This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Notice of final results of sixth antidumping duty new shipper review and final results and partial rescission of the fourth antidumping duty administrative review.
Notice of extension of the time limit for the final results in the administrative review and new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from the People's Republic of China.
Notice of preliminary results of sixth new shipper review and preliminary results and partial rescission of fourth antidumping duty administrative review.
Notice of final results and partial rescission of the new shipper review and final results and partial rescission of the third antidumping duty administrative review.
Notice of preliminary results and partial rescission of fourth new shipper review and preliminary results of third antidumping duty administrative review.
Notice of extension of the time limit for the final results in the new shipper review and administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from the People's Republic of China.
Notice of extension of the time limit for the preliminary results in the new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from the People's Republic of China.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
155
as of
09/08/2026 at 10:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2015-13979 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
06/05/2015 at 8:45 am.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2015-13979 (80 FR 32352)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
DATES:
Effective Date:
June 8, 2015.
SUMMARY:
The Department of Commerce (the Department) published the
Preliminary Results
of the 2013/2014 new shipper review on January 22, 2015.[1]
This review covers one company, Dezhou Kaihang Agricultural Science Technology Co., Ltd. (Dezhou Kaihang). We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the
Preliminary Results.
Based upon our analysis of the comments received, we made changes to the margin calculations for these final results. As a result of these changes, we find that Dezhou Kaihang did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. The period of review (POR) is February 1, 2013 through February 28, 2014.[2]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael J. Heaney or Robert James, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4475 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department published the
Preliminary Results
on January 22, 2015.[3]
On March 13, 2015, the Department extended the deadline for issuing the final results by 60 days.[4]
On February 23, 2015, Dezhou Kaihang submitted its case brief.[5]
On March 19, 2015, petitioner Monterey Mushrooms submitted a rebuttal brief.[6]
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this antidumping order are certain preserved mushrooms, whether imported whole, sliced, diced, or as stems and pieces. The merchandise subject to this order is classifiable under subheadings: 2003.10.0127, 2003.10.0131, 2003.10.0137, 2003.10.0143, 2003.10.0147, 2003.10.0153, and 0711.51.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive.[7]
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues which parties raised is attached to this notice as an appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file in the Central Records Unit (CRU), Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building, as well as electronically
via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
https://access.trade.gov
and in the CRU. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at
http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our review of the comments received from interested parties regarding our
Preliminary Results,
and for the reasons explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we have revised the margin calculation for
( printed page 32353)
Dezhou Kaihang. The analysis memorandum for Dezhou Kaihang contains further explanation of the margin calculations utilized in the final results.[8]
Final Results of Review
The weighted average dumping margin for the final results of this review for the period February 1, 2013 through February 28, 2014 and for the following exporter/producer combination is as follows:
The Department intends to disclose calculations performed for these final results to the parties within five days of the date of publication of this notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise covered by this review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review.
For assessment purposes, because Dezhou Kaihang's margin is zero, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the entry covered in this new shipper review without regard to antidumping duties.
On October 24, 2011, the Department announced a refinement to its assessment practice in non-market economy cases.[9]
Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by Dezhou Kaihang during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate at the PRC-wide rate.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this new shipper review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise produced by Shandong Fengyu Edible Fungus Co., Ltd. and exported by Dezhou Kaihang, no cash deposit rate will be required since the rate established in the
Final Results of Review
section of this notice is zero; (2) for subject merchandise exported by Dezhou Kaihang but not produced by Shandong Fengyu Edible Fungus Co., Ltd., the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity (
i.e.,
308.33 percent); and (3) for subject merchandise produced by Shandong Fengyu Edible Fungus Co., Ltd. but not exported by Dezhou Kaihang, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to that exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these results and this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: June 1, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
List of Topics Discussed in the Accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion Of Issues
Comment 1 Metal Cans
Comment 2 Coal
Comment 3 Labor Cost
Comment 4 Surrogate Financial Ratios
Recommendation
Footnotes
1.
See Certain Preserved Mushrooms From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review; 2013/2014,80 FR 3216 (January 22, 2015) (
Preliminary Results).
2.
As noted in the
Preliminary Results,
the Department extended the review period for this new shipper review to capture the entry associated with the sale made by Dezhou Kaihang during the POR.
See 19 CFR 351.214(f)(2)(ii).
4.
See
Memorandum dated March 13, 2015 from Michael J. Heaney to Christian Marsh Re: Certain Preserved Mushrooms from the People's Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review: 2013-2014.
5.
See
February 23, 2015 letter from Dezhou Kaihang to Secretary of Commerce Re: Certain Preserved Mushrooms from the People's Republic of China; Submission of Case Brief.
7.
For a complete description of the scope of the order,
see
“Certain Preserved Mushrooms from the People's Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results in the 2013/2014 New Shipper Review” dated June 1, 2015 (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
8.
See
Memorandum to the File from Michael J. Heaney “Analysis of Data Submitted by Dezhou Kaihang Agricultural Science Technology Co., Ltd (Dezhou Kaihang) in the Final Results of New Shipper Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Preserved Mushrooms from the People's Republic of China (PRC)” dated June 1, 2015 (Dezhou Kaihang Final Analysis Memorandum).