This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Rule
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
295
as of
10/06/2026 at 6:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Defense Acquisition Regulations System. Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
DoD is issuing a final rule, with changes, amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to update text on transportation matters relating to DoD contracts.
DATES:
Effective Date:
August 20, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Mary Overstreet, Defense Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DARS), 3060 Defense Pentagon, Room 3B855, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Telephone 703-602-0311; facsimile 703-602-0350. Please cite DFARS Case 2003-D028.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
In keeping with the DFARS Transformation initiative objective of improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the acquisition process, while allowing the acquisition workforce the flexibility to innovate, DoD issued a proposed rule at 70 FR 43109 on July 26, 2005, to update text on transportation matters relating to DoD contracts, including clarifying certain shipping procedures and offering additional guidance on their use.
This final rule is a result of the DFARS Transformation initiative. The changes to the final rule—
○ Delete text on transportation matters that are sufficiently addressed in the Federal Acquisition Regulation or in DoD transportation regulations;
○ Clarify requirements for inclusion of shipping instructions in solicitations and contracts; and
○ Delete procedures for contracting for the preparation of property for shipment or storage; and for preparation of consignment instructions. Text on these subjects will be relocated to the DFARS companion resource, Procedures, Guidance, and Information (PGI). Additional information on PGI is available at
http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/pgi.
( printed page 51417)
B. Public Comments
No public comments were received in response to the proposed rule.
C. Summary of Changes to the Proposed Rule
The following changes to the proposed rule resulted from DoD deliberations:
○ 247.001 indicates the availability of additional information at PGI 247.001 for the Voluntary Intermodal Sealift Agreement program.
○ 247.200 indicates the availability of additional guidance at PGI 247.200 for procurement of transportation or related services.
○ 247.270-3, proposed for deletion, has been retained (redesignated as 240.270-2).
○ 247.271-2, proposed for deletion, has been retained (redesignated as 247.271-1).
○ 247.271-4(i) (redesignated as 247.271-3(i)) indicates the availability of additional information at PGI 247.271-3(c)(1) for demurrage and detention charges.
○ 247.301 indicates the availability of guidance at PGI 247.301 relating to Government Purchase Card purchases that require shipments to destinations outside CONUS.
○ 247.371 (redesignated as 247.370) indicates the availability of guidance at PGI 247.370 relating to DD Form 1384, Transportation Control and Movement Document.
This is not a significant regulatory action, and therefore, is not subject to review under Section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD certifies that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq.,
because the rule addresses internal DoD requirements for transportation planning and management. Therefore, DoD has not performed a final regulatory flexibility analysis. No comments were received from small business concerns and other interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small entities.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the rule does not impose any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501,
et seq.
For definitions of “Civil Reserve Air Fleet” and “Voluntary Intermodal Sealift Agreement,” see Joint Pub 1-02, DoD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. See additional information at PGI 247.001 for the Voluntary Intermodal Sealift Agreement program.
This subpart does not apply to the operation of vessels owned by, or bareboat chartered by, the Government. See additional guidance at PGI 247.200 for procurement of transportation or related services.
Solicitation provisions, schedule formats, and contract clauses.
* * * * *
(c) In solicitations and resulting contracts, the schedules provided by the installation personal property shipping office. Follow the procedures at PGI 247.271-3(c) for use of schedules.
* * * * *
(i) The clause at 252.247-7014, Demurrage. See additional information at PGI 247.271-3(c)(1) for demurrage and detention charges.
* * * * *
15. Section 247.301 is revised to read as follows:
Use the clause at 252.247-7021, Returnable Containers Other Than Cylinders, in solicitations and contracts for supplies involving contractor-furnished returnable reels, spools, or other returnable containers if the
( printed page 51418)
contractor is to retain title to the containers.
DD Form 1384, Transportation Control and Movement Document.
The transportation office of the shipping activity prepares the DD Form 1384 to accompany all shipments made through a military air or water port, in accordance with DoD 4500.9-R, Defense Transportation Regulation, Part II, Chapter 203. A link to this document is available in PGI 247.370.
DD Form 1653, Transportation Data for Solicitations.
The transportation specialist prepares the DD Form 1653 to accompany requirements for the acquisition of supplies. The completed form should contain recommendations for suitable f.o.b. terms and other suggested transportation provisions for inclusion in the solicitation.
Ocean transportation incidental to a contract for supplies, services, or construction.
* * * * *
(b) DD Form 1653, Transportation Data for Solicitations, shall be used—
(1) By the requesting activity in developing the Government estimate for transportation costs; and
(2) By the contracting officer in ensuring that valid shipping instructions and delivery terms are included in solicitations and contracts that may involve transportation of supplies by sea.
(c) If the contractor notifies the contracting officer that the contractor or a subcontractor considers that—
(1) No U.S.-flag vessels are available, the contracting officer must request confirmation of the nonavailability from—
(i) The Commander, Military Sealift Command (MSC), through the Contracts and Business Management Directorate, MSC; or
(ii) The Commander, Military Surface Deployment and Distribution (SDDC), through the SDDC global e-mailbox
sddc.ops.ffw@us.army.mil
and the Principal Assistant Responsible for Contracting, SDDC.
(2) The proposed freight charges to the Government, the contractor, or any subcontractor are higher than charges for transportation of like goods to private persons, the contracting officer may approve a request for an exception to the requirement to ship on U.S.-flag vessels for a particular shipment.
(i) Prior to granting an exception, the contracting officer must request advice, oral or written, from the Commander, MSC, or the Commander, MTMC.
(ii) In advising the contracting officer whether to grant the exception, the Commander, MSC, or the Commander, SDDC, must consider, as appropriate, evidence from—
(A) Published tariffs;
(B) Industry publications;
(C) The Maritime Administration; and
(D) Any other available sources.
(3) The freight charges proposed by U.S.-flag carriers are excessive or otherwise unreasonable—
(i) The contracting officer must prepare a report in determination and finding format, and must—
(A) Take into consideration that the 1904 Act is, in part, a subsidy of the U.S.-flag commercial shipping industry that recognizes that lower prices may be available from foreign-flag carriers. Therefore, a lower price for use of a foreign-flag vessel is not a sufficient basis, on its own, to determine that the freight rate proposed by the U.S.-flag carrier is excessive or otherwise unreasonable. However, such a price differential may indicate a need for further review;
(B) Consider, accordingly, not only excessive profits to the carrier (to include vessel owner or operator), if ascertainable, but also excessive costs to the Government (i.e., costs beyond the economic penalty normally incurred by excluding foreign competition) resulting from the use of U.S.-flag vessels in extraordinarily inefficient circumstances; and
(C) Include an analysis of whether the cost is excessive, taking into account factors such as—
(
1) The differential between the freight charges proposed by the U.S.-flag carrier and an estimate of what foreign-flag carriers would charge based upon a price analysis;
(
2) A comparison of U.S.-flag rates charged on comparable routes;
(
3) Efficiency of operation regardless of rate differential (
e.g.,
suitability of the vessel for the required transportation in terms of cargo requirements or vessel capacity, and the commercial reasonableness of vessel positioning required); and
(
4) Any other relevant economic and financial considerations.
(ii) The contracting officer must forward the report to—
(A) The Commander, MSC, through the Contracts and Business Management Directorate, MSC; or
(B) The Commander, through the SDDC global e-mailbox:
sddc.ops.ffw@us.army.mil
and the Principal Assistant Responsible for Contracting, SDDC.
(iii) If in agreement with the contracting officer, the Commander, MSC, or the Commander, SDDC, will forward the report to the Secretary of the Navy or the Secretary of the Army, respectively, for a determination as to whether the proposed freight charges are excessive or otherwise unreasonable.
21. Section 247.573-2 paragraph (d) is amended by removing the acronym “MTMC” and adding in its place the acronym “SDDC” each time it appears as follows:
a. In paragraph (d)(1) introductory text;
b. In paragraph (d)(1)(i);
c. In paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(B);
d. In paragraph (d)(1)(iii);
e. In paragraph (d)(2);
f. In paragraph (d)(3)(ii)(B); and
g. In paragraph (d)(3)(iii).
PART 252—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
22. Sections 252.247-7000 through 252.247-7002 and 252.247-7004 through 252.247-7007 are amended in the introductory text by removing “247.270-6” and adding in its place “247.270-4”.
26. Sections 252.247-7014 and 252.247-7016 through 252.247-7020 are amended in the introductory text by removing “247.271-4” and adding in its place “247.271-3”.