Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”)  and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, notice is hereby given that on April 21, 2006, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (“CBOE” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared principally by the CBOE. On June 15, 2006, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. The Exchange filed this proposal as a “non-controversial” proposed rule change pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act, and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder, which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule Start Printed Page 35962change, as amended, from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend certain of its rules, or portions thereof, which it has determined to be obsolete, outdated, and/or unnecessary. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's web site (http://www.cboe.com), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange performed a complete review of its Rules, as well as the surveillance procedures thereto, and identified a number of CBOE Rules, or portions thereof, that are outdated, obsolete, and/or unnecessary. In conjunction with this review, this filing proposes to: (i) Delete certain rules that are currently obsolete and no longer necessary; and (ii) amend certain rules that need to be updated. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to delete or amend (as indicated below) the following CBOE rules.
CBOE Rule 2.15. This rule pertains to the make-up of the Exchange's internal departments and how the Exchange may establish such departments. The Exchange no longer refers to them as “departments” but presently refers to them as “divisions.” For this reason, the Exchange proposes to amend the language of this rule to bring it up to date and make it consistent with the current terminology.
CBOE Rule 4.3. This rule currently requires that the Exchange's members receive the prior written consent of the Exchange before he/she establishes or maintains wire connections or shares an office with other members or non-members. Due to the anachronistic nature of this rule, the Exchange feels that no regulatory purposes are currently served by the requirements of this rule. This rule was implemented in the early 1970s, a time when communication was extremely limited. The rule was implemented to assure that there was no confusion on the part of the Exchange or a customer as to what member or member organization actually maintained a specific office space or wire connection and/or with whom. By having prior notice of such information, the Exchange would be able to discern who was affiliated with a specific office space and who was not. This was also at a time when customer business was done on a “face to face” basis, in which a customer would traditionally walk up off the street and into a member or member organization's storefront business. The Exchange states that this type of business activity rarely takes place these days. Due to communication enhancements (such as the cell phone, email and internet), this rule is no longer consistent with our current environment and capabilities. Customer business is not as much of a “face to face” business as it was in the 1970s and 1980s due to these communication enhancements. Customers have access to the internet and can converse with members or member organizations through other means of communications like the cell phone, email and facsimile. In addition, to the extent that CBOE Rule 4.3 is designed to provide the Exchange with notice of its members' business locations, it is redundant; CBOE Rule 3.7 requires that each Exchange member: (i) Promptly file with the Exchange's Membership Department its business address and residence address; and (ii) promptly file any changes to this information. For these reasons, the Exchange proposes to delete CBOE Rule 4.3.
CBOE Rule 6.64. This rule requires: (i) Every clearing member to maintain an office at a location that is approved by the Exchange; (ii) that the clearing member shall also have present at the office a representative that is authorized to sign any instruments and transactions on behalf of the clearing member; and (iii) that the clearing member shall file with the Exchange a certified list of those representatives that are authorized to sign any instruments and transactions on behalf of the clearing member. Due to the technological advancements in electronic communications over the past number of years, the Exchange believes that the requirements of this Rule are no longer necessary. When the Exchange originally implemented this rule, the only way of communicating with its clearing members was in-person or by telephoning them at their place of business. Based on such limitations, it was important to ensure that the Exchange knew the office location of its clearing members and that the members would have someone physically present at such office if the need arose to get in contact with them for the purpose of having an instrument or transaction reviewed and executed by the clearing member. This Rule was implemented in the late 1970s, a time when communication with members was limited. Such limitations no longer exist. Now, due to the advancements in electronic communications (such as cellular phones, mobile e-mail, Internet and facsimile), the Exchange has the ability to communicate with Exchange clearing members through these others means and thus no longer needs the physical presence of a clearing member representative at the clearing member's office for the sake of signing any instruments or transactions. In addition, pursuant to Chapter 3 of the CBOE Rules, all Exchange clearing members must have their office locations and contact information on file with the Exchange. Having the ability to communicate with Exchange clearing members at all times, whether they are at the office location or not, it is no longer necessary to require the physical presence of an authorized person at the clearing members office location. Therefore, because these requirements are obsolete and are no longer necessary, the Exchange proposes to delete this Rule.
Interpretations .03 and .04 of CBOE Rule 7.4. CBOE Rule 7.4 pertains to the obligations of orders by an order book official (“OBO”). Specifically, Interpretation .03 of CBOE Rule 7.4 requires an OBO to maintain an “order shoe” for each option class that he/she trades at his/her post. Interpretation .04 of CBOE Rule 7.4 defines the term “custody” for purposes of the Rule to mean that the option order is placed into the appropriate order shoe for each option traded at an OBO's post. Presently, the Exchange no longer requires an OBO to maintain an order shoe. The purpose of the order shoe was to give the OBO a place to deposit an order from the floor when the OBO wanted that order to be placed in the Exchange order book (“Book”). An OBO would have a specific order shoe for either a put or a call option order. Upon an OBO's deposit of an order into an order shoe, an Exchange employee Start Printed Page 35963would then take such order and enter it into the Book manually. Due to technological advancements, such orders are no longer manually entered into the Book and are now maintained electronically. Specifically, these orders are maintained electronically on either: (i) CBOE's Hybrid Trading System (“Hybrid”) or (ii) CBOE's electronic book (“e-Book”). For option classes trading on Hybrid, these orders will be maintained electronically on Hybrid, since it is an electronic trading platform. For option classes that are non-Hybrid, the OBO no longer puts an order in an order shoe; the OBO now enters such orders electronically into the e-Book. An OBO will continue to be bound by the requirements of CBOE Rule 7.4 pertaining to an OBO's obligations for orders on both Hybrid and the e-Book. It should be noted that this filing does not propose any changes to an OBO's obligations pertaining to maintaining orders, but solely proposes to update CBOE Rule 7.4 because such orders are no longer physically deposited into an order shoe by an OBO. The Exchange proposes to delete Interpretations .03 and .04 of CBOE Rule 7.4 because it no longer uses order shoes due to these electronic advancements in trading and does not intend to use them in the future. These Interpretations, therefore, are obsolete and no longer necessary.
Interpretation .13 of CBOE Rule 12.3. CBOE Rule 12.3 pertains to margin requirements for customer accounts. Specifically, Interpretation .13 of CBOE Rule 12.3 states that the margin treatment for spread options that involve stock index warrants and currency warrants is subject to a one-year pilot program scheduled to begin on August 29, 1995. This Interpretation is obsolete and no longer necessary because the referenced pilot program expired almost ten years ago, on August 29, 1996. For this reason, the Exchange proposes to delete this Interpretation.
Interpretation .02 of CBOE Rule 15.10. CBOE Rule 15.10 pertains to the reporting requirements that are applicable to short sales in the Nasdaq National Market. Specifically, Interpretation .02 to this Rule requires that, when a Market-Maker facilitates an option or combination order from off of the Exchange trading floor and contemporaneously hedges the resulting position with a short sale Nasdaq National Market, the Market-Maker must give prior notification to an Exchange official or Trading Official prior to making such trade. Then, in turn, the Exchange Official or Trading Official must file a report describing such transaction with the Exchange's “Department of Market Surveillance.” The Department of Market Surveillance used to be a department within the Exchange's Regulatory Division. Presently, the Department of Market Surveillance no longer exists and is simply referred to as part of the Regulatory Division in general. Therefore, the Exchange proposes to amend this Interpretation to bring it up to date by amending the reference to “Department of Market Surveillance” and replacing it with “Regulatory Division.”
CBOE Rule 24.9(a)(5)(i) and Interpretations .04 and .08 of Rule 24.9. CBOE Rule 24.9 details the terms of index option contracts that are traded on the Exchange. Specifically, CBOE Rule 24.9(a)(5)(i) and Interpretation .04 of CBOE Rule 24.9 pertain to the exercise settlement values for CBOE's index options based on the FT-SE (U.K.) 100 Index (the FT-SE Index”). Also, Interpretation .08 of CBOE Rule 24.9 pertains to the trading of reduced-value LEAPS on the FT-SE 100 stock index. The Exchange no longer trades options on the FT-SE Index and reduced value LEAPS on the FT-SE stock index, and it does not plan to trade them in the future. For this reason, CBOE Rule 24.9(a)(5)(i) and Interpretations .04 and .08 of CBOE Rule 24.9 are no longer necessary and the Exchange proposes to delete those sections.
Interpretation .06 of CBOE Rule 24.9. Interpretation .06 of CBOE Rule 24.9 pertains to the use of “implied forward levels” in determining the strike prices on options based on indices of Mexican stocks. Currently, the Exchange does not trade options based on indices of Mexican stocks, and it has no intention of trading them in the future. For this reason, Interpretation .06 is no longer necessary and therefore the Exchange proposes to delete this section.
2. Statutory Basis
By proposing to amend those Exchange rules, or portions thereof, which have been determined to be obsolete, outdated and/or unnecessary, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with section 6(b) of the Act  in general and furthers the objectives of section 6(b)(5) of the Act  in particular in that it should promote just and equitable principles of trade, serve to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange states that the proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange states that no written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change: (1) Does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on competition; and (3) by its terms does not become operative for 30 days after the date of this filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act  and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
- Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
- Send an e-mail to email@example.com. Please include File No. SR-CBOE-2006-41 on the subject line.
- Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, Start Printed Page 35964Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File No. SR-CBOE-2006-41. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-CBOE-2006-41 and should be submitted on or before July 13, 2006.Start Signature
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.
Nancy M. Morris,
3. In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange made certain clarifying changes regarding the purposes for the proposed changes. For purposes of calculating the 60-day period within which the Commission may summarily abrogate the proposed rule change the Commission considers the period to commence on June 15, 2006, the date on which the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1. See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).Back to Citation
6. As required by Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii), 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii), the CBOE submitted written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing.Back to Citation
11. See supra at note 3.Back to Citation
[FR Doc. E6-9853 Filed 6-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P