SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Scope of the Order

The products covered by this order are certain preserved mushrooms. The merchandise subject to this order is classifiable under subheadings: 2003.10.0127, 2003.10.0131, 2003.10.0137, 2003.10.0143, 2003.10.0147, 2003.10.0153, and 0711.51.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and Customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive.^[2]

Background

On April 3, 2015, the Department published in the Federal Register , a notice of initiation of the antidumping duty administrative review of mushrooms from the PRC for the period February 1, 2014, through January 31, 2015, with respect to the 63 companies named in the review requests submitted by interested parties.^[3] On April 29, 2015, the Department released to all interested parties having an administrative protective order (APO) CBP data for entries of the subject merchandise during the POR. We invited interested parties to comment regarding the CBP data and respondent selection. The Department received no comments concerning these CBP data. Moreover, based on our review of the CBP data, the Department determined that only Kangfa had reviewable entries. Accordingly, on June 11, 2015, the Department issued a questionnaire to Kangfa.

No Shipments Certifications

On May 1, 2015, (1) Dezhou Kaihang Agricultural Science Technology Co., Ltd., (Dezhou Kaihang), (2) Fujian Haishan Foods Co., Ltd. (Fujian Haishan), (3) Inter-Foods (Dongshan) Co., Ltd. (Inter-Foods), (4) Shandong Fengyu Edible Fungus Corporation Ltd. (Fengyu), (5) Xiamen International Trade & Industrial Co., Ltd. (XITIC), (6) Zhangzhou Gangchang Canned Foods Co., Ltd. (Gangchang) and (7) Zhangzhou Hongda Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd. (Hongda) submitted no shipment certifications.^[4] On June 3, 2015, Guangxi Jisheng Foods, Inc. (Guangxi Jisheng) did so as well. On August 20, 2015, the Department sent inquiries to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to confirm the no shipments certifications received from the following companies: (1) The exporter/producer combination of Dezhou Kaihang/Fengyu; (2) the exporter/producer combination of Fujian Haishan/Hongda; (3) XITIC; and (4) Gangchang.^[5] On October 22, 2015, the Department sent an additional inquiry to CBP regarding the certification provided by Guangxi Jisheng.^[6] To date, the Department has received no information contrary to the no shipment claims submitted.

Based on the no-shipment certifications and our analysis of the CBP information, we preliminarily determine that Dezhou Kaihang/Fengyu, Fujian Haishan/Hongda, XITIC, Gangchang, and Guangxi Jisheng did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR. In addition, for Dezhou Kaihang/Fengyu, Fujian Haishan/Hongda, XITIC, Gangchang, and Guangxi Jisheng, the Department finds that consistent with its refinement to its assessment practice in non-market economy (NME) cases, it is appropriate not to rescind the review in part in this circumstance but, rather, to complete the review with respect to these companies and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the review.^[7] If the Department continues to determine in the final results of this review that these companies have no reviewable transactions, we intend to instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits of estimated antidumping duties at the current rate in effect for those companies.^[8]

Partial Rescission

Section 351.213(d)(1) of the Department's regulations provides that the Department will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested the review withdraws its request for review within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The Department published the Initiation Notice on April 3, 2015.^[9]

On July 2, 2015, Monterey Mushrooms withdrew its request for review of 27 companies, including (1)Fujian Tongfa Foods Group Co., Ltd. (Fujian Tongfa), (2) Mikado Food China Co., Ltd. (Mikado), (3) Xiamen Hua Min Import & Export Co., Ltd., (4) Zhangzhou Tan Co. Ltd., Fujian, China and (5) Zhangzhou Yuxing Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd. No other party has requested a review of any of the five companies indicated above. Because all review requests have been timely withdrawn, we are rescinding this review with respect to these companies. For the remaining 22 companies, there continue to be active review requests; therefore, we are not rescinding the review for those companies. ( printed page 68838)

Methodology

The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, please see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/​frn/​. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Preliminary Results of the Review

On July 6, 2015, Kangfa withdrew from participation in this review prior to responding to the Department's questionnaire issued on June 10, 2015.^[10] We therefore determine that Kangfa is ineligible for a separate rate and is part of the PRC-wide entity.^[11]

Additionally, the Department preliminarily determines that the remaining 51 companies did not demonstrate their eligibility for separate rate status in this review because they have not filed either separate rate applications or separate rate certifications.^[12] As a result, the Department is preliminarily treating these 51 companies as part of the PRC-wide entity.

The Department's change in policy regarding conditional review of the PRC-wide entity applies to this administrative review.^[13] Under this policy, the PRC-wide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or the Department self-initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity in this review, the PRC-wide entity is not under review and therefore its rate is not subject to change. The rate previously established for the PRC-wide entity in this proceeding is 308.33 percent.^[14]

Disclosure and Public Comment

Normally, the Department discloses to interested parties the calculations performed in connection with a preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of the notice of preliminary results in the Federal Register , in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, because the Department has preliminarily determined that Kangfa is ineligible for a separate rate, there are no calculations to disclose. Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of the preliminary results.^[15] Rebuttals to case briefs may be filed no later than five days after the deadline for filing case briefs and all rebuttal comments must be limited to comments raised in the case briefs.^[16] Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.^[17] Case and rebuttal briefs must be filed electronically via ACCESS.^[18]

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.^[19] Hearing requests should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, and a list of the issues parties intend to present at the hearing. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and location to be determined. Prior to the date of the hearing, the Department will contact all parties that submitted case or rebuttal briefs to determine if they wish to participate in the hearing. The Department will then distribute a hearing schedule to the parties prior to the hearing and only those parties listed on the schedule may present issues raised in their briefs.

Unless extended, the Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any briefs, within 120 days after the publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).

Assessment Rates

Upon issuing the final results of the review, the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.^[20] The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of ( printed page 68839) review. We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate relevant entries from the PRC-wide entity (including Kangfa) at the current rate for the PRC-wide entity ( i.e., 308.33 percent). For the companies identified above that were found to have made no shipments during the POR, we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number ( i.e., at that exporter's rate) at the PRC-wide rate.^[21]

Cash Deposit Requirements

The following cash deposit requirements, when imposed, will apply to all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For any previously reviewed or investigated PRC and non-PRC exporter not listed above that received a separate rate in a previous segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (2) for all PRC exporters that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity ( i.e., 308.33 percent); and (3) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied the non-PRC exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

1. Summary

2. Background

3. Respondent Selection

4. Scope of the Order

5. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments

6. Partial Rescission

7. Non-Market Economy Country Status

8. Separate Rates Determination

9. Companies That Did Not Establish Their Eligibility for a Separate Rate

10. Conclusion