Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
On October 1, 2004, the United States Court of International Trade (CIT) issued an order sustaining the Department of Commerce's (the Department's) Final Results of Redetermination on Remand (September 15, 2004) (“Redetermination Results”). Royal Thai Government, et. al., v. United States, Consol. Court No. 02-00026, Slip. Op. 04-124 (CIT 2004) (“Royal Thai”). In the Redetermination Results, the Department found as ordered by the CIT, that the challenged duty drawback program is not countervailable. The effect of this finding is the reduction of the overall countervailable subsidy rate to a de minimis level.
Consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2nd 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (“Timken”), the Department is notifying the public that the Royal Thai decision was “not in harmony” with the Department's final determination.
October 1, 2004.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean Carey or Dana Mermelstein, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3964 or (202) 482-1391, respectively.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
On October 3, 2001, the Department issued a countervailing duty determination covering hot-rolled steel from Thailand. Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From Thailand, 66 FR 50410 (October 3, 2001). On December 3, 2001, the countervailing duty order was published. Notice of Countervailing Duty Order: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From Thailand 66 FR 60197 (December 3, 2001).
On February 1, 2002, respondents, the Royal Thai Government (RTG) and Sahaviriya Steel Industries (SSI), filed their complaint, appealing the final determination and countervailing duty order. Royal Thai Government, et. al., v. United States, Court. No. 02-00027. Petitioners, National Steel Corporation, Bethlehem Steel Corporation, and United States Steel Corporation, also appealed the final determination. National Steel Corp, et. al., v. United States, Court No. 02-00026, consolidated into Royal Thai Government, et. al., v. United States, Consol. No. 02-00026.
On May 19, 2004, the RTG and SSI obtained an injunction, applicable during the pendency of this litigation in the CIT, enjoining the United States from liquidating or causing or permitting liquidation of any entries of certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products from Thailand that: (1) Were affected by the Department's investigative proceeding; (2) were produced and exported by SSI; (3) were entered or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2002; and, (4) remain unliquidated as of 5 p.m. on May 20, 2004.
On July 27, 2004, the CIT found that the Department's determination to countervail the challenged duty drawback program in its entirety was not supported by substantial evidence and is not in accordance with law. Because the CIT found that the drawback program is not countervailable, and the revised subsidy rate is de minimis (1.80 percent ad valorem), it ordered the Department to find that no countervailable subsidies are being provided to the production or exportation of certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products from Thailand. See Royal Thai Government, et. al., v. United States, Consol. Court No. 02-00026, Slip. Op. 04-91 (CIT 2004).
On October 1, 2004, the CIT affirmed the Redetermination Results pursuant to its decision in Royal Thai. The CIT thus sustained the Redetermination Results in which the Department found that no countervailable subsidies are being provided to the production or exportation of certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products from Thailand.
In its decision in Timken, the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant to section 516(a)(c)(1) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, the Department must publish notice of a decision of the CIT which is not in harmony with the Department's determination. The CIT's decision in Royal Thai was not in harmony with the Department's Final Determination. Therefore, publication of this notice fulfills the statutory obligation.
Suspension of Liquidation
This notice will serve to continue the suspension of liquidation pending the expiration of the period to appeal the CIT's October 1, 2004, decision, or, if that decision is appealed, pending a final decision by the Federal Circuit. Because the CIT issued an injunction on May 19, 2004, the Department will continue to suspend entries of hot-rolled steel from Thailand as specified in the injunction. The Department will revoke the Order and issue instructions covering these entries if the CIT's decision is not appealed, or if it is affirmed on appeal.Start Signature
Dated: December 20, 2004.
James J. Jochum,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E4-3872 Filed 12-28-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S