National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
Notice of receipt of petition for decision that nonconforming 2002 Nissan Pathfinder 4 wheel drive multipurpose passenger vehicles (MPVs) are eligible for importation.
This document announces receipt by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that 2002 Nissan Pathfinder 4 wheel drive MPVs that were not originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards are eligible for importation into the United States because (1) they are substantially similar to vehicles that were originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States and that were certified by their manufacturer as complying with the safety standards, and (2) they are capable of being readily altered to conform to the standards.
The closing date for comments on the petition is December 3, 2003.
Comments should refer to the docket number and notice number, and be submitted to: Docket Management, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC 20590 (docket hours are from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.). Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit http://dms.dot.gov.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA, 202-366-3151.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not originally manufactured to conform to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards shall be refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle of the same model year that was originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States and certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and that the vehicle is capable of being readily altered to conform to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in the Federal Register.
Sunshine Car Import of Cape Coral, Florida (“Sunshine”) (Registered Importer 01-289) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether 2002 Nissan Pathfinder 4 wheel drive MPVs are eligible for importation into the United States. The vehicles that Sunshine believes are substantially similar are 2002 Nissan Pathfinder 4 wheel drive MPVs that were manufactured for importation into, and sale in, the United States and certified by their manufacturer as conforming to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
The petitioner claims that it carefully compared non-U.S. certified 2002 Nissan Pathfinder 4 wheel drive MPVs to their U.S.-certified counterparts, and found the vehicles to be substantially similar with respect to compliance with most Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
Sunshine submitted information with its petition intended to demonstrate that non-U.S. certified 2002 Nissan Pathfinder 4 wheel drive MPVs, as originally manufactured, conform to many Federal motor vehicle safety standards in the same manner as their U.S. certified counterparts, or are capable of being readily altered to conform to those standards.
Specifically, the petitioner claims that non-U.S. certified 2002 Nissan Pathfinder 4 wheel drive MPVs are identical to their U.S. certified counterparts with respect to compliance with Standard Nos. 102 Transmission Shift Lever Sequence, 103 Defrosting and Defogging Systems, 104 Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 109 New Pneumatic Tires, 113 Hood Latch Systems, 116 Brake Fluid, 124 Accelerator Control Systems, 135 Passenger Car Brake Systems, 201 Occupant Protection in Interior Impact, 202 Head Restraints, 204 Steering Control Rearward Displacement, 205 Glazing Materials, 206 Door Locks and Door Retention Components, 207 Seating Systems, 209 Seat Belt Assemblies, 210 Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages, 212 Windshield Retention, 216 Roof Crush Resistance, 219 Windshield Zone Intrusion, and 302 Flammability of Interior Materials.
Petitioner states that the vehicles are equipped with anti-theft devices that exempt them from the parts marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard found in 49 CFR part 541.
Petitioner also contends that the vehicles are capable of being readily altered to meet the following standards, in the manner indicated: Start Printed Page 62346
Standard No. 101 Controls and Displays: (a) Substitution of the word “Brake” for the ECE warning symbol as a marking for the brake failure indicator lamp; (b) replacement or conversion of the speedometer to read in miles per hour.
Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated Equipment: Inspection of all vehicles and replacement of noncompliant lighting system components with U.S-model parts on vehicles that are not already so equipped.
Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and Rims: Installation of a tire information placard.
Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirror: Inscription of the required warning statement on the face of the passenger side rearview mirror.
Standard No. 114 Theft Protection: Installation of a key warning buzzer, or reprogramming of the key lock system with U.S.-version software information to achieve compliance with the standard.
Standard No. 118 Power Window Systems: Inspection of all vehicles and installation, on vehicles that are not already so equipped, of a relay that will prevent the window transport from operating when the ignition is in the “off” position.
Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection: (a) Installation of a seat belt warning buzzer, wired to the seat belt micro switch; (b) inspection of all vehicles and installation of U.S.-model seat belts, driver's and passenger's air bags, knee bolsters, control unit, and sensors on vehicles that are not already so equipped. The petitioner states that the vehicles should be equipped with combination lap and shoulder belts at the front and rear outboard seating positions that are self-tensioning and released by means of a single red push button, and with a lap belt in the rear center seating position.
Standard No. 214 Side Impact Protection: Inspection of all vehicles and installation of U.S.-model door beams on vehicles that are not already so equipped.
Standard No. 225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems: Installation of U.S.-model tether anchorages.
Standard No. 301 Fuel System Integrity: Inspection of all vehicles and replacement of the filler neck (including restrictor) and the filler cap with U.S.-model components on vehicles that are not already so equipped.
Petitioner states that all vehicles must be inspected for compliance with the Bumper Standard found in 49 CFR part 581, and that U.S.-model components will be installed on any vehicles that are not already so equipped.
In addition, the petitioner states that a vehicle identification number (VIN) plate must be affixed to the vehicles so that it is readable from outside the driver's windshield pillar, and a reference and certification label must be affixed to the edge of the driver's side door or to the latch post nearest the driver to meet the requirements of 49 CFR Part 565.
Lastly, the petitioner states that a certification label will be affixed to the driver's side doorjamb to meet the requirements of the vehicle certification regulations in 49 CFR part 567.
Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the petition described above. Comments should refer to the docket number and be submitted to: Docket Management, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC 20590 (docket hours are from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.). It is requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted.
All comments received before the close of business on the closing date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for examination in the docket at the above address both before and after that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.Start Signature
Issued on: October 8, 2003.
Kenneth N. Weinstein,
Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 03-27505 Filed 10-31-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P