Skip to Content


Idaho Panhandle National Forest, Idaho-Bussel 484 Project EIS

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble Start Printed Page 21173


Forest Service, USDA.


Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.


The Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact statement on a proposal of ecosystem management in the Bussel 484 Project Area, which is approximately 14,600 acres in size. Opportunities were developed through a comparison of existing project are conditions with desired future conditions for all the resources in the project area. The proposed action was developed utilizing the Idaho Panhandle Forests Forest Plan, a roads analysis, an ecosystem assessment at the watershed scale, findings from the St. Joe Geographic Assessment and the Upper Columbia River Basin Assessment, the National Fire Plan along with trends observewd by interdisciplinary specialists conducting on-the-ground assessments.


Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received within 60 days of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The draft environmental impact statement is expected to be available for public review in November 2005, and the final environmental impact statement is expected to be completed in 2006.


Send written comments to Charles Mark, District Ranger, St. Joe Ranger District, 222 South 7th Street Suite 1, St. Maries, Idaho 83861 or electronically to For further information, mail correspondence to Cornie Hudson, Bussel 484 EIS Team Leader at the address listed above. Information on this project can also be found on the Internet by going to http://www.fs.fed.usi/​pnf/​ and looking under Ecosystems, Management, Index of NEPA Projects and St. Joe Ranger District.

Start Further Info


Connie Hudson—Bussel 484 Project Team Leader, 208-245-2531.

End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information


Purpose and Need for Action

The Forest Service is proposing this project in order to restore and accelerate the development of early seral, shade-intolerant species (western white pine and western larch); promote and maintain mature forests with large trees; reduce stand densities to minimize stresses and disturbance risks; reduce the potential for large, severe wild fires while promoting conditions for safe and effective control of fires; provide fire protection to Bonneville Power Administration transmission line; provide wood products for the local timber dependent economy; maintain access to National Forest System lands now and in the future while reducing resource damage, protecting cultural resources, providing recreation opportunities, clarifying motorized and non-motorized access, providing wildlife security acres in the project area, improving aquatic habitat conditions, improving watershed conditions, reducing road maintenance costs, reducing possibilities of new weed establishment, and promoting sites that are less suitable for weeds; work towards restoring Bear Creek and Little Bear Creek to water quality that supports designated beneficial uses; and improve stream habitat and riparian conditions in project area streams.

Proposed Action

The proposed action includes timber harvest; road construction; storage, and decommissioning; natural and activity fuels reduction; tree and shrub planting; access management changes; and woody debris placement in streams in the Bussel 484 Project Area.

Responsible Official

Ranotta K. McNair, Forest Supervisor, Idaho Panhandle National Forests, 3815 Schreiber Way, Coeur D'Alene, Idaho 83815.

Nature of Decision To Be Made

The St. Joe Ranger District will prepare the EIS. The Forest Supervisor of the Idaho Panhandle National Forests will decide whether to implement this project, and if so, in what manner. The decision will be documented in a Record of Decision (ROD).

Scoping Process

The project was listed on the Idaho Panhandle National Forests Quarterly Schedule of Proposed Actions in January 2005. Public scoping packages describing the proposed action were mailed to the Bussel 484 Project mailing list on April 19, 2005. No public meetings are currently scheduled.

Preliminary Issues

Preliminary issues raised during the development of the proposed action include effects to water quality from motorized vehicles entering Norton Creek while using the Norton Creek Railroad Grade; controversy over changes in access management including loss of motorized access on roads and trails and implementation of an area restriction which would prohibit cross country motorized travel; and removal of site nutrients with vegetative and fuel treatment activities.

Comment Requested

This notice of intent initiates the scoping process which guides the development of the environmental impact statement. To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues and concerns on the proposed action, comments should be as specific as possible. Public participation in this analysis is welcome at any time; comments received within 60 days of publication of this notice will be especially useful in the preparation of the Draft EIS.

Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent Environmental Review

A draft environmental impact statement will be prepared for comment. The comment period on the draft environment impact statement will be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes the Notice of Availability in the Federal Register.

The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of draft environmental impact statements must structure their Start Printed Page 21174participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 533 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this proposed participate by the close of the 45 day comment period so that substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final environmental impact statement.

To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulation for implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.

Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal and will be available for public inspection.

Start Signature

Dated: April 18, 2005.

Ranotta K. McNair,

Forest Supervisor, Idaho Panhandle National Forests.

End Signature End Supplemental Information

[FR Doc. 05-8172 Filed 4-22-05; 8:45 am]