SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This rule makes four technical amendments to relevant portions of the Department of Justice regulations that provide whistleblower protections to FBI employees under 28 CFR parts 0 and 27. Three of the amendments are made so that the provisions conform with the organizational changes brought about by a restructuring of the FBI's Office of Professional Responsibility (FBI-OPR) in 2004, whereby FBI-OPR's investigatory function was moved to the FBI's Inspection Division (FBI-INSD) and FBI-OPR retained its adjudicatory role. The fourth change is made to conform the regulations with the implementing statute.

First, “the FBI Inspection Division (FBI-INSD) Internal Investigations Section,” is added to the list of offices designated to receive a “protected” disclosure in 28 CFR 27.1(a) because that is the office now responsible for investigating and most likely to receive allegations of misconduct internal to the FBI. ( printed page 1494)

Second, as presently worded, 28 CFR 27.1(b) provides that the Department's Office of Inspector General (OIG) or Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) may refer whistleblower disclosures to FBI-OPR for investigation unless the Deputy Attorney General determines that such referral shall not be made. To reflect the current assignment of responsibility, “FBI-OPR” in § 27.1(b) is changed to “FBI-INSD Internal Investigations Section.”

Third, like § 27.1(b), 28 CFR 0.29d(a) provides that OIG or DOJ-OPR may refer whistleblower disclosures to FBI-OPR for investigation unless the Deputy Attorney General determines that such referral shall not be made. “FBI-OPR” in § 0.29d(a) is changed to “FBI Inspection Division (FBI-INSD) Internal Investigations Sections.”

Finally, this rule also makes a technical correction to 28 CFR 27.4(e)(1), so that the “contributing factor” standard in that provision is consistent with 5 U.S.C. 1221(e)(1), in accordance with Congress' directive in 5 U.S.C. 2303(c) that “[p]rohibited personnel practices in the [FBI]” be enforced “in a manner consistent with applicable provisions of [5 U.S.C.] sections 1214 and 1221.” Section 1221(e)(1) provides, in relevant part:

[T]he Board shall order * * * corrective action as the Board considers appropriate if the employee, former employee, or applicant for employment has demonstrated that a disclosure described under section 2302(b)(8) was a contributing factor in the personnel action which was taken or is to be taken against such employee, former employee, or applicant. The employee may demonstrate that the disclosure was a contributing factor in the personnel action through circumstantial evidence, such as evidence that—

(A) the official taking the personnel action knew of the disclosure; and (B) the personnel action occurred within a period of time such that a reasonable person could conclude that the disclosure was a contributing factor in the personnel action.

The rule will change the third “or” in § 27.4(e)(1) to “and” in order to track this statutory language.

Administrative Procedure Act

This rule relates to matters of agency personnel, organization, and procedure, and is therefore exempt from the requirements of notice and comment and a 30-day delay in the effective date of 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2), (b)(3)(A), (d)(3).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Attorney General, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b), has reviewed this rule and, by approving it, certifies that this regulation will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because it pertains to personnel and administrative matters affecting the Department.

Executive Order 12866

This rule has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, section 1(b), Principles of Regulation. The Department has determined that this rule is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866, section 3(f), and accordingly this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.

Executive Order 12988

This rule meets the applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform.

Executive Order 13132

This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 13132, Federalism, the Department has determined that this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federal summary impact statement.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions are necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996

This rule is not a “major rule” as defined by section 251 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C. 804. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of the United States-based companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.

This action pertains to agency personnel, organization, and procedure and does not substantially affect the rights or obligations of non-agency parties. Accordingly it is not a “rule” for the purposes of the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801.

Congressional Review Act

The Department has determined that this action pertains to agency personnel, organization, and procedure and, accordingly, is not a “rule” as that term is used by the Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996). Therefore, the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not apply.

Accordingly, by virtue of the authority vested in me as Attorney General, including 5 U.S.C. 301 and 28 U.S.C. 509 and 510, parts 0 and 27 of title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations are amended as follows:

1. The authority for citation for part 0 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, 515-519.

2. Revise paragraph (a) of § 0.29d to read as follows:

3. The authority for citation for part 27 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 3151; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, 515-519; 5 U.S.C. 2303; President's Memorandum to the Attorney General, Delegation of Responsibilities Concerning FBI Employees Under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, 3 CFR p. 284 (1997).

4. Revise § 27.1 to read as follows:

5. Revise paragraph (e)(1) of § 27.4 to read as follows: