Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD).
DoD is adopting as final, with changes, the interim rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement determinations made by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics with regard to the acquisition of items containing para-aramid fibers and yarns manufactured in foreign countries that have entered into a reciprocal defense procurement memorandum of understanding with the United States.
Effective Date: June 21, 2010.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Amy Williams, 703-602-0310.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
DoD published an interim rule in the Federal Register on December 18, 2008 (73 FR 76970). The comment period closed on February 17, 2009.
10 U.S.C. 2533a restricts DoD procurement of foreign synthetic fabric or coated synthetic fabric, including textiles, fibers, and yarns for use in such fabrics. Section 807 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Pub. L. 105-261) provides authority for DoD to waive the restriction at 10 U.S.C. 2533a with regard to para-aramid fibers and yarns. On February 12, 1999, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology (USD(AT&L)) waived the restriction at 10 U.S.C. 2533a for para-aramid fibers and yarns manufactured in the Netherlands. On August 15, 2008, the USD(AT&L) expanded the existing waiver to permit the acquisition of para-aramid fibers and yarns manufactured in any qualifying country listed in DFARS 225.003(10).
The interim rule also clarified the definition of “qualifying countries” at DFARS 225.003 and 252.225-7012 by including a list of the qualifying countries within the definition instead of referring to the list at DFARS 225.872-1.
DoD received comments on the interim rule from nine respondents. Based on public comments, changes were made to the interim rule. The differences between the interim rule and this final rule include—
- Restricting the authority to acquire para-aramid fibers and yarns manufactured in a qualifying country to apply to para-aramid fibers (both staple and continuous) and continuous filament para-aramid yarns, based on a new USD(AT&L) determination and findings, dated November 9, 2009, which contains a five year review requirement.
- Amplifying the definition of “qualifying country” to make clear that these are countries with which DoD has negotiated reciprocal defense procurement memoranda of understanding.
B. Public Comments
The following is a discussion of the comments and the changes included in this final rule as a result of those comments:Start Printed Page 34944
1. Limit the Rule to Staple Para-Aramid Fibers and Continuous Filament Para-Aramid Yarns
Two respondents opposed the interim rule acceptance of para-aramid yarns other than continuous filament yarns from any qualifying country (not just the Netherlands) because they believe it will increase competition from yarn producers outside the United States. They do not want the interim rule to apply to “yarns spun from staple para-aramid fibers.” They believe the rule should only apply to staple para-aramid fibers and continuous filament para-aramid yarns.
Response: The respondents' rationale is that section 807 says that DoD may only procure articles containing para-aramid fibers and yarns manufactured in a qualifying country if—
- Procuring articles containing para-aramid fibers and yarns manufactured from suppliers in the national technology industrial base (U.S. & Canada) would result in sole source contracts or subcontracts; and
- To do so would not be in the best interests of the Government.
DoD's 1999 Findings of Fact stated that DuPont is the sole manufacturer of para-aramid (continuous and staple) fiber in the United States and Canada. This is a correct statement. Therefore, the request by the respondents to limit this rule to staple para-aramid fiber is unfounded.
However, the Findings also stated that DuPont is the sole producer of para-aramid yarn. DuPont is the sole producer of continuous filament para-aramid yarn, but it does not produce within the U.S. yarns made from staple para-aramid fiber. DoD has now identified 72 yarn producers in the U.S. and Canada, and three of these advertise that they produce yarn products made from DuPont Kevlar. DuPont supplies its Kevlar staple fiber to four major and six minor yarn producers in the U.S. and Canada, and it believes that there are several dozen more companies in Europe who produce yarn of this type.
Therefore, the Under Secretary of Defense (AT&L) issued on November 9, 2009, a revised determination and findings that limits the findings to staple and continuous para-aramid fibers and continuous filament para-aramid yarn. The final rule has been revised accordingly.
2. Review in Five Years To Establish Continued National Defense Need
One respondent commented that this exception should be reviewed in five years and extended only if needed for national defense purposes. Another respondent notes that DuPont is in the process of building a new plant in South Carolina and that this would boost the availability of these products in the U.S.
Response: DoD concurs. The request from industry that precipitated the USD (AT&L)'s determination to waive the restriction for all qualifying countries was based on DoD's immediate and increasing need for ballistic strength fiber in support of MRAP, ballistic armor, and other defense requirements in support of the Global War on Terror. It is reasonable to assume that this need will continue for at least five years, but a review at that time is a good idea. This requirement has been included in the new determination and findings.
3. Detrimental to U.S. Manufacturing Base
Several respondents opposed this rule on the basis that it would be detrimental to the U.S. textile manufacturing base.
One respondent was concerned about negative impact on spinners, knitters, weavers, finishers, and garment makers in the supply chain. Another respondent expressed concern over more foreign imports, when the jobs are so desperately needed in our own country (see also discussion of Regulatory Flexibility at paragraph 6). A third respondent referred to detrimental impact on the textile manufacturing base. He cited the exodus of textile manufacturing from the United States for decades and stated that the textile manufacturing that remains has moved into high performance and niche specialty areas. This respondent stated that by allowing items containing these fibers and the importation of yarns to move forward will continue to erode the U.S. textile manufacturing base.
Response: There are only two companies in the United States or a qualifying country that make para-aramid fibers and continuous filament para-aramid yarns: DuPontTM which makes Kevlar®, and the Teijin Group which makes Twaron. DuPontTM is the sole producer of these items in the United States. Therefore, this rule, when amended to exclude yarn produced from staple para-aramid fibers, will not deprive any U.S. companies of business.
The concern for the well-being of the textile industry, including knitters, weavers, finishers, and garment makers, is misplaced. This rule does not allow acquisition of items containing para-aramid fibers and continuous filament yarns from qualifying countries, but only the fibers and yarns (see DFARS 225.7002-2(m)).
4. Domestic Para-Aramid Sewing Thread May Be of Lower Quality
One respondent fully supported the interim rule and recommended that it should be made permanent. The respondent cited an experience with the specification to use para-aramid thread that was heavier and weaker than the commercial thread that was used in the commercial marketplace, in order to comply with the domestic source restriction.
Response: The Berry Amendment does not require the use of domestic fibers at the expense of satisfactory quality. There is an exception that can be applied if domestic products of a satisfactory quality are not available.
5. Need To Expand the Nations From Which Fiber Can Be Procured
One respondent proposed we add other friendly nations of quality ballistic fiber, such as Japan and India, to the list of nations from which these fibers can be procured.
Response: The authority provided to DoD in section 807 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Pub. L. 105-261) specifically applies only to foreign countries that are a party to a reciprocal defense procurement memorandum of understanding (MOU) entered into under section 2531 of title 10 of the United States Code and that permits United States firms that manufacture para-aramid fibers and yarns to compete with foreign firms for the sale of para-aramid fibers and yarns in that country, as determined by the Secretary of Defense. Section 2531 begins as follows:
(a) Considerations in Making and Implementing MOUs and Related Agreements. In the negotiation, renegotiation, and implementation of any existing or proposed memorandum of understanding, or any existing or proposed agreement related to a memorandum of understanding, between the Secretary of Defense, acting on behalf of the United States, and one or more foreign countries (or any instrumentality of a foreign country) relating to research, development, or production of defense equipment, or to the reciprocal procurement of defense items, the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1) Consider the effects of such existing or proposed memorandum of understanding or related agreement on the defense technology and industrial base of the United States; and
(2) Regularly solicit and consider comments and recommendations from the Secretary of Commerce with respect to the commercial implications of such memorandum of understanding or Start Printed Page 34945related agreement and the potential effects of such memorandum of understanding or related agreement on the international competitive position of United States industry.
Under the authority of 10 U.S.C. 2531, DoD has negotiated reciprocal defense procurement (RDP) MOUs with “qualifying” countries. These RDP MOU partners have committed to remove barriers to purchases of supplies produced in the other country or services performed by sources in the other country. The qualifying countries listed at DFARS 225.003(10) are the countries with which DoD has reciprocal defense procurement MOUs. DoD has not negotiated reciprocal defense procurement MOUs with Japan or India.
6. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
One respondent commented on the statement with regard to regulatory flexibility analysis that small entities normally are not involved in the production of para-aramid fibers and yarns. The respondent stated that there are many small entities involved in the weaving and production of para-aramid fabrics and that it would be devastating to the textile industry to expand the rule to cover the import of woven fabric or finished products.
Response: Since the rule does not cover the import of woven fabric or finished products, but addresses only fibers and yarns, this statement does not affect the requirement for a regulatory flexibility analysis. The reinstated requirement for domestic manufacture of yarn from staple para-aramid fiber removes any possible impact on domestic small entities.
7. Clarify the Definition of “Qualifying Country”
One respondent stated that the interim rule insufficiently defined “qualifying country.” Alternate language was provided to expand this definition:
“Qualifying country” means a country with a memorandum of understanding or international agreement with the United States in which both agree to remove barriers to purchases of supplies produced in the other country or services performed by sources of the other country, and the memorandum or agreement complies, where applicable, with the requirements of section 36 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776) and with 10 U.S.C. 2457.
Response: DoD has adopted the expanded definition.
8. Outside Scope of Case
a. One respondent recommends that DoD should also exempt meta-aramid fibers from qualifying countries.
Response: This comment is outside the scope of this case. The law which DoD is implementing only authorizes the exceptions for para-aramid fibers.
b. One respondent has comments regarding other changes to the clause at DFARS 252.212-7001.
Response: These comments relate to DFARS Case 2008-D002 and have been considered under that case.
This rule was subject to Office of Management and Budget review under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because there are no small entities in the United States that can produce para-aramid fibers or continuous filament para-aramid yarns. The impact on spinners of para-aramid yarn other than continuous filament yarn has been removed by the change to the final rule.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply, because the rule does not impose any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 225 and 252End List of Subjects Start Signature
Ynette R. Shelkin,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Accordingly, the interim rule amendingEnd Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
1. The authority citation forEnd Amendment Part Start Part
PART 225—FOREIGN ACQUISITIONEnd Part Start Amendment Part
2. Section 225.003 is amended by revising the introductory text of paragraph (10) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(10) Qualifying country means a country with a reciprocal defense procurement memorandum of understanding or international agreement with the United States in which both countries agree to remove barriers to purchases of supplies produced in the other country or services performed by sources of the other country, and the memorandum or agreement complies, where applicable, with the requirements of section 36 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776) and with 10 U.S.C. 2457. Accordingly, the following are qualifying countries:
3. Section 225.7002-2 is amended by revising paragraph (m)(2) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
(m) * * *
(2) The fibers and yarns are para-aramid fibers and continuous filament para-aramid yarns manufactured in a qualifying country.
PART 252—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSESEnd Part Start Amendment Part
4. Section 252.212-7001 is amended by revising the clause date and revising paragraph (b)(8) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT STATUTES OR EXECUTIVE ORDERS APPLICABLE TO DEFENSE ACQUISITIONS OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JUN 2010)
(b) * * *
(8) ______ 252.225-7012, Preference for Certain Domestic Commodities (JUN 2010) (10 U.S.C. 2533a).
5. Section 252.225-7012 is amended by revising the clause date; revising the introductory text of paragraph (a)(3); and revising paragraph (c)(6)(ii) to read as follows:End Amendment Part
PREFERENCE FOR CERTAIN DOMESTIC COMMODITIES (JUN 2010)
(a) * * *Start Printed Page 34946
(3) Qualifying country means a country with a reciprocal defense procurement memorandum of understanding or international agreement with the United States in which both countries agree to remove barriers to purchases of supplies produced in the other country or services performed by sources of the other country, and the memorandum or agreement complies, where applicable, with the requirements of section 36 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776) and with 10 U.S.C. 2457. Accordingly, the following are qualifying countries:
(c) * * *
(6) * * *
(ii) The fibers and yarns are para-aramid fibers and continuous filament para-aramid yarns manufactured in a qualifying country.
[FR Doc. 2010-14937 Filed 6-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P