Federal Communications Commission.Start Printed Page 40815
In the Special Access Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), the Commission commenced a broad examination of the regulatory framework to apply to interstate special access services provided by price cap local exchange carriers (LECs), including whether the special access pricing flexibility rules that the Commission adopted in 1999 have worked as intended. This document invites interested parties to update the record in light of industry developments.
Comments are due on or before August 8, 2007 and reply comments are due on or before August 15, 2007.
You may submit comments, identified by WC Docket No. 05-25 and RM-10593, by any of the following methods:
- Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
- Federal Communications Commission's Web Site: http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
- E-mail: email@example.com, and include the following words in the body of the message: “Get form.” A sample form and directions will be sent in response.
- First-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
Detailed instructions for submitting comments, including how to submit comments by hand, messenger delivery or by commercial overnight courier, and additional information on the rulemaking process are contained in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Margaret Dailey, Wireline Competition Bureau, Pricing Policy Division (202) 418-1520, firstname.lastname@example.org.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
This is a summary of the Commission's Public Notice, FCC 07-12, released on July 9, 2007. The full text of this document is available for public inspection during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554 and may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.fcc.gov/.
Pursuant to the Commission's rules governing notices of proposed rulemakings, 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, the Commission invites interested parties to update the record in this proceeding. In the Special Access NPRM, 70 FR 19381, April 13, 2005, the Commission commenced a broad examination of the regulatory framework to apply to interstate special access services provided by price LECs, including whether the special access pricing flexibility rules that the Commission adopted in 1999 have worked as intended. 47 CFR 69.701 et seq.; Pricing Flexibility Order, 64 FR 51258, Sept. 22, 1999. On June 8, 2005, a Protective Order was entered to enable parties to submit documents that contain proprietary or confidential information and to ensure adequate protection for such documents. In response to the Special Access NPRM, the Commission received comments on June 13, 2005 and reply comments on July 29, 2005.
Since these comments were filed, a number of developments in the industry may have affected parties' positions on the issues raised in the Special Access NPRM. These developments include a number of significant mergers and other industry consolidations, the continued expansion of intermodal competition in the market for telecommunications services, which affects the uses of, and competition to provide, a variety of special access services or alternatives; and GAO's November 2006 release of Report 07-80 (GAO Report), which summarizes its review of certain aspects of the market for special access services. Accordingly, the Commission requests that parties refresh the record in this proceeding to reflect the effects of these developments. Parties should include any new information or arguments that may be relevant to the Commission's consideration of what action, if any, may be appropriate in this proceeding. We also ask parties to address the specific questions below, which were not raised in the Special Access NPRM. First, parties should comment on the effect of the post Special Access NPRM mergers and other industry consolidation on the availability of competitive special access facilities and providers. Parties should also comment on the effect these mergers may have had on scale economies or the profitability of special access services. In addition, since the release of the Special Access NPRM, demand for wireless voice and wireless broadband services has increased, and special access has been an important input for these services. We seek comment on how special access pricing affects the price and availability of wireless services and the investment in and deployment of wireless networks. In the Special Access NPRM, the Commission sought comment on both the price and cost of special access services, and on how costs for special access facilities should be estimated. We seek comment here on methods that may be used to estimate the costs of special access facilities, including whether models may appropriately be used to estimate such costs. For example, cost and engineering models have been used to estimate the cost of Unbundled Network Elements. Could they also be used to estimate costs of special access facilities? We note that a number of carriers have embarked on significant upgrades to their networks to provide high capacity services to their customers. We seek information on projected costs per customer to deploy these facilities. To assist in the assessment of the reasonableness of rates for special access services, we ask parties to supplement the record with information on vendor prices for high capacity transmission equipment, outside plant, fiber, and fiber installation, and on prices for nonregulated services that provide similar or equivalent capabilities to special access services, such as Ethernet and packet-based services.
In the Special Access NPRM, the Commission noted that an examination of the current state of competition in the marketplace is critical to a determination of whether our pricing flexibility rules have worked as intended. We asked parties to comment and provide data on whether DS-1 special access channel terminations between the LEC end office and the customer premises are in the same product market as DS-3 and OCn channel terminations. In light of rapid changes in fiber technologies, we now ask parties to comment on whether we should further subdivide optical fiber services into low capacity OCn services (such as OC-3) and higher capacity OCn services. We particularly seek information as to how much capacity competitors believe is necessary to justify building new facilities to serve customers.
This inquiry is also relevant to the Commission's analysis of demand responsiveness. In the Special Access NPRM, the Commission stated that parties may demonstrate that the market for a particular special access service is not competitive by showing that a significant number of an incumbent price cap LEC's customers cannot purchase a comparable special access service from an entity other than the LEC. Parties are invited to comment on whether any changes in the market have affected the availability of comparable alternatives. To the extent that parties contend that continued regulation of special access services is warranted, we request that they provide specific Start Printed Page 40816proposals for an appropriate regulatory scheme to assure reasonable rates and conditions for special access services. Finally, we ask parties to comment on the analysis and findings in the GAO Report summarizing GAO's review of competition in the market for special access services.
Ex Parte Requirements
This matter shall be treated as a “permit-but-disclose” proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 CFR 1.1200 et seq. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. 47 CFR 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth at 47 CFR 1.1206(b).
Comment Filing Procedures
Pursuant to Commission rules governing notices of proposed rulemakings, interested parties may file comments on or before August 8, 2007 and reply comments on or before August 15, 2007. 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419. All pleadings must reference WC Docket No. 05-25 and RM-10593. Comments may be filed using: (1) The Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS); (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal; or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121, May 1, 1998. Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the ECFS at http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/ or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Filers should follow the instructions provided on the Web sites for submitting comments. For ECFS filers, if multiple docket or rulemaking numbers appear in the caption of this proceeding, filers must transmit one electronic copy of the comments for each docket or rulemaking number referenced in the caption. In completing the transmittal screen, filers should include their full name, U.S. Postal Service mailing address, and the applicable docket or rulemaking number. Parties may also submit an electronic comment by Internet e-mail. To get filing instructions, commenters should send an e-mail to email@example.com, and should include the following words in the body of the message: “get form.” A sample form and directions will be sent in reply.
Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one docket or rulemaking number appear in the caption of this proceeding, commenters must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number. Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail (although we continue to experience delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). Parties are strongly encouraged to file comments electronically using the Commission's ECFS. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
The Commission's contractor will receive hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary at 236 Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110, Washington, DC 20002. The filing hours at this location are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All hand deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before entering the building. Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington DC 20554.
Parties should also send a copy of their filings to Margaret Dailey, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Room 5-A232, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554, or by e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org. Parties shall also serve one copy with the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, (202) 488-5300, or via e-mail to email@example.com.
Documents in WC Docket No. 05-25 and RM-10593 are available for public inspection and copying during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from BCPI, telephone (202) 488-5300, facsimile (202) 488-5563, TTY (202) 488-5562, e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org. These documents may also be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.fcc.gov/. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to email@example.com or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (tty).Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects
and 69End List of Subjects Start Signature
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
[FR Doc. E7-14272 Filed 7-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P