Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”)  and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, notice is hereby given that on March 11, 2008, the American Stock Exchange LLC (“Amex” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared substantially by the Amex. The Amex has submitted the proposed rule change under Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act  and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder, which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Amex proposes to amend Amex Rules 1A—AEMI, “Applicability, Definitions, References and Phase-In,” and 128A—AEMI, “Automatic Execution,” to reflect the widening of the spread tolerances and the elimination of the momentum tolerances built into the AEMI system. The Amex believes that these changes are necessary to enable the automated execution of orders and quotes (“Auto-Ex”) to occur more continuously on the Exchange, without unnecessary interruption.
The text of the proposed rule change is available at http://www.amex.com, the principal office of the Amex, and the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Amex included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item III below. The Amex has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
Spread and momentum tolerances are built into AEMI whereby if the difference in price of any two consecutive executions (spread) or velocity of price changes over a specific time window (momentum) in any particular security exceed certain thresholds—a “breach”—Auto-Ex is disabled in that security. Upon a breach, an Amex specialist would conduct an intra-day pair-off before Auto-Ex is restored. The Amex now believes that the tolerances, in their current form, are no longer essential to the proper functioning of an automated market, given that Regulation NMS  ensures price protection for automated quotations in other market centers that are priced better than the Amex top of book. Further, the Amex believes that the tolerances in their current form have not necessarily been effective in dampening price volatility (in contrast to Amex specialists' obligations to maintain reasonable depth with price continuity). The Amex also notes that its competitors, Nasdaq and NYSE Arca, do not impose such limitations on Auto-Ex in their markets. Accordingly, the Amex believes that the time has come to modify its systems so that Auto-Ex can occur more continuously, without Start Printed Page 14513unnecessary interruptions by breaches, and believes that market quality will not be compromised by such changes.
The proposed changes would double the existing spread tolerances, and eliminate the momentum tolerances, so that the automatic execution of trades by AEMI could occur more continuously during the trading day. The Amex states that Auto-Ex would be shut down only if: (i) There were a breach of a Tolerance (as re-defined by the proposal in Rule 128A—AEMI(g)); (ii) a systems, regulatory, or order imbalance issue required a halt to automatic trading, whereupon Auto-Ex would be re-enabled by the specialist via auction pair-off or re-opening pair-off, as per current practice; or (iii) if all liquidity on either side of the market in a particular security were momentarily exhausted, whereupon a non-firm stabilizing quote would be maintained until the specialist updated his firm quote, as per current practice.
2. Statutory Basis
The Amex believes that the proposed rule change is designed to be consistent with Regulation NMS, as well as Section 6(b) of the Act, in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Amex believes that the proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change.
II. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
The Amex has designated the proposed rule change as one that: (1) Does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on competition; and (3) does not become operative for 30 days from the date of filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. Therefore, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act  and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.
The Amex has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay. The Commission hereby grants the Amex's request. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest because other exchanges already operate in a manner proposed herein for AEMI, and the Amex's proposal does not appear to present any novel regulatory issues.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
- Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
- Send an e-mail to email@example.com. Please include File Number SR-Amex-2008-22 on the subject line.
- Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Amex-2008-22. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Amex. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make publicly available. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Amex-2008-22 and should be submitted on or before April 8, 2008.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.Start Signature
Florence E. Harmon,
5. See Rule 128A—AEMI(f)(i)-(ii).Back to Citation
7. The Amex states that New York Stock Exchange Rule 1000(a)(iv) specifies that Auto-Ex will disable when a “liquidity replenishment point” is reached. According to the Amex, a liquidity replenishment point is a type of spread tolerance. The Amex states, further, that the NYSE does not have anything equivalent to a momentum tolerance.Back to Citation
8. The Amex states that the “elimination” of the momentum tolerance (Rule 128A—AEMI(f)(ii)) will be accomplished systemically by re-setting the parameters programmed into AEMI at extreme values that should never be encountered, rather than eliminating the concept itself from AEMI, which would be a substantially more difficult system change.Back to Citation
9. See Rule 1A—AEMI (defining stabilizing quote).Back to Citation
13. 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) requires the Amex to provide the Commission with written notice of its intention to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description of the text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to filing the proposal with the Commission, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Commission has determined to waive the five-day period in this case.Back to Citation
14. For purposes of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).Back to Citation
[FR Doc. E8-5427 Filed 3-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P