This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Rule
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
100
as of
07/12/2026 at 6:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
We are amending the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act regulations for certain live bacterial and viral vaccines by removing the requirement to retest the Master Seeds for immunogenicity 3 years after the initial qualifying immunogenicity test. In addition, we are amending the requirement concerning mouse safety tests prescribed for a biological product recommended for animals other than poultry. These changes update the standard requirements by eliminating unnecessary testing of Master Seed bacteria and viruses and other forms of bulk or completed biological product.
DATES:
Effective Date:
January 22, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. Albert P. Morgan, Chief Staff Officer, Operational Support Section, Center for Veterinary Biologics, Policy, Evaluation, and Licensing, APHIS, USDA, 4700 River Road, Unit 148, Riverdale, MD 20737-1228; (301) 734-8245.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Virus-Serum-Toxin Act regulations in 9 CFR part 113 (referred to below as the regulations) contain standard procedures and requirements that are used to establish the purity, safety, potency, and efficacy of veterinary biological products. Current standard requirements for certain live bacterial and viral vaccines require that each Master Seed be retested for immunogenicity 3 years after the initial immunogenicity test.
The requirement to confirm the immunogenicity of a Master Seed at 3 years has been in place since the master seed concept for vaccine production was established, and had been considered necessary until such time that an accumulation of data derived from such confirmatory testing established the antigenic stability of Master Seed bacteria and viruses over extended periods of storage. Data accumulated by veterinary biologics licensees over several years have shown that the immunogenicity of the Master Seed is not adversely affected over extended periods of storage.
On January 31, 2007, we published in the
Federal Register
(72 FR 4470-4472, Docket No. APHIS-2006-0079) a proposal[1]
to amend the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act regulations for certain live bacterial and viral vaccines by removing the requirement to retest the Master Seeds for immunogenicity 3 years after the initial qualifying immunogenicity test. We also proposed to amend the requirement concerning mouse safety tests prescribed for biological products recommended for animals other than poultry.
We solicited comments concerning our proposal for 60 days ending April 2, 2007. We received two comments by that date, from a trade association representing veterinary biologics manufacturers and a representative of a State animal health commission.
One commenter supported the elimination of unnecessary testing/retesting from the regulations and noted that such action would decrease duplicative testing in animals. With regard to using the subcutaneous route of inoculation when conducting the mouse safety test, that same commenter recommended that proposed § 113.33(a)(1) should provide the option to split the injection volume among more than one injection site. The commenter pointed out that this recommendation was consistent with the “good practice” guidelines for subcutaneous injections recommended by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care.
We agree with the commenter's recommendation and have amended § 113.33(a)(1) in this final rule to allow the option of dividing the 0.5 mL inoculation volume among more than one injection site.
The second commenter expressed concern that adverse local reactions may be missed if intraperitoneal inoculation is the only route used for the mouse safety test, and suggested that such test be conducted by inoculating mice using both the subcutaneous and intraperitoneal routes instead of by only one route as had been proposed.
In response to the commenter's concern that adverse local reactions may be missed if only one route is used, we wish to point out that § 113.300(b) of the regulations requires final container samples from each serial of product to be tested for safety in at least one species for which the vaccine is intended; the purpose of such test is to ensure freedom from undue adverse local reactions. Accordingly, we are not making any changes in this final rule in response to the comment.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the proposed rule and in this document, we are adopting the proposed rule as a final rule, with the changes discussed in this document.
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. The rule has been determined to be not significant for the purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
We are amending the regulations for certain live bacterial and viral vaccines to eliminate the requirement to retest the Master Seed for immunogenicity 3 years after the initial qualifying immunogenicity test. In addition, this amendment updates the regulations concerning mouse safety tests by requiring either intraperitoneal or subcutaneous inoculation of mice, but not both, in such tests. The primary effect of this rule will be to update the standard requirements by eliminating unnecessary testing of Master Seed bacteria and viruses and other forms of bulk or completed product in animals.
( printed page 72564)
There are approximately 125 veterinary biologics establishments, including licensees and permittees that may be affected by this rule. According to the standards of the Small Business Administration, most veterinary biologics establishments would be classified as small entities.
It is anticipated that no increased recordkeeping burden will be added to licensees or permittees since the amended regulations actually will mean that fewer tests will be needed and fewer reports required to be submitted. We further anticipate that licensees and permittees may benefit economically from the cost savings associated with the reduction in the amount of required animal testing. The overall effect of this amendment will be to reduce the costs associated with producing and testing veterinary biological products.
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This program/activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance under No. 10.025 and is subject to Executive Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local officials. (See 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V.)
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect. This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule. The Virus-Serum-Toxin Act does not provide administrative procedures which must be exhausted prior to a judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no new information or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501et seq.).
(1) Vaccine prepared for use as recommended on the label shall be tested by inoculating eight mice intraperitoneally or subcutaneously with 0.5 mL (the inoculation volume may be divided among more than one injection site), and the animals observed for 7 days.
(2) If unfavorable reactions attributable to the product occur in any of the mice during the observation period, the serial or subserial is unsatisfactory. If unfavorable reactions which are not attributable to the product occur, the test shall be declared inconclusive and may be repeated:
Provided,
That, if the test is not repeated, the serial or subserial shall be declared unsatisfactory.
9. In §§ 113.302, 113.304, 113.314, 113.315, 113.317, 113.327, 113.331, and 113.332, paragraph (c)(4) is removed and paragraph (c)(5) is redesignated as paragraph (c)(4).