Office of the Secretary, Interior.
The Office of the Secretary is revising regulations found at 43 CFR 5.1 to allow implementation of legislation that directs the establishment of a reasonable fee for commercial filming activities or similar projects and still photography where a permit is required.
Effective Date: April 13, 2006.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lee Dickinson, Special Park Uses Program Manager, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, NW., ORG CODE 2460, Washington, DC 20240, telephone: 202-513-7092, or e-mail: Lee_Dickinson@nps.gov.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
Public Law 106-206 (codified at 16 U.S.C. 460 l-6d) directs the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture to establish a reasonable fee system (referred to as a location fee in this publication) for commercial filming and still photography activities on lands under the Secretaries' jurisdiction.
The Department of the Interior (DOI) regulations at 43 CFR part 5 prohibit the National Park Service (NPS) from collecting fees “for the making of motion pictures, television productions or sound tracks * * * ”. The Office of the Secretary is revising the current regulation by removing the prohibition.
Lands of the United States were set aside by Congress or the Executive Branch to conserve and protect areas of untold beauty and grandeur, historical importance, and uniqueness for future generations. Often it is the uniqueness of the land that attracts filmmakers. This tradition started with explorers who traveled with paint and canvas or primitive photo apparatus before the areas were designated as a national park, wildlife refuge, or forest. Generally, land management agencies allow commercial filming and still photography when it is consistent with their mission and will not harm the resource or interfere with the visitor experience.
While many commercial filming and still photography permits issued by the land management agencies are for small productions involving educational material or commercial advertising, a significant number of commercial filming permits have been issued to makers of major motion pictures.
Public Law 106-206 specifically requires permits, reasonable fees for use of federal lands and reimbursement of costs incurred by the government as a result of both commercial filming and certain still photography activities. Congress recognized in this law that when commercial filming and certain Start Printed Page 19128still photography activities are allowed on Federal lands, it is necessary to manage the activity through a permitting process to minimize the possibility of damage to the cultural or natural resources or interference with other visitors to the area and the agencies will incur costs in providing this management.
The Department of the Interior (DOI) regulations at 43 CFR part 5 which prohibit the NPS from collecting fees for commercial film productions are in conflict with the Pub. L. 106-206. Therefore, to implement the fee requirement of the law the Office of the Secretary is revising the current regulation by removing the prohibition.
In June 2004, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) at the request of some members of Congress began a review of NPS policy and guidance related to issuing special use permits for special events and for commercial filming and still photography. In a report issued May 6, 2005, the GAO concluded that the NPS could have collected and retained at least $1.6 million in location fees for commercial filming and still photography activities permitted on park lands if Pub. L. 106-206 had been implemented. One recommendation of the report was that the NPS “Expedite the implementation of the law that requires the Park Service to collect location fees and costs for commercial filming and still photography, when appropriate.”
In order to expedite the implementation of Pub. L. 106-206, the Office of the Secretary will implement this final rule which will remove from current regulations found in 43 CFR 5.1(b)(1) the statement that prohibits the National Park Service from charging a fee “for the making of motion pictures, television productions or sound tracks. * * *” This rule will allow the NPS to charge fees during an interim period while a Department-wide rule, which includes the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, is promulgated. The Department-wide rule will establish a fee schedule specific to this rule.
Compliance With Other Laws
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Order 12866)
This document is a significant rule and has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
(1) This rule will not have an effect of $100 million or more on the economy. It will not adversely affect in a material way the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities.
(2) This rule will not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency.
(3) This rule does not alter the budgetary effects of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights or obligations of their recipients.
(4) While this rule follows the direction of Congress by implementing the provisions of Public Law 106-206, OMB has determined that the rule raises novel legal or policy issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rulemaking will not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more.
b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order 12630, the rule does not have significant takings implications.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, the rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism assessment.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
In accordance with Executive Order 12988, the Office of the Solicitor has determined that this rule does not unduly burden the judicial system and meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed regulation requires individuals and companies wishing to do commercial filming and still photography park lands to obtain a permit from the superintendent managing the park land. The permit holder is also responsible for reimbursing the agency for costs incurred and to pay a land use fee. The mechanics of applying for the permit and the forms involved are not addressed in this proposed regulation, but are addressed in existing NPS regulations and internal guidance. The NPS uses application forms NPS 10-931 (Film—Short Form) and NPS 10-932 (Film—Long Form). Both forms are assigned OMB Control Number 1024-0026 and expire December 31, 2006. Therefore, these regulations do not contain information collection requirements that the OMB must approve under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, health, and safety because it is not expected to:
(a) Increase public use to the extent of compromising the nature and character of the area or causing physical damage to it;
(b) Introduce noncompatible uses that might compromise the nature and characteristics of the area, or cause physical damage to it;
(c) Conflict with adjacent ownerships or land uses; or
(d) Cause a nuisance to adjacent owners or occupants.
Based on this determination, the regulation is categorically excluded from the procedural requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by Departmental guidelines in 516 DM 6, (49 FR 21438). Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement has been prepared.
The location fee authorized by Public Law 106-206 and governed by this proposed regulation is a fee collected when a permit is issued by the NPS for a commercial filming or still photography activity. Any analysis required by the NEPA, as well as the National Historic Preservation Act, would be conducted in conjunction with the permitting process and would Start Printed Page 19129evaluate the impact of the requested activity on the resource.
Government-to-Government Relationship With Tribes
In accordance with Executive Order 13175 “Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments” (65 FR 67249), the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994, “Government-to-Government Relations with Native American Tribal Governments” (59 FR 22961), and 512 DM 2, we have evaluated potential effects on federally recognized Indian tribes and have determined that there are no potential effects.
Clarity of This Regulation
Executive Order 12866 requires each agency to write regulations that are easy to understand. We invite your comments on how to make this rule easier to understand, including answers to questions such as the following: (1) Are the requirements in the rule clearly stated? (2) Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that interferes with its clarity? (3) Does the format of the rule (grouping and order of sections, use of headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce its clarity? (4) Would the rule be easier to understand if it were divided into more (but shorter) sections? (A “section” appears in bold type and is preceded by the symbol “§ ” and a numbered heading; for example § 14.10 Purpose). (5) Is the description of the rule in the “Supplementary Information” section of the preamble helpful in understanding the proposed rule? What else could we do to make the rule easier to understand?
Send a copy of any comments that concern how we could make this rule easier to understand to: Office of Regulatory Affairs, DOI, Room 7229, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240. You may also e-mail the comments to this address: Exsec@ios.doi.gov
Administrative Procedure Act
In this rulemaking, we are revising existing regulations in order to implement Public Law 106-206, a law to allow the Secretary of the Interior to establish a fee system for commercial filming and certain still photography activities on Federal land. The existing regulations at 43 CFR 5.1 prohibit charging fees for these activities and the new law, Public Law 106-206, (codified at 16 U.S.C. 4601-6d), requires the Secretary to charge fees for these same activities. This rulemaking will delete the prohibition in the existing regulation. Therefore, we are publishing this action without prior proposal because we view this as a nondiscretionary revision that is required by law. We find good cause, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b) and 553(d), that notice and public procedure are unnecessary and this rule will take effect upon publication. However later this year we will publish in the Federal Register and request comments on a proposed rule on commercial filming and still photography activities for Department of the Interior agencies, including the National Park Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, and Bureau of Land Management.Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 5End List of Subjects Start Amendment Part
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of the Interior amendsEnd Amendment Part Start Part
PART 5—MAKING PICTURES, TELEVISION PRODUCTIONS OR SOUND TRACKS ON CERTAIN AREAS UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOREnd Part Start Amendment Part
1. The authority for part 5 continues to read as follows:End Amendment Part
2. Revise § 5.1(b)(1) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(b) * * *
(1) No fees will be charged for the making of motion pictures, television productions or sound tracks on areas administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The regular general admission and other fees currently in effect in any area under the jurisdiction of the National Park Service are not affected by this paragraph.
Dated: April 6, 2006.
P. Lynn Scarlett,
Deputy Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 06-3529 Filed 4-12-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P