SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 305(a) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) requires that the Secretary of Commerce maintain a list of all fisheries operating in the U.S. EEZ and all fishing ( printed page 76915) gear used in such fisheries (16 U.S.C. 1855(a)). This section of the MSA further prohibits any person or vessel from employing fishing gear or engaging in a fishery not included on the List of Fisheries “without giving 90 days advance written notice to the appropriate Council.” Fishery management councils are authorized to submit changes to the list to the Secretary of Commerce as each council deems appropriate, after which the Secretary must publish a revised list after providing notice of the changes to the public and after providing an opportunity for public comment on those changes (16 U.S.C. 1855(a)(4)). On August 7, 2014 (79 FR 46214), NMFS published a proposed rule to update 50 CFR 600.725(v), Section VI, the section of the List of Fisheries that applies to fisheries occurring within the U.S. West Coast EEZ. The Council recommended revising and updating the List of Fisheries at its September 2013 meeting, after reviewing all of the fisheries occurring within the West Coast EEZ and after taking comments from West Coast states, tribes and members of the public. Through this final rule, NMFS implements the Council's recommended revisions to the List of Fisheries, with no changes or edits. The regulatory text published in the proposed rule for this action has not been changed for this final rule.

Comments and Responses

In the proposed rule, NMFS solicited public comment through September 8, 2014. During the comment period, NMFS received two letters of comment. One letter of comment, received from a member of the public, requested that the Council update the northern anchovy stock assessment. The proposed rule to update the List of Fisheries does not address the northern anchovy stock assessment; therefore, that letter is not relevant to this action.

Comment: NMFS received a letter from an environmental non-government entity providing qualified support for the rule, but expressing concern that with the proposed revisions, the List of Fisheries is still not narrow enough to ensure that the Council will be notified if anyone attempts to develop a new fishery on currently unfished squid species (Line 10 of Section VI at 50 CFR 600.725(v)) or on those finfish and invertebrate not explicitly listed in Lines 1-18 of Section VI (See Line 19 of Section VI at 50 CFR 600.725(v)). This commenter also suggested that the Council review and update the List of Fisheries on a regular basis, as part of its reviews of its Fishery Ecosystem Plan.

Response: The Council's recommended revisions to the List of Fisheries, published in the proposed rule and implemented in this final rule, update the previously broad and outdated List of Fisheries. NMFS disagrees with the commenter's assertion that the revised List of Fisheries is overly broad at Lines 10 and 19. Line 10, which addresses squid species other than market squid ( Doryteuthis opalescens) and octopus, is intended to include all existing fisheries for those species groups. There are some West Coast cephalopod harvests other than in the market squid fishery, particularly in those years that populations of certain squid species ( e.g. Dosidicus gigas, Humboldt squid) appear in the EEZ in unpredictably significant quantities. Without Line 10 of Section VI at 50 CFR 600.725(v), the List of Fisheries could exclude existing cephalopod fisheries, which would be contrary to the purpose of the List of Fisheries to include existing fisheries.

Line 19 of Section VI at 50 CFR 600.725(v) covers all finfish and invertebrate fisheries not listed in the rest of the table at Section VI and not otherwise prohibited. Line 19 is to be read in the context of the rest of Section VI of the List of Fisheries, which details all of the major federal and state fisheries that occur within the West Coast EEZ. To prepare this rulemaking, the Council, NMFS, and West Coast states and tribes, carefully reviewed recent and historic commercial landings data from the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission's Pacific Fisheries Information Network (PacFIN), as well as Federal and state recreational fisheries gear requirements and data. As explained in the preamble to the proposed rule for this action, the Council's intent in developing its revisions to the List of Fisheries was to define existing fisheries in as narrow terms as possible, but the Council did not intend to eliminate any existing fisheries, including fisheries that might only occur during years when West Coast climate conditions were conducive to certain species occurring in greater than usual amounts. Lines 1 through 18 of the table at Section VI provide a significantly detailed list of West Coast existing commercial and recreational fisheries. Line 19 ensures that existing small or intermittent commercial and recreational fisheries are not unintentionally thwarted by failure to include them on the List of Fisheries.

The MSA does not intend the List of Fisheries as a tool to prohibit fishing, but rather as a tool to ensure that the Council is formally notified by fisheries participants intending to begin new fisheries. The Council is in the process of developing a comprehensive, multi-FMP amendment to prohibit the development of commercial fisheries for a broad group of currently unfished forage fish species, including those squid species mentioned by the commenter. Should anyone begin targeting and landing currently unfished forage species between now and the completion of the comprehensive FMP amendment, the West Coast state, tribal, and federal agencies and the Council will be notified via PacFIN landings data.

NMFS appreciates the commenter's suggestion that Section VI of the List of Fisheries be reviewed and updated on a regular basis and as a part of the Council's FEP review process. The Council is next scheduled to begin reviewing and updating the FEP in 2018 and NMFS will both pass that suggestion on to the Council and will preserve the commenter's suggestion in the agency's planning file for that review process.

Classification

Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the MSA, the NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this final rule is consistent with the four U.S. West Coast FMPs, other provisions of the MSA, and other applicable law.

This final rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.

The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration during the proposed rule stage that this action would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The factual basis for the certification was published in the proposed rule and is not repeated here. No comments were received regarding this certification. As a result, a regulatory flexibility analysis was not required and none was prepared.

This final rule was developed after meaningful collaboration, through the Council process, with the tribal representative on the Council. NMFS is not aware of any Treaty Indian tribe or subsistence fisheries in the EEZ other than those listed in § 600.725(v). This action does not supersede or otherwise affect exemptions that exist for Treaty Indian fisheries.

For the reasons discussed in the preamble, 50 CFR part 600 is amended as follows:

1. The authority citation for part 600 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 561 and 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

2. In § 600.725, in paragraph (v), Section VI of the table is revised to read as follows: