This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated to Amend its “Trigger” Rule to Permit RAES Orders to Automatically Execute Against Orders Resting on the Exchange's Limit Order Book
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
There is no table of contents available for this document.
Related Documents
Enhanced Content - Related Documents
FederalRegister.gov uses the agency dockets published with the document to display related documents.
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated to Amend its “Trigger” Rule to Permit RAES Orders to Automatically Execute Against Orders Resting on the Exchange's Limit Order Book
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
9
as of
10/10/2026 at 4:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
On July 30, 2004, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (“CBOE” or “Exchange”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”),[1]
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2]
a proposed rule change relating to the Exchange's AutoQuote Triggered Ebook Execution system (“Trigger”). On September 23, 2004, the Exchange amended the proposed rule
( printed page 78070)
change.[3]
The proposed rule change, as amended, was published for comment in the
Federal Register
on November 22, 2004.[4]
The Commission received no comments on the proposal. This order approves the proposed rule change.
Trigger allows orders resting in CBOE's electronic book to automatically execute in the limited situation where the bid or offer for a series of options generated by the Exchange's AutoQuote system (or any Exchange approved proprietary quote generation system used in lieu of the Exchange's Autoquote system) crosses or locks the Exchange's best bid or offer for that series as established by a booked order. Currently, Trigger provides for automatic executions of orders resting in the book [5]
up to the maximum number of contracts permitted to be entered into RAES for that series (“Trigger Volume”). The trading crowd has the ability, but not the obligation, to execute manually the remaining contracts in the book that exceed the Trigger Volume. Any unexecuted contracts in the booked order in excess of the Trigger Volume remain in the book, and the bid or offer generated by Autoquote is one tick inferior to the price of the booked order, so that the disseminated quote does not cross or lock the Autoquote bid or offer.
The Exchange proposes to amend CBOE Rule 6.8(d)(v) to provide that where contracts remain in the book after an execution (or partial execution), or for any series where Trigger has not yet been implemented, orders in RAES for options of that series may, as determined by the appropriate FPC on a class by class basis, be (1) Automatically executed; or (2) rerouted on the Exchange's Order Routing System to the crowd PAR terminal (or to another location in the event of system problems or contrary firm routing instructions).
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange [6]
and, in particular, the requirements of section 6(b) of the Act [7]
and the rules and regulations thereunder. The Commission finds specifically that the proposed rule change is consistent with section 6(b)(5) of the Act,[8]
because, in the Commission's view, the proposed rule change should help facilitate the execution of incoming RAES orders submitted during the Trigger process by making such orders eligible for automatic execution against the book orders that are crossed or locked by the Exchange's Autoquote system (or any Exchange approved proprietary quote generation system used in lieu of the Exchange's Autoquote system). The Commission notes that the proposed rule change would not change the existing execution process for incoming RAES orders that are submitted prior to a locked or crossed market.[91]
It is therefore ordered,
pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act,[10]
that the proposed rule change (SR-CBOE-2004-52) is approved.
December 22, 2004.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.[11]
3.
See
letter from David Doherty, CBOE, to Nancy J. Sanow, Assistant Director, Division of Market Regulation, Commission, dated September 22, 2004, and accompanying Form 19b-4 (“Amendment No. 1”). Amendment No. 1 replaced and superseded the original filing in its entirety.
6.
In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
8.
15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). Section 6(b)(5) of the Act requires that the rules of a national securities exchange be “designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system, and in general, to protect investors and the public interest; and are not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.”