This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
253
as of
08/12/2026 at 10:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2019-05143 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
03/18/2019 at 8:45 am.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2019-05143 (84 FR 10087)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), HHS.
ACTION:
Request for supplemental evidence and data submissions.
SUMMARY:
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is seeking scientific information submissions from the public. Scientific information is being solicited to inform our review on
Noninvasive Nonpharmacologic Treatment for Chronic Pain,
which is currently being conducted by the AHRQ's Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPC) Program. Access to published and unpublished pertinent scientific information will improve the quality of this review.
Mailing Address:
Center for Evidence and Practice Improvement, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, ATTN: EPC SEADs Coordinator, 5600 Fishers Lane, Mail Stop 06E53A, Rockville, MD 20857.
Shipping Address (FedEx, UPS, etc.):
Center for Evidence and Practice Improvement, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, ATTN: EPC SEADs Coordinator, 5600 Fishers Lane, Mail Stop 06E77D, Rockville, MD 20857.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jenae Benns, Telephone: 301-427-1496 or Email:
epc@ahrq.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has commissioned the Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPC) Program to complete a review of the evidence for
Noninvasive Nonpharmacologic Treatment for Chronic Pain.
AHRQ is conducting this systematic review pursuant to Section 902(a) of the Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. 299a(a).
The EPC Program is dedicated to identifying as many studies as possible that are relevant to the questions for each of its reviews. In order to do so, we are supplementing the usual manual and electronic database searches of the literature by requesting information from the public (
e.g.,
details of studies conducted). We are looking for studies that report on
Noninvasive Nonpharmacologic Treatment for Chronic Pain,
including those that describe adverse events. The entire research protocol is available online at:
https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/topics/noninvasive-nonpharm-pain-update/protocol.
This is to notify the public that the EPC Program would find the following information on Noninvasive Nonpharmacologic Treatment for Chronic Pain helpful:
A list of completed studies that your organization has sponsored for this indication. In the list, please
indicate whether results are available on ClinicalTrials.gov along with the ClinicalTrials.gov trial number.
For completed studies that do not have results on ClinicalTrials.gov,
please provide a summary, including the following elements: Study number, study period, design, methodology, indication and diagnosis, proper use instructions, inclusion and exclusion criteria, primary and secondary outcomes, baseline characteristics, number of patients screened/eligible/enrolled/lost to follow-up/withdrawn/analyzed, effectiveness/efficacy, and safety results.
A list of ongoing studies that your organization has sponsored for this indication.
In the list, please provide the
ClinicalTrials.gov
trial number or, if the trial is not registered, the protocol for the study including a study number, the study period, design, methodology, indication and diagnosis, proper use instructions, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and primary and secondary outcomes.
Description of whether the above studies constitute ALL Phase II and above clinical trials sponsored by your
( printed page 10088)
organization for this indication and an index outlining the relevant information in each submitted file.
Your contribution will be very beneficial to the EPC Program. Materials submitted must be publicly available or able to be made public. Materials that are considered confidential; marketing materials; study types not included in the review; or information on indications not included in the review cannot be used by the EPC Program. This is a voluntary request for information, and all costs for complying with this request must be borne by the submitter.
The draft of this review will be posted on AHRQ's EPC Program website and available for public comment for a period of 4 weeks. If you would like to be notified when the draft is posted, please sign up for the email list at:
https://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/email-updates.
The systematic review will answer the following questions. This information is provided as background. AHRQ is not requesting that the public provide answers to these questions.
The Key Questions
1. In adults with chronic low back pain:
a. What are the benefits and harms of noninvasive nonpharmacologic therapies compared with sham treatment, no treatment, waitlist, attention control, or usual care?
b. What are the benefits and harms of noninvasive nonpharmacologic therapies compared with pharmacologic therapy (
e.g.,
NSAIDS, acetaminophen, antiseizure medications, antidepressants)?
c. What are the benefits and harms of noninvasive nonpharmacologic therapies compared with exercise?
2. In adults with chronic neck pain:
a. What are the benefits and harms of noninvasive nonpharmacologic therapies compared with sham treatment, no treatment, waitlist, attention control, or usual care?
b. What are the benefits and harms of noninvasive nonpharmacologic therapies compared with pharmacologic therapy?
c. What are the benefits and harms of noninvasive nonpharmacologic therapies compared with exercise?
3. In adults with osteoarthritis-related pain:
a. What are the benefits and harms of noninvasive nonpharmacologic therapies compared with sham treatment, no treatment, waitlist, attention control, or usual care?
b. What are the benefits and harms of noninvasive nonpharmacologic therapies compared with pharmacologic therapy?
c. What are the benefits and harms of noninvasive nonpharmacologic therapies compared with exercise?
4. In adults with fibromyalgia:
a. What are the benefits and harms of noninvasive nonpharmacologic therapies compared with sham treatment, no treatment, waitlist, attention control, or usual care?
b. What are the benefits and harms of noninvasive nonpharmacologic therapies compared with pharmacologic therapy?
c. What are the benefits and harms of noninvasive nonpharmacologic therapies compared with exercise?
5. In adults with chronic tension headache:
a. What are the benefits and harms of noninvasive nonpharmacologic therapies compared with sham treatment, no treatment, waitlist, attention control, or usual care?
b. What are the benefits and harms of noninvasive nonpharmacologic therapies compared with pharmacologic therapy?
c. What are the benefits and harms of noninvasive nonpharmacologic therapies compared with biofeedback?
6. Do estimates of benefits and harms differ by age, sex, presence of comorbidities (
e.g.,
emotional or mood disorders) or degree of nociplasticity/central sensitization?
Population(s):
Adults (including pregnant or breastfeeding women) with the following chronic pain (defined as pain lasting 12 weeks or longer or pain persisting past the time for normal tissue healing) conditions specified in the Key Questions:
○
Key Question 1:
Nonradicular chronic low back pain.
○
Key Question 2:
Chronic neck pain without radiculopathy or myelopathy.
○
Key Question 3:
Pain related to primary or secondary osteoarthritis.
○
Key Question 4:
Fibromyalgia.
○
Key Question 5:
Primary chronic tension headache (defined as 15 or more headache days per month for at least 3 months).
○
Key Question 6:
Patients with any of the five chronic pain conditions.
○ Primary efficacy outcomes (in priority order); we will focus on outcomes from validated measures.
Function/disability/pain interference.
Pain.
○ Harms and adverse effects.
○ Secondary outcomes.
Psychological distress (including depression and anxiety).
Quality of life.
Opioid use.
Sleep quality, sleep disturbance.
Health care utilization.
Timing:
○ Duration of followup: short term (up to 6 months), intermediate term (6-12 months) and long term (at least 1 year); we will focus on longer-term (>1 year) effects where possible.
○ Studies with <1 month followup after treatment will be excluded.
Settings:
○ Any nonhospital setting or setting of self-directed care.
○ Exclusions: Hospital care, hospice care, emergency department care.