Skip to Content


Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Document Statistics
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are cumulative counts for this document including its time on Public Inspection. Counts are subject to sampling, reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble Start Printed Page 49225


National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).


Final rule.


NASA, with the concurrence of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), has adopted as final, without change, an interim rule amending the Supplement Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.


Effective Date: August 20, 2014.

Start Further Info


Adam F. Greenstone, Alternate Designated Agency Ethics Official, NASA Office of the General Counsel, 300 E. St. SW., Washington, DC 20546, 202.358.1775,

End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information


I. Background

NASA published an interim rule in the Federal Register at 79 FR 7565 on February 10, 2014, to amend the Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The rule permitted student interns to seek prior approval to engage in outside employment with a NASA contractor, subcontractor, grantee, or party to a NASA agreement in connection with work performed by that entity or under that agreement. The amendments clarified the types of outside employment activities that require approval; streamlined the process for approval; eliminated obsolete position titles; and extended the permissible time period of approval. The interim rule became effective on February 10, 2014. One respondent submitted a comment on the interim rule.

II. Discussion and Analysis

The NASA Office of General Counsel reviewed the comment and considered it in development of the final rule.

A. Summary of Significant Changes

No changes were made as a result of the public comments.

B. Analysis of Public Comments

Comment: The respondent commented that this was a positive regulatory change that would fix the predicament of student interns at NASA being too broadly restricted from engaging in outside employment, and increase interest in NASA's internships.

Response: The comment supports NASA's regulatory amendments in the interim rule. Previously, student interns generally were barred from employment with an entity performing work under a NASA contract, grant, or Space Act agreement in connection with that work. In making this regulatory change, NASA concluded that the previous prohibition was unnecessarily broad, and that the integrity of NASA's operations will not be diminished by liberalizing the current prohibition to permit student interns to seek approval to engage in outside activities with these entities. Student interns typically perform basic research functions without substantial involvement in NASA decisions that affect outside entities, and often spend extended periods in leave without pay status during semesters when they carry a full-time academic workload. It is also vital that students in STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) disciplines have full access to NASA development opportunities to maintain U.S. leadership in these fields. For these reasons, NASA, with OGE's concurrence, retained but liberalized this provision in a revised paragraph (c) of § 6901.103 to permit management to approve such activities of student interns when NASA ethics officials determine that the activity would comply with Federal ethics laws and OGE regulations, to which employed student interns remain subject.

III. Regulatory Analysis Section

Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements, unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because this rule only pertains to NASA employees.

Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if the regulation is necessary, to select the regulatory approach that maximizes net benefits. This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, because this rule relates solely to the internal operations of NASA. Therefore, the Office of Management and Budget did not review this rule.

Paperwork Reduction Act

The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) does not apply to this rule because it does not contain any information collection requirement that requires approval of the Office of Management and Budget.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

This rule relates to agency management or personnel, and therefore the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) does not cover the rule.

Executive Order 13132, Federalism

This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 13132, Federalism, NASA has determined that the rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the Start Printed Page 49226preparation of a federalism summary impact statement.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

For the purposes of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. chapter 25, subchapter II), this rule would not significantly or uniquely affect small governments and would not result in increased expenditures by State, local, and tribal governments, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more (as adjusted for inflation) in any one year.

Start List of Subjects

List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 6901

  • Ethical conduct
End List of Subjects

Interim Rule Adopted as Final Without Change

Start Amendment Part

Accordingly, the interim rule amending 5 CFR part 6901, which was published in the Federal Register at 79 FR 7565 on February 10, 2014, is adopted as a final rule without change.

End Amendment Part Start Signature

Dated: August 13, 2014.

Charles F. Bolden Jr.,

Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Walter M. Shaub, Jr.,

Director, United States Office of Government Ethics.

End Signature End Supplemental Information

[FR Doc. 2014-19735 Filed 8-19-14; 8:45 am]