Skip to Content


Sunshine Act Meetings

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold the following meetings during the week of November 8, 2004:

An Open Meeting will be held on Tuesday, November 9, 2004 at 10 a.m. in Room 1C30, the William O. Douglas Room; a Closed Meeting will be held on Tuesday, November 9, 2004 at 11:30 a.m., and a Closed Meeting will be held on Wednesday, November 10, 2004 at 10 a.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), (9)(B), and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Atkins, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the closed meeting in closed session and determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible.

The subject matter of the Open Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, November 9, 2004 will be:

1. The Commission will consider whether to publish for public comment a release setting forth the following proposals that relate to national securities exchanges and registered securities associations that are self-regulatory organizations (“SROs”). In particular, the Commission will consider whether to propose the following:Start Printed Page 64599

A. New Rules 6a-5 and 15Aa-3 under the Exchange Act, which would require SROs to implement certain minimum governance standards, including a majority independent board, fully independent Nominating, Governance, Audit, Compensation, and Regulatory Oversight Committees, and the separation of an SRO's regulatory functions from its market operations and other business interests (“Governance Standards Proposal”).

B. Amendments to Rules 6a-2, 15Aa-1, and Rule 15Aa-2 (redesignated Rule 15Aj-1) and to Form 1 and to new Form 2 (redesignated Form X-15AA-1) and repeal of Forms X-15Aj-1 and X-15Aj-2 under the Exchange Act, which would require the SROs to provide to the Commission, and publicly disclose, greater and more current information about their operation and structure, including their governance processes, regulatory programs, financial condition, and ownership (“Transparency Proposal”).

C. New Rule 17a-26 under the Exchange Act, which would require SROs to file with the Commission quarterly and annual reports containing specified information on the operation of their regulatory programs, including their examination, investigation, and enforcement activities (“SRO Reporting Proposal”).

D. New Rules 6a-5(o) and 15Aa-3(o), new Rule 17a-27, and amendments to Form 1 and new Form 2, which would require SROs to (i) restrict ownership and voting levels of individual members to no more than 20% and (ii) report significant accumulations of ownership by any person, and would require SRO members to report significant ownership interest information as well (“SRO Ownership Proposal”).

E. New Regulation AL, which would impose reporting and notification requirements on an SRO that lists or trades its own securities or those of its trading facilities or affiliates (“SRO Self-Listing Proposal”).

F. Amendment to Rule 17a-1 under the Exchange Act, which would codify the current practice of the SROs to keep at least one copy of their required books and records in the United States (“Books and Records Proposal”).

The Commission also will consider whether to publish for public comment a Concept Release, which would request and examine public comment on a variety of issues relating to the efficacy of the current self-regulatory system, including the possibility of implementing specified enhancements to the current SRO system or pursuing one of several possible alternative regulatory models.

For further information, please contact Geraldine Idrizi at (202) 942-7317 (Governance Standards Proposal); Susie Cho at (202) 942-0748 or Leah Mesfin at (202) 942-0196 (Transparency Proposal); Richard Holley at (202) 942-8086 (SRO Reporting Proposal); Sonia Trocchio at (202) 942-0753 (SRO Self-Listing Proposal, SRO Ownership Proposal, and Books and Records Proposal); and Christopher Stone at (202) 942-7938 (Concept Release).

2. The Commission will hear oral argument on appeals by Leslie A. Arouh and the Division of Enforcement of an initial decision of an administrative law judge. Arouh was formerly an associated person with First Union Capital Markets (“First Union”), a registered broker-dealer. The law judge concluded that Arouh participated in an adjusted trading scheme which consisted of First Union's (1) buying $100 million of corporate bonds at prices above the prevailing market price from a group of accounts at ARM Capital Advisors LLC (“ARM”), a registered investment adviser, (2) selling the same bonds, at market price, to a different group of ARM accounts shortly thereafter, resulting in a $1.376 million loss to First Union, and (3) selling to ARM accounts bonds that were marked up sufficiently above the prevailing market price to reimburse First Union's losses on the first two legs.

The law judge found Arouh willfully violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5. The law judge suspended Arouh from association with a broker or dealer for ninety days and ordered Arouh to pay a civil money penalty of $330,000.

Arouh argues that the record does not support the law judge's findings of violation, that the sanctions imposed by the law judge are excessive, and that no sanctions are warranted. The Division has appealed the sanctions, arguing that, in addition to the civil money penalty, the Commission should bar Arouh permanently from association with any broker or dealer and impose a cease-and-desist order against him.

Among the issues likely to be considered are:

A. Whether respondent committed the alleged violations; and

B. If so, whether sanctions should be imposed in the public interest.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, November 9, 2004 will be: Post argument discussion.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, November 10, 2004 will be:

Formal orders of investigations;

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature; and

An adjudicatory matter.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

Start Signature

Dated: November 2, 2004.

Jonathan G. Katz,


End Signature End Preamble

[FR Doc. 04-24812 Filed 11-3-04; 11:18 am]