Mr. Gary Abel is a former General Manager of the Sterigenics International Inc. (Sterigenics), facility in Tustin, California.
An NRC inspection was conducted at Sterigenics' facility in Tustin, California on October 18-19, 2004, to review compliance with the NRC's June 6, 2003, Order Imposing Compensatory Measures (Order) for Panoramic and Underwater Irradiator Licensees. Following that inspection, an investigation was initiated by the NRC Office of Investigations (OI) in order to determine whether Mr. Abel, who was the General Manager of the facility at the time, engaged in deliberate misconduct. Based on the results of the NRC inspection and investigation, the NRC identified that Mr. Abel acted in apparent violation of 10 CFR 30.10, “Deliberate misconduct.” 10 CFR 30.10 states, in part, that any employee of a licensee may not: (1) Engage in deliberate misconduct that causes a licensee to be in violation of any order issued by the Commission; or (2) deliberately submit to the NRC information that the person submitting the information knows to be incomplete or inaccurate in some respect material to the NRC. Attachment 3 of the NRC's June 6, 2003 Order requires certain specific handling requirements for documents containing Safeguards Information-Modified Handling (SGI-M).
Based on the inspection and investigation, the NRC was concerned that between December 2003 and April 2004, Mr. Abel engaged in deliberate misconduct when he faxed, over unprotected telecommunications circuits, a document containing SGI-M, when he knew this was prohibited by the Order. This act caused the licensee to be in violation of the June 6, 2003, Order. In addition, the NRC was concerned that Mr. Abel submitted to the NRC information that he knew was incomplete or inaccurate regarding some of the circumstances relating to the faxed document.
In a letter dated March 21, 2006, the NRC identified to Mr. Abel an apparent violation of 10 CFR 30.10, and offered Mr. Abel the opportunity to either request a predecisional enforcement conference or request Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) with the NRC in an attempt to resolve any disagreement on whether a violation occurred and if a violation did in fact occur, the appropriate enforcement sanction. In response to the March 21, 2006 letter, Mr. Abel requested ADR to resolve the matter with the NRC. ADR is a process in which a neutral mediator with no decision-making authority assists the NRC and Mr. Abel to resolve any differences regarding the matter.
An ADR session was held between Mr. Abel and the NRC in Lisle, Illinois, Start Printed Page 57573on August 4, 2006. During that ADR session, an agreement was reached. The elements of the agreement consisted of the following:
1. The NRC and Mr. Abel agree that a violation of 10 CFR 30.10 occurred. Specifically, 10 CFR 30.10 prohibits, in part, any licensee or licensee employee from engaging in deliberate misconduct that causes a licensee to be in violation of any rule or Order issued by the Commission. Mr. Abel agrees that he deliberately faxed a document containing SGI-M information over unprotected telecommunications circuits to a security contractor in violation of the NRC's June 6, 2003, Order Imposing Compensatory Measures (Order) for Panoramic and Underwater Irradiator Licensees. This caused Mr. Abel's former employer to be in violation of the Order.
2. Mr. Abel does not agree that he violated 10 CFR 30.10 by deliberately providing information that was inaccurate and incomplete to the NRC. The NRC and Mr. Abel agree to disagree regarding this point.
3. The NRC and Mr. Abel agree that the actions in this paragraph are sufficient to address the NRC's concerns. Mr. Abel agrees to issuance of a letter and Confirmatory Order confirming this agreement, and also agrees to waive any request for a hearing regarding this Confirmatory Order. The Confirmatory Order would include the following elements:
A. Mr. Abel will not engage in future NRC or Agreement State licensed activities for a period of 1 year to begin on the date of this Confirmatory Order or on October 1, 2006, whichever date is sooner.
B. Not later than 90 days from the date of the Confirmatory Order, Mr. Abel will write an article for publication in the NRC's NMSS Newsletter that is mutually agreeable. The article will address the following elements: (1) That he was employed at a senior position at an irradiation facility, (2) how an individual should conduct themselves during an NRC inspection (e.g., the need for candor and forthrightness, the need to acknowledge violations forthrightly, if found, the potential consequences to an individual who does not provide complete and accurate information to the NRC, etc. * * *), and (3) the importance of controlling SGI-M material. The NRC agrees that Mr. Abel's article will be published anonymously, and Mr. Abel will submit the article to an addressee which the NRC will provide.
C. In light of Mr. Abel's agreement as described in Item 3, the NRC agrees not to take any further action against Mr. Abel regarding this matter.
D. Mr. Abel understands that the NRC, as part of its normal process, will issue a press release with the Confirmatory Order. The NRC will provide Mr. Abel a copy of the press release prior to its release.
On September 16, 2006, Mr. Abel consented to issuing this Confirmatory Order with the commitments, as described in Section IV below. Mr. Abel further agreed in his September 16, 2006, consent and waiver that this Confirmatory Order is to be effective upon issuance and that he has waived his right to a hearing. Implementation of these commitments will provide enhanced assurance that documents containing SGI-M will be appropriately protected and will resolve the NRC's concerns. I find that Mr. Abel's commitments as set forth in Section IV are acceptable and necessary and conclude that with these commitments the public health and safety are reasonably assured. In view of the foregoing, I have determined that the public health and safety require that Mr. Abel's commitments be confirmed by this Order. Based on the above and Mr. Abel's consent, this Confirmatory Order is immediately effective upon issuance.
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 147, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, the Commission's regulations in 10 CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR Part 30, and the Commission's June 6, 2003 Order, it is hereby ordered, effective immediately, that:
(1) Mr. Abel will not engage in future NRC or Agreement State licensed activities for a period of 1 year to begin on the date of this Confirmatory Order or on October 1, 2006 whichever date is sooner.
4. Not later than 90 days from the date of the Confirmatory Order, Mr. Abel will write an article for publication in the NRC's NMSS Newsletter that is mutually agreeable. The article will address the following elements: (1) That he was employed at a senior position at an irradiation facility, (2) how an individual should conduct themselves during an NRC inspection (e.g., the need for candor and forthrightness, the need to acknowledge violations forthrightly, if found, the potential consequences to an individual who does not provide complete and accurate information to the NRC), and (3) the importance of controlling SGI-M material. The NRC agrees that Mr. Abel's article will be published anonymously, and Mr. Abel will submit the article to an addressee which the NRC will provide.
The Director, Office of Enforcement may relax or rescind, in writing, any of the above conditions upon a showing by Mr. Abel of good cause.
Any person adversely affected by this Confirmatory Order, other than Mr. Abel, may request a hearing within 20 days of its issuance. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the time to request a hearing. A request for extension of time must be made in writing to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and include a statement of good cause for the extension. Any request for a hearing shall be submitted to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff, Washington, DC 20555. Copies also shall be sent to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, to the Assistant General Counsel for Materials Litigation and Enforcement at the same address, to the Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV, 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011, and to Mr. Abel. Because of the possible disruptions in delivery of mail to United States Government offices, it is requested that answers and requests for hearing be transmitted to the Secretary of the Commission either by means of facsimile transmission to 301-415-1101 or by e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org and also to the Office of the General Counsel either by means of facsimile transmission to 301-415-3725 or by e-mail to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov. If such a person requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with particularity the manner in which his interest is adversely affected by this Order and shall address the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.309 (d) and (f).
If a hearing is requested by a person whose interest is adversely affected, the Commission will issue an Order designating the time and place of any hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered at such hearing shall be whether this Confirmatory Order should be sustained.
An answer or a request for hearing shall not stay the immediate effectiveness of this order.Start Signature
Dated this 22nd day of September, 2006.
For the nuclear regulatory commission.
Cynthia A. Carpenter,
Director, Office of Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E6-16075 Filed 9-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P