SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Restrictive Trade Practices or Boycotts

Part 760 of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) is entitled “RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES OR BOYCOTTS,” otherwise referred to as the antiboycott provisions of the EAR. These provisions apply to, and may prohibit, certain activities in the interstate or foreign commerce of the United States undertaken by United States persons (defined in § 760.1(b)) with intent to comply with, further or support an unsanctioned foreign boycott (see § 760.1(e)). In addition, § 760.5(a)(1), Scope of Reporting Requirements, requires United States persons to report to the Department of Commerce (Department) certain requests they receive to take any “action which has the effect of furthering or supporting a restrictive trade practice or boycott fostered or imposed by a foreign country against a country friendly to the United States or against any United States person. . . .” (boycott-related requests). Section 760.5(b), Manner of Reporting, specifies the required reporting procedures; specifically, § 760.5(b)(4)—(b)(7) prescribe the manner of submission of the report to the Department. Failure to report such boycott-related requests in the manner prescribed may constitute a violation of the EAR.

Prior to this rule, § 760.5(b)(4) and (5) of the EAR required United States persons to prepare reports of boycott-related requests on form BIS 621-P (single transaction) or on form BIS 6051-P (multiple transactions), both available on-line through the Office of Antiboycott Compliance (OAC) page of the BIS Web site (OAC Web page) in a fillable PDF format, and to submit the reports in duplicate paper copy to OAC postmarked by the last day of the month following the calendar quarter in which the request was received (or, if received outside the United States, by the last day of the second month following the calendar quarter in which the request was received). ( printed page 70934)

Electronic Submission of Report of Request for Restrictive Trade Practice or Boycott

While United States persons may continue to submit paper reports by mail consistent with § 760.5(b)(4)—(b)(7), this final rule amends the EAR to allow submission of reports electronically, with the same deadlines, through the OAC Web page.

These revisions amend only the manner of reporting by offering an alternative method of submitting the report; in all other respects, the reporting requirements remain unchanged. Electronic filing offers the recipient of a boycott-related request a faster and less burdensome method to fulfill the regulatory reporting requirement than paper submission by mail. This action is consistent with the Administration's ongoing efforts to modernize regulatory requirements. Information on both paper and electronic submissions is available through the OAC Web page at http://bis.doc.gov/​index.php/​enforcement/​oac?​id=​300.

United States persons who choose to submit reports electronically may access the electronic form via a link on the OAC Web page. Once all required fields are completed and the report has been submitted electronically, an electronic “Submission Confirmation” notification, confirming the date and time of receipt of the submission by OAC, will automatically be displayed on the reporting person's screen. Additional guidance on accessing and completing electronic reports is available on the OAC Web page or by contacting OAC at 202.482.2448.

Amendments to Part 760 of the EAR to Establish the Electronic Filing Option for Report of Request for Restrictive Trade Practice or Boycott

In this rule, BIS amends § 760.5 (Reporting Requirements) by revising paragraph (b) to provide United States persons with the option to submit reports of boycott-related requests electronically through the OAC Web page, as described above. Specifically, in this rule, BIS authorizes the electronic reporting option by amending paragraphs (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6) and (b)(7) of § 760.5 of the EAR.

Export Administration Act of 1979

The Export Administration Act of 1979, 50 U.S.C. 4601-4623 (Supp. III 2015) (available at http://uscode.house.gov), has been in lapse since August 21, 2001. The President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent being that of August 4, 2016 (81 FR 52587 (Aug. 8, 2016)), has continued the EAR in effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2006 & Supp. IV 2010)).

Rulemaking Requirements

1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.

2. This rule involves a collection previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under Control Number 0694-0012, “Report of Requests for Restrictive Trade Practice or Boycott—Single or Multiple Transactions,” which carries a burden hour estimate of 71 minutes to prepare and submit. Total burden hours associated with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA) and the aforementioned OMB Control Number are expected to decrease slightly as a result of the addition of an electronic method to submit required reports of boycott requests through the OAC Web page pursuant to § 760.5 (Reporting Requirements) of the EAR. Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, no person is required to respond to, or may be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.

3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications as that term is defined under Executive Order 13132.

4. Pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553(b), BIS finds that publication of this rule in other than final form is unnecessary because the amendments in this rule are administrative changes. They are provided to notify the public that an electronic filing option is available as a result of the technical update of the capabilities of OAC's information technology system. These administrative changes will not affect the rights of the public to continue to use the report filing option that existed prior to these changes. They do not change the existing regulatory requirement that United States persons report requests they receive to take certain actions in support of restrictive trade practices or boycotts. They only offer an option to use a second method, electronic reporting, as an alternative to reporting by mail. Offering this second method may facilitate compliance with the reporting requirements.

Section 553(d) of the APA generally provides that rules may not take effect earlier than thirty (30) days after they are published in the Federal Register . BIS finds good cause to waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) because the delay would be contrary to the public interest. The delay in effectiveness delays the availability to the public of the additional method of filing reports. BIS is simply amending the EAR to provide a second reporting method. Further, this rule is an administrative change to assist the public in complying with reporting requirements. Delaying this action would not serve any other practical purpose. Delaying the notice to the public of the new report filing option is contrary to the interest of establishing methods of making regulatory compliance efficient, and, therefore, less burdensome.

No other law requires that a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment be given for this final rule. Because a notice of proposed rulemaking is not required under the APA or by any other law, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are not applicable. As a result, no final regulatory flexibility analysis is required, and none has been prepared.

Accordingly, part 760 of the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR parts 730-774) is amended as follows:

1. The authority citation for part 760 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.;50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 4, 2016, 81 FR 52587 (August 8, 2016).

2. Section 760.5 is amended by revising paragraphs (b)(4) through (7) to read as follows: