This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
13
as of
09/16/2026 at 2:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
I. Introduction
On May 10, 2004, May 11, 2004, June 22, 2004, July 21, 2004, August 12, 2004, and August 16, 2004, the International Securities Exchange, Inc. (“ISE”), the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. (“CBOE”), the American Stock Exchange LLC (“Amex”), the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (“PCX”), the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (“Phlx”), and the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc. (“BSE”) (collectively, the “Participants”), respectively, filed with
( printed page 62921)
the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) an amendment (“Joint Amendment No. 13”) to the Plan for the Purpose of Creating and Operating an Intermarket Option Linkage (the “Linkage Plan”).[1]
In Joint Amendment No. 13, the Participants propose to modify the definitions of Firm Customer Quote Size (“FCQS”) and Firm Principal Quote Size (“FPQS”) to accommodate the “natural size” of quotations. The Linkage Plan currently requires that the Participants be firm for both Principal Acting as Agent and Principal Orders for at least 10 contracts. The proposed Amendment would permit exchanges to be firm for the actual size of their quotation, even if this amount is less than 10 contracts.
The proposed amendment to the Linkage Plan was published in the
Federal Register
on August 24, 2004.[2]
No comments were received on the proposed amendment. This order approves the proposed amendment to the Linkage Plan.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
Proposed Joint Amendment No. 13 seeks to change the definitions of both FCQS and FPQS. While the proposed Amendment would maintain a general requirement that the FCQS and FPQS be at least 10 contracts, that requirement would not apply if a Participant were disseminating a quotation of fewer than 10 contracts. In that case, the Participant may establish a FCQS or FPQS equal to its disseminated size, or “natural size.”
Under the proposed amendment, as with Linkage orders today, if the order is of a size eligible for automatic execution, the receiving exchange must provide automatic execution of the Linkage order. If this is not the case (for example, the receiving exchange's automatic execution system is not engaged), the receiving exchange may allow the order to drop to manual handling. However, the receiving exchange still must provide a manual execution for at least the FCQS or FPQS, as appropriate (in this case, the size of its disseminated quotation of less than 10 contracts).
III. Discussion
After careful consideration, the Commission finds that the proposed amendment to the Linkage Plan is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposed amendment to the Linkage Plan is consistent with Section 11A of the Act [3]
and Rule 11Aa3-2 thereunder,[4]
in that it is appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors and the maintenance of fair and orderly markets.
The Commission notes that the Participants adopted the current definitions of FCQS and FPQS, which impose a “10-up” requirement, at a time when all the Participants had rules requiring that their minimum quotation size be for at least 10 contracts. Consequently, an exchange receiving a customer limit order for fewer than 10 contracts would disseminate the price of the customer limit order with a size of 10 contracts and the specialist or the trading crowd would be responsible to make up the difference. Since implementation of the Linkage Plan, several of the Participants have modified their rules to permit them to disseminate the “natural size” of customer limit orders that are of a size less than 10 contracts.[5]
Proposed Joint Amendment No. 13 should conform the minimum quotation requirements contained in the Linkage Plan to be consistent with the Participants' rules regarding the dissemination of the size associated with customer limit orders. The Commission believes that conforming the requirements of the Linkage Plan to the requirements adopted by the Participants, which permit them to disseminate an order's “natural size,” should provide greater transparency to investors and the marketplace and better reflect the true state of liquidity in the marketplace.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 11A of the Act [6]
and Rule 11Aa3-2 thereunder,[7]
that the proposed Joint Amendment No. 13 is approved.
October 19, 2004.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.8
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
Footnotes
1.
On July 28, 2000, the Commission approved a national market system plan for the purpose of creating and operating an intermarket options market linkage proposed by Amex, CBOE, and ISE.
See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 43086 (July 28, 2000), 65 FR 48023 (August 4, 2000). Subsequently, Phlx, PCX, and BSE joined the Linkage Plan.
See
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 43573 (November 16, 2000), 65 FR 70850 (November 28, 2000); 43574 (November 16, 2000), 65 FR 70851 (November 28, 2000); and 49198 (February 5, 2004), 69 FR 7029 (February 12, 2004).