaking.
MSHA will inform the court of this settlement agreement. The parties will subsequently file a signed agreement Start Printed Page 47299dismissing the pending DPM litigation upon completion of the rulemakings described in the settlement above (Case Nos. 01-1046, 01-1124, and 01-1146 (D.C. Cir.)) pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). Each party will bear its own costs and fees.
IV. Stay of Effectiveness
As a result of the parties' settlement negotiations, MSHA has determined that the provisions subject to a stay should be revised and has developed an enforcement policy for the interim concentration limit that involves extensive compliance assistance. A stay of the provisions is necessary to prevent confusion while MSHA carries out this enforcement policy. A stay should not decrease protection of miners and may further a full settlement of the court challenge. Accordingly, this stay meets the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 705 which states, “When an agency finds that justice so requires, it may postpone the effective date of action taken by it pending judicial review.”)
By a separate document in the Federal Register, MSHA will initiate rulemaking on these provisions.Start Signature
Dated: July 16, 2002.
Dave D. Lauriski,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Mine Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 02-18310 Filed 7-17-02; 1:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 4510-43-P