This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Rule
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
Approval and Promulgation; State of Utah; Salt Lake County and Utah County Nonattainment Area Coarse Particulate Matter State Implementation Plan Revisions To Control Measures for Point Sources
This final rule is effective on November 13, 2017.
Table of Contents
Enhanced Content - Table of Contents
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Approval and Promulgation; State of Utah; Salt Lake County and Utah County Nonattainment Area Coarse Particulate Matter State Implementation Plan Revisions To Control Measures for Point Sources
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
120
as of
09/09/2026 at 8:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2017-21778 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
10/10/2017 at 8:45 am.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2017-21778 (82 FR 47149)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing approval of certain State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by Utah on January 4, 2016, and of certain revisions submitted on January 19, 2017, for the coarse particulate matter (PM10) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) in the Salt Lake County and Utah County PM10
nonattainment areas. The revisions that the EPA is approving are located in Utah Division of Administrative Rule (DAR) R307-110-17 and SIP Subsection IX.H.1-4, and establish emissions limits for PM10, NOX
and SO2
for certain stationary sources in the nonattainment areas. These actions are being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES:
This final rule is effective on November 13, 2017.
ADDRESSES:
The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA-R08-OAR-2017-0298. All documents in the docket are listed on the
http://www.regulations.gov
Web site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available,
e.g.,
CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through
http://www.regulations.gov,
or please contact the person identified in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Hou, Air Program, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6210,
hou.james@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Under the 1990 amendments to the CAA, Salt Lake and Utah Counties were designated nonattainment for PM10
and classified as moderate areas by operation of law as of November 15, 1990 (56 FR 56694, 56840; November 6, 1991). On July 8, 1994, the EPA approved the PM10
SIP for the Salt Lake and Utah County Nonattainment Areas
( printed page 47150)
(59 FR 35036). The SIP included a demonstration of attainment and various control measures, including emission limits at stationary sources.
On January 4, 2016, Utah submitted SIP revisions to R307-110-17 titled “Section IX, Control Measures for Area and Point Sources, Part H, Emission Limits” and revisions to Subsection IX.H.1-4. The titles for Subsection IX.H.1-4 include: (1) General Requirements: Control Measures for Area and Point Sources, Emission Limits and Operating Practices, PM10
Requirements; (2) Source Specific Emission Limitations in Salt Lake County PM10
Nonattainment/Maintenance Area; (3) Source Specific Emission Limitations in Utah County PM10
Nonattainment/Maintenance Area; and (4) Interim Emission Limits and Operating Practices. Additionally, on January 19, 2017, Utah submitted revisions to Subsection IX.H.1-4. Further discussion of the revisions to R307-110-17 and Subsection IX.H.1-4 can be found below.
On July 13, 2017 (82 FR 32287), the EPA proposed to approve certain SIP revisions to the Salt Lake County and Utah County NAA Moderate area SIPs submitted by the State. Our proposed notice provides details on the EPA's evaluation of the State's submittals. The submittals dated January 4, 2016, and January 19, 2017, contained revisions to the Utah DAR, Title R307—Environmental Quality, set of rules, and SIP subsection IX.H.1-4.
II. Response to Comments
The EPA did not receive any comments on the July 13, 2017 proposed action.
III. Final Action
For the reasons stated in our proposed notice, the EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to Administrative Rule R307-110-17 and revisions to Subsection IX.H.1-4 for incorporation into the Utah SIP as submitted by the State of Utah on January 4, 2016, and January 19, 2017. These revisions establish emissions limitations and related requirements for certain stationary sources of PM10, NOX
and SO2, and will therefore serve to continue progress towards attainment and maintenance of the PM10
NAAQS in the nonattainment areas. The revisions reflect more stringent emission levels for total emissions of PM10, SO2, and NOX
for each of the affected facilities, as well as updates of the inventory of major stationary sources to accurately reflect the current sources in both the Salt Lake County and Utah County nonattainment areas (
e.g.,
removing sources which no longer exist, or are now covered under an area source rule). The updated list of sources and revised emission limits for the major stationary sources in the two nonattainment areas will serve to enhance both area's ability to attain or maintain the NAAQS.
The specific emission limits and operating practices the EPA is finalizing for approval are listed in the following tables:
Table 1—Source Specific Emission Limitations in the Salt Lake County PM
10
Nonattainment Area
Source
Pollutant
Process unit
Mass based limits
Concentration based
limits
Alternative emission
limits
Big West Oil
PM
10
Facility Wide
1.037 tons per day (tpd)
NO
X
Facility Wide
0.8 tpd
SO
2
Facility Wide
0.6 tpd
Bountiful City Light and Power
NO
X
GT#1
0.6 g NO
X
/kW-hr
NO
X
GT#2 and GT#3
7.5 lb NO
X
/hr
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
NO
X
Facility Wide
0.648 tpd
Chevron Products Company
PM
10
Facility Wide
0.715 tpd
NO
X
Facility Wide
2.1 tpd
SO
2
Facility Wide
1.05 tpd
Hexcel Corporations
5.50 MMscf natural gas per day.
0.061 MM pounds of carbon fiber produced per day.
Holly Refining and Marketing Company
PM
10
Facility Wide
0.416 tpd
NO
X
Facility Wide
2.09 tpd
SO
2
Facility Wide
0.31 tpd
Kennecott Utah Copper: Bingham Canyon Mine
Maximum of 30,000 miles for waste haul trucks per day.
Fugitive road dust emission control requirements.
Kennecott Copperton Concentrator
Requirement to operate a gas scrubber operated in accordance with parametric monitoring.
Kennecott Utah Copper: Power Plant and Tailings Impoundment
PM
10
Power Plant Unit #5
18.8 lb/hr.
NO
X
Power Plant Unit #5
2.0 ppmdv (15% O2 dry).
NO
X
Power Plant Unit #5 Startup/Shutdown
395 lb/hr.
PM
10
(Filterable)
Units #1, #2, #3, and #4
Nov 1-Feb 28/29
0.004 grains/dscf.
PM
10
(Filterable + Condensable)
Units #1, #2, #3, and #4 Nov 1-Feb 28/29
0.03 grains/dscf.
NO
X
Units #1, #2, and #3 Nov 1-Feb 28/29
336 ppmdv (3% O2).
NO
X
Unit #4 Nov 1-Feb 28/29
336 ppmdv (3% O2).
PM
10
(Filterable)
Units #1, #2, and #3; Mar 1-Oct 1
0.029 grains/dscf.
( printed page 47151)
PM
10
(Filterable + Condensable)
Units #1, #2, and #3; Mar 1-Oct 1
0.29 grains/dscf.
PM
10
(Filterable)
Unit #4; Mar 1-Oct 1
0.029 grains/dscf.
NO
X
Units #1, #2, and #3; Mar 1-Oct 1
426.5 ppmdv (3% O2).
NO
X
Unit #4; Mar 1-Oct 1
384 ppmdv (3% O2).
Kennecott Utah Copper: Smelter and Refinery
PM
10
(Filterable)
Main Stack
89.5 lb/hr.
PM
10
(Filterable + Condensable)
Main Stack
439 lb/hr.
SO
2
(3-hr rolling avg)
Main Stack
552 lb/hr.
SO
2
(daily avg)
Main Stack
422 lb/hr.
NO
X
(daily avg)
Main Stack
154 lb/hr.
NO
X
Refinery: Sum of 2 tank house boilers
9.5 lb/hr.
NO
X
Refinery: Combined Heat Plant
5.96 lb/hr.
NO
X
Molybdenum Autoclave Project: Combined Heat Plant
5.01 lb/hr.
PacifiCorp Energy: Gadsby Power Plant
NO
X
Steam Unit #1
179 lb/hr.
NO
X
Steam Unit #2
204 lb/hr.
NO
X
Steam Unit #3
142 lb./hr. (Nov 1-Feb 28/29).
NO
X
Steam Unit #3
203 lb/hr (Mar 1-Oct 31).
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company
PM
10
Facility Wide
2.25 tpd
NO
X
Facility Wide
1.988 tpd.
SO
2
Facility Wide
3.1 tpd.
University of Utah
NO
X
Boiler #3
187 ppmdv (3% O2 Dry).
Boiler #4a & #4b
9 ppmdv (3% O2 Dry).
Boiler #5a & #5b
9 ppmdv (3% O2 Dry).
Turbine
9 ppmdv (3% O2 Dry).
Turbine and WHRU Duct burner
15 ppmdv (3% O2 Dry).
West Valley Power 1
NO
X
Sum of all five turbines
1,050 lb/day.
1
West Valley Power was not a listed source in the 1994 SIP for the Salt Lake County PM
10
NAA.
Table 2—Source Specific Emission Limitations in the Utah County PM
10
Nonattainment Area
Source
Pollutant
Process unit
Mass based limits
Concentration
based limits
Alternative
emission limits
Brigham Young University
NO
X
Unit #1 2
9.55 lb/hr
95 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry).
NO
X
Unit #2
37.4 lb/hr.
331 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry)
SO
2
Unit #2
56.0 lb/hr
597 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry).
NO
X
Unit #3
37.4 lb/hr
331 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry).
SO
2
Unit #3
56.0 lb/hr
597 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry).
NO
X
Unit #4 3
19.2 lb/hr
127 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry).
NO
X
Unit #5
74.8 lb/hr
331 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry).
SO
2
Unit #5
112.07 lb/hr
597 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry).
NO
X
Unit #6 3
19.2 lb/hr
127 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry).
Geneva Nitrogen Inc.: Geneva Plant
PM
10
Prill Tower
0.236 tpd
PM
2.5
Prill Tower
0.196 tpd.
NO
X
Montecatini Plant
30.8 lb/hr.
NO
X
Weatherly Plant
18.4 lb/hr.
PacifiCorp Energy: Lakeside Power Plant
NO
X
Block #1 Turbine/HRSG Stacks
14.9 lb/hr.
NO
X
Block #2 Turbine/HRSG Stacks
18.1 lb/hr.
Payson City Corporation: Payson City Power
NO
X
All engines combined
1.54 tpd.
Provo City Power: Power Plant
NO
X
All engines combined
2.45 tpd.
Springville City Corporation: Whitehead Power Plant
NO
X
All engines combined
1.68 tpd.
2
The NO
X
limit for Unit #1 is 95 ppm (9.55 lb/hr) until it operates for more than 300 hours during a rolling 12-month period, then the limit will be 36 ppm (5.44 lb/hr). This will be accomplished through the installation of low NO
X
burners with Flue Gas Recirculation.
3
The NO
X
limit for Units #4 and #6 is 127 ppm (38.5 lb/hr) until December 31, 2018, at which time the limit will then be 36 ppm (19.2 lb/hr).
( printed page 47152)
Table 3—Interim Emission Limits and Operating Practices 4
Source
Pollutant
Process unit
Mass based limits
Concentration based
limits
Alternative emission
limits
Big West Oil
PM
10
Facility Wide
0.377 tpd Oct 1-Mar 31.
0.407 tpd April 1-Sept 30
SO
2
Facility Wide
2.764 tpd Oct 1-March 31 3.639 tpd April 1-Sept 30
NO
X
Facility Wide
1.027 tpd Oct 1-Mar 31 1.145 tpd Apr 1 - Sep 30
Chevron Products Company
PM
10
Facility Wide
0.234 tpd
SO
2
Facility Wide
0.5 tpd.
NO
X
Facility Wide
2.52 tpd.
Holly Refining and Marketing Company
PM
10
Facility Wide
0.44 tpd.
SO
2
Facility Wide
4.714 tpd.
NO
X
Facility Wide
2.20 tpd.
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company
PM
10
Facility Wide
0.261 tpd.
SO
2
Facility Wide
3.699 tpd Nov 1-Feb 28/29-4.374 tpd Mar 1-Oct 31
NO
X
Facility Wide
1.988 tpd.
4
This section establishes interim emission limits for sources whose new emission limits under Subsections IX.H.2 and 3 are based on controls that are not currently installed, with the provision that all necessary controls needed to meet the emission limits under Subsection IX.H.2 and IX.H.3 shall be installed by January 1, 2019.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of Utah Division of Administrative Rules described in the amendments set forth to 40 CFR part 52 below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through
www.regulations.gov
and/or at the EPA Region 8 Office (please contact the person identified in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for inclusion in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by the EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of the EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in the next update to the SIP compilation.[1]
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
See42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, these actions merely approve state law as meeting federal requirements and do not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For this reason, these actions:
Are not significant regulatory actions subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Do not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501et seq.);
Are certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601et seq.);
Do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Are not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and
Do not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, underExecutive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP does not apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the final rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
B. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801et seq.,
as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the
Federal Register
. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register
. This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this
( printed page 47153)
action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 11, 2017. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements.
See
CAA section 307(b)(2).
a. In the table in paragraph (c), by revising under the centered heading “R307-110. General Requirements: State Implementation Plan,” the table entry for “R307-110-17”;
b. In the table in paragraph (e), by revising under the centered heading “IX. Control Measures for Area and Point Sources,” the table entry for “Section IX.H.1. Fine Particulate Matter (PM 10), Emission Limits and Operating Practices (Utah County)”;
c. In the table in paragraph (e), by adding under the centered heading “IX. Control Measures for Area and Point Sources.” table entries for “Section IX.H.2. Source Specific Emission Limitations in Salt Lake County PM 10
Nonattainment/Maintenance Area;” “Section IX.H.3. Source Specific Emission Limitations in Utah County PM10
Nonattainment/Maintenance Area;” and “Section IX.H.4. Interim Emission Limits and Operating Practices” in numerical order.
R307-110. General Requirements: State Implementation Plan
* * * * * * *
R307-110-17
Section IX, Control Measures for Area and Point Sources, Part H, Emission Limits
12/8/2016
[Insert
Federal Register
citation]
10/11/2017
Except for Section IX.H.21.e. which is conditionally approved through one year from 7/5/16, IX.H.21.g., Sections of IX.H.21 that reference and apply to the source specific emission limitations disapproved in Section IX.H.22, and Sections IX.H.22.a.ii-iii, IX.H.22.b.ii, and IX.H.22.c.
* * * * * * *
* * * * *
(e) * * *
Rule title
State
effective date
Final rule
citation, date
Comments
* * * * * * *
IX. Control Measures for Area and Point Sources
* * * * * * *
Section IX.H.1. General Requirements: Control Measures for Area and Point Sources, Emission Limits and Operating Practices, PM
10
Requirements
12/3/2015
[Insert
Federal Register
citation]
10/11/2017
Section IX.H.2. Source Specific Emission Limitations in Salt Lake County PM
10
Nonattainment/Maintenance Area
12/3/2015
12/8/2016
[Insert
Federal Register
citation]
10/11/2017
Section IX.H.3. Source Specific Emission Limitations in Utah County PM
10
Nonattainment/Maintenance Area
12/3/2015
[Insert
Federal Register
citation]
10/11/2017
Section IX.H.4. Interim Emission Limits and Operating Practices