Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
We are amending the regulations governing the importation of citrus fruit to allow fresh Unshu oranges from the Republic of Korea to be imported into the State of Alaska under certain conditions. As a condition of entry, the oranges will have to be prepared for shipping using packinghouse procedures that include culling of damaged or diseased fruit and cleaning with high-pressure air or water in combination with brushing. In addition, the oranges will have to be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate with an additional declaration stating that the oranges were inspected and found free from Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri and Unaspis yanonensis. The individual cartons or boxes in which the Unshu oranges are shipped will also have to be marked with a statement restricting their importation and distribution to the State of Alaska. This action will allow for the importation of Unshu oranges from the Republic of Korea into Alaska while continuing to provide protection against the introduction of quarantine pests.
Effective Date: November 26, 2007.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Alex Belano, Import Specialist, Commodity Import Analysis and Operations, Plant Health Programs, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 734-8765.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
Citrus canker is a disease that affects citrus and is caused by the infectious bacterium Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri (also known as Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri and Xanthomonas citri). Currently, the regulations in 7 CFR 319.28 (referred to below as the regulations) allow the importation of Unshu oranges (Citrus reticulata var. unshu) from certain areas in the Republic of Korea (South Korea) into certain areas of the United States under a permit and after the specified safeguards of a preclearance program have been met to prevent the introduction of citrus canker. However, the importation of Unshu oranges from South Korea was administratively suspended in 2002 due to the increased number of interceptions of the causal agent of citrus canker at various packinghouses in South Korea.
In 2005, the national plant protection organization (NPPO) of South Korea requested that the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) allow the shipment of Unshu oranges into the State of Alaska until the pest risk of citrus canker from South Korea could be adequately mitigated for the rest of the United States.
On December 4, 2006, we published in the Federal Register (71 FR 70330-70335, Docket No. APHIS-2006-0133) a proposal  to allow the importation of fresh Unshu oranges from the Republic of Korea into the State of Alaska under certain conditions. As a condition of entry, we proposed that the oranges would have to be prepared for shipping using packinghouse procedures that include culling of damaged or diseased fruit and washing in a water bath. In addition, we proposed that the oranges would have to be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate with an additional declaration stating that the oranges were inspected and found free from Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri and Unaspis yanonensis. The individual cartons or boxes in which the Unshu oranges are shipped would also have to be marked with a statement restricting their importation and distribution to the State of Alaska. This action was intended to allow for the importation of Unshu oranges from the Republic of Korea into Alaska while continuing to provide protection against the introduction of quarantine pests.
We solicited comments concerning our proposal for 60 days ending February 2, 2007. We received two comments by that date, both from domestic citrus industry groups. One of the commenters expressed concern that a pesticide not approved for use in the United States could be imported on fruit from South Korea. While the United States does not have direct control over pesticides that are used on food commodities such as Unshu oranges in other countries, there are regulations in the United States concerning the importation of food to ensure that commodities do not enter the United States containing illegal pesticide residues. Through section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the authority to establish, change, or cancel tolerances for food commodities. These tolerances are the maximum levels of pesticide residues that have been determined, through comprehensive safety evaluations, to be safe for human consumption. Tolerances apply to both food commodities that are grown in the United States and food commodities that are grown in other countries and imported into the United States. While EPA has no authority in a foreign country, the tolerance levels are enforced once the commodity enters the Start Printed Page 60538United States. Chemicals such as DDT that are banned in the United States do not have tolerances on food commodities. Federal Government food inspectors are responsible for monitoring food commodities that enter the United States to confirm that tolerance levels are not exceeded and that residues of pesticide chemicals that are banned in the United States are not present on the commodities. Tolerance levels for all chemicals that are acceptable for use on Unshu oranges may be found in EPA's regulations in 40 CFR 180.101 through180.2020. Tolerance information can also be obtained at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/food/viewtols.htm.
Both commenters expressed concern that the systems approach developed by South Korea was not stringent enough, given the difficulty of eradicating X. axonopodis pv. citri (citrus canker) and the potential risks from asymptomatic fruit. Concerns included the lack of requirements for worker training, equipment sanitation, and establishment of buffer zones. In particular, the commenters were concerned that the proposed rule did not mention inspection or sampling rates for citrus canker. As stated in the proposed rule, shipments of Unshu oranges to Alaska present minimal risk of introducing or disseminating citrus canker due to the lack of host material within Alaska and the lack of a suitable climate for establishment of the disease. For those reasons, and because visibly infected fruit will be culled at the packinghouse, we are not requiring a sampling regime for Unshu oranges within South Korea. In addition, fruit exposed to, but asymptomatic for, citrus canker is unlikely to have sufficient levels of viable bacteria to cause infection. However, a standard port of entry inspection rate of 2 percent would apply. APHIS has successfully operated similar programs of low risk for tropical fruit commodities imported into Alaska, such as sand pears and apples from Japan, avocados from Mexico, and sand pears from South Korea.
Both commenters also stated that, despite labeling restricting distribution of the fruit to Alaska, it may accidentally be redirected or sent through first-class mail to a citrus-producing State. As stated in the risk management document, in the past 10 years, over 24 million Unshu oranges from South Korea have been imported and only one air shipment of misdirected fruit ended up in a citrus-producing State. That shipment was immediately redirected to a non-citrus-producing State. In order for the fruit to leave Alaska by ground transport, it would have to travel by truck or car via highway, and all agricultural shipments are inspected at the U.S.-Canada border. As citrus fruit is not grown in Canada or Alaska, import restrictions for non-U.S. citrus fruit would apply. Further, we consider the volume of fruit shipped in first-class mail to be too small to present a potential pest risk. The probability of potentially infected citrus fruit reaching areas where any disease could spread is very low.
Both commenters further expressed concern regarding the lack of a requirement for sodium hypochlorite or sodium orthophenyl phenol in the required water bath and concern that the water bath could contribute to the spread of citrus canker. As stated above, we believe shipments of Unshu oranges to Alaska present a minimal risk of introducing or disseminating citrus canker due to the lack of host material and the lack of a suitable climate for establishment of the disease; therefore requiring the use of a disinfectant wash is not necessary. In addition, because the water bath requirement is actually a combination high-pressure water spray and brushing intended to remove external insect pests, there is no standing water that can serve as a medium for transmitting infection. Alternately, forced air cleaning and brushing may be used in place of the water spray. We have amended the regulatory text in § 319.28(c)(1) to make that clear.
Finally, both commenters stated that U.S. inspectors should be present to oversee all aspects of South Korea's citrus export program. In a preclearance program, U.S. inspectors are required to be onsite in the country of export to oversee shipments to the United States. However, the program for importing Unshu oranges to Alaska from South Korea is not a preclearance program. Therefore, the presence of U.S. inspectors to oversee the program is not required and, based on the reasons given in the proposed rule, is not necessary.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the proposed rule and in this document, we are adopting the proposed rule as a final rule, with the change discussed in this document.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. The rule has been determined to be not significant for the purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
The United States is not a commercial producer of Unshu oranges (Citrus reticulata var. unshui). The United States does produce other mandarin varieties of Citrus reticulata, such as tangerines and Satsuma mandarins. Effects of the final rule on U.S. entities will depend on (1) the substitutability in Alaska of Unshu oranges for these other mandarin varieties, and (2) Alaska's share of the U.S. supply of the other mandarin varieties. We address these overriding issues before discussing small entities that may be affected.
Unshu orange prices are higher than the prices of U.S.-grown mandarin varieties, indicating that they are not close substitutes. Retail prices of Unshu oranges are approximately $1.20 per pound, whereas other mandarin varieties, such as Satsuma, range from $0.60 to $1 per pound depending on the time of year.
Clearly, the effects of the final rule with respect to Alaska's broadly defined demand for all mandarin varieties are most likely to be very limited. Rather, we expect reestablished imports from South Korea to compete for a share of Alaska's Unshu orange market.
Prior to the administrative suspension in 2002, South Korea and Japan were principal suppliers of Unshu oranges to the United States. It is estimated that Alaska consumes approximately 30 percent of the Unshu oranges imported from Japan. Quantities of Unshu oranges imported from South Korea and Japan, 1995 to 2005, are shown in table 1.Start Printed Page 60539
|Source: USDA, APHIS, International Services.|
|1 In 2002, we amended the regulations to allow Unshu oranges from Honshu Island, Japan, to be imported into the previously prohibited citrus-producing States of Arizona, California, Florida, Hawaii, Louisiana, and Texas. That same rule imposed a fumigation requirement for all Unshu oranges from Honshu Island, which seriously curtailed the market for that fruit in non-citrus producing States. As a result, there were no exports of Unshu oranges from Japan to the United States in 2002. We subsequently amended the regulations to apply the fumigation requirement only to fruit bound for citrus-producing States, and exports resumed in 2003.|
Unshu orange imports from Japan between 1995 and 2005 averaged 238 metric tons per year. Average imports of Unshu oranges from South Korea between 1995 and 2002 were 644 metric tons per year, with significant year-to-year fluctuations and the average for 2001 and 2002 jumping to 1,518 metric tons. Imports of Unshu oranges from Japan have maintained a more steady supply, even in the more recent years during which Unshu oranges from South Korea have been administratively suspended. From this data, it is not apparent that South Korean supplies will significantly displace Unshu orange imports from Japan.
According to the pest risk assessment prepared for this rulemaking, the quantity of Unshu oranges that will be imported from South Korea into Alaska each year is estimated to be between 200 and 2,000 metric tons (440,925 and 4,409,245 pounds), based on projected imports of between 10 and 100 standard 40-foot containers. The lower end of this range of imports will be comparable to recent import levels from Japan. Based upon the past shipments detailed in table 1, we anticipate that imports of Unshu oranges from South Korea will not exceed 75 containers (1,500 metric tons) per annum. The historical import data detailed in table 1 suggest that South Korean supplies will not significantly displace Japanese Unshu oranges on the Alaskan market.
Our expectation is that the final rule will have little effect on U.S. producers of mandarin varieties such as tangerines and Satsumas. Any impact for these producers will be small, given that the various mandarin varieties do not appear to be close substitutes for Unshu oranges. Moreover, only sales to Alaska will be affected. However, recognizing that our information for determining possible effects of the final rule is incomplete, we present here data on U.S. tangerine trade and production.
The United States is a net importer of mandarins (including Satsumas and tangerines). In 2005, the United States imported 209.4 million pounds of mandarins (including Satsumas and tangerines) with approximately 91 percent arriving from Spain. In that same year, the United States exported approximately 48.1 million pounds of mandarins (including Satsumas and tangerines). Canada is the largest importer of U.S. fresh mandarins, accounting for 52 percent of U.S. exports. The second and third largest importers of U.S. mandarins are South Korea and Japan, accounting for approximately 38 and 6 percent of exports, respectively. U.S. imports of tangerines experienced an average increase of 17.8 percent annually over the last decade while exports have increased an average of 5.9 percent. Domestic production accounted for approximately 80 percent of domestic fresh consumption in 2005. The United States relies on imports of mandarins to supplement domestic production in satisfying domestic demand. Fresh utilization of U.S. mandarin and tangerine production only accounts, on average, for 70 percent of total utilized production annually. U.S. grower revenue from fresh tangerine production in 2004-05 was approximately $107.4 million.
U.S. tangerine production, imports, and domestic supplies are shown in table 2. Net imports were 20 percent of domestic supply in 2004 to 2005.Start Printed Page 60540
|Year||Production a||Net imports b||Supply c|
|Data Source: USDA/ERS Briefing Room, Fruit and Tree Nut Yearbook, 2005.|
|a Excludes processed fruit.|
|b Net imports are imports minus exports.|
|c U.S. production (excluding processed utilization) plus net imports.|
The small business size standard for tangerine groves, as identified by the Small Business Administration (SBA) based upon the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 111320, is $750,000 or less in annual receipts.
While available data do not provide the size distribution of U.S. tangerine farms by annual receipts, it is reasonable to assume that the majority of the operations are small businesses by SBA standards. According to the 2002 Census of Agriculture data, there were a total of 1,731 tangerine operations in the United States in 2002. It is estimated that approximately 93 percent of all citrus-producing farms had annual sales in 2002 of $500,000 or less.
If Unshu oranges and U.S.-grown mandarin varieties were close substitutes, then U.S. entities could be affected to the extent that Unshu orange imports from South Korea would displace sales in Alaska of the U.S.-grown mandarin varieties. Small entities would be affected, since they comprise a substantial number of the producers of mandarin varieties, as indicated by the data on tangerine operations. However, even if all Unshu orange imports from South Korea were to directly replace consumption of U.S.-grown tangerines in Alaska, the effect on U.S. producers will be very minor. Under such a scenario, annual imports of Unshu oranges from South Korea of 2,000 metric tons (the upper limit of the projected range of imports) will displace less than 1 percent of fresh tangerines produced by U.S. operations in 2004-05. We emphasize that even a small impact for U.S. producers such as this is highly unlikely.
We expect that any product displacement that may occur as a result of the changes will be borne by other foreign suppliers of Unshu oranges, in particular Japan's exporters. However, we do not expect any significant product displacement as a result of South Korean supplies. Alaska's Unshu orange consumers may benefit to the extent that the competition results in price declines.
An alternative to this final rule was to continue with the 2002 administrative suspension of the importation of Unshu oranges from South Korea into all parts of the United States, including Alaska. Continuing the suspension of South Korean Unshu orange imports into Alaska is not a satisfactory alternative to the final rule. The final rule's specified mitigation measures will ensure a low risk of introduction of citrus canker and Diaspidad scale into the United States. Resumption of imports will reestablish competition with Japanese suppliers, benefitting U.S. consumers but with little if any expected effect on U.S. producers.
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This final rule allows fresh Unshu oranges to be imported into the State of Alaska from South Korea. State and local laws and regulations regarding Unshu oranges imported under this rule will be preempted while the fruit is in foreign commerce. Fresh fruits are generally imported for immediate distribution and sale to the consuming public, and remain in foreign commerce until sold to the ultimate consumer. The question of when foreign commerce ceases in other cases must be addressed on a case-by-case basis. No retroactive effect will be given to this rule, and this rule will not require administrative proceedings before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information collection or recordkeeping requirements included in this rule have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under OMB control number 0579-0314.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to compliance with the E-Government Act to promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies, to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. For information pertinent to E-Government Act compliance related to this rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste Sickles, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 734-7477.Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
- Nursery stock
- Plant diseases and pests
- Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
Accordingly, we are amendingEnd Amendment Part Start Part
PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE NOTICESEnd Part Start Amendment Part
1. The authority citation for part 319 continues to read as follows:End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
2. Section 319.28 is amended as follows:End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
a. By redesignating paragraphs (c) through (i) as paragraphs (d) through (j), respectively.End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
b. By adding a new paragraph (c) to read as set forth below.End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
c. By revising newly redesignated paragraph (f) to read as set forth below.End Amendment Part
(c) The prohibition does not apply to Unshu oranges (Citrus reticulata Blanco var. unshu, Swingle [Citrus unshiu Marcovitch, Tanaka]), also known as Satsuma mandarin, grown in the Republic of Korea and imported under permit into the State of Alaska under the following conditions:
(1) The Unshu oranges must be prepared for shipping using packinghouse procedures that include culling damaged or diseased fruit and cleaning the fruit with high-pressure air or water spray in combination with brushing.
(2) Each shipment of Unshu oranges must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate from the national plant protection organization of the Republic of Korea bearing the following additional declaration: “These oranges were inspected and are considered to be free from citrus canker (Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri) and arrowhead scale (Unaspis yanonensis).
(3) The individual boxes in which the oranges are shipped must be marked with the following: “These oranges may not be shipped to or distributed in any State other than Alaska.”
(f) Importations allowed in paragraphs (b), (c), (d), and (e) of this section shall be subject to the permit and other requirements under the regulations in Subpart-Fruits and Vegetables of this part.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0314)
Done in Washington, DC, this 19th day of October, 2007.
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
1. To view the proposed rule and the comments we received, go to http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS-2006-0133.Back to Citation
2. Information on retail prices of Unshu oranges provided by Jerry Kraft of The Oppenheimer Group, the sole importer of Unshu oranges from Japan.Back to Citation
3. This average does not include 2002, since it is likely that Japan would have exported Unshu oranges to the United States in that year if the fumigation requirement described in footnote 1 of table 1 had not been in place.Back to Citation
4. USDA, APHIS, PPQ-CHPST, ``A Qualitative Pest Risk Analysis for the Importation of Fresh Unshu Orange Fruit (Citrus reticulata Blanco var. unshu Swingle) from the Republic of Korea,'' May 25, 2006, pg 33.Back to Citation
5. Source: Global Trade Atlas.Back to Citation
6. Source: USDA, FAS, PS&D Online. ``Fresh Tangerines: Production, Supply and Distribution in selected Countries,'' http://www.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/psdDownload.aspx.Back to Citation
7. The proportion of domestic fresh consumption attributed to U.S. production is production less exports and processed utilization. Data Source: USDA ERS Briefing Room, Fruit and Tree Nut Yearbook, 2005.Back to Citation
8. USDA, ERS Briefing Room, Fruit and Tree Nut Yearbook, 2005.Back to Citation
9. Florida Agricultural Statistics Service (FASS), National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), USDA, ``Citrus Summary 2004-05,'' February 2006.Back to Citation
10. Based upon 2002 Census of Agriculture, State Data and the “Small Business Size Standards by NAICS Industry,” Code of Federal Regulations, Title 13, Chapter 1.Back to Citation
11. Based upon 2002 Census of Agriculture, State Data.Back to Citation
12. The number of tangerine farms in the United States, as reported by the 2002 Census of Agriculture, includes operations that produced tangerines for processed utilization.Back to Citation
[FR Doc. E7-21007 Filed 10-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P