Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
On January 9, 2017, the Environmental Protection Agency published a final rule which added subsurface intrusion component to the Superfund Hazard Ranking System. That document inadvertently failed to update the Table of Contents and contained a few other typographical errors. This document corrects the final regulation.
This correction is effective August 3, 2018.
Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terry Jeng, phone: (703) 603-8852, email: firstname.lastname@example.org, Site Assessment and Remedy Decisions Branch, Assessment and Remediation Division, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation (Mailcode 5204P), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460.
End Further Info
Start Supplemental Information
This is EPA's erratum to the final rule titled Addition of a Subsurface Intrusion Component to the Hazard Ranking System, published January 9, 2017 (82 FR 2760). This is the second set of corrections. The first set of corrections was published in the Federal Register on January 31, 2018 (83 FR 4430). This document augments those corrections.
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing notice and an opportunity for public comment. See Utility Solid Waste Activities Group v. EPA, 236 F.3d 749, 752 (D.C. Cir. 2001). We have determined that there is good Start Printed Page 38037cause for making these correcting amendments final without prior proposal and opportunity for public comment. Notice and comment is unnecessary because these administrative or clerical corrections govern the methodology of how EPA, rather than the public or industry, evaluates contaminated sites under the Hazard Ranking System. Similarly, notice and comment is impracticable and contrary to the public interest because the correcting amendments will more quickly ensure that EPA is following the proper procedures to evaluate potential threats to public health from releases of hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants. Thus, good cause exists to proceed without notice and public comment.
These correcting amendments are effective immediately upon publication. Section 553(d) of the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553(d), provides that final rules shall not become effective until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, “except . . . as otherwise provided by the agency for good cause,” among other exceptions. The purpose of this provision is to “give affected parties a reasonable time to adjust their behavior before the final rule takes effect.” Omnipoint Corp. v. FCC, 78 F.3d 620, 630 (D.C. Cir. 1996); see also United States v. Gavrilovic, 551 F.2d 1099, 1104 (8th Cir. 1977) (quoting legislative history). Thus, in determining whether good cause exists to waive the 30-day delay, an agency should “balance the necessity for immediate implementation against principles of fundamental fairness which require that all affected persons be afforded a reasonable amount of time to prepare for the effective date of its ruling.” Gavrilovic, 551 F.2d at 1105. EPA has determined that there is good cause for making these correcting amendments effective immediately because, as stated above, the corrections govern how EPA, rather than the public or industry, applies the Hazard Ranking System to evaluate potential threats to public health from releases of hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants. Accordingly, EPA finds that good cause exists under section 553(d)(3) to make this rule effective immediately upon publication.
Start List of Subjects
End List of Subjects
- Environmental protection
- Air pollution control
- Hazardous substances
- Hazardous waste
- Intergovernmental relations
- Natural resources
- Oil pollution
- Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
- Water pollution control
- Water supply
Dated: June 29, 2018.
Barry N. Breen,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Land and Emergency Management.
40 CFR part 300 is corrected as follows:
PART 300—NATIONAL OIL AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES POLLUTION CONTINGENCY PLAN
Start Amendment Part
1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows: End Amendment Part
Start Amendment Part
2. Amend Appendix A to Part 300 by: End Amendment Part
Start Amendment Part
a. In the Table of Contents revising the entries for “5.0” through “5.3”; and End Amendment Part
Start Amendment Part
b. Revising Table 2-5, Table 5-16, and Table 7-1. End Amendment Part
The revisions read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 300—The Hazard Ranking System
Table of Contents
List of Figures
List of Tables
* * * * *
5.0 Soil Exposure and Subsurface Intrusion Pathway.
5.0.1 Exposure components.
5.1 Soil exposure component.
5.1.0 General considerations.
5.1.1 Resident population threat.
184.108.40.206 Likelihood of exposure.
220.127.116.11 Waste characteristics.
18.104.22.168.2 Hazardous waste quantity.
22.214.171.124.3 Calculation of waste characteristics factor category value.
126.96.36.199.1 Resident individual.
188.8.131.52.2 Resident population.
184.108.40.206.2.1 Level I concentrations.
220.127.116.11.2.2 Level II concentrations.
18.104.22.168.2.3 Calculation of resident population factor value.
22.214.171.124.5 Terrestrial sensitive environments.
126.96.36.199.6 Calculation of resident population targets factor category value.
188.8.131.52 Calculation of resident population threat score.
5.1.2 Nearby population threat.
184.108.40.206 Likelihood of exposure.
220.127.116.11.2 Area of contamination.
18.104.22.168.3 Likelihood of exposure factor category value.
22.214.171.124 Waste characteristics.
126.96.36.199.2 Hazardous waste quantity.
188.8.131.52.3 Calculation of waste characteristics factor category value.
184.108.40.206.1 Nearby individual.
220.127.116.11.2 Population within 1 mile.
18.104.22.168.3 Calculation of nearby population targets factor category value.
22.214.171.124 Calculation of nearby population threat score.
5.1.3 Calculation of soil exposure component score.
5.2 Subsurface intrusion component.
5.2.0 General considerations.
5.2.1 Subsurface intrusion component.
126.96.36.199 Likelihood of exposure.
188.8.131.52.1 Observed exposure.
184.108.40.206.2 Potential for exposure.
220.127.116.11.2.1 Structure containment.
18.104.22.168.2.2 Depth to contamination.
22.214.171.124.2.3 Vertical migration.
126.96.36.199.2.4 Vapor migration potential.
188.8.131.52.2.5 Calculation of potential for exposure factor value.
184.108.40.206.3 Calculation of likelihood of exposure factor category value.
220.127.116.11 Waste characteristics.
18.104.22.168.1.3 Calculation of toxicity/degradation factor value.
22.214.171.124.2 Hazardous waste quantity.
126.96.36.199.3 Calculation of waste characteristics factor category value.
188.8.131.52.1 Exposed individual.
184.108.40.206.2.1 Level I concentrations.
220.127.116.11.2.2 Level II concentrations.
18.104.22.168.2.3 Population within area(s) of subsurface contamination.
22.214.171.124.2.4 Calculation of population factor value.
126.96.36.199.4 Calculation of targets factor category value.
5.2.2 Calculation of subsurface intrusion component score.
5.3 Calculation of the soil exposure and subsurface intrusion pathway score.
* * * * *
Table 2-5—Hazardous Waste Quantity Evaluation Equations
|Tier||Measure||Units||Equation for assigning
|A||Hazardous constituent quantity (C)||lb||C.|
|B b||Hazardous wastestream quantity (W)||lb||W/5,000.|
|Start Printed Page 38038|
|C b||Volume (V)|
| ||Surface impoundment||yd3||V/2.5.|
| ||Surface impoundment (buried/backfilled)||yd3||V/2.5.|
| ||Drums c||gallon||V/500.|
| ||Tanks and containers other than drums||yd3||V/2.5.|
| ||Contaminated soil||yd3||V/2,500.|
|D b||Area (A)|
| ||Surface impoundment||ft2||A/13.|
| ||Surface impoundment (buried/backfilled)||ft2||A/13.|
| ||Land treatment||ft2||A/270.|
| ||Contaminated soil||ft2||A/34,000.|
|a Do not round to nearest integer.|
|b Convert volume to mass when necessary: 1 ton = 2,000 pounds = 1 cubic yard = 4 drums = 200 gallons.|
|c If actual volume of drums is unavailable, assume 1 drum=50 gallons.|
|d Use land surface area under pile, not surface area of pile.|
* * * * *
Table 5-16—Values for Vapor Pressure and Henry's Constant
| ||Assigned value|
|Vapor Pressure (Torr):|
|Greater than 10||3|
|1 to 10||2|
|Less than 1||0|
|Henry's Constant (atm-m3/mol):|
|Greater than 10 −3||3|
|Greater than 10 −4 to 10 −3||2|
|10 −5 to 10 −4||1|
|Less than 10 −5||0|
* * * * *
Table 7-1—HRS Factors Evaluated Differently for Radionuclides
|Ground water pathway||Status a||Surface water pathway||Status a||Soil exposure component of
SESSI pathway||Status a||Subsurface intrusion
SESSI pathway||Status a||Air pathway||Status a|
|Likelihood of Release||Likelihood of Release||Likelihood of Exposure||Likelihood of Exposure||Likelihood of Release|
|Observed Release||Yes||Observed Release||Yes||Observed Contamination||Yes||Observed Exposure||Yes||Observed Release||Yes.|
|Potential to Release||No||Potential to Release||No||Attractiveness/Accessibility to Nearby Residents||No||Potential for Exposure||Yes||Gas Potential to Release||No.|
|Containment||No||Overland Flow Containment||No||Area of Contamination||No||Structure Containment||No||Gas Containment||No.|
|Net Precipitation||No||Runoff||No||Depth to Contamination||Yes||Gas Source Type||No.|
|Depth to Aquifer||No||Distance to Surface water||No||Vertical migration||No||Gas Migration Potential||No.|
|Travel Time||No||Flood Frequency||No||Vapor Migration Potential||No||Particulate Potential to Release||No.|
| ||Flood Containment||No||Area of Observed Exposure||No||Particulate Containment||No.|
| ||Area of Subsurface Contamination||No||Particulate Source Type||No.|
| ||Particulate Migration Potential||No.|
|Start Printed Page 38039|
|Waste Characteristics||Waste Characteristics||Waste Characteristics||Waste Characteristics||Waste Characteristics|
|Mobility||No||Persistence/Mobility||Yes/No||Hazardous Waste Quantity||Yes||Hazardous Waste Quantity||Yes||Mobility||No.|
|Hazardous Waste Quantity||Yes||Bioaccumulation Potential||No||Hazardous Waste Quantity||Yes.|
| ||Hazardous Waste Quantity||Yes|
|Nearest Well||Yesb||Nearest Intake||Yesb||Resident Individual||Yesb||Exposed Individual||Yesb||Nearest Individual||Yes.b|
|Population||Yesb||Drinking Water Population||Yesb||Resident Population||Yesb||Population||Yesb||Population||Yes.b|
|Wellhead Protection Area||No||Sensitive Environments||Yes b||Resources||No||Sensitive Environments||No.|
| ||Human Food Chain Individual||Yes b||Terrestrial Sensitive Environments||No|
| ||Human Food Chain Population||Yes b||Nearby Individual Population Within 1 Mile||No No.|
|a—Factors evaluated differently are denoted by “yes”; factors not evaluated differently are denoted by “no”.|
|b—Difference is in the determination of Level I and Level II concentrations.|
* * * * *
End Supplemental Information
[FR Doc. 2018-16605 Filed 8-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P