Skip to Content


Draft Low Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for the Folsom Professional Centre, Sacramento County, CA

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble


Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.


Notice of availability.


Catlin Folsom Crossing, L.P. (the “applicant”) has applied to the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for a 3-year incidental take permit for one covered species pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). The application addresses the potential for “take” of the threatened valley elderberry longhorn beetle (Desmoncerus californicus dimorphus) (beetle) associated with construction of a two-story office condominium building within a 5.59-acre undeveloped parcel located on Blue Ravine Road, in Folsom, Sacramento County, California. This project is known as the Folsom Professional Centre. A conservation program to minimize and mitigate for the project activities would be implemented as described in the Folsom Professional Centre Low Effect Habitat Conservation Plan (Plan), which would be implemented by the applicant.

We are requesting comments on the permit application and on the preliminary determination that the Plan qualifies as a “Low-effect” Habitat Conservation Plan, eligible for a categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended. The basis for this determination is discussed in the Environmental Action Statement (EAS), which is also available for public review.


Written comments should be received on or before April 21, 2003.


Comments should be addressed to the Field Supervisor, Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, 2800 Cottage Way, W-2605, Sacramento, California 95825. Written comments may be sent by facsimile to (916) 414-6711.

Start Further Info


Ms. Vicki Campbell, Chief, Conservation Planning Division, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office; telephone: (916) 414-6600.

End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information


Availability of Documents

Individuals wishing copies of the application, Plan, and EAS should immediately contact the Service by telephone at (916) 414-6600 or by letter to the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office. Copies of the Plan, and EAS also are available for public inspection, during regular business hours, at the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES); Catlin Properties, 3620 Fair Oaks Blvd., Suite 150, Sacramento, California 95864; and City of Folsom, Planning, Zoning, and Development Department, 50 Natomas Street, Folsom, California 95630-2696.

Background Information

Section 9 of the Act and its implementing Federal regulations prohibit the take of animal species listed as endangered or threatened. Take is defined under the Act as harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture or collect listed animal species, or attempt to engage in such conduct (16 U.S.C. 1538). However, under section 10(a) of the Act, we may issue permits to authorize incidental take of listed species. “Incidental take” is defined by the Act as take that is incidental to, and not the purpose of, carrying out an otherwise lawful activity. Regulations governing incidental take permits for threatened and endangered species, respectively, are found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 50 CFR 17.22 and 50 CFR 17.32.

The applicant is seeking a permit for take of the beetle during the life of the permit. This species is referred to as the “covered species” in the Plan.

The project encompasses construction of a two-story office building and parking lot on the 5.59-acre project site. The building would consist of individual condominium office units. The resident elderberry shrubs would be removed to accommodate the new office building and parking lot. The project Start Printed Page 13945site contains habitat (e.g., elderberry shrubs) for the beetle. Construction of the proposed project would result in the removal of 6 elderberry shrubs, with 24 stems greater than 1-inch diameter at ground level, which have been determined to be habitat for the beetle. One beetle exit hole was found in these six shrubs. The project site does not contain any other rare, threatened, or endangered species or habitat. No critical habitat for any listed species occurs on the project site.

The applicant proposes to minimize and mitigate the effects to the covered species associated with the covered activities by fully implementing their Plan. The purpose of the Plan's conservation program is to promote the biological conservation of the covered species, the beetle. The applicant will minimize and mitigate the impacts of taking the beetle by transplanting the six elderberry shrubs that are currently on the construction site, and purchasing between 6 to 20 credits at a Service approved Conservation Bank. Each credit includes an established ratio of elderberry seedlings and native riparian plant seedlings. The number of credits purchased will be based upon the date that the applicant would transplant the six elderberry shrubs to the Conservation Bank. Transplanting outside of the dormant period for elderberry shrubs, November 16th to February 15th, would increase impacts to the beetle. The adult beetles and larvae have a greater likelihood of being killed or injured as a result of the elderberry shrubs increased risk of mortality due to transplanting during the active growing season. Therefore, if the elderberry shrubs are transplanted during the active growing season, the number of credits purchased by the applicant would be toward the higher end of the 6 to 20 credit range.

The Proposed Action consists of the issuance of an incidental take permit and implementation of the Plan, which includes measures to minimize and mitigate impacts of the project on the beetle. Two alternatives to the taking of listed species under the Proposed Action are considered in the Plan. Under the No Action Alternative, no permit would be issued and the office building and parking lot would not be built. Under the Reduced Take Alternative, the office building and parking lot would be built but the size and scope would be reduced and fewer elderberry shrubs would be transplanted.

We have made a preliminary determination that the Plan qualifies as a “low-effect” plan as defined by the Habitat Conservation Planning Handbook (November 1996). Determination of Low-effect Habitat Conservation Plans is based on the following three criteria: (1) Implementation of the Plan would result in minor or negligible effects on federally listed, proposed, and candidate species and their habitats; (2) implementation of the Plan would result in minor or negligible effects on other environmental values or resources; and (3) impacts of the Plan, considered together with the impacts of other past, present and reasonably foreseeable similarly situated projects would not result, over time, in cumulative effects to environmental values or resources which would be considered significant. As more fully explained in our EAS, the Plan qualifies as a “low-effect” plan for the following reasons:

1. Approval of the Plan will result in minor or negligible effects on the beetle and its habitat. We do not anticipate significant direct or cumulative effects to the beetle resulting from development of the Folsom Professional Centre.

2. Approval of the Plan will not have adverse effects on unique geographic, historic or cultural sites, or involve unique or unknown environmental risks.

3. Approval of the Plan will not result in any cumulative or growth inducing impacts and, therefore, will not result in significant adverse effects on public health or safety.

4. The project does not require compliance with Executive Order 11988 (Floodplain Management), Executive Order 11990 (Protection of Wetlands), or the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, nor does it threaten to violate any Federal, State, local or tribal laws or requirement imposed for the protection of the environment.

5. Approval of the Plan will not establish a precedent for future action or represent a decision in principle about future actions with potentially significant environmental effects.

We, therefore, have preliminarily determined that approval of the Plan qualifies as a categorical exclusion under the NEPA, as provided by the Department of the Interior Manual (516 DM 2, Appendix 1 and 516 DM 6, Appendix 1). Based upon this preliminary determination, we do not intend to prepare further NEPA documentation. We will consider public comments in making the final determination on whether to prepare such additional documentation.

We are providing this notice pursuant to section 10(c) of the Act. We will evaluate the permit application, the Plan, and comments submitted thereon to determine whether the application meets the requirements of section 10(a) of the Act. If the requirements are met, we will issue a permit to Catlin Folsom Crossing, L.P. for the incidental take of the beetle from development of the Folsom Professional Centre. We will make the final permit decision no sooner than 30 days from the date of this notice.

Start Signature

Dated: March 14, 2003.

Ken McDermond,

Deputy Manager, Region 1, California/Nevada Operations Office, Sacramento, California.

End Signature End Supplemental Information

[FR Doc. 03-6771 Filed 3-20-03; 8:45 am]