This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
Written comments and papers are requested to be submitted on or
Table of Contents
Enhanced Content - Table of Contents
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
360
as of
10/17/2026 at 4:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), U.S. Department of Commerce
ACTION:
Notice, Request for Comments
SUMMARY:
Section 101 of the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, Pub. L. No. 106-229,
codified at15 U.S.C. 7001et seq.
(“ESIGN” or “the Act”), preserves the legal effect, validity, and enforceability of signatures and contracts relating to electronic transactions and electronic signatures used in the formation of electronic contracts. 15 U.S.C. 7001(a). Section 103 (a) and (b) of the Act, however, provides that the provisions of section 101 do not apply to contracts and records governed by statutes and regulations regarding court documents; probate and domestic law matters; state commercial law; consumer law covering utility services, residential property foreclosures and defaults, and insurance benefits; product recall notices; and hazardous materials documents. Section 103 of the Act also requires the Secretary of Commerce, through the Assistant Secretary for Communications, to review the operation of these exceptions to evaluate whether they continue to be necessary for consumer protection, and to make recommendations to Congress based on this evaluation. 15 U.S.C. 7003(c)(1). This Notice is intended to solicit comments from interested parties for purposes of this evaluation, specifically on the health and life insurance cancellation notices exception to the ESIGN Act.
See15 U.S.C. 7003(b)(2)(C). NTIA will publish separate notices requesting comment on the other exceptions listed in section 103 of the ESIGN Act.[1]
DATES:
Written comments and papers are requested to be submitted on or before February 10, 2003.
ADDRESSES:
Written comments should be submitted to Josephine Scarlett, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, 14th Street and Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230. Paper submissions should include a three and one-half inch computer diskette in HTML, ASCII, Word, or WordPerfect format (please specify version). Diskettes should be labeled with the name and organizational affiliation of the filer, and the name of the word processing program used to create the document. In the alternative, comments may be submitted electronically to the following electronic mail address:
esignstudy_insnot@ntia.doc.gov. Comments submitted via electronic mail also should be submitted in one or more of the formats specified above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For questions about this request for comment, contact: Josephine Scarlett, Attorney, Office of the Chief Counsel, NTIA, 14th Street and Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone (202) 482-1816 or electronic mail:
jscarlett@ntia.doc.gov. Media inquiries should be directed to the Office of Public Affairs, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, at (202) 482-7002.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act
Congress enacted the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, Pub. L. No. 106-229, 114 Stat. 464 (2000), to facilitate the use of electronic records and signatures in interstate and foreign commerce and to remove uncertainty about the validity of contracts entered into electronically. Section 101 requires, among other things, that electronic signatures, contracts, and records be given legal effect, validity, and enforceability. Sections 103(a) and (b) of the Act provides that the requirements of section 101 will not apply to contracts and records governed by statutes and regulations regarding: probate and domestic law matters; state commercial law; consumer law covering utility services, residential default and foreclosure notices; insurance benefits cancellation notices; product recall notices; and hazardous materials documents.
The statutory language providing for an exception to section 101 of ESIGN for health and life insurance cancellation notices is found in section 103(b)(2)(C) of the Act:
(b) Additional Exceptions.—
The provisions of section 101 shall not apply to—
* * * *
(2) any notice of—
* * * *
(C) the cancellation or termination of health insurance or benefits or life insurance benefits (excluding annuities)—
* * * *
The statutory language requiring the Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information to submit a report to Congress on the results of the evaluation of the section 103 exceptions to the ESIGN Act is found in section 103(c)(1) of the Act as set forth below.
(c) Review of Exceptions.—
(1) Evaluation required.—
The Secretary of Commerce, acting through the Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information, shall review the operation of the exceptions in subsections (a) and (b) to evaluate, over a period of 3 years, whether such exceptions continue to be necessary for the protection of consumers. Within 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Assistant Secretary shall submit a report to Congress on the results of such evaluation.
Health and Life Insurance Cancellation Notices
Information regarding life and health insurance rates and benefits is widely distributed through electronic means, including Internet websites and facsimiles. The ESIGN Act exception for life and health insurance cancellation notices excludes insurance cancellation notices sent to consumers by an
( printed page 75850)
electronic method from the operation of the statute. The rules and regulations governing termination and cancellation notices for life and health insurance benefits are governed, in part by Federal law, but primarily by state law.
The Department of Labor, Pension Welfare Benefits Administration (PWBA), and the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS), have Federal regulatory authority for the distribution of information regarding life and health insurance to Federal employees and to Medicare and Medicaid recipients. As early as 1997, before the passage of ESIGN, these agencies proposed rules to allow the release of information regarding health and life insurance benefits in electronic format.
See, e.g.,62 FR 16979 (April 8, 1997). Since that time, both agencies have conducted rulemaking proceedings to incorporate standards for the electronic transmission of certain health insurance information. The CMS adopted standards for electronic transactions regarding health plans, health care clearinghouses, and certain health care providers in August 2000.
See65 FR 50312 (August 17, 2000). CMS recently proposed an amendment to its rules to improve Medicare and Medicaid programs, and the efficiency and effectiveness of the health care system in general by encouraging the development of a health information system through the establishment of standards and requirements for the electronic transmission of certain health insurance information.
See67 FR 38050 (May 31, 2002). The CMS's regulations require health providers and organizations to provide: written notice to Medicare enrollees of the termination of a risk contract; notice by mail to Medicare enrollees of a health maintenance organization (HMO) or covered medical provider's (CMP) intention not to renew a contract; and 60 days' notice of a contract termination initiated by the HMO or CMP.
See42 CFR 417.488(a), 417.492(a)(ii), and 417.494(b)(iv)(4).
The Labor Department's PWBA also recently issued regulations governing the disclosure of pension and health plan information through electronic media.
See67 FR 17264 (April 9, 2002). Under new rules that became effective on October 9, 2002, the administrator of a group health plan may furnish certain documents to plan enrollees, beneficiaries, and other persons entitled to the information using electronic media.
See29 CFR 2520.104b-1(c).
With respect to state laws, some states' regulations require health and life insurance companies to provide written notice to policyholders before the effective date of a policy cancellation or nonrenewal. For example, the Florida statute provides that a health insurance provider must provide the insured written notice at least 45 days prior to cancellation or nonrenewal. Fla.Stat. § 408.909(7) (2002). The South Carolina Code provides that an insurer must give an insured at least 31 days' written notice of nonrenewal of a health insurance policy. S.C. Code Ann. § 38-71-335.
The use of electronic means to transmit health and life insurance cancellation notices, therefore, would represent a departure from Federal and state rules that require companies to transmit information in writing through postal delivery. Approximately forty-three states have used section 102(a)(1) of ESIGN to adopt electronic transactions laws that incorporate or exclude state-exclusive areas from the application of the state's electronic transactions law.
See
National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws at
http://www.nccusl.org/nccusl/LegislativeByState.pdf.
Of the states that have passed these laws, several have expressly excluded health and life insurance cancellation notices from the operation of the state electronic transactions laws.[2]
For example, North Carolina's electronic transaction law provides that the law does not apply to “any notice of the cancellation or termination of health insurance or benefits, or life insurance or benefits, excluding annuities.”
See
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 66-313(e)(3) (2000). A large number of the remaining states have passed state uniform electronic transactions laws that do not contain language that expressly excludes health and life insurance cancellation notices. These states' statutes may contain general provisions, however, that makes the substantive insurance law controlling, which requires an examination of the insurance codes in these states to determine whether electronic health and life insurance cancellation notices are legally valid. Information regarding changes in state or Federal law to allow electronic transmission of cancellation notices for life and health insurance would assist in the evaluation of whether consumers would be adequately protected if the life and health insurance cancellation notices exception is eliminated from the ESIGN Act.
The ESIGN Section 103 Evaluation
The ESIGN Act directs the Assistant Secretary of Communications and Information to conduct an evaluation of whether the exceptions set out in section 103 of the Act continue to be necessary for the protection of consumers, and to submit a report to Congress on the results of the evaluation no later than June 30, 2003. The Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information is the chief administrator of NTIA. As the President's principal advisor on telecommunications policies pertaining to the Nation's economic and technological advancement, NTIA is the executive branch agency responsible for developing and articulating domestic and international telecommunications policy.
The ESIGN section 103 evaluation is intended to examine the current status of Federal and state regulations that govern, and practices of companies that issue life and health insurance cancellation notices, in preparation for a report to Congress on whether this exception remains necessary to protect consumers. This evaluation is not a review or analysis of Federal and state regulations and rules relating to life and health insurance cancellation notices for the purpose of recommending changes to those regulations, but to advise Congress of the current state of law, practice, and procedure regarding this issue. Comments filed in response to this Notice should not be considered to have a connection with or impact on ongoing specific Federal and state procedures or rulemaking proceedings concerning life and health insurance cancellation notices.
Invitation to Comment
NTIA requests that interested parties, including members of the bar, courts and consumer representatives, submit written comment on any issue of fact, law, or policy that may assist in the evaluation required by section 103(c). We invite comment from all parties that may be affected by the removal of the life and health insurance cancellation notices exception from the ESIGN Act including, but not limited to, state agencies and organizations, national and state bar associations, consumer advocates, and insurance or benefits law practitioners. The comments will assist NTIA in evaluating the potential impact of the removal of this exception from
( printed page 75851)
ESIGN on consumers, insurers, practitioners, and state electronic transactions laws. The following questions are intended to provide guidance as to the specific subject areas to be examined as a part of the evaluation. Commenters are invited to discuss any relevant issue, regardless of whether it is identified below.
1. What methods, if any, are available to protect health and life insurance consumers if the exception for life and health insurance cancellation notices is eliminated from the ESIGN Act? Discuss.
2. Discuss state and municipal health and life insurance regulations, laws, and ordinances that require written notice to consumers for cancellation or termination of insurance benefits.
3. Discuss any state regulations that allow companies to transmit health and life insurance cancellation notices by electronic methods.
4. How would the removal of the insurance cancellation notices exception to ESIGN affect health and life insurance consumers? How would the removal of the exception affect the provision of notice by health and life insurance companies to their customers? Please discuss.
5. What effect would the removal of the exception have on current state and Federal policies concerning cancellations of life and health insurance? Discuss.
6. If the ESIGN Act is amended to eliminate the health and life insurance cancellation notice exception, what other changes, if any, should be made to the Act to maintain consumer protection laws? What changes would be necessary, if any, to maintain current state and Federal policies concerning the content and timing of health and life insurance termination and cancellation notices?
7. What are the benefits for health and life insurance customers, and insurance companies that may result from electronic notice of cancellation of insurance benefits?
8. List any issues regarding delivery, timing, authentication, and privacy for health and life insurance benefits cancellation notices that can and should be resolved prior to removal of the exception from the Act?
9. Discuss current electronic methods that are used to provide life and health insurance information to customers(e.g., executed contracts, quotes provided, benefits statements).
10. Describe any consumer protection mechanisms employed by companies that use electronic methods to transmit health and life insurance information to consumers.
11. Have states and companies developed electronic notification procedures for the transmission of health and life insurance information? If so, discuss:
a. the receipt verification procedures that have been implemented;
b. regulations that have been updated to reflect electronic signature technologies; and
c. current state regulations that require the retention of a separate paper copy.
12. Discuss any other issues (such as privacy and state consumer protection laws) that may be affected if insurance cancellation notices are included under the requirements of section 101 of the ESIGN Act.
Please provide copies of studies, reports, opinions, research or other empirical data referenced in the responses.
Dated: December 4, 2002.
Kathy D. Smith,
Chief Counsel, National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
Footnotes
1.
Comments submmitted in response to
Federal Register
notices requesting comment on the other exceptions to ESIGN will be considered as part of the same section 103 evaluation and not as part of a separate review of the Act.
2.
The following states have enacted electronic transactions laws that include an exception for health and life insurance cancellation notices: Alabama, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey, New Mexico, and North Carolina.
See e.g.,
Md Code Ann., Com. Law § 21-201(B)(4)(III); N.C. Gen. Stat. § 66-313(E)(3) (2001); and National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws,
available athttp://www.nccusl/legislativebystate.pdf.