Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Office for Terrorism Preparedness and Emergency Response, Division of State and Local Readiness.
Notification of intent to implement: (1) Maintenance of funding (MOF); (2) nonfederal matching requirements; (3) evidence-based benchmarks and objective standards; (4) maximum amount of carryover; (5) pandemic influenza operations plans criteria; (6) audit requirements; and (7) withholding and repayment guidelines. Links to the Interim Progress Report (IPR) for Budget Period 9 (BP9) of the Public Health Emergency Preparedness (PHEP) program are provided for informational purposes only.
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS or the Department), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), will issue an Interim Progress Report (IPR) for the PHEP cooperative agreement program in the third quarter of Fiscal Year (FY) 2008, as authorized under section 319C-1 of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act, as amended by the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act (PAHPA) (Pub. L. 109-417) (42 U.S.C. 247d-3a). The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, (H.R. 2764) provided funding for these awards. This notice provides information to facilitate the critical aspects of the program, including:
- Background of the program;
- Current requirements for awardees:
- Future requirements of awardees:
○ Nonfederal matching requirements—reduced or no award provided;
○ Evidence-based benchmarks and objective standards—substantial failure results in withholding of funds; Start Printed Page 30402
○ Maximum amount of carryover—exceeding the limit results in repayment of funds;
○ Pandemic influenza planning documents—failure to submit a sufficient operations plan results in withholding of funds;
○ Audit requirements—failure results in repayment of funds;
- Electronic submission;
- Important dates;
- PHEP IPR for BP9 (http://www.emergency.cdc.gov/);
- Withholding and Repayment Guidance (Attachment).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donna Knutson at (404) 639-7530, or e-mail at [email@example.com].End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
Background of the Program
Building on the lessons learned from the attacks of September 11, 2001, and Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005, the PAHPA was enacted in December 2006 to improve the Nation's public health and medical preparedness and response capabilities for emergencies, whether deliberate, accidental, or natural. The PAHPA amended and added new sections to the PHS Act. Examples of these changes include identifying the Secretary of Health and Human Services as the lead official for all Federal public health and medical responses to public health emergencies and other incidents covered by the National Response Framework; establishing the position of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), who will lead and coordinate HHS preparedness and response activities, advise the Secretary of Health and Human Services during an emergency, and lead the coordination of emergency preparedness and response efforts between HHS and other Federal agencies; consolidating Federal public health and medical response programs under the renamed ASPR; requiring the development and implementation of the National Health Security Strategy; and reauthorizing the PHEP cooperative agreements administered by CDC and the Hospital Preparedness Program (HPP) cooperative agreements administered by ASPR. In addition to reauthorizing these two cooperative agreement programs, the PAHPA added new requirements that awardees must meet. The purpose of this notice is to notify PHEP awardees about critical aspects and requirements of the PHEP cooperative agreements, as amended by PAHPA. The Secretary of Health and Human Services is required under section 319C-1(g) of the PHS Act to develop and require application of measurable benchmarks and objective standards that measure levels of preparedness with respect to PHEP activities. The Secretary of Health and Human Services must withhold funds beginning in FY 2009 from PHEP awardees who fail substantially to meet the applicable benchmarks or objective standards for the immediately preceding fiscal year and/or who fail to submit a sufficient pandemic influenza operations plan. Thus, PHEP awardees will have funds withheld from their FY 2009 awards (as described in the attached withholding guidance) if, when expending their FY 2008 PHEP awards, they fail substantially to meet the benchmarks and objective standards described in the FY 2008 (BP9) IPR or to submit a sufficient pandemic influenza operations plan. The Secretary of Health and Human Services is required to develop and implement a process to notify entities who have failed substantially to meet the evidence-based benchmarks and objective standards or who have failed to submit a sufficient pandemic influenza operations plan. The process must provide awardees with the opportunity to correct their noncompliance.
Purpose: The purpose of the PHEP cooperative agreement program is to provide funding to improve and upgrade state and local public health jurisdictions' preparedness and response to bioterrorism, outbreaks of infectious diseases, and other public health threats and emergencies, utilizing the following goals:
1. Integration—integrating public health and public and private medical capabilities with other first responder systems including through—
i. The periodic evaluation of Federal, State, local, and tribal preparedness and response capabilities through drills and exercises; and
ii. The integration of public and private sector public health and medical donations and volunteers.
2. Public health—developing and sustaining Federal, State, local, and tribal essential public health security capabilities, including the following—
i. Disease situational awareness domestically and abroad, including detection, identification, and investigation.
ii. Disease containment including capabilities for isolation, quarantine, social distancing, and decontamination.
iii. Risk communication and public preparedness.
iv. Rapid distribution and administration of medical countermeasures.
3. Medical—increasing the preparedness, response capabilities, and surge capacity of hospitals, other healthcare facilities (including mental health facilities), and trauma care and emergency medical service systems, with respect to public health emergencies, which shall include developing plans for the following—
i. Strengthening public health emergency medical management and treatment capabilities.
ii. Medical evacuation and fatality management.
iii. Rapid distribution and administration of medical countermeasures.
iv. Effective utilization of any available public and private mobile medical assets and integration of other Federal assets.
v. Protecting healthcare workers and healthcare first responders from workplace exposures during a public health emergency.
4. At-risk individuals—
i. Taking into account the public health and medical needs of at-risk individuals in the event of a public health emergency.
ii. For purposes of these awards, the term “at-risk individuals” means children, pregnant women, senior citizens, and other individuals who have special needs in the event of a public health emergency, as determined by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (see the IPR for BP9 for updated definition).
5. Coordination—minimizing duplication of, and ensuring coordination between, Federal, State, local, and tribal planning, preparedness, and response activities (including Emergency Management Assistance Compact). Such planning shall be consistent with the National Response Framework, or any successor plan, and National Incident Management Systems and the National Preparedness Goal.
6. Continuity of operations—maintaining vital public health and medical services to allow for optimal Federal, State, local, and tribal operations in the event of a public health emergency.
Eligibility: Since the funding opportunity represents the fourth year of a five-year cooperative agreement, eligibility is limited to those currently funded through PHEP Program Announcement AA154 and authorized under 42 U.S.C. 247d-3a. Eligible applicants are the health departments of States or their bona fide agents, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, American Start Printed Page 30403Samoa, Guam, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Republic of Palau, and the official public health agencies of New York City, New York; Los Angeles County, California; and Chicago, Illinois.
Current Requirements of Awardees
Maintenance of Funding (MOF)
MOF is defined as ensuring that the amount contributed by the entity that receives the award to support public health security does not fall below the average of the amount provided annually during the previous two years. This definition includes:
1. Appropriations specifically designed to support public health emergency preparedness as expended by the entity receiving the award; and
2. Funds not specifically allocated for public health emergency preparedness activities but which support public health emergency preparedness activities, such as personnel assigned to public health emergency preparedness responsibilities or supplies or equipment purchased for public health emergency preparedness from general funds or other lines within the operating budget of the entity receiving the award.
The definition of expenditures does not include one-time expenses to support public health preparedness and response, such as purchases of antiviral drugs. Awardees will be required to document the required MOF as part of the IPR for BP9. According to Public Law 109-417, any funds withheld from the PHEP cooperative agreement program or the Hospital Preparedness Program will be reallocated to the Healthcare Facilities Partnership program in the same state.
Future Awardee Requirements
PHEP cooperative agreement funding must be matched by nonfederal contributions beginning with the distribution of federal FY 2009 funds (Budget Period 10). Nonfederal contributions (match) may be provided directly or through donations from public or private entities and may be in cash or in-kind, fairly evaluated, including plant, equipment, or services. Amounts provided by the federal government, or services assisted or subsidized to any significant extent by the federal government, may not be included in determining the amount of such nonfederal contributions. Awardees will be required to provide matching funds as described:
i. For FY 2009, not less than 5% of such costs ($1 for each $20 of federal funds provided in the cooperative agreement); and
ii. For any subsequent fiscal year of such cooperative agreement, not less than 10% of such costs ($1 for each $10 of federal funds provided in the cooperative agreement).
Please refer to 45 CFR 92.24 for match requirements, including descriptions of acceptable match resources. Documentation of match must follow procedures for generally accepted accounting practices and meet audit requirements. Beginning with federal FY 2009, the Secretary of Health and Human Services may not make an award to an entity eligible for PHEP funds unless the eligible entity agrees to make available nonfederal contributions as described above. CDC will require each eligible entity to include in its FY 2008 (BP9) mid-year progress report a plan describing the methods and sources of match that the eligible entity agrees to pursue in FY 2009.
Evidence-Based Benchmarks and Objective Standards
In accordance with section 319C-1(g)(1), CDC has established the following evidence-based benchmarks and objective standards. Substantial failure to meet these benchmarks and standards will result in withholding of funds for the FY 2009 budget year (BP10). The following benchmarks and standards also appear in the PHEP IPR for BP9:
1. Demonstrated capability to notify primary, secondary, and tertiary staff to cover all incident management functional roles during a complex incident.
To provide an effective and coordinated response to a complex incident, a public health department must maintain a current roster of pre-identified staff available to fill core Incident Command System (ICS) functional roles. During an incident that lasts more than 12 hours, secondary and tertiary staff may be called upon to fill ICS roles, and thus the health department must maintain a roster of all staff qualified for those roles. Testing the staff notification system is critical for an efficient response, especially when the notification is unannounced and occurs outside of regular business hours.
a. Confirm the accuracy of the primary, secondary, and tertiary contact information for all eight ICS functional roles at least once every six months.
b. Test the notification system twice a year, with at least one test being unannounced and occurring outside of regular hours. The test can be a drill or an exercise, or it may be demonstrated by a response to a real incident.
Guidance on the numerator, denominator, and scoring methodology to determine how results will factor in to a withholding penalty for this measure will be available by May 15, 2008.
2. Demonstrated capability to receive, stage, store, distribute, and dispense material during a public health emergency.
Health departments must be able to provide countermeasures to 100% of their identified population within 48 hours after the decision to do so. To be able to achieve this standard, health departments must maintain the capability to plan and execute the receipt, staging, storage, distribution, and dispensing of material during a public health emergency.
a. Obtain a score of 69 or higher on the Division of Strategic National Stockpile (DSNS) State Technical Assistance Review by December 31, 2008.
b. Each planning/local jurisdiction within each Cities Readiness Initiative (CRI) metropolitan statistical area conducts a minimum of three DSNS drills by August 10, 2009.
c. To comply with the PAHPA legislation and for purposes of guiding funding decisions for 2009, the planning/local jurisdiction(s) that comprises the 25% most populous within a CRI MSA conducts at least one of the three DSNS drills prior to December 31, 2008 (with the remaining two drills conducted by August 10, 2009).
These drills may include any three of the following: staff call down, site activation, facility set-up, pick-list generation, dispensing, and/or modeling of throughput. Guidance on the numerator, denominator, and scoring methodology to determine how results will factor in to a withholding penalty for this measure will be available by May 15, 2008.
Maximum Amount of Carryover
CDC shall determine the maximum percentage amount of an award that an awardee may carry over to the succeeding fiscal year. Unjustifiable unobligated balances will be determined by using the awardee's spend plan and financial status and progress/performance reports. (See the Withholding and Repayment Guidance for additional information).
To provide effective program management, an awardee must be able to develop and execute spend plans, make procurements and let contracts on schedule, and otherwise assure the Start Printed Page 30404infrastructure capacity to support the attainment of programmatic objectives. One outcome of an effective management infrastructure is the full expenditure of funds awarded in the budget period.
CDC recognizes that there may be justifiable causes (e.g., state hiring freezes, inefficiencies on the part of the awarding agency) or unjustifiable causes (e.g., ineffective management infrastructure at the state level, irregularities in contracting or payment of debt) for dollars to remain unobligated at the end of the budget period even after a robust execution of plans. Therefore, the awardee must immediately communicate with CDC any events occurring between the scheduled spend plan and progress/performance report date which have significant impact upon the cooperative agreement.
CDC will make available by May 15, 2008, additional guidance regarding spend plan and progress/performance reports to determine how results will factor into a repayment penalty for this measure.
Pandemic Influenza Plans
State pandemic influenza operations plans must meet national standards. On June 16, 2008, awardees will submit a second version of their pandemic influenza operations plans based on guidance provided by HHS on March 13, 2008. Two scores (Comprehensiveness and Operational Readiness) for each of the seven elements in the “Health and Medical” category will be used by CDC to determine the extent to which criteria have been met, as follows:
No Major Gaps
A Few Major Gaps
Many Major Gaps
Operational Readiness Score:
Substantial Evidence of Operational Readiness
Significant Evidence of Operational Readiness
Little Evidence of Operational Readiness
Failure to meet accepted criteria for pandemic influenza operations planning will result in the withholding of funds for the FY 2009 budget period. Guidance on the numerator, denominator, and scoring methodology for this measure will be available by May 15, 2008.
Each entity receiving funds shall, not less than once every two years, audit its expenditures from amounts received from the PHEP cooperative agreement. Such audits shall be conducted by an entity independent of the agency administering the PHEP cooperative agreement in accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations.
Audit reports must be submitted to CDC. Failure to conduct an audit or expenditures made not in accordance with PHEP cooperative agreement guidance and grants management policy may result in a requirement to repay funds to the Federal treasury or the withholding of future funds.
Given the technical capabilities necessary to carry out and document the activities required under this program, HHS is announcing the funding opportunity on the grants.gov Web site at http://www.grants.gov. Detailed instructions for submitting the combined IPR and application for funding will be available through a download in the Preparedness Emergency Response System for Oversight, Reporting, and Management Services (PERFORMS) at https://sdn/cdc/gov.
Important PHEP Dates
- Anticipated application due date: June 27, 2008.
- Anticipated award date: August 11, 2008.
Please refer to the PHEP IPR for actual reporting dates and requirements.
Withholding and Repayment Guidance
The Withholding and Repayment Guidance is provided in its entirety for review as an attachment. (See attachment below.)Start Signature
Dated: May 20, 2008.
James D. Seligman,
Chief Information Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services.
CDC Public Health Emergency Preparedness Cooperative Agreement Withholding and Repayment Guidance
This standard operating procedure (SOP) describes procedures CDC will use to implement withholding or repayment actions in connection with the Public Health Emergency Preparedness (PHEP) cooperative agreement program.
A. Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act (PAHPA) requirements for the PHEP Cooperative Agreement. The PAHPA requires the withholding of amounts from entities that fail to achieve benchmarks and objective standards or to submit an acceptable pandemic influenza operations plan, beginning with Fiscal Year 2009 and in each succeeding fiscal year:
Benchmarks and Statewide Pandemic Influenza Operations Plan
(1) Enforcement Condition: Awardees substantially fail to meet evidence-based benchmarks and objective standards and/or fail to prepare and submit an acceptable pandemic influenza operations plan.
Please note 319C-1(g)(6)(B) Separate Accounting: Each failure described under A(1) shall be treated as a separate failure for purposes of calculating amounts withheld under A(2). For example, a failure to achieve applicable benchmarks as a whole will count as one failure and a failure to submit a pandemic influenza operations plan will count as a second failure.
(2) Enforcement Action:
- Withhold funds—Fiscal Year 2008 is for the purpose of evaluation to determine the amount to be withheld from the year immediately following year of failure. Additionally, each failure is to be treated as a separate failure for the purposes of the penalties described below:
- Initial failure—withholding in an amount equal to 10% of funding per failure.
- Two consecutive years of failure—withholding in an amount equal to 15% of funding per failure.
- Three consecutive years of failure—withholding in an amount equal to 20% of funding per failure.
- Four consecutive years of failure—withholding in an amount equal to 25% of funding per failure.
- Reallocation of amount withheld—According to Pub. L. 109-417, any funds withheld from the PHEP or the Hospital Preparedness Program will be reallocated to the Healthcare Facilities Partnership program in the same state.
- Preference in reallocation—According to Pub. L. 109-417, any funds withheld from the PHEP or the Hospital Preparedness Program will be reallocated to the Healthcare Facilities Partnership program in the same state.
Waive or Reduce: The Secretary of Health and Human Services may waive or reduce the withholding as described above for a single entity or for all entities in a fiscal year, if the Secretary determines that mitigating conditions Start Printed Page 30405exist that justify the waiver or reduction.
(1) Enforcement Condition: Awardees who fail to submit the required audit or spend amounts in noncompliance.
(2) Enforcement Action: Grants Management Officer disallows costs and requests payment via standard audit disallowance process or temporarily withholds funds pending corrective action.
Adjudication: Enforcement will be in accordance with 45 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR), part 16.
(1) Enforcement Condition: For each fiscal year, the percentage amount of an award unexpended by an awardee exceeds the maximum percentage permitted by the Secretary.
(2) Enforcement Action: Awardees shall return to the Secretary the portion of the unexpended amount that exceeds the maximum permitted to be carried over. According to Public Law 109-417, any funds withheld from the PHEP or the Hospital Preparedness Program will be reallocated to the Healthcare Facilities Partnership program in the same state.
Waive or Reduce: The awardee may request a waiver of the maximum percentage amount or the Secretary may waive or reduce the withholding as described above for a single entity or for all entities in a fiscal year, if the Secretary determines that mitigating conditions exist that justify the waiver or reduction. The Secretary will make a decision after reviewing the awardee's request for waiver.
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) permits grantees to appeal to the Departmental Appeal Board (DAB) certain post-award adverse administrative decisions made by HHS officials (see 45 CFR part 16). CDC has established a first-level grant appeal procedure that must be exhausted before an appeal may be filed with the DAB (see 42 CFR part 50.404). CDC will assume jurisdiction for any of the above adverse determinations.End Supplemental Information
[FR Doc. E8-11718 Filed 5-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P