This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Rule
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
193
as of
10/08/2026 at 10:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCIES:
Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils) have agreed on a final rule amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to delete the cost principle concerning transportation costs and to revise the cost principles concerning cost of money, other business expenses, and deferred research and development costs.
DATES:
Effective Date:
June 23, 2003.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The FAR Secretariat, Room 4035, GS Building, Washington, DC 20405, (202) 501-4755, for information pertaining to status or publication schedules. For clarification of content, contact Mr. Edward Loeb at (202) 501-1224. Please cite FAC 2001-14, FAR case 2001-029.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register
at 67 FR 13072, March 20, 2002, with request for comments. Two respondents submitted public comments. The Councils considered all comments and concluded that the proposed rule should be converted to a final rule with the following changes to the proposed rule:
1. Revise the language at FAR 31.205-10(b)(1) to state that cost of money “is measured, assigned, and allocated to contracts in accordance with 48 CFR 9904.414 or measured and added to the cost of capital assets under construction in accordance with 48 CFR 9904.417, as applicable.”
2. Change the word “cost” in paragraph 31.205-10(b)(3) to “cost of money” to maintain clarity and consistency at FAR 31.205-10. A discussion of the comments is provided below:
Comment:
Respondent recommends that paragraph (a)(2) of FAR 31.205-10 be revised to state that cost of money “shall be treated like an incurred cost for cost-reimbursement purposes.”
Councils' response:
Do not concur. The Councils believe FAR 31.205-10(a)(1) of the proposed rule clearly specifies that cost of money is an imputed cost (as opposed to an incurred cost). Paragraph (a)(2) further states that, for cost-reimbursement purposes, this imputed cost is an “incurred cost.” The Councils do not believe this language would permit a contractor to argue that cost of money is not an imputed cost. In fact, the cost principle at FAR 31.205-10 has referred to cost of money as being, for cost-reimbursement purposes, an “incurred cost” since at least as early as 1984, but has also always specifically stated that it is actually an “imputed cost.”
Comment:
Respondent recommends revising the language in the proposed rule at FAR 31.205-10(b)(1) for cost of money that states “it is measured, assigned, and allocated to contracts in accordance with 48 CFR 9904.414 or 48 CFR 9904.417, as applicable.” Respondent notes that 48 CFR 9904.417—Cost of Money as an Element of the Cost of Capital Assets under Construction (CAS 417), addresses the measurement of cost of money attributable to assets being constructed rather than contract costs.
Councils' response:
Concur. The Councils revised the rule at paragraph (b)(1) to state that cost of money “is measured, assigned, and allocated to contracts in accordance with 48 CFR 9904.414 or measured and added to the cost of capital assets under construction in accordance with 48 CFR 9904.417, as applicable.”
Comment:
Respondent recommends revising FAR 31.205-10(b)(1) by changing the word “cost” to “imputed cost” or “cost of money,” to make it consistent with the other language in the cost principle.
Councils' response:
Concur. The Councils changed the word “cost” in paragraph (b)(3) to “cost of money.”
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review under Section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of Defense, the General Services Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration certify that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq., because most contracts awarded to small entities use simplified acquisition procedures or are awarded on a competitive, fixed-price basis, and do not require application of the cost principles discussed in this rule.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to the FAR do not impose information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501,
et seq.
Facilities capital cost of money
means “cost of money as an element of the cost of facilities capital” as used at 48 CFR 9904.414—Cost Accounting Standard—Cost of Money as an Element of the Cost of Facilities Capital.
(1) Is an imputed cost that is not a form of interest on borrowings (see 31.205-20);
( printed page 28092)
(2) Is an “incurred cost” for cost-reimbursement purposes under applicable cost-reimbursement contracts and for progress payment purposes under fixed-price contracts; and
(ii) Cost of money as an element of the cost of capital assets under construction (48 CFR 9904.417).
(b) Cost of money is allowable, provided—
(1) It is measured, assigned, and allocated to contracts in accordance with 48 CFR 9904.414 or measured and added to the cost of capital assets under construction in accordance with 48 CFR 9904.417, as applicable;
(2) The requirements of 31.205-52, which limit the allowability of cost of money, are followed; and
(3) The estimated facilities capital cost of money is specifically identified and proposed in cost proposals relating to the contract under which the cost is to be claimed.
(c) Actual interest cost in lieu of the calculated imputed cost of money is unallowable.
5. In section 31.205-28, revise the introductory text to read as follows:
7. Amend section 31.205-48 by revising the section heading to read as set forth above; and in the first sentence by removing the word “section” and adding “subsection” in its place.
(a) Facilities capital cost of money will be an allowable cost under the contemplated contract, if the criteria for allowability in FAR 31.205-10(b) are met. One of the allowability criteria requires the prospective Contractor to propose facilities capital cost of money in its offer.