Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”)  and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, notice is hereby given that on August 25, 2005, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (the “CHX” or the “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the CHX. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons, and is approving the proposal on an accelerated basis.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 1 of Article XXX relating to Registration and Appointment to permit its Committee on Specialist Assignment and Evaluation (“CSAE”) to, in special circumstances, assign securities  to a specialist firm without the firm first identifying a particular co-specialist to trade the securities, so long as the specialist firm promptly provides the CSAE with the name of the co-specialist that would trade the issues, and the CSAE concludes that the co-specialist is qualified to trade the issues. Below is the text of the proposed rule change, as amended. Proposed new language is italicized; proposed deletions are in [brackets].
Registration and Appointment
Rule 1. No change.
* * * Interpretations and Policies:
.01 Committee on Specialist Assignment and Evaluation
II. Assignment Procedures
When a security is to be assigned or reassigned, the Committee will notify all specialist units and invite applications. This notice will include all relevant facts about the security. If the Committee believes that special qualifications should be sought in the successful applicant, the Committee after satisfying itself that these are reasonable and not exclusionary, should direct that they be included in the notice.
It should be noted that assignments are made to specialist units but that , except as provided below in paragraph 6, the specialist unit must indicate the individual co-specialist who will be registered in that stock. The registration of a co-specialist, however, does not diminish the responsibility of the specialist unit for the stock assigned to it.
1. Applications. In applying, a specialist unit should state the reasons why it believes the stock should be assigned to it. A standard application form is available from the Exchange and should be used for this purpose. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph 6, below, t[T]he application must, at a minimum, include the name and background of the co-specialist who will normally be trading the security and his ability and experience relative to the issue being applied for. Also, if any special or unique characteristics of the security have been identified by the Committee, such as unusually high capital requirements or institutional participation making trading difficult, the applicant should specifically note and comment on its ability to deal with the special characteristics.
6. Assignment process when posting of large groups of stocks. If circumstances require the Exchange to allocate more than 100 stocks at any specific time, the Exchange recognizes that it may be difficult for a specialist firm to identify the specific co-specialist who would be assigned to trade each of the issues for which that firm seeks an assignment. In those circumstances, the CSAE may make a temporary 30-day assignment to a specialist firm (based on the firm's overall demonstrated ability, experience and financial responsibility, as well as the overall best interests of the Exchange). The CSAE may make that temporary assignment final if: (1) The specialist firm, within 15 days of the temporary assignment, provides the CSAE with the identification of the individual co-specialist who will be trading the stock(s); and (2) the CSAE, after evaluating that co-specialist's demonstrated ability and experience, finds that the co-specialist is qualified to trade the stock(s). If the CSAE determines that the co-specialist is not qualified to trade the stock(s), the stock(s) shall be immediately posted for assignment.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule changes and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item III below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange states that the Exchange's CSAE is responsible for assigning securities to specialist firms for trading. Under current Interpretation and Policy .01 of Rule 1 of Article XXX, each participant firm seeking to act as a CHX specialist in a particular issue is required to identify, during the application process, the individual co-specialist who will be trading that security. The Exchange believes that this process works efficiently when the CSAE is assigning a few securities at a time.
On rare occasions, however, the CSAE may need to assign larger groups of securities. In those situations, the Exchange represents that it may be difficult and impractical for specialist firms to identify individual co-specialists for all of the securities for which the firms will apply because, among other things, the firms may need to hire new co-specialists to trade the securities. To address these limited circumstances, the Exchange has proposed a change in its assignment rule that would allow the CSAE to make a temporary 30-day assignment to a specialist firm without the firm first identifying a particular co-specialist to trade the securities. According to the Exchange, the assignment could not become final (and the firm could not begin trading the securities) unless: (1) The specialist firm, within 15 days of the temporary assignment, provides the CSAE with the identification of the individual co-specialist who will be trading the securities; and (2) the CSAE, after evaluating that co-specialist's demonstrated ability and experience, finds that the co-specialist is qualified to trade the securities. If the CSAE determines that the co-specialist is not qualified to trade the securities, the securities would be immediately posted for assignment to other specialist firms.
The Exchange believes that the proposal is narrowly tailored to provide an efficient and effective process for assigning securities in those rare situations when a large number of securities must be assigned in a relatively short period of time. As an initial matter, the proposed rule change would apply only in instances where the CSAE is allocating more than 100 stocks at any specific time, a circumstance that has occurred rarely at the Exchange. Additionally, the proposal would not allow a specialist firm to begin trading a security until it had notified the CSAE of the individual co-specialist who would trade a security, and the CSAE had determined that that individual was qualified to do so. Finally, the proposal would require the CSAE to determine which specialist firm should trade securities based on criteria that are consistent with those set out in the Exchange's rules. In these cases, the CSAE would review a firm's overall demonstrated ability, experience and financial responsibility, as well as the overall best interests of the Exchange. The Exchange further represents that the best interests of the Exchange incorporates a variety of issues, including the issue of concentration of specialist assignments on the Exchange. The Exchange also believes that the CSAE should be cognizant of concentration issues and should allocate securities in a manner that, consistent with the other factors and requirements of the assignment process, minimizes concentration as much as possible.Start Printed Page 53827
2. Statutory Basis
The CHX believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act. In particular, the Exchange believes that the proposed change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, protect investors and the public interest by allowing the Exchange to establish an effective and efficient process to permit the assignment of a large number of securities within a relatively short period of time.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
- Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
- Send an e-mail to email@example.com. Please include File Number SR-CHX-2005-23 on the subject line.
- Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-9303.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CHX-2005-23. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the CHX. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CHX-2005-23 and should be submitted on or before October 3, 2005.
IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change
The Commission has considered the Exchange's proposed rule change, and finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act, and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange. In particular, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, which requires that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and to remove impediments and perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange represents that it is currently considering the assignment of a large number of securities that are temporarily assigned to certain CHX specialist firms. The Exchange further represents that it needs to promptly make final assignment decisions for these securities. The Commission believes that the proposal should facilitate the ability of the Exchange to expeditiously assign a large number of securities (i.e., exceeding 100 securities) in a relatively short time frame in the rare circumstances it is necessary to do so, without compromising the overall interests of the assignment process.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, the Commission may not approve any proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of the notice of filing thereof, unless the Commission finds good cause for so doing. The Commission hereby finds good cause for approving the proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after publishing notice of filing thereof in the Federal Register. The Commission notes that the Exchange's assignment procedures, pursuant to Interpretation and Policy .01 of Rule 1 of Article XXX, generally requires that, during the application process, specialist firms identify the co-specialist (or co-specialists) whom the specialist firm believes will trade the securities. Because of the large number of securities that are available for allocation in this case, the Commission believes that the specialist firms might, in some cases, find it difficult to identify individual co-specialists for all of the securities for which they apply. The Commission believes that the proposed rule change is necessary to facilitate the orderly assignment of a large number of securities within a relatively short period of time. The Commission expects the Exchange to assign securities, on a 30-day temporary basis, to a particular specialist firm based on the firm's overall demonstrated ability, experience and financial responsibility, subject to the firm's identification (within 15 days of the assignment) of the particular co-specialist(s) who will trade the securities and the Exchange CSAE's determination that the individual co-specialist(s) have the demonstrated ability and experience to trade the issues. In addition, the Commission notes that assignment could not become final and the firm could not begin trading securities allocated pursuant to the proposal unless the firm promptly provided the Exchange's CSAE with the name of the co-specialist, and the CSAE concluded that the co-specialist is qualified to trade the issues. Finally, the Commission expects the CSAE to be cognizant of the issue of concentration of specialist securities assignments on the Exchange, consistent with the representations of the Exchange Start Printed Page 53828referenced above. For the reasons set forth above, the Commission finds good cause to accelerate approval of the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the proposed rule change (SR-CHX-2005-23) is hereby approved on an accelerated basis.Start Signature
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.17
Jonathan G. Katz,
3. The Commission notes that the Exchange uses the terms “security(ies), stock(s) and issue(s)” interchangeably.Back to Citation
4. See Article IV, Rule 6, and Article XXX, Rule 1.Back to Citation
5. See Article XXX, Rule 1.01.II.1.Back to Citation
6. Under the Exchange's assignment rules, the CSAE ordinarily considers the demonstrated ability of the identified co-specialist, along with the firm's financial responsibility and the overall best interests of the Exchange. See Article XXX, Rule 1.01.III.1.Back to Citation
7. Telephone conversation of August 26, 2005, between Ellen Neely, President and General Counsel, CHX and Hong-Anh Tran, Special Counsel, Division of Market Regulation, Commission.Back to Citation
8. Id.Back to Citation
12. In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered its impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).Back to Citation
16. Id.Back to Citation
17. CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).Back to Citation
[FR Doc. E5-4948 Filed 9-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P