This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”)  and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, notice is hereby given that on March 24, 2003, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”), through its subsidiary, the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (“Nasdaq”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Nasdaq has prepared. On March 28, 2003, the NASD submitted Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments from interested persons on the proposed rule change, as amended.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
Nasdaq proposes to establish a service bureau distributor fee for bandwidth enhancements of Computer-to-Computer Interface (“CTCI”) lines that are used to provide service bureau functionality. If the Commission approves the proposal, Nasdaq proposes to implement the rule change retroactively as of April 1, 2003. The text of the proposed rule change is below. Proposed new language is in italics.
7000. CHARGES FOR SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT
Rule 7010. System Services
(a)-(e) No change.
(f) Nasdaq WorkstationTM Service
(1) No change.
(2) The following charges shall apply for each CTCI subscriber:Start Printed Page 20190
|Dual 56kb lines (one for redundancy) and single hub and router|
|Dual 56kb lines (one for redundancy), dual hubs (one for redundancy), and dual routers (one for redundancy)|
|Dual T1 lines (one for redundancy), dual hubs (one for redundancy), and dual routers (one for redundancy). Includes base bandwidth of 128kb|
|Option 1, 2, or 3 with Message Queue software enhancement||Fee for Option 1, 2, or 3 (including any Bandwidth Enhancement Fee and Service Bureau Distributor Fee) plus 20%|
|Disaster Recovery Option:||$975/month|
|Single 56kb line with single hub and router. (For remote disaster recovery sites only.)|
|Bandwidth Enhancement Fee (for T1 subscribers only)||$600/month per 64kb increase above 128kb T1 base|
|Service Bureau Distributor Fee (for T1 subscribers only)||$3,400/month per 64kb increase above 128kb T1 base for lines used for service bureau functions|
|Installation Fee||$2000 per site for dual hubs and routers $1000 per site for single hub and router|
|Relocation Fee (for the movement of TCP/IP- $1700 per relocation capable lines within a single location)|
(g)(s) No change.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, Nasdaq included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it had received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
Nasdaq's CTCI network is a point-to-point dedicated circuit connection from the premises of brokerages and service providers to Nasdaq's Trumbull, Connecticut processing facilities. Through CTCI, firms are able to enter trade reports into Nasdaq's Automated Confirmation Transaction Service (“ACT”), orders into Nasdaq's transaction execution systems, and mutual fund pricing data into Nasdaq's Mutual Fund Quotation Service. The CTCI network operates over the Enterprise Wide Network II (“EWN II”) and provides connectivity over powerful 56kb and T1 data lines. In addition, the CTCI network uses the industry-standard Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (“TCP/IP”), a transmission protocol that Nasdaq describes as robust, efficient, and well known among the technical community.
Separately, Nasdaq has submitted filings to reduce the fee for CTCI bandwidth enhancements  from $4,000 to $600 per month for each 64 kilobit (“kb”) increment of additional bandwidth provided over a T1 CTCI line (above the base level of 128 kb). Nasdaq believes, however, that this price reduction should not be applied to T1 lines that are used to provide service bureau functionality. A service bureau is a firm (which may or may not be an NASD member) that connects to the systems of Nasdaq and other market centers and then offers its customers the ability to route orders to those market centers, in addition to providing the customers various order management, risk management, and regulatory compliance services. It is Nasdaq's understanding that service bureaus generally pass on the costs of connecting to Nasdaq and other market centers to their own customers. Nasdaq believes that, because a service bureau may use a single T1 line pair to provide market access to numerous customers, a service bureau is able to spread the costs of access across its entire customer base. In Nasdaq's view, the service bureau in effect acts as a distributor of access services. Accordingly, Nasdaq believes that an NASD member that accesses the Nasdaq market through a service bureau has generally paid a much lower price for connectivity than a member that connects directly to Nasdaq through T1 circuits. To help address this disparity, Nasdaq is proposing to establish a service bureau distributor fee, which would be applicable to additional bandwidth provided over T1 lines that are used for service bureau functionality. The proposed fee would be $3,400 for each 64 kb increase in bandwidth above the 128 kb base, and would be in addition to the bandwidth enhancement fee of $600 for each 64 kb increase. Accordingly, lines used for service bureau functionality would continue to be charged fees that are equivalent to those charged under the price schedule that has been in effect since 2001. The fee would be assessed Start Printed Page 20191on a line-by-line basis. Thus, a firm that used some lines to provide service bureau functionality while using other lines for its own use would identify its service bureau lines and would pay the fee only with respect to those lines.
Even after the implementation of this proposed rule change, it is likely that service bureau customers would pay less for connectivity to Nasdaq than firms that connect directly. Accordingly, Nasdaq will closely monitor connectivity costs and may make additional pricing modifications in the near future.
2. Statutory Basis
Nasdaq believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of section 15A of the Act, particularly subsection 15A(b)(5), because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any facility or system that the NASD operates or controls. Nasdaq believes that the proposed rule change would help to address an existing disparity between the charges paid by market participants for direct CTCI connections to Nasdaq and the much lower charges paid by market participants for access through service bureaus.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Nasdaq neither solicited nor received written comments with respect to the proposal.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
A. By order approve such proposed rule change, or
B. Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. In particular, the Commission requests comment on Nasdaq's proposal to implement the proposed rule change retroactively as of April 1, 2003. The Commission notes that the retroactive implementation of the proposed fee change would enable Nasdaq to charge for services that it has already rendered.
Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the NASD. All submissions should refer to file number SR-NASD-2003-50 and should be submitted by May 15, 2003.Start Signature
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
3. The proposed rule change is applicable to both NASD member and non-members.Back to Citation
4. The text is marked to show changes from the language of the rule as amended by SR-NASD-2003-43 (March 19, 2003) and SR-NASD-2003-46 (March 19, 2003).Back to Citation
5. The term “bandwidth” refers to the amount of data that can be transmitted over a CTCI line in one second. Accordingly, bandwidth enhancements allow a CTCI subscriber to send and receive a greater volume of data over a line.Back to Citation
6. See SR-NASD-2003-43 (March 19, 2003) (NASD members) and SR-NASD-2003-46 (March 19, 2003) (non-members).Back to Citation
7. For example, prior to the merger of Nasdaq Tools Inc. into Nasdaq, Nasdaq charged Nasdaq Tools Inc. for the use of CTCI lines in accordance with the pricing schedule contained in NASD Rule 7010(f), yet by spreading these costs among its customers, Nasdaq Tools Inc. was able to charge a pass-through fee of $265 per subscriber per month to users of its Tools Plus service bureau product. Following the merger of Nasdaq Tools Inc. into Nasdaq, Nasdaq continues to charge Tools Plus users this same price. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 46973 (December 9, 2002), 67 FR 77305 (December 17, 2002) (SR-NASD-2002-164). Nasdaq believes that other service bureaus pass on CTCI costs to their subscribers in a similar manner. Nasdaq also notes that because the cost of lines used for service bureau functionality will not change, a change in Tools Plus CTCI pricing is not warranted at this time. See id. at 77308-09.Back to Citation
8. Nasdaq believes that its proposal to charge a distributor fee is analogous to the proposed rule change that the Commission approved in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 45102 (November 26, 2001), 66 FR 59830 (November 30, 2001) (SR-NASD-2001-59), in which Nasdaq adopted a fee schedule for firms acting as distributors of historical market data that was higher than the fee schedule for persons purchasing the data without a license to redistribute it.Back to Citation
9. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 43821 (January 8, 2001), 66 FR 3627 (January 16, 2001) (SR-NASD-00-80); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44144 (April 2, 2001), 66 FR 18332 (April 6, 2001) (SR-NASD-00-81).Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 03-10097 Filed 4-23-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P