Skip to Content

Notice

Proposed Agency Information Collection

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble

AGENCY:

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.

ACTION:

Comment Request.

SUMMARY:

In compliance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC) is submitting the information collection in Docket No. RD14-4-000 to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review of the information collection requirements. Any interested person may file comments directly with OMB and should address a copy of those comments to the Commission as explained below. The Commission issued a Notice in the Federal Register (79 FR 36498, 6/27/2014) requesting public comments. FERC received no comments in response to that notice and has made this notation in its submission to OMB.

DATES:

Comments on the collection of information are due by October 14, 2014.

ADDRESSES:

Comments filed with OMB, identified by the docket number, should be sent via email to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs: oira_submission@omb.gov. Attention: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Desk Officer. The Desk Officer may also be reached via telephone at 202-395-4718.

A copy of the comments should also be sent to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, identified by the Docket No. RD14-4-000, by either of the following methods:

Instructions: All submissions must be formatted and filed in accordance with submission guidelines at: http://www.ferc.gov/​help/​submission-guide.asp. For user assistance contact FERC Online Support by email at ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or by phone at: (866) 208-3676 (toll-free), or (202) 502-8659 for TTY.

Docket: Users interested in receiving automatic notification of activity in this docket or in viewing/downloading comments and issuances in this docket may do so at http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​docs-filing.asp.

Start Further Info

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ellen Brown may be reached by email at DataClearance@FERC.gov, telephone at (202) 502-8663, and fax at (202) 273-0873.

End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The proposed information collection in Docket No. RD14-4-000 relates to a proposed revision to the Interchange Scheduling and Coordination (INT) group of Reliability Standards, developed by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), and submitted to the Commission for Start Printed Page 54697approval. The proposed revision modifies the Interchange Scheduling and Coordination Reliability Standards in response to Commission directives in Order No. 693,[1] as well as some other clarifying revisions relating to the ten revised definitions and four new definitions to be added to the NERC Glossary of Terms Used in NERC Reliability Standards (NERC Glossary). One of the revised definitions leads some entities under Reliability Standard IRO-008-1 to perform additional paperwork tasks. The existing information collection requirements contained in the Interchange Scheduling and Coordination, and Interconnection Reliability Operations and Coordination groups of Reliability Standards are contained in FERC-725A (OMB Control Number 1902-0244). The Commission is submitting the new information collection requirements to OMB under new collections FERC-725W (for the new burden under INT-011-1) and FERC-725Z (for the new burden under IRO-008-1).[2]

On March 16, 2007, the Commission issued Order No. 693, approving 83 of the 107 Reliability Standards and associated definitions filed by NERC, including the Interchange Scheduling and Coordination group of Reliability Standards INT-001, INT-003, INT-004, INT-005, INT-006, INT-007, INT-008, INT-009, and INT-010.[3] In Order No. 693, the Commission directed NERC to make changes through the Reliability Standards development process to address certain directives. Specifically, the Commission directed NERC to: (1) Develop a modification to INT-001-2 that includes a requirement that interchange information must be submitted for all point-to-point transfers entirely within a balancing authority area, including all grandfathered and “non-Order No. 888” transfers; and (2) to develop a modification to INT-006-1 through the Reliability Standards development process to make the standard applicable to reliability coordinators and transmission operators, and require reliability coordinators and transmission operators to review energy interchange transactions from the wide-area and local area reliability viewpoints respectively and, where their review indicates a potential detrimental reliability impact, communicate to the sink balancing authorities necessary transaction modifications.

In its February 27, 2014 petition, NERC seeks Commission approval of proposed revisions to the currently effective Reliability Standards, as well as one new Reliability Standard to address the Commission's directives. NERC asserts that, collectively, the five proposed Reliability Standards, consisting of fourteen requirements, consolidate the body of Interchange Scheduling and Coordination Reliability Standards. In its petition, NERC also seeks approval for the retirement of the currently effective Reliability Standards.[4] NERC also seeks approval of ten revised definitions and four new definitions to be added to the NERC Glossary. NERC proposes to add the term “Interchange” to the existing definition for “Operational Planning Analysis.” [5] NERC States that “by explicitly including `Interchange' in the definition of `Operational Planning Analysis,' the Reliability Coordinator must consider Interchange when performing the analysis required in Reliability Standard IRO-008-1.” [6] Therefore, the estimates for this information collection are based on the proposed modifications.

The Commission estimates a modest increase in information collection and reporting that would result from implementing NERC's proposed revision to the NERC Glossary definition of “Operational Planning Analysis” and new proposed Reliability Standard INT-011-1. The estimate reflects NERC's proposal to include a requirement that interchange information must be submitted for all point-to-point transfers entirely within a balancing authority area, including all grandfathered and “non-Order No. 888” transfers; and NERC's alternative proposal to address the Commission's concern regarding INT-006-1, as described above.

NERC explains that “by explicitly including `Interchange' in the definition of `Operational Planning Analysis,' the Reliability Coordinator must consider Interchange when performing the analysis required in Reliability Standard IRO-008-1.” [7] These administrative burdens fall into three categories of “Submit Interchange Information,” “Communicate Transaction Modification” and “Submit a Request for Interchange” as described in NERC's petition.[8] NERC's technical justification has shown that when the results of reliability coordinator studies indicate the need for action, the reliability coordinator is required to share the results per Requirement R3 of Reliability Standard IRO-008-1. NERC explains that because energy transfers within a balancing authority area that use point-to-point transmission service can impact transmission congestion, proposed Reliability Standard INT-011-1 ensures that these transfers are communicated and accounted for in congestion management procedures. If a transfer within a balancing authority area is submitted as a request for interchange or otherwise accounted for in congestion management procedures, it can be evaluated and processed comparable to a request for interchange that crosses balancing authority areas.[9]

Accordingly, we estimate an increase of one hour needed for “Submit Interchange Information” for balancing authorities, “Communicate Transaction Modification” for the reliability coordinators, and “Submit a Request for Interchange” for the load-serving entities, respectively. With respect to the proposed revisions and retirement of the currently-effective Reliability Standards, the Commission estimates no material change in information collection because the consolidation of the standards does not impact the paperwork burden.

Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this proposed collection is estimated as:

Start Printed Page 54698
FERC-725A
Number and type of respondentsAnnual number of responses per respondentTotal number of responsesAverage burden & cost per response 10Total annual burden hours & total annual costCost per respondent ($)
(1)(2)(1)*(2)=(3)(4)(3)*(4)=(5)(5)÷(1)
Submit Interchange Information114, Balancing authority (BA)525,9281, $605,928, $355,680$3,120
Communicate Transaction Modification21, Reliability coordinator (RC)122521, $60252, $15,120720
Submit Request for Interchange, (INT-011-1)502, Load-serving entity (LSE)126,0241, $606,024, $361,440720
Evidence Retention637, BA/RC/LSE16371, $32637, $20,38432
Total12,84112,841, $752,624
Start Signature

Dated: September 5, 2014.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

End Signature End Supplemental Information

Footnotes

1.  Mandatory Reliability Standards for the Bulk-Power System, Order No. 693, 72 FR 16416 (Apr. 4, 2007), FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,242, at PP 819, 821, 843, 848, 872, 875 & 887, order on reh'g, Order No. 693-A, 120 FERC ¶ 61,053 (2007).

Back to Citation

2.  In the initial notice the Commission stated that the new information collection would be under FERC-725A. However, to increase administrative efficiency, the Commission will submit the new requirements to OMB under FERC-725W and FERC-725Z.

Back to Citation

3.  Order No. 693, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶31,242 at PP 814-887.

Back to Citation

4.  NERC Petition at 4.

Back to Citation

5.  “Interchange” is defined in the NERC Glossary as “Energy transfers that cross Balancing Authority Boundaries.

Back to Citation

6.  NERC Petition at 32.

Back to Citation

7.  NERC Petition at 32.

Back to Citation

8.  NERC Petition, Exhibit E at 1-2.

Back to Citation

9.  NERC Petition at 22.

Back to Citation

10.  The estimates for cost per response are derived using the following formula: Average Burden Hours per Response * XX per Hour = Average Cost per Response. The estimates for cost per hour (rounded to the nearest dollar) are derived as follows:

Back to Citation

[FR Doc. 2014-21742 Filed 9-11-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P