Office of the Secretary, Department of Defense.
The rule proposes to provide the Director, TRICARE Management Activity (TMA), or designee, with the authority to sanction third-party billing agents by invoking the administrative remedy of exclusion or suspension from the TRICARE program. Such sanctions Start Printed Page 58203may be invoked in situations involving fraud or abuse on the part of third-party billing agents that prepare or submit claims presented to TRICARE for payment.
Written comments received at the address indicated below by November 21, 2011 will be accepted.
You may submit comments, identified by docket number and or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) number and title, by either of the following methods:
- Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
- Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark Center Drive, 2nd Floor, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-3100.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number or RIN for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Joy Saly, TRICARE Management Activity, Medical Benefits and Reimbursement Branch, telephone (303) 676-3742.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
TRICARE has regulatory authority under 32 CFR 199.9 to invoke sanctions in situations involving fraud or abuse on the part of providers of TRICARE services. A provider is defined in 32 CFR 199.2 as, “A hospital or other institutional provider, a physician, or other individual professional provider, or other provider of services or supplies as specified in Sec 199.6 of this part.” Third-party billing agents do not meet the definition of a provider as stated in 32 CFR 199.2, nor do TRICARE regulations currently define third-party billing agents.
Title 42 of the CFR subpart C—Exclusions at 42 CFR 402.200(b)(1) provides for the imposition of an exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs (and, where applicable, other Federal health care programs) against persons that violate the provisions provided in Sec. 402.1(e) (and further described in Sec. 402.1(c)). However, TRICARE has to date established no independent regulatory authority to sanction or exclude third-party billing agents.
When TRICARE identifies submission of improper claims by a third-party billing agent not identified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), TRICARE must refer the case to another Federal agency (Defense Criminal Investigative Service, Department of Justice, etc.) for action. In addition, CMS' authority extends only to those third-party billing agents in the United States because Medicare only covers care received in the U.S. or its territories.
II. Department of Defense Inspector General Report on TRICARE Controls Over Claims Prepared by Third-party Billing Agents
The Department of Defense, Office of Inspector General (DoD IG) initiated an audit in February 2008 to review TRICARE controls over claims submitted by third-party billing agents (Department of Defense Inspector General Report No. D-2009-037—“TRICARE Controls Over Claims Prepared by Third-Party Billing Agencies”). The DoD IG published a report on December 31, 2008. The report included a recommendation that the Director, TMA strengthen internal controls by initiating action to obtain statutory or regulatory authority to sanction billing agencies or any entities that prepare or submit improper health care claims to TRICARE contractors.
Statutory authority already exists that provides the Secretary with the authority to administer the TRICARE program to ensure quality of care for program beneficiaries, including sanctioning entities determined to be involved fraud, abuse, or conflict of interest. TRICARE already has regulatory authority to invoke sanctions on providers under 32 CFR 199.9. Based on the existing statutory authority, TMA is pursuing a regulatory change that will provide the authority to ensure both providers and third-party billing agents are held accountable for the submission of correct and proper billings. The regulatory change proposes to implement the DoD IG recommendation by adding third-party billing agents as another entity under the regulation that can be sanctioned in situations where fraud and abuse are identified on the part of third-party billing agents that prepare or submit claims presented to TRICARE for payment.
TRICARE program policy acknowledges a participating provider may arrange for a third-party to act on its behalf in the submission and the monitoring of third-party claims, including TRICARE claims. There must be an agency relationship established in which the third-party billing agent is reimbursed for the submission and monitoring of claims, but the claim remains that of the provider and the proceeds of any third-party payments, including TRICARE payments, are paid to the provider. TRICARE contractors may deal with these agents in much the same manner as they deal with the provider's accounts receivable department. This proposed rule does not intend to change the current acknowledgment of a provider's right to use a third-party billing agent as a separate billing resource.
This rule seeks to establish that such entities, when acting on behalf of a provider, are held to an equal standard in regard to accuracy and honesty when filing claims for services and supplies under the TRICARE program. As such, these entities should be subject to the same administrative controls applied to providers in ensuring that funds are disbursed appropriately. This rule will allow TRICARE to sanction third-party billing agents to prevent the payment of false or improper billings.
Executive Order 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review” and Executive Order 13563, “Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review”
Section (Sec.) 801 of title 5, United States Code, and Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 require certain regulatory assessments and procedures for any major rule or significant regulatory action, defined as one that would result in an annual effect of $100 million or more on the national economy or which would have other substantial impacts. It has been certified that this rule is not a significant regulatory action.
Public Law 104-4, Section 202, “Unfunded Mandates Reform Act”
Section 202 of Public Law 104-4, “Unfunded Mandates Reform Act,” requires that an analysis be performed to determine whether any Federal mandate may result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million in any one year. It has been certified that this proposed rule does not contain a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year, and thus this proposed rule is not subject to this requirement.
Public Law 96-354, “Regulatory Flexibility Act” (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601)
Public Law 96-354, “Regulatory Flexibility Act” (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601), Start Printed Page 58204requires that each Federal agency prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis when the agency issues a regulation which would have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. This proposed rule is not an economically significant regulatory action, and it has been certified that it will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Therefore, this proposed rule is not subject to the requirements of the RFA.
Public Law 96-511, “Paperwork Reduction Act” (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
This rule does not contain a “collection of information” requirement, and will not impose additional information collection requirements on the public under Public Law 96-511, “Paperwork Reduction Act” (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Executive Order 13132, “Federalism”
E.O. 13132, “Federalism,” requires that an impact analysis be performed to determine whether the rule has federalism implications that would have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. It has been certified that this proposed rule does not have federalism implications, as set forth in E.O. 13132.Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 32 CFR part 199End List of Subjects
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 199 is proposed to be amended as follows:Start Part
1. The authority citation for Part 199 continues to read as follows:
2. Section 199.2 is amended by adding to paragraph (b), to appear in alphabetical order, a definition of “Third-party billing agent,” to read as follows:
(b) * * *
Third-party billing agent. Any entity that acts on behalf of a provider to prepare, submit and monitor claims, excluding those entities that act solely as a collection agency.
3. Section 199.9 is amended by adding paragraph (n) to read as follows:
(n) * * * Third-party billing agents as defined in § 199.2(b) of this part, while not considered providers, are subject to the provisions of this section to the same extent as such provisions apply to providers.
Dated: August 24, 2011.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-23763 Filed 9-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P