This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
On March 1, 2012 and April 23, 2012, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (“Phlx” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) [1] and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2] two proposed rule changes relating to the transaction fees for certain Complex Order transactions.[3]
In SR-Phlx-2012-27 (filed on March 1, 2012), Phlx proposed to amend the Exchange's Fee Schedule to increase the transaction fees and rebates for certain Complex Order transactions and create a new rebate for certain Complex Orders. The proposed rule change was immediately effective upon filing with the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.[4] Notice of filing of the proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on March 15, 2012.[5]
In SR-Phlx-2012-54 (filed on April 23, 2012), Phlx proposed to replace a portion of SR-Phlx-2012-27 to provide additional information concerning the Directed Participant and Market Maker fees for removing liquidity in Complex orders (“Second Proposal,” and, together with SR-Phlx-2012-27, the “Phlx Proposals”). The proposed rule change was immediately effective upon filing with the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.[6] Notice of filing of the proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on May 4, 2012.[7]
The Commission received no comment letters on the Phlx Proposals.
On April 30, 2012, the Commission instituted proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule changes.[8] Thereafter, NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. submitted a response letter in support of the Phlx Proposals on July 26, 2012.[9]
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act [10] provides that, after initiating disapproval proceedings, the Commission shall issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed rule change not later than 180 days after the date of publication of notice of the filing of the proposed rule change. The Commission may extend the period for issuing an order approving or disapproving the proposed rule change, however, by not more than 60 days if the Commission determines that a longer period is appropriate and publishes the reasons for such determination. The proposed rule changes were published for notice and comment in the Federal Register on March 15, 2012 and May 4, 2012, respectively. September 11, 2012 is 180 days from March 15, 2012 and November 10, 2012 is an additional 60 days from that date.
The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the Phlx Proposals so that it has sufficient time to consider the Phlx Proposals and the issues raised by those proposals, and the Exchange's response to such issues in its response letter.[11] The Commission also finds it appropriate to designate a longer period within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed rule changes so that it has sufficient time to consider data that has been provided by the Exchange in support of its proposals, including additional data that it anticipates will be provided by the Exchange.[12]
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,[13] designates November 10, 2012, and December 30, 2012, as the respective dates by which the Commission should either approve or disapprove the proposed rule changes (SR-Phlx-2012-27 and SR-Phlx-2012-54).
( printed page 57168) September 11, 2012.For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.[14]
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
3. A Complex Order is any order involving the simultaneous purchase and/or sale of two or more different options series in the same underlying security, priced at a net debit or credit based on the relative prices of the individual components, for the same account, for the purpose of executing a particular investment strategy. A Complex Order may also be a stock-option order, which is an order to buy or sell a stated number of units of an underlying stock or exchange-traded fund (“ETF”) coupled with the purchase or sale of options contract(s). See Exchange Rule 1080, Commentary .08(a)(i).
Back to Citation5. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66551 (March 9, 2012) 77 FR 15400.
Back to Citation7. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66883 (April 30, 2012) 77 FR 26591.
Back to Citation8. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66884, 77 FR 26595(May 4, 2012) (“Order Instituting Proceedings”).
Back to Citation9. See Letter to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Commission, from Joan C. Conley, Senior Vice President & Corporate Secretary, NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc., dated July 26, 2012.
Back to Citation11. For example, in the order instituting proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule changes, the Commission sought comment on whether discrimination on the basis of whether a market maker has an off-exchange arrangement to pay an order flow provider to direct its orders to that market maker is a “fair” basis for discrimination among exchange members with respect to the fees charged by the exchange. The Commission also sought comment on whether the Phlx Proposals adequately addressed the reasonableness of the proposed fees (and thus the proposed fee differential).
Back to Citation12. To date, the Exchange has provided data on price improvement for directed customer complex orders, and the rates of interaction with customer complex orders by types of market participant, among other things.
Back to Citation[FR Doc. 2012-22785 Filed 9-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P